DRAFT Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy Public Workshop September 2, 2009 Lisa Van de Water Air Quality Specialist
Jan 02, 2016
DRAFTRegional Energy Efficiency Strategy
Public Workshop
September 2, 2009
Lisa Van de WaterAir Quality Specialist
2
Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy – the basics
• Long-range strategy to programmatically encourage & incentivize non-regulatory emissions reductions through energy efficiency
• Regional, coordinated approach to EE• Partnership with & leveraging of existing EE
programs (utilities, regional partners) to maximize efficiency & emissions reductions
3
Overview
• 2007 Ozone Plan – Dual-path Strategy
• Electricity Production & Consumption
• REES Components
• ARRA “kick-start”
• Review Schedule
• Questions & Comments
4
2007 Ozone Plan
• Attainment of 8-hour federal ozone standard
• Significant Challenges– Topography– Meteorology
• “Dual-path” strategy– Regulatory Measures– “Black-Box” – Fast Track Strategy
5
2007 Fast TrackEmission Reduction Measures
• Green Contracting• Green Fleets• Truck Replacement/Retrofit/Repower• Short Sea Shipping• High-Speed Rail• Alternative Energy• Energy Conservation – Efficiency• Heat Island Mitigation• Episodic/Regional Controls• Inland Ports
6
“Green” Clean Air Opportunity
• Need for non-regulatory emissions reductions
• AB 32 greenhouse gas reductions
• American Recovery & Reinvestment Act– Significant energy efficiency & renewable
energy dollars– Economic stimulus
7
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– When: off-peak or peak– For what: critical systems or household appliances
8
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– When: off-peak or peak– For what: critical systems or household appliances
9
10
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– For what: critical systems or household appliances– When: off-peak or peak
11
Electricity Use & Air Quality
NO x
SOx
Source: eGRID2007 Version 1.0, Year 2005 Summary Tables (created in 2008)
CAMX
*
CO2 712 lb/MWh
CH4 30 lb/GWh
N2O 8 lb/GWh
NOX 0.6 lb/MWh
SOX 0.5 lb/MWh
TX
1,324
18
15
0.8
3.2
12
Electricity Generation Resource Mix
Source: eGRID2007 Version 1.0, Year 2005 Summary Tables (created in 2008)
CAMX = 0.24%US = 0.01%
All Fossil FuelsCAMX – 56%
US – 72%
back
13
California Major Utilities' Resource Mix
2.0%1.0%3.0%2.0%3.0%1.8%Wind
1.0%<1%<1%0.0%1.0%0.2%Solar
3.0%4.0%<1%4.0%1.0%2.1%Small Hydro
3.0%<1%2.0%2.0%9.0%4.7%Geothermal
3.0%1.0%3.0%5.0%2.0%2.1%Biomass
12.0%6.0%8.0%13.0%16.0%10.9%Renewables
0.0%10.0%15.0%23.0%17.0%12.9%Nuclear
41.0%30.0%50.0%42.0%54.0%41.5%Natural Gas
47.0%6.0%10.0%19.0%5.0%19.0%Large Hydro
0.0%48.0%18.0%3.0%8.0%15.7%Coal
SMUDLADWPSDG&EPG&ESCEStatewideResource Type
SOURCE: CEC Website Data - 2006 http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/electricity_resource_mix_pie_charts/index.html
14
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– For what: critical systems or household appliances– When: off-peak or peak
15
Base Load & Peak Load
Base
Intermediate
Peak
WinterPower Demand
Time of Day
Base
Intermediate
Peak
SummerPower Demand
Time of Day
16
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– For what: critical systems or household appliances– When: off-peak or peak
17
CA Electricity Usage per Capita
18
CA Electricity Demand
19
Complexity of Electricity
• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load
• Consumption– Who: sectors– For what: critical systems or household appliances– When: off-peak or peak
20
Streetlight1%
Residential32%
Mining Construction
2%
Industry15%
Commercial Building
37%
Commercial Other
5%Ag Water Pump
8%
Source: CA Energy Commission, Energy Consumption Data Management System; 2007 All Utility Entities
California Electricity Consumption
21
Lodging4.9%
Misc.16.1%
Health6.8%
Retail14.7%
Refrigerated Warehouse
2.9%
Food Store8.8%
Unrefrigerated Warehouse
3.7%
School5.0%
College3.8%
Small Office7.1%
Large Office17.4%
Restaurant8.9%
Source: CA Energy Commission, California End-Use Survey, 2006
Commercial Electricity Use by Building Type
All Office 24.5%
22
Motors4.2%Air Compressors
0.3%
Process1.0%
Miscellaneous5.8%
Refrigeration13.4%
Cooking4.2%
Water Heating0.9%
Interior Lighting28.7%
Exterior Lighting5.8%
Office Equipment7.1%
Heating1.6%
Cooling14.9%
Ventilation11.9%
Source: CA Energy Commission, California End-Use Survey, 2006
Commercial Electricity Usage by End Use
Total Lighting
35%
Lighting Cooling
Refrigeration Ventilation
75%
23
Lighting8.8%
Laundry Appliances
6.7%
Home Electronics7.2%
Other Equipment2.5%
Other End Uses7.7%
Heating, Ventilation,
Cooling31.2%
Kitchen Appliances
26.7%
Water Heating9.1%
Source: End-Use Consumption of Electricity 2001, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Residential End-Use Electricity Usage
24
Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy
• Outreach, Information & Education• Tools & Programs
– Residential, Commercial/Industrial, Local Government
– Programs for successful energy efficiency & green fleets programs
• Grants Program– Expand existing opportunities– New grant opportunities
25
Outreach, Education & Information
• Healthy Air Living
• Targeted Outreach– Local Government– Minority Small Business– Neighborhood Groups– Industrial Regulated Sources– Ag Regulated Sources
26
Outreach, Education & Information
• Comprehensive Energy Website
• Energy Efficiency Opportunities Analysis– Model after studies by McKinsey & Company
• Look at economics of Energy Efficiency & GHG abatement
• Focus on the regional scale
– Enlist help from • Valley Colleges & Universities• Regional energy efficiency experts
27
McKinsey & Company, December 2009
U.S. Energy Efficiency Supply Curve - 2020
Dollars per million BTU’s saved over
lifetime of measure.
80% of opportunity requires deploying
58% of upfront investment.
28
Tools & Programs
• Residential Programs– Categories of homes– Packaged retrofits– Efficient efficiency
• Commercial Programs– Energy audit– Retrofits– Simple work practices– Long-range strategies for sustainable efficiencies &
renewables
29
More Tools & Programs
• Industrial Programs– Processes & operations– Office efficiencies
• Municipal Programs– Energy policies– Implementation assistance
• Fleets– Fuel efficiency, fleet minimization– Alternative fuels
• CNG/LNG• Electric with solar recharge
30
Grants & Incentives
• Expand ERIP to include energy efficiency
• Broad spectrum of assistance• EE projects that improve air quality
– Technical assistance for grant applications
– Letters of support from AQ perspective
– Grant administration with partners
31
Partnerships
• Coordination is key– Message– Programs
• Next two years– SJVCEO– ARRA funds & projects– EE Opportunities Analysis
• Utility Partners – best way to reach multiple markets/customers so that efforts are not duplicated
32
“Kick Start” with ARRA
• EECBG Program for small jurisdictions– Regional application– Maximize dollars brought in & energy savings
• SEP funding through CEC– Municipal financing opportunities– Comprehensive Retrofit Program
• Residential• Commercial
• Other grant opportunities – $7.1 million, so far– Alternative fuels & vehicles– Renewable Energy
33
Implementation
• End of 2009 – submit ARRA applications to CEC & initiate programs
• February 2010 – EE & RE website• End of 2010 – Energy Efficiency
Opportunities Analysis• Ongoing – Outreach & Education; monitor
EE savings; monitor emissions reductions• 2011 & beyond – Expand programs &
grants opportunities
34
Review Schedule
• Fast Track Task Force – June 16
• Public Workshop – September 2nd
– Present draft– Comment period ends September 16th
– Revised draft
• Governing Board – November 5th
35
Comment Deadline
• 5:00 p.m. September 16, 2009• Contact: Lisa Van de Water• Mail: San Joaquin Valley APCD
1990 E Gettysburg AveFresno CA 93726
• Phone: (559) 230-6100• Fax: (559) 230-6064• Email:
Thank You