Faceted Search for Hydrologic Data Discovery

Faceted Search for Hydrologic Data Discovery

Alex BedigAlva Couch

Tufts University, Medford, MA

Overview of Relevant Architecture

Source: http://www.cuahsi.org/his

“Ontology”

• A collection of terms along with a set of relationships between terms.

• In our case, main relationship is hierarchical: “is a subconcept of”.

• Provides a mapping between user notions of data, and data as it is found in HIS Central.

Discovery in HydroDesktop

Source: HydroDesktop

Procedure of Discovery in HydroDesktop

1.Specify spatial and temporal dimensions.2.Choose terms from the “Hydrosphere”

variable name ontology.3.Click search, wait… for results… usually.

April 15, 2011 Usability Study

CUAHSI Ontology Startree

Use Case 1: No Matching Series

User’s selections return no series, no feedback suggesting which constraints could be relaxed.

ISSUE:

Search should occur in multiple steps, informing the user of where data exists in each step.

SOLUTION:

Use Case 2: No Familiar Terms

User is unfamiliar with the terms provided in the variable-name ontology, leading to low confidence in search results.

ISSUE:

Search should allow for multiple representations of the same canonical names, eliminate options based upon known terms, and

present only options for which data is available.

SOLUTION:

Use Case 3: Too Many Results

User’s search returns a large number of results; filtering any further requires download of results for client-side manipulation.

ISSUE:

Exposing multiple dimensions of metadata in the search interface allows for more precise search, reducing download time and selection

procedures.

SOLUTION:

Demo!

SOAP Endpoint: http://cuahsi.eecs.tufts.edu/FacetedSearch/MultiFacetedHISSvc.svc?wsdl

Prototype Services Demonstrated: • GetAllOntologyElements• GetTypedOntologyElementsGivenConstraints• ConductFacetedSearch

Conclusions• Faceted search of HIS Central improves the user

experience by:– Eliminating “wasted” time in which a search returns no

data.– Allowing multiple metadata dimensions to be specified.– Allowing multiple ontological representations of

vocabulary.– Moving towards the use of multiple vocabularies.

• Thus increasing the likelihood that a user finds relevant data.

Conclusions

• Faceted search requires some rethinking of HIS central, including– Services that return whether series exist for a

query.– Support for multi-dimensional queries.– A need for speed that may justify supercomputing

solutions.