Transcript
Page 2Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
Gender and diversity in mine actionWhat are the main arguments for mainstreaming gender and diversity in mine
action?
Promotes equality Increases effectiveness Maximises impact
Page 3Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
Fully
… Partially
× Not at all
To what extent does the No More Mines proposal meet good practice criteria for gender and diversity mainstreaming?
Exercise
Page 4Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
The proposal contains a value statement on the organisation’s commitment to gender equality and inclusion.
Criterion 1
Page 5Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
The proposal outlines the project’s contribution to SDG5 on gender equality, as well as the Women, Peace, and Security Agenda.
Criterion 2
Page 6Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
A gender and diversity analysis of the project area has been conducted and is clearly reflected in the need analysis section.
Criterion 3
Page 7Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
All numerical data related to people is broken down by sex and age throughout the proposal.
Criterion 4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Women Girls Boys Men
Number
Page 8Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
The project objectives and / or outcomes reflect the gender and diversity considerations identified in the gender and diversity analysis.
Criterion 5
Page 9Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
The project activities have been tailored to reflect the gender and diversity considerations outlined in the need analysis.
Criterion 6
Page 10Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
All indicators and targets related to people are disaggregated by sex and age.
Criterion 7
Page 11Abigail Jones | GICHD – GMAP 29/04/20 © GICHD
The project budget either i) contains an explicit line for costs associated with gender and diversity mainstreaming, or ii) the budget narrative clearly explains
how these costs have been mainstreamed.
Criterion 8
top related