Overview General Info Mission Statement PDS TRM Questions.
Post on 18-Jan-2016
215 Views
Preview:
Transcript
2012 Formula SAE- Outboard Suspension -
Team:Carole Gayley Jose Colin
Chip Larson Josh McCall Efe Yıldırım Rick Rickert
Industry Advisor: Even Waymier
Overview
• General Info•Mission Statement
• PDS• TRM
• Questions
General InfoEvery year the Viking Motorsport team
designs and builds an open wheel racecar using a 600cc engine and
competes in an international competition held in Kentucky.
Mission StatementThe mission of theOutboard Suspension teamis to improve the design of the hub and upright by reducing machine time and cost, while decreasing weight, and decreasing rolling resistance in the bearings.
Product Design SpecificationPerformance
Priority Requirements Primary Customer
Goal Metric Target Target Basis
Verification
4 Hub weight FSAE Team Decrease weight Pounds 2lb Customer defined
Prototype
ManufacturingPriority Requirements Primary
CustomerGoal Metric Target Target
BasisVerification
4 Ease of hub manufacturing
FSAE Team / manufacturing
Decrease complexity
Machining time (min)
80 minutes Customer defined
Prototype
Product Design SpecificationLife in Service
Priority Requirements Primary Customer
Goal Metric Target Target Basis
Verification
2 Service life FSAE Team / driver
Ensure sufficient reliability
Operating life (years)
Minimum 5 year life
Customer / group
FEA / prototype
DisposalPriority Requirements Primary
CustomerGoal Metric Target Target
BasisVerification
1 Recyclable Material
FSAE Team Minimize Disposal Cost
N/A N/A Customer Defined
MSDS
Product Benchmarking
2011 VMS Outboard Suspension• 3.1 lb hub weight, 120 minute hub machining time, $200 hub cost, 4 lugs
2010 VMS Outboard Suspension• 4 lb hub weight, off the shelf Volkswagen product, $35 hub cost, 4 lugs
Taylor Race Engineering Outboard Suspension• 4 lb hub weight, off the shelf product, $389 hub cost, 4 lugs
2012 Design Target• 2 lb hub weight, 80 minute hub machining time, $200 hub cost, 1 lug
Technical Risk Management- Risk Identification -
• The team is unable to deliver on time•The parts are improperly sized•The parts cost too much to make
Technical Risk Management- Risk Assessment -
Frequent Likely Possible Unlikely Rare
Catastrophic Extreme Extreme High High Moderate
Severe Extreme High High Moderate Low
Marginal High Moderate Moderate Low Low
Negligible Moderate Low Low Low Low
Missed delivery date Parts undersized Parts cost too high
Technical Risk Management- Risk Mitigation -
• Delivery time• Timelines for the project have been developed to keep the project on schedule - Reduces Likelihood• Maintain ability to use previous years parts - Reduces consequence
Technical Risk Management- Risk Mitigation -
• Parts Undersized• Detailed FEA and engineering practices are used to size parts - Reduces Likelihood• Extensive on vehicle testing starting at low speeds to validate parts - Reduces consequence
Technical Risk Management- Risk Mitigation -
• Part cost too high• Keep part features simple and easy to machine - Reduces Likelihood• Ensure parts are designed correct the first time so duplicates don’t have to be made - Reduces consequence
Technical Risk Management- Risk Monitoring -
• Watch timelines to ensure project is on schedule• Carefully monitor the vehicle during first runs to ensure parts are strong• Get cost quotes before the parts are made and talk with the machinist to find areas to decrease cost
QuestIons?
top related