Transcript
SONA Q4 :October - December
“Health + Performances = Success"
PARAMETERs:
PERFORMANCEs: - Exchange
- Exchange + Leadership - Leadership Role - Members - n° of member for each X realized
HEALTH : - costumers relation
- Exchange - Communication - Talent Management - Finance - Organizational Structure
Modality of Evaluation:
1. Each Parameter has a score
2. I define the total score for performance and health
3. I calculate an average between performance and health
4. The average is the indicator for the status of each LC
LC’s SITUATION for Q4
RANKING Q3
LCs (31 Dec 2010)
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Serie1
What is the “campione ottimale”
It is the indicator of the best situation that each area has to have in the Best LC.
In this way you can understand in which situation are your areas comparing these
with the “ campione ottimale”
ANCONA
ANCONA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
BARI
BARI
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exc
hang
e
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
BOLZANO
BOLZANO
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
CATANIA:
CATANIA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
GENOVA
GENOVA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
MILANO CATTOLICA
MILANO CATTOLICA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
NAPOLI FEDERICO II
NAPOLI FEDERICO II
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
PALERMO
PALERMO
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
PAVIA
PAVIA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
PISA
PISA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
ROMA SAPIENZA
ROMA SAPIENZA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
ROMA TRE
ROMA TRE
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
TORINO
TORINO
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
TRENTO
TRENTO
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
TRIESTE
TRIESTE
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
VENEZIA
VENEZIA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
Best LC for each subsystem
Costumer Relation: Ancona, Bari, Genova, Napoli Parthenope, Sapienza, Roma Tre, Venezia
Exchange: Ancona, Catania,Palermo, Roma Tre
Communication:Palermo, Torino
Finance:Venezia, Pavia, Palermo
Talent Management:Ancona, Milano Cattolica, Palermo
CLUSTERs Q4
Explenation:
In order to allocate each LC in clusters I took in consideration the average of each LC based on performance and health.
In the next slide you can discover the average of each LCs.
Average = (Perf. + Heal.) / 2
Average of LCs:
LC name PERF. HEALTH TOT
Ancona 2 1,7 1,85
Bari 1 2,1 1,55
Bolzano 0,8 1,4 1,1
Catania 1,4 1,6 1,5
Genova 0,6 2 1,3
Milano Cattolica 0,6 1,7 1,15
Napoli Federico 2 0,8 1,5 1,15
Napoli Parthenope 1,2 2 1,6
Palermo 1,4 2,1 1,75
Pavia 1 1,4 1,2
Pisa 0,4 1,1 0,75
Roma Sapienza 1 1,7 1,35
Roma Tre 1,4 1,9 1,65
Torino 1,6 2,1 1,85
Trento 0,8 1,7 1,25
Trieste 0,8 1,3 1,05
Venezia 0,2 1,9 1,05
1th Cluster
10X 3 X+L 8 LR
40 M 18-24 H
AVERAGE
2,51 – 4
No one LC is in this cluster for the Q4
WHO WANT TO COVER THIS POSITION ???
2th Cluster
6 X 2 X+L 6 LR
30 M 12-17 H
AVERAGE
1,51 – 2,50
LC:
-Ancona
-Bari
-Napoli Parthenope
-Palermo
-Roma Tre
-Torino
3th Cluster
3 X 1 X+L 2 LR
10 M 6-11 H
AVERAGE
0 – 1,50
LCs
Bolzano
Catania
Genova
Milano Cattolica
Napoli Federico II
Pavia
Pisa
Roma Sapienza
Trento
Trieste
Venezia
CONGRATULATION TO:
Napoli Parthenope
Ancona
Bari
Roma Tre
Palermo
For their new position in Cluster 2
Italian Do it Better…
For each question you can contact Silvia, MCVP LCD & Project
silvia.prastani@aiesec.net
Good Work…
top related