DRAFT Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy Public Workshop
Post on 02-Jan-2016
33 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
DRAFTRegional Energy Efficiency Strategy
Public Workshop
September 2, 2009
Lisa Van de WaterAir Quality Specialist
2
Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy – the basics
• Long-range strategy to programmatically encourage & incentivize non-regulatory emissions reductions through energy efficiency
• Regional, coordinated approach to EE• Partnership with & leveraging of existing EE
programs (utilities, regional partners) to maximize efficiency & emissions reductions
3
Overview
• 2007 Ozone Plan – Dual-path Strategy
• Electricity Production & Consumption
• REES Components
• ARRA “kick-start”
• Review Schedule
• Questions & Comments
4
2007 Ozone Plan
• Attainment of 8-hour federal ozone standard
• Significant Challenges– Topography– Meteorology
• “Dual-path” strategy– Regulatory Measures– “Black-Box” – Fast Track Strategy
5
2007 Fast TrackEmission Reduction Measures
• Green Contracting• Green Fleets• Truck Replacement/Retrofit/Repower• Short Sea Shipping• High-Speed Rail• Alternative Energy• Energy Conservation – Efficiency• Heat Island Mitigation• Episodic/Regional Controls• Inland Ports
6
“Green” Clean Air Opportunity
• Need for non-regulatory emissions reductions
• AB 32 greenhouse gas reductions
• American Recovery & Reinvestment Act– Significant energy efficiency & renewable
energy dollars– Economic stimulus
7
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– When: off-peak or peak– For what: critical systems or household appliances
8
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– When: off-peak or peak– For what: critical systems or household appliances
9
10
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– For what: critical systems or household appliances– When: off-peak or peak
11
Electricity Use & Air Quality
NO x
SOx
Source: eGRID2007 Version 1.0, Year 2005 Summary Tables (created in 2008)
CAMX
*
CO2 712 lb/MWh
CH4 30 lb/GWh
N2O 8 lb/GWh
NOX 0.6 lb/MWh
SOX 0.5 lb/MWh
TX
1,324
18
15
0.8
3.2
12
Electricity Generation Resource Mix
Source: eGRID2007 Version 1.0, Year 2005 Summary Tables (created in 2008)
CAMX = 0.24%US = 0.01%
All Fossil FuelsCAMX – 56%
US – 72%
back
13
California Major Utilities' Resource Mix
2.0%1.0%3.0%2.0%3.0%1.8%Wind
1.0%<1%<1%0.0%1.0%0.2%Solar
3.0%4.0%<1%4.0%1.0%2.1%Small Hydro
3.0%<1%2.0%2.0%9.0%4.7%Geothermal
3.0%1.0%3.0%5.0%2.0%2.1%Biomass
12.0%6.0%8.0%13.0%16.0%10.9%Renewables
0.0%10.0%15.0%23.0%17.0%12.9%Nuclear
41.0%30.0%50.0%42.0%54.0%41.5%Natural Gas
47.0%6.0%10.0%19.0%5.0%19.0%Large Hydro
0.0%48.0%18.0%3.0%8.0%15.7%Coal
SMUDLADWPSDG&EPG&ESCEStatewideResource Type
SOURCE: CEC Website Data - 2006 http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/electricity_resource_mix_pie_charts/index.html
14
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– For what: critical systems or household appliances– When: off-peak or peak
15
Base Load & Peak Load
Base
Intermediate
Peak
WinterPower Demand
Time of Day
Base
Intermediate
Peak
SummerPower Demand
Time of Day
16
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– For what: critical systems or household appliances– When: off-peak or peak
17
CA Electricity Usage per Capita
18
CA Electricity Demand
19
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– For what: critical systems or household appliances– When: off-peak or peak
20
Streetlight1%
Residential32%
Mining Construction
2%
Industry15%
Commercial Building
37%
Commercial Other
5%Ag Water Pump
8%
Source: CA Energy Commission, Energy Consumption Data Management System; 2007 All Utility Entities
California Electricity Consumption
21
Lodging4.9%
Misc.16.1%
Health6.8%
Retail14.7%
Refrigerated Warehouse
2.9%
Food Store8.8%
Unrefrigerated Warehouse
3.7%
School5.0%
College3.8%
Small Office7.1%
Large Office17.4%
Restaurant8.9%
Source: CA Energy Commission, California End-Use Survey, 2006
Commercial Electricity Use by Building Type
All Office 24.5%
22
Motors4.2%Air Compressors
0.3%
Process1.0%
Miscellaneous5.8%
Refrigeration13.4%
Cooking4.2%
Water Heating0.9%
Interior Lighting28.7%
Exterior Lighting5.8%
Office Equipment7.1%
Heating1.6%
Cooling14.9%
Ventilation11.9%
Source: CA Energy Commission, California End-Use Survey, 2006
Commercial Electricity Usage by End Use
Total Lighting
35%
Lighting Cooling
Refrigeration Ventilation
75%
23
Lighting8.8%
Laundry Appliances
6.7%
Home Electronics7.2%
Other Equipment2.5%
Other End Uses7.7%
Heating, Ventilation,
Cooling31.2%
Kitchen Appliances
26.7%
Water Heating9.1%
Source: End-Use Consumption of Electricity 2001, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Residential End-Use Electricity Usage
24
Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy
• Outreach, Information & Education• Tools & Programs
– Residential, Commercial/Industrial, Local Government
– Programs for successful energy efficiency & green fleets programs
• Grants Program– Expand existing opportunities– New grant opportunities
25
Outreach, Education & Information
• Healthy Air Living
• Targeted Outreach– Local Government– Minority Small Business– Neighborhood Groups– Industrial Regulated Sources– Ag Regulated Sources
26
Outreach, Education & Information
• Comprehensive Energy Website
• Energy Efficiency Opportunities Analysis– Model after studies by McKinsey & Company
• Look at economics of Energy Efficiency & GHG abatement
• Focus on the regional scale
– Enlist help from • Valley Colleges & Universities• Regional energy efficiency experts
27
McKinsey & Company, December 2009
U.S. Energy Efficiency Supply Curve - 2020
Dollars per million BTU’s saved over
lifetime of measure.
80% of opportunity requires deploying
58% of upfront investment.
28
Tools & Programs
• Residential Programs– Categories of homes– Packaged retrofits– Efficient efficiency
• Commercial Programs– Energy audit– Retrofits– Simple work practices– Long-range strategies for sustainable efficiencies &
renewables
29
More Tools & Programs
• Industrial Programs– Processes & operations– Office efficiencies
• Municipal Programs– Energy policies– Implementation assistance
• Fleets– Fuel efficiency, fleet minimization– Alternative fuels
• CNG/LNG• Electric with solar recharge
30
Grants & Incentives
• Expand ERIP to include energy efficiency
• Broad spectrum of assistance• EE projects that improve air quality
– Technical assistance for grant applications
– Letters of support from AQ perspective
– Grant administration with partners
31
Partnerships
• Coordination is key– Message– Programs
• Next two years– SJVCEO– ARRA funds & projects– EE Opportunities Analysis
• Utility Partners – best way to reach multiple markets/customers so that efforts are not duplicated
32
“Kick Start” with ARRA
• EECBG Program for small jurisdictions– Regional application– Maximize dollars brought in & energy savings
• SEP funding through CEC– Municipal financing opportunities– Comprehensive Retrofit Program
• Residential• Commercial
• Other grant opportunities – $7.1 million, so far– Alternative fuels & vehicles– Renewable Energy
33
Implementation
• End of 2009 – submit ARRA applications to CEC & initiate programs
• February 2010 – EE & RE website• End of 2010 – Energy Efficiency
Opportunities Analysis• Ongoing – Outreach & Education; monitor
EE savings; monitor emissions reductions• 2011 & beyond – Expand programs &
grants opportunities
34
Review Schedule
• Fast Track Task Force – June 16
• Public Workshop – September 2nd
– Present draft– Comment period ends September 16th
– Revised draft
• Governing Board – November 5th
35
Comment Deadline
• 5:00 p.m. September 16, 2009• Contact: Lisa Van de Water• Mail: San Joaquin Valley APCD
1990 E Gettysburg AveFresno CA 93726
• Phone: (559) 230-6100• Fax: (559) 230-6064• Email:
lisa.vandewater@valleyair.org
Thank You
top related