Keynote 2 designing university teaching to meet the needs

COHEREBlended learning: a strategy for online higher education research

Calgary, October 17-19, 2012

DESIGNING UNIVERSITY TEACHING TO MEET THE NEEDS OF 21ST CENTURY

STUDENTS

Dr. Tony Bates,Tony Bates Associates Ltd

1

2

Overview

Why the move to blended/hybrid learning?

What kind of course? How to decide

Pedagogical developments

Why web 2.0 is changing the game

Advanced course designs

Conclusions

Discussion

Joseph Kim’s blended class

• Weekly 30 minute web modules (main content):

• Short ‘lecture’ videos

• Extra media

• Feedback via chat, CMAs

• Weekly live lecture

• Weekly tutorials with TAs3

Joseph Kim: Introductory Psychology: McMaster University:3,500 students in class

Why the move to blended/hybrid learning?

• Large lecture classes

• Recognition that students can learn ‘some things’ online

• Demands of knowledge society: 21st century skills

• New, easy to use technologies

4

5

21st century skills

good communication skills

independent learning

ethics/responsibility

teamwork

flexibility

thinking skills

knowledge navigation

IT skills embedded in subject area

5

Hybrid learning

• ‘Flipped’ teaching: move towards re-design

• BUT: it can be so much more

• Rationales for hybrid learning:

• More interaction/student activity

• Use classroom time ‘better’

• What is the best use of face-to-face time? What is the right mix?

6

What kind of courses?

no e-learning fully e-learning

face-to-

face

classroom

aids

hybrid(reduced f2f +

online)

fully

online(distance)

blended learningdistributed learning

What kind of course?

where on the continuum should my course or program be?

four deciding factors:

teaching philosophy

targeted students

demands of subject discipline (content + skills)

resources

How do you want to teach online?

From this:

9

to this?

+

Pedagogical developments to drive blended learning

• Collaborative learning

• Knowledge construction

• Use of multimedia

• Learner control and choice

• New program structures

• New forms of assessment

• Self-directed learning

10

Students

Who benefits from online learning?

lifelong learners wanting new qualifications/upgrading

full-time students wanting more flexibility

students needing 21st century skills

independent learners

remote, isolated students

Subject requirements

What do students need to know? (content)

Content: haematology

What must they be able to do with their knowledge? (skills)

Skills: identify analytes, analyze glucose and insulin levels, interpret results

Subject requirements

Learning objectives

Resources• Instructor’s time

( workload; course design)

• LT support (instructional/web design)

• experienced colleagues

• technology (e.g. LMS)

• open educational resources

Blended, hybrid or distance?

Determine by analysis of:

Teaching philosophy

+

(potential) students

+

needs of discipline

+

resources available

Who should decide?

• Face-to-face, hybrid, fully online?

• Individual instructor; program team; senior admin?

• Best decided at program level: a progression?

• One course, multiple delivery, for different students?

• What mechanisms for this decision? 1

6

Questions

• How are decisions made in your institution about delivery mode (hybrid or fully online)?

• Who do you think should make these decisions?

• How do you decide what should be done online and what face-to-face?

17

The growth of web 2.0 in education

• Mobile learning

• blogs/WordPress, e.g. ETEC 522

• wikis, e.g. UBC Latin American

studies

• video and audio, e.g. showing

dynamic change, talking through images

• e-portfolios

• open educational resources

Features of web 2.0

• Portability/mobility

• End-user control/authoring

• Collaboration and sharing

• Collective intelligence

• Low-cost/free, adaptive software

• Rich media

20

Educational implications

• learners have powerful tools

• personal learning environments

• ‘open’ access, content, services

• learners can find/create/add/adapt content

• power shift from teachers to learners

From e-learning 1.0 to e-learning 2.0

E-LEARNING 1.0 (before web 2.0)

• Use of learning management system

• Instructor determines content

• Assessment by instructor

• Learning environment managed by instructor

• Any web 2.0 tools added by instructor

From e-learning 1.0 to e-learning 2.0

E-LEARNING 2.0

• Learning managed by learner

• Peer-to-peer collaboration

• Access to open content

• Learning demonstrated by creating multi-media materials (e.g. e-portfolios)

• Development of 21st century skills

Role of instructor in learning

1. Downes and Siemens: no role; learners are autonomous, self-directed

2. Guide-on-the side: facilitate, guide, interact, organize, but learner controls

3. Teacher controls: web 2.0 extra tools for developing competencies

When to use web 2.0

Learning as development: a move from dependent to independent or inter-dependent learning

Use of web 2.0 depends on:

• needs of learners

• requirements of accreditation

• your educational philosophy

Web 2.0 excellent tools for learner-centered teaching/developing 21st century skills.

25

‘Advanced’ online course design

core skill: knowledge management

how to find, analyze, evaluate and apply information

open content within a learning design

student-generated multimedia content: online project work

assessment by e-portfolios

26

‘Advanced’ course designs (1)

ETEC 522: UBC: Set up an e-learning business; course uses WordPress

Students explore new apps/potential for learning (via web, in groups)

Learn about creating a start-up business

Develop plan for new business

Develop a video ‘elevator’ pitch to an investor; critiqued by class

Advanced course designs (2)

Loyalist College Ontario: Border Simulation for CSBA

• Fully operational ‘virtual’ border post

• Built in Second Life at Loyalist

• Students play roles, with avatars, in separate rooms

• ‘Virtual’ cars can be dismantled

• Virtual students score 37% higher27

28

Why not rethink a course to….?

Develop skills as well as content

Increase learner engagement/activity

Increase interaction with/between students

Get students to find/analyze/apply information

Get students to demonstrate learning through multimedia – and assess

Conclusions

• For many students real benefits from hybrid learning: flexibility; 21st century skills

• We know how to teach effectively online; need to follow best practices

• Ensure students maximize the campus experience in a hybrid course

• Make students do the work

• Innovate and share

29

30

Questions

Is hybrid learning the future for your institution?

If so, what needs to happen for you to move in this direction?

Will it affect the reputation of the institution – if so, in what way or how?