Optical Applications with CST Microwave Studio Optical Applications with CST Microwave Studio ® Dr. Frank Demming-Janssen 2 Outline • What’s so special on optical simulations?
Post on 10-Jun-2018
311 Views
Preview:
Transcript
11
Optical Applicationswith CST Microwave Studio ®
Dr. Frank Demming-Janssen
22
Outline
• What’s so special on optical simulations?– optics for beginners
– materials
• Solver overview for optical simulation• Application examples
33
Gradient Index Fiber/Optics
TF/SF Calculatio
n
2nd-Order and 3rd-Order nonlinear materials
Plasmon
Gauss Beam
n and k
Fresnel equations
44
n and k
are called the refractive index and extinction coefficient
nk
kn
inkinn
im
re
2
)1(22
=−=
+⋅=⋅+=
εε
κ)
optical user will ALWAYS use these parameters
κ⋅+= inn)
*
* sometimes:
55
Calculate Drude Parameter Macro
66 www.cst.com
Optical WG Modes with CST MWS
n = 1.45n = 1.16
a = 500 nm
Freq: 330 THz -> 909 nm wavelength
a
optical_wg_sweep.zip
77 www.cst.com
21
2/
nn
nkb o
−−= β ( )2
12
22
1 nnakV o −⋅⋅=
Theoretical Dispersion Plot
*G.P. Agrawal: Fiber Optics Communication Systems, Wiley Series in Microwave and Optical Engineering, pp 34
With:
88 www.cst.com
Modes
HE11
HE12
99 www.cst.com
Modedispersion Mode 1
Error calculation: Because of the use of the normalized propagation const. b the
error in this curve seems larger then it is! An error of less the 1% in the ββββ might show up as a error of more then 5% in b!
1010 www.cst.com
Modedispersion Higher Order modes
1111
Plasmon
1212
Materials
• For metals the real part of eps is NOT negligible and is negative and dispersive!
1313
CST MICROWAVE STUDIO®
• periodic boundaries (unit cells)– Dispersion diagramsEigenmode
• periodic structures with Floquet port modes – unit cells surface plasmons
• TET mesh– accurate field solutions at dielectric/Drude metal interface
Frequency Domain
• Large Problems – Memory efficient algorithm– Hardware Accelerator, Cluster Computing
• Perfect Boundary approximation – eliminates staircase error at dielectric/dielectric and
dielectric/PEC interface• Broadband Solution
– Broadband Farfield Monitor
Transient
Solver Overview Optical Applications
1414
Transient Solver- advantages -
• Memory efficient algorithm– solves electrical large problems
1515
Transient Solver- advantages -
• Memory efficient algorithm• Perfect Boundary Approximation
– eliminates staircase error at dielectric/dielectric and dielectric/PEC interface
1616
Transient Solver- advantages -
• Memory efficient algorithm• Perfect Boundary Approximation• Calculates Broadband Solution
Coated Silica Sphere
1717
Transient Solver- some weaknesses -
• Local Field Error (Drude Material)
• PBA works only “perfect” on normal dielectric materials. • On Drude materials with a sign change of real par of ε at
interface PBA has no effect – only affect local field values
MWS FDTD from publication
1818
Frequency Domain Solver- advantages -
• TET and HEX mesh– TET mesh resolves material interfaces: Accurate local field
information for Drude Materials
HEX TET
1919
Frequency Domain Solver- advantages -
• TET and HEX mesh– TET mesh resolves material interfaces: Accurate local field
information for Drude Materials
Fields along line across material interface
HEX TET
2020
Example: Nanometric Optical Tweezers
EP
metal tip
dielectric Sphere: 5 nm radius
Reference: Lukas Novotny, Randy X. Bian, and X. Sunney Xie,
Physical Review Letters, Volume 79, No. 4, 28 July 1997
Acrobat-Dokument
2121
Field enhancement
E
P
EP
Polarization of the incident E-field aligned with tip axis : enhancement factor 75
Polarization of the incident E-fieldperpendicular to the tip axis :
no enhancement
Incident fieldλ = 810 nm
2222
Trapping a particle underneath the tip
Trapped dielectric particle
Trapped metallic particle
Incident fieldλ = 810 nm
2323
Frequency Domain Solver- advantages -
• TET and HEX mesh• Periodic and Unit cell calculation
– Allows arbitrary angle of incidents for plane waves
2424
Example: Frustrated Total Reflection
Power Flow vs. Gap Width
Transmission vs. Gap Width
2525
Example: Surface Plasmon Generation
EP
metal sheet50 nm
Incident field phi > phi critical
ε = 2.56
ε = 1.69
ε = -15.99 + 0.8i
2626
Example: Surface Plasmon Generation
2727
Example: Plasmon Scattering
EP
Grating distance
2828
Example: Plasmon scattering by gradingscattered field
EP
2929
Example: Plasmon excitation by grading
EP
Grating distance
Surface Plasmon
3030
Example: Plasmon excitation by grading- structure setup -
• 2 D Solution– setup only 1 mesh cell in
height
• Periodic Boundaries• Ports at both ends
3131
Example: Plasmon excitation by grading- structure setup -
• record “balance”: Energy absorb by system
3232
Example: Plasmon excitation by gradingTD Simulation
grating
550 THz
450 THz
3333
Frequency Domain Solver- advantages -
• TET and HEX mesh• Periodic and Unit cell calculation• Arbitrary material dispersion
For FD Solver ignore warning concerning material fit
3434
Example: Scattering on a coated sphere
Test vehicle: nano shell - silver coated silica
3535
Results: Extinction Cross Section
MWS: different solversPublished results
3636
Thank you
top related