Lecture 22

Post on 19-Jan-2016

31 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Lecture 22. OUTLINE The MOSFET (cont’d) Velocity saturation Short channel effect MOSFET scaling approaches Reading : Pierret 19.1; Hu 7.1, 7.3. MOSFET Scaling. MOSFETs have been steadily miniaturized over time 1970s: ~ 10 m m Today: ~30 nm Reasons: Improved circuit operating speed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript

Lecture 22

OUTLINE

The MOSFET (cont’d) • Velocity saturation• Short channel effect• MOSFET scaling approaches

Reading: Pierret 19.1; Hu 7.1, 7.3

MOSFET Scaling• MOSFETs have been steadily miniaturized over time

– 1970s: ~ 10 m– Today: ~30 nm

• Reasons:– Improved circuit operating speed– Increased device density --> lower cost per function

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 2

Benefit of Transistor ScalingAs MOSFET lateral dimensions (e.g. channel length L) are reduced:

• IDsat increases decreased effective “R”

• gate and junction areas decrease decreased load “C” faster charging/discharging (i.e. d is decreased)

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 3

Velocity SaturationVelocity saturation limits IDsat in sub-micron MOSFETS

Simple model:

Esat is the electric field at velocity saturation:

sat

sat

vv

v

1

sat

sat

v2

for sat

for < sat

Siin holesfor cm/s 106

Siin sonfor electr cm/s 1086

6

satv

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 4

MOSFET I-V with Velocity Saturation

LV

VVm

VVCL

W

I

sat

DS

DSDSTGSeffoxe

D

1

2

L

VI channellong

I

sat

DS

DD

1

In the linear region:

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 5

Drain Saturation Voltage, VDsat

• If satL >> VGS-VT then the MOSFET is considered “long-channel”. This condition can be satisfied when– L is large, or – VGS is close to VT

LVV

m

V satTGSDsat 11

satsat

v2

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 6

Example: Drain Saturation VoltageQuestion: For VGS = 1.8 V, find VDsat for an NMOSFET with Toxe = 3 nm, VT = 0.25 V, and WT = 45 nm, if L = (a) 10 m, (b) 1 m, (c) 0.1 m (d) 0.05 m

Solution: From VGS , VT and Toxe, eff is 200 cm2V-1s-1. Esat= 2vsat / eff = 8 104 V/cm

m = 1 + 3Toxe/WT = 1.21

1

LVV

mV

satTGSDsat

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 7

(a) L = 10 m: VDsat= (1/1.3V + 1/80V)-1 = 1.3 V

(b) L = 1 m: VDsat= (1/1.3V + 1/8V)-1 = 1.1 V

(c) L = 0.1 m: VDsat= (1/1.3V + 1/.8V)-1 = 0.5 V

(d) L = 0.05 m: VDsat= (1/1.3V + 1/.4V)-1 = 0.3 V

11

LVV

mV

satTGSDsat

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 8

IDsat with Velocity SaturationSubstituting VDsat for VDS in the linear-region ID equation gives

For very short channel length:

• IDsat is proportional to VGS–VT rather than (VGS – VT)2

• IDsat is not dependent on LEE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 9

LmVV

I channellong

LmVV

VVCmLW

I

sat

TGS

Dsat

sat

TGS

TGSeffoxe

Dsat

11

22

mVVL TGSsat /

TGSoxesatTGSeffoxesatDsat VVCWvVVCW

I 2

Short- vs. Long-Channel NMOSFET

Short-channel NMOSFET:• IDsat is proportional to VGS-VTn rather than (VGS-VTn)2

• VDsat is lower than for long-channel MOSFET• Channel-length modulation is apparent

0 1 2 2.5Vds (V)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

I ds

(mA

/m

)

L = 0.15 mV

gs = 2.5V

Vgs

= 2.0V

Vgs

= 1.5V

Vgs

= 1.0V

Vds (V)

I ds

(A

/m

)

L = 2.0 m Vgs = 2.5V

Vgs = 2.0V

Vgs = 1.5V

Vgs

= 1.0V

0.0

0.01

0.02

0.03

(a)

(b)

Vt = 0.7 V

Vt = 0.4 V

0 1 2 2.5Vds (V)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

I ds

(mA

/m

)

L = 0.15 mV

gs = 2.5V

Vgs

= 2.0V

Vgs

= 1.5V

Vgs

= 1.0V

Vds (V)I d

s (

A/

m)

L = 2.0 m Vgs = 2.5V

Vgs = 2.0V

Vgs = 1.5V

Vgs

= 1.0V

0.0

0.01

0.02

0.03

(a)

(b)

Vt = 0.7 V

Vt = 0.4 V

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 10

Velocity Overshoot• When L is comparable to or less than the mean free

path, some of the electrons travel through the channel without experiencing a single scattering event

projectile-like motion (“ballistic transport”)

The average velocity of carriers exceeds vsat

e.g. 35% for L = 0.12 m NMOSFET

Effectively, vsat and sat increase when L is very small

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 11

The Short Channel Effect (SCE)

• |VT| decreases with L– Effect is exacerbated by high values of |VDS|

• This effect is undesirable (i.e. we want to minimize it!) because circuit designers would like VT to be invariant with transistor dimensions and bias condition

“VT roll-off”

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 12

Qualitative Explanation of SCE• Before an inversion layer forms beneath the gate, the

surface of the Si underneath the gate must be depleted (to a depth WT)

• The source & drain pn junctions assist in depleting the Si underneath the gate – Portions of the depletion charge in the channel region are

balanced by charge in S/D regions, rather than by charge on the gate

Less gate charge is required to invert the semiconductor surface (i.e. |VT| decreases)

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 13

depletionchargesupportedby gate(simplifiedanalysis) n+ n+

VG

p depletion region

Large L:

S D

Small L:

DS

Depletion charge supported by S/D

Depletion charge supported by S/D

The smaller L is, the greater the percentage of depletion charge balanced by the S/D pn junctions:

rj

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 14

First-Order Analysis of SCE

1

212

j

Tj r

WrLL

L

LL

21

WT

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 15

• The gate supports the depletion charge in the trapezoidal region. This is smaller than the rectangular depletion region underneath the gate, by the factor

• This is the factor by which the depletion charge Qdep is reduced from the ideal

• One can deduce from simple geometric analysis that

VT Roll-Off: First-Order Model

1

21)(

j

Tj

oxe

TATchannellongTT r

W

L

r

C

WqNVVV

Minimize VT by

• reducing Toxe

• reducing rj

• increasing NA

(trade-offs: degraded eff, m) MOSFET vertical dimensions should be scaled along with horizontal dimensions!

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 16

MOSFET Scaling: Constant-Field Approach

• MOSFET dimensions and the operating voltage (VDD) each are scaled by the same factor >1, so that the electric field remains unchanged.

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 17

Constant-Field Scaling Benefits

• Circuit speed improves by

• Power dissipation per function is reduced by 2

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 18

• Since VT cannot be scaled down aggressively, the operating voltage (VDD) has not been scaled down in proportion to the MOSFET channel length:

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 19

• Electric field intensity increases by a factor >1• Nbody must be scaled up by to suppress short-channel effects

• Reliability and power density are issues

EE130/230M Spring 2013 Lecture 22, Slide 20

MOSFET Scaling: Generalized Approach

top related