Insights 2015 - State and Local Tax Traps for the Unwary - Tim Clancy
Post on 23-Jan-2017
150 Views
Preview:
Transcript
State and Local Tax Traps for the Unwary
Tim Clancy & Ned Lenhart
Income Tax
#WBInsights15
Nexus – What causes it? Historical perspective– Physical presence – Public Law 86-272– Sales of Services
#WBInsights15
Nexus – Other StandardsBright line nexus
– Factor presence test under Multistate Tax Commission• Sales > $500,000• Payroll > $50,000• Property > $50,000• Greater than 25% test
– Indexing and other threshold levels used by states– Application to income, franchise, gross receipts tax
#WBInsights15
Nexus – Other StandardsEconomic nexus
– Licensing, use of intangibles, financial, software• “Lanco” “Geoffrey” • “KFC” “MBNA”
– Physical presence is not required “Quill”
– Application to income, franchise,and gross receipts tax
DEPT OF REVENUE
#WBInsights15
Nexus – Traps for the Unwary
• Fulfillment activities• Warranties• Remote employees• Independent contractors
#WBInsights15
Nexus – Traps for the Unwary
• Investments in pass through entities• Internet activities • Digital goods• Intangible property
#WBInsights15
Nexus – Traps for the Unwary
Non-filing of returns• Unpaid taxes• Interest• Penalties
#WBInsights15
Nexus – Opportunities• State by state analysis of laws and court
cases• Preventative measures by taxpayers• Review of includible apportionment factors
#WBInsights15
Nexus – Opportunities• State by state analysis of laws and court
cases• Preventative measures by taxpayers• Review of includible apportionment factors• Voluntary disclosure agreements vs amnesty
programs• Credit for taxes paid to another state
#WBInsights15
Apportionment – Sales of Services
Methods of sourcing service revenue– Cost of performance– Proportionate– Market
#WBInsights15
Sales of Services Traps/Opportunities
Cost of performance (“COP”)– Income producing activity– Costs included– Use of independent contractors– Application of “COP-ish” rules or fair
reflection of income
#WBInsights15
Sales of ServicesTraps/Opportunities
Market based sourcing– Georgia laws– Inconsistent state laws– Cascading rules
• Delivery• Receipt• Benefit• Use• Reasonable approximation
#WBInsights15
Occasional TransactionsSale of LLC Interest
• Business vs. non-business income• Apportionment of income • Beware of tiered entities!!!!
#WBInsights15
Occasional TransactionsSales under IRC §338(h)(10)
• Sale of stock treated as an asset sale• Business vs. non-business income• Apportionment of income
#WBInsights15
Pass Through Entities• Withholding or composite returns• Credit for taxes paid• Taxes imposed upon pass-through entity
#WBInsights15
Pass Through Entities
REFUND OPPORTUNITY
Georgia Tax Tribunal case Rosenberg v. MacGinnittie
Sales/Use Tax
#WBInsights15
Sales tax: Why be concerned? • $406 Billion-- sales tax collections estimated for 2015 • 28% of total state revenue from sales tax • $20 billion in unremitted tax due• States view your company as:
– Source of future tax remittances on taxable sales– Source of revenue from taxable purchases (use tax)– Source of revenue from historical errors (audits)
#WBInsights15
Four Common Sales Tax Risks
• Improper Nexus Determination• Inaccurate tax rules applied to sales• Insufficient exemption documents• Inherited tax liability (successor)
#WBInsights15
Sales Tax Legislative Trends• Nexus Expansion Legislation
1. Click-through (“Amazon”) nexus 2. Affiliate Nexus
• Expansion of tax base to services1. Software as services (SaaS) (TN)2. Digital products3. Installation and repair services4. Staffing and personal services
• 2016 Georgia Legislative Session
#WBInsights15
Thank You!
Tim ClancyWindham Brannontclancy@windhambrannon.com678.510.2804
Ned LenhartInterstate Tax Strategiesnlenhart@salestaxstrategies.com770.985.9573
top related