Smart Learning, Smart Campus Hyeoncheol Kim, Ph.D. Professor 1999-, CSE, Korea University, Seoul, Korea S.A. Professor 2011-, IIC, Hokkaido University,

Post on 12-Jan-2016

225 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Smart Learning, Smart Campus

Hyeoncheol Kim, Ph.D.

Professor 1999- , CSE, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaS.A. Professor 2011- , IIC, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

2011.7

Contents

1. What is ‘Smart Learning’ and Why?

2. Smart learning in Corporate Train-ing

3. Smart learning in K-12 Education4. Smart learning in Higher Educa-

tion5. Summary

WHAT IS SMART LEARN-ING AND WHY?

New Technol-ogy

Popularized Technology

Changes inLife style

Changes inWay of think-

ing

Changes in Social Culture

Cu

ltura

l an

d m

ora

l con

flic

ts

• Understanding ‘new popularized technology’ is a key to understand changes of way of thinking and cultures.

Three changes @• Students

– Digital Natives, Cognitive Cyborg– Different ways to Communicate, Learn and Play– More comfortable in cyberspace (ex. Info access, social,

etc.)

– Instant communication and feedback, multitasking

• Teaching & Learning environments– Unlimited learning resources at your finger tip– Constructivism, social, collaboration– Problem solving ability rather than knowledge acquisi-

tion• Everyday Tools

– ubiquitous, smart, cloud, SNS, open system, etc.– Wireless internet, smart phone and pad

Smart era

e-

u-, m-

s-

electronic

ubiquitous

smart

• Traditional offline materials and services are digitalized and online services, respec-tively.• Desktop PC and wired inter-net

• New units• Info access anytime and anywhere• Integrated IT environment• Various devices and wireless internet

•info share-merge to produce new meaning and services• Various smart devices and ways of communicate and distribute

Offline

Smart era (example)

e-erau-, m-era

smart-era

Problem situation:“I don’t want to wait long for my bus.”

Offlineera

Seoul public transportation system(a network of bus, subway and train)(new units share new info to create new services)

• Info on a paper => digitalized• Telephone => web access

Open, Share,

Collabo-rate

Clouding

• Each and every units (individual, devices, tools, materials, etc.) are digitally 2-way networked.• Ubiquitous environment

• In the network,• Instant communications and information sharing

• Synchronizing, Clouding• Open-Share-Collaborate framework

• New information and services emerge• New units and info are networked -> creativity• Ex. SNS, social learning, smart learning

One simple example

• What unit?• What information to open-share?• What new services?

………..

………..………..

Common features of the tools• Open & Share

• s/a files, pictures, slides, lectures, as well as annotations, bookmarks, comments

• through clouding services• Collaboration in authoring• Smart devices, clouds, synchronization

Digitalization of printed materials Online of services

Where “education” meets “smart”

Education Smart-

ubiquitous

networked

clouding

<Open, Share, Collaborate><Communicate, merge>

E-PCinternet

SNS

Smart Class

• What are the “units”?• What “info” to open & share?• What T&L purposes?

• Active communications?• Efficient info collection and sharing?• Instant feedback?

• What technical tools and How?• design

infotools

Teaching&Learning

Stu-dents,Teacher

What would the things• Students like and use everyday• Impossible to do in offline classes

and e-classes.

Example: My personal case

…………….

Lecture 1 Lecture 2 Lecture 32

teacher

students

Problems:-Communication lacks.

- between students - between prof and students- between lectures

Solutions:- Clickers for instant communication and feedback - Twitter/facebook to connect each lectures- Wiki to collaborate- Peer Review for socio-constructivism

materils

SMART LEARNING IN CORPORATE TRAINING

A Case

• Case of Samsung CIC Creative Intelligence Campus

– Samsung group• 27 companies, 200,000 employees Samsung Electronics

80,000

• 10,000 newcomers every year• Efficient Training program required.

– Samsung HRD Training Center• trains 50,000 a year offline, 0,000 newcomers

• 80% of newcomers are considered as digital na-tives• Leadership, value-share, management skills

Problems and Solutions

• Problems to be solved– New way of training for digital natives– Large-sized class

• one-way communication => interactive 2-way communication

• Inconvenience in material sharing

– Gap between training at the center and work-site.

• Solution – CIC at the HRD training center since 2010

CIC features

– Digital Textbooks, Tablet devices • No pencil, No paper, No book

– Interaction • Quick Question, Quick Answer, Quick Poll

– Teacher Mode • Audience Report, Dashboard

– Clouding Server

CIC features - dashboard

Roughly 50 such solutions

CIC - Results

– Trainee satisfaction UP.• Interactive communications• Convenient material sharing

– Anytime, anywhere training.– Green IT

• total 840,000 printed books saved. (total 105,000,000 sheets of size A4)

SMART LEARNING IN K-12 EDUCATION

2011.6.29 News

“Ministry of Education, Science and Technology” and “National IT Strategy Committee” in Korea announced“Korea K-12 Smart Education Plan (proposal)”

• 2011-2015 total budget of US$ 2 billions.• Digital textbook, Smart Classroom Infra.

Tasks Budget(K\) 5yrs Budget(US$)

Digital Textbook 574,800,000,000 544,834,123

Online Class 16,850,000,000 15,971,564

Online Assessment, Test 89,100,000,000 84,454,976

Edu Contents Share (OCW)

6,300,000,000 5,971,564

Info Ethics 4,800,000,000 4,549,763

Teacher Training 258,400,000,000 244,928,910

Clouding Service 1,185,900,000,000 1,124,075,829

Administration 92,000,000,000 87,203,791

total 2,228,150,000,000 2,111,990,521*Expected Budget for 5 years (2011-2015)

*Rough number of schools (E, J, H) – 5700, 3000, 2100*Rough number of students (E, J, H) – 4M, 2M, 2M

Korea K-12 Smart Education Plan 2011-2015

• Digital Textbook – Digital Textbook Development

• K-12 textbooks by 2015 (students have choice of paper- or digital books)

– Development of Smart Learning Models, Running of model schools and classes• From 2012

– Revising Law and Regulations

• Online Class– Online Classes

• Students who are not able to come to school• Subjects with not-enough-number of teachers

– Online AP or UP classes• AP(advanced placements) or UP(university placements)

– IPTV after-school programs

• What does a Digital Textbook look like?– Combined and networked are textbook contents, reference

books and materials, work book, exercise book, dictionaries, notebook, multimedia materials, etc.

– Device independent; PC, Smart Phone, Smart Pad, etc.

• Online Assessment– IBT for national assessment tests

• From 2015

– Continuous assessments for students whose academic achievements lower than threshold.

• Education Contents Sharing– Revising copyright law and regulations for educational

purposes– Educational contents management system in nationwide– Promotion of Open-Share culture of educational contents

• (ex. CCL, OCW) • KOCW 2010 – 1800 titles from 110 universities

• Information Ethics Education in K-12– Information Ethics Education

• Contents and Software Developments

– Internet addiction. Addiction rate 2010: 12.4% for teens, 5.8% for adults

• monitoring, prediction, advising, consulting, clinics

– Supporting voluntary activities

• Teacher Training– Training programs for smart learning, smart environments of

training centers– Supporting assistants to assist teachers for smart learning and

tools.

• Clouding services– Infrastructure at schools (ex. wireless internet) 12.8% in 2010, 100% in

2015

– Contents Open-market– Standard Platform for clouding services

Future schools(K-12) worldwide

• USA: SRI international – School 2.0• England: Building School for the future• Finland• France• Singapore: FutureSchool@Singapore• Japan : Future School

Ubiquitous classroom projects in Korea2006-2010

• Korea have run 132 model class-rooms (in elementary schools)– Provided with tablet PCs and wireless in-

ternet, and digital textbooks– Satisfaction very low

• Focused on H/W tools and infra, not on Teaching & Learning practices

SMART LEARNING INHIGHER EDUCATION UNIVERSITIES

• Different from K-12 or corporate training– Various types of, various sizes of classes

• Size of 5 to 300• Subjects vary from liberal arts to science and engineer-

ing• General education courses vs. major subject cources• Lecture, group discussion, experiments

• Smart Campus Cases– Some cases in Korea

• Smart administrations, but NOT ‘teaching and learning’

– No successful stories yet about smart “education” in universities.

Characteristics

• Problems which traditional Universities suffer from– Low satisfaction rate students, industry, communities

– Being leaded, not leading industry, community, so-ciety and future

– Low budgets

• My proposal not publishes, not represent any ideas or opinions of Ko-

rea Univ. or Hokkaido Univ. focuses on– Smart ‘teaching & learning’ in classrooms

• Classroom learning, not Online learning• ‘Teaching & Learning’, not Administration

Problems

• Goals– Improving Quality of Education

• Increasing satisfaction rate students, parents, industry, communities

• Cultivating creative and interdisciplinary talents – New way of teaching & learning

– Regaining Leadership in education, changes and revolution and thus future of industries and societies• Networked to industrial training, continuing education

for general publics and graduates

– Efficient managements of educational resources• lecturers, spaces, facilities, printed materials, etc.• Green IT, saving 20% of them

Goals

• Strategies – Digital & Smart Infra

• In classrooms– Interactive communication and material sharing (ex. Samsung CIC)– New way of assessing – Automatic digitalization of lectures and materials, to be stored in a digital

archives

• Out of classrooms – Accessing to the archives anytime and anywhere, even in 10 years later

– Digital Archives • Digitally record, archive, open and share• Like Broadcasting Companies,

– Lectures and materials to reuse, merge, recreate to produce better educa-tional contents

• Connects to industry and communities, Open-Share– Industrial training and continuing education for general publics– Feedbacks to improve contents – Ex. OCW 2.0

– New ways of “Teaching & Learning & Assessing”

Strategies

– Better educational contents • Open-share of digital archives• Reuse, recombine, recreate• Promotes creativity and interdisciplinary

– Better teaching & Learning• Instant communication and feedback• Appropriate assessments

– Contributing communities and society• Educational leadership• Open-share of digital archives

– Green Campus• Saves 20% of educational resources

Expected results

SUMMARY

• Key words– Open, Share and Collaborate– Thus Creativity

• H/W tools and infra– already popularized

• Problems are– How to successfully make the best use

of them into classrooms to improve teaching & learning

top related