Deriving galaxy ages and metallicities using 6dF

Post on 02-Feb-2016

25 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Deriving galaxy ages and metallicities using 6dF. 6dFGS Workshop April 2005 Rob Proctor (Swinburne University of Technology) Collaborators: Philip Lah (ANU) Duncan Forbes (Swinburne University of Technology) Warrick Couch (UNSW) Matthew Colless (AAO). Aim and Outline. Aim: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript

Deriving galaxy ages and metallicities using 6dF

Deriving galaxy ages and metallicities using 6dF

6dFGS Workshop April 2005

Rob Proctor (Swinburne University of Technology)

Collaborators:Philip Lah (ANU)

Duncan Forbes (Swinburne University of Technology)

Warrick Couch (UNSW)

Matthew Colless (AAO)

6dFGS Workshop April 2005

Rob Proctor (Swinburne University of Technology)

Collaborators:Philip Lah (ANU)

Duncan Forbes (Swinburne University of Technology)

Warrick Couch (UNSW)

Matthew Colless (AAO)

Aim and OutlineAim and Outline• Aim: • To test theories of galaxy formation

using galactic-archeology.

• Outline: • The challenges.• Our approach to them using 6dFGS data.• Some preliminary results.• The future.• Some conclusions

• Aim: • To test theories of galaxy formation

using galactic-archeology.

• Outline: • The challenges.• Our approach to them using 6dFGS data.• Some preliminary results.• The future.• Some conclusions

The challengesThe challenges• The age-metallicity degeneracy:

• Young, metal-rich populations strongly resemble old, metal-poor populations.

• The age-metallicity degeneracy:• Young, metal-rich populations strongly

resemble old, metal-poor populations.

Age=6 Gyr , [Fe/H]=0.2

Age=12Gyr,

[Fe/H]=0.0

15 Gyr

1.0 Gyr

1.5 Gyr

[Fe/H]=-0.4

[Fe/H]=-2.252.0 Gyr 7 Gyr

Models: Bruzual & Charlot (2003) Models: Sanchez-Blazquez (Ph.D. thesis); Vazdekis et al. 2005 (in prep)

The challengesThe challenges• Abundance-ratio variations (e.g.

[Mg/Fe] †)

†[X/Y]=log(NX/NY)*-log(NX/NY)

• A new opportunity?

•‘’-element abundance ratios in stellar populations are indicators of the time-scale of star formation.

Lick indices (Worthey 1994)Lick indices (Worthey 1994)

• 25 spectral features with a variety of sensitivities to age, overall metallicity ([Z/H]) and ‘’-element abundance ratio ([Mg/Fe]).

• Models of Thomas, Maraston & Korn (2004) used here.•Model simple stellar populations (SSPs) with ages up to 15 Gyr and [Z/H] from -2.25 to +0.4 dex.•‘’-element abundance ratios of from -0.3 to +0.5 dex modelled using the spectral synthesis of Tripicco & Bell (1995)

• 25 spectral features with a variety of sensitivities to age, overall metallicity ([Z/H]) and ‘’-element abundance ratio ([Mg/Fe]).

• Models of Thomas, Maraston & Korn (2004) used here.•Model simple stellar populations (SSPs) with ages up to 15 Gyr and [Z/H] from -2.25 to +0.4 dex.•‘’-element abundance ratios of from -0.3 to +0.5 dex modelled using the spectral synthesis of Tripicco & Bell (1995)

• Differences in sensitivities leads to the breaking of the age/metallicity degeneracy.

Breaking the degeneracy with Lick

indices.

Breaking the degeneracy with Lick

indices.N=1200

• Data require extrapolation of models in metallicity

• A population apparently older than 15 Gyr.

• Observational error.

• Modelling uncertainties.• Horizontal-branch morphology?

Age =1 GyrZ

=0.5

Age=15 Gyr

Z=-2.25

Our approach.Our approach.

• Employ as many indices as possible (up to 25) in the derivation of galaxy properties using a 2-fitting procedure (Proctor & Sansom 2002; Proctor et al. 2004a,b).• This:

• Minimises effects of most reduction and calibration errors (sky-subtraction, flux calibration, stray cosmic rays, poor calibration to Lick system etc).

• Minimises effects of modelling errors.

• Utilises the fact that ALL indices contain SOME information about age, [Fe/H], [/Fe] and [Z/H] (Proctor et al. 2005).

• Provides some of the most reliable age and metallicity estimates from integrated spectra to-date (I.e. work to low S/N).

• Employ as many indices as possible (up to 25) in the derivation of galaxy properties using a 2-fitting procedure (Proctor & Sansom 2002; Proctor et al. 2004a,b).• This:

• Minimises effects of most reduction and calibration errors (sky-subtraction, flux calibration, stray cosmic rays, poor calibration to Lick system etc).

• Minimises effects of modelling errors.

• Utilises the fact that ALL indices contain SOME information about age, [Fe/H], [/Fe] and [Z/H] (Proctor et al. 2005).

• Provides some of the most reliable age and metallicity estimates from integrated spectra to-date (I.e. work to low S/N).

• Use Lick indices to estimate luminosity-weighted age, [Fe/H], [/Fe] and [Z/H] for ~5000 6dFGS DR1 galaxies (Already ~50x larger than any previous study of its kind).

Results from 6dFGS spectra: Emission

Results from 6dFGS spectra: Emission

Ref………..

H, OII and NII emission strengths supplied by Philip Lah.

• Use emission to isolate a sample dominated by early-type galaxies.

• From ~35,000 DR1 galaxies with index measurements we find:

• 9000 with S/N>15• 5000 emission free

• 2000 with HII region emission

• 2000 with AGN emission

• 3000 with S/N>22• 1800 emission free

• 600 with HII region emission

• 600 with AGN emission

HII regions AGN

6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion

6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion

• Both AGN and HII region galaxies lower velocity dispersion (mass) than the emission free.

• Emission line galaxies dominate at low velocity dispersion.

• Consistent with the notion that we are excluding late-type galaxies.

N=7500

6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion

6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion

• Suggests a mass-age correlation in opposite sense to hierarchical collapse models of Kauffmann (1996).

• i.e. Highest mass galaxies tend to be old.

• Range of ages inconsistent with models of primordial collapse.

BUT………..

N=3000

6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion

6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion

N=3000

“Frosting”• A busrt of SF of only a

few % of galaxy mass can easily provide the majority of the sampled luminosity.

e.g. NGC 821: Proctor et al. 2005

NGC 821

N=2500

6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion

6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion

• Sampling effects probably cause apparent age-mass relation.

• Recall sample is essentially

luminosity limited..

• Can infer Forbes & Ponman (1999) finding that young galaxies tend to have high luminosity for their velocity dispersion

MB=-21MB=-19

• Lines of constant luminosity estimated using FJ-relation and [M/L] models of BC03.

The Faber-Jackson Relation

The Faber-Jackson Relation

• Confirms Forbes & Ponman (1999) finding that residuals to the FJ-relation correlate with galaxy age.

• Suggests age/metallicity degeneracy has been broken.

• Confirms Forbes & Ponman (1999) finding that residuals to the FJ-relation correlate with galaxy age.

• Suggests age/metallicity degeneracy has been broken.N=1500

Red: Young

The Colour-Magnitude Relation (CMR)

(The ‘red-sequence’)

The Colour-Magnitude Relation (CMR)

(The ‘red-sequence’)

• However, the sample is limited to high luminosity galaxies.

•(photometric bimodality becomes significant R>-17)

• Nevertheless, argues against common belief that low scatter in CMR implies old ages.

(At least in high luminosity galaxies)

• However, the sample is limited to high luminosity galaxies.

•(photometric bimodality becomes significant R>-17)

• Nevertheless, argues against common belief that low scatter in CMR implies old ages.

(At least in high luminosity galaxies)

• Normally assumed to indicate a mass/metallicity relation and to imply a small range of ages.• Data suggest true picture not so clear-cut

6dFGS: Results for [Z/H]

6dFGS: Results for [Z/H]

An age-metallicity relation A mass-metallicity relation

[Z/H]=0.7log()-0.6log(age)-1.0

(a mass-metallicity relation that evolves with time)

Red: Low mass Red: Young

6dFGS: -element abundance ratios.

6dFGS: -element abundance ratios.Red: Young Red: Low mass

N=3500

An [/Fe]-age relation Suggests less continuous SF than solar neighbourhood

Pure Fe

Pure Fe

The future.The future.• Refine age/metallicity measurements (This is a work in

progress).

• Probe ages and metallicities in emission line galaxies (Consider ages<1.0 Gyr).

• Investigate emission line characteristics (HII/AGN,

Balmer decrements, gas metallicities).

• Quantify trends in galaxy parameters (FJ-relation, CMR and age/mass/metallicity planes).

• Test idea of ‘frosting’ (Compare spectroscopic results for central regions to global photometry).

• Investigate variations with environment.

• DR2 and DR3.

• Refine age/metallicity measurements (This is a work in

progress).

• Probe ages and metallicities in emission line galaxies (Consider ages<1.0 Gyr).

• Investigate emission line characteristics (HII/AGN,

Balmer decrements, gas metallicities).

• Quantify trends in galaxy parameters (FJ-relation, CMR and age/mass/metallicity planes).

• Test idea of ‘frosting’ (Compare spectroscopic results for central regions to global photometry).

• Investigate variations with environment.

• DR2 and DR3.

Conclusions.Conclusions.• We have used Lick indices to break the age-metallicity

degeneracy in by far the largest study of its kind to-date.

• Results show trends in ALL metallicity parameters with both mass AND age.• These provide challenges to both primordial and monolithic

collapse models of galaxy formation.

• The 6dFGS will prove to be an invaluable testing ground for galaxy formation models.

• The addition of reliable age and metallicity estimates for a large number of galaxies will significantly enhance the value of the 6dFGS.

• We have used Lick indices to break the age-metallicity degeneracy in by far the largest study of its kind to-date.

• Results show trends in ALL metallicity parameters with both mass AND age.• These provide challenges to both primordial and monolithic

collapse models of galaxy formation.

• The 6dFGS will prove to be an invaluable testing ground for galaxy formation models.

• The addition of reliable age and metallicity estimates for a large number of galaxies will significantly enhance the value of the 6dFGS.

Abrat issues 1 - ?Abrat issues 1 - ?

Lick indices (Worthey 1994)Lick indices (Worthey 1994)

• Properties of single stellar populations (SSPs) are estimated using:

• Stellar spectral libraries (Teff, log g and [Fe/H]).• Isochrones (age and [Fe/H]).• A Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF: No. with

mass).

• Properties of single stellar populations (SSPs) are estimated using:

• Stellar spectral libraries (Teff, log g and [Fe/H]).• Isochrones (age and [Fe/H]).• A Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF: No. with

mass).• Integration of stellar properties (weighted by IMF)

along isochrones of given age and metallicity yields model properties for an SSP.

• Spectral synthesis of Tripicco & Bell (1995) models ‘’-elements (Models used here : Thomas, Maraston & Korn 2004)

15 Gyr

1.0 Gyr

1.5 Gyr

[Fe/H]=-0.4

[Fe/H]=-2.25

Age-metallicity degeneracy

1. Photometry

Age-metallicity degeneracy

1. Photometry

- Tight locus of all combinations of age and metallicity in the range 2.0 -15 Gyr, -2.25≤[Fe/H]≤-0.4 (Models: Bruzual & Charlot 2003)

2.0 Gyr

7 Gyr

6dFGS: [Fe/H] results6dFGS: [Fe/H] results

Our approach.Our approach.• Estimate Age, [Fe/H],

[/Fe] and [Z/H]• Use as many indices as

possible (up to 25)• Thus:• Minimise effects of

most errors (reduction and calibration)

• Utilise the fact that ALL indices contain SOME information about age, [Fe/H] and [E/Fe].

• Estimate Age, [Fe/H], [/Fe] and [Z/H]

• Use as many indices as possible (up to 25)

• Thus:• Minimise effects of

most errors (reduction and calibration)

• Utilise the fact that ALL indices contain SOME information about age, [Fe/H] and [E/Fe].

top related