CHILDRENS SERVICES Beauty & The Beast Of Inter-agency Working Sheena Bolland Dr John Henning Brodersen.

Post on 29-Mar-2015

219 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Beauty & Beauty & The BeastThe Beast

Of Inter-agency Working

Sheena Bolland

Dr John Henning Brodersen

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Today’s Programme

• Introduction• Service Development• Theory / Culture of multi-agency work

The Beast• The positives and negatives of multi-agency working• Interface with different cultures management perspective supervision

The Beauty• Best of each culture

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

The C.A.S.T team

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

GPs, Paediatricians, Teachers, School Nurses, Youth Justice Workers, Health Visitors, Social Workers, Voluntary Agencies etc

Tier 1

Individual Professionals Trainedin Children and Young People’s Mental Healtheg Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Therapists etc

Specialist Multi-disciplinary Teams

Tier 2

Tier 3

Very specialist

services, incl. children away from

home

Tier 4

The 4-tier model for CAMHS

Primary Mental Health Workers etc

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Objectives Of The Service

• To establish a multi-agency service working across the Tiers

• To reduce the waiting times & improve access to CAHMS specialist services

• To support children at risk of exclusion & reduce school exclusions

• To ensure families of children using the Tier 2 service has access to appropriate family support workers

• To reduce the “risk” for children

• To continually develop services for families in the Medway area

• To provide a consultation service for professionals in Medway

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

ServiceDevelopment

Manager

SSA

ClinicalPsychologist

P/TPaediatrician

Senior PractionerPMHW

Chatham

Primary MentalHealth Worker

Gillingham

Primary MentalHealth Worker

Rochester

Primary MentalHealth Worker

Sexual Inappropriate Behaviour

Behaviour Support Worker

Gillingham & Chatham

Behaviour Support Worker

Strood & Chatham

Connexions PA13-19 years

Medway

P/TCounsellor

Sessional FamilySupport Workers

Team Structure

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Clinica

l Govern

ance

PSA 2

CAHMS MAPPINGEDUCA

TIONNational Service Framework

WKMHTWKMHT

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

What can theory do to help us create more cohesive multi-agency teams?

Helps us reflect on what goes on between team members and between agencies.

Help inform us in how to improve working practice, in an evidence based manner with good accountability for decision making.

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Social Construction of Reality and Culture

Knowledge is not universally ‘true’ but depends on the culture.

Traditions and what is viewed as common sense are culturally determined.

e.g. nodding yes and no reversed in Bulgaria.

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM) Pearce & Chronin (1980)

•Culture

•Episode

•Speech Act

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Government

Social services

Health services

Education

Private and voluntary organisations

Socio –culturalcontext

Cultural MapCultural Map

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Clinical Psychology

Counselling

General nursing

Health visitor

Social work

Teaching

British Psychological Society

General Medical Council

Royal College of Nursing

Professional contextProfessional context

UKCP

BACP

Primary mental health workers

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Attachment Theory (Bowlby, 1979).

Family Scripts (Byng-hall, 1995).

Narrative Approaches (White, 1995).

Roles (Belbin, 1981).

Structural Issues (Minuchin, 1974).

Theories used in this presentation

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

The Beasts of inter-agency working

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Where is your team currently in terms of its development?

e.g. Forming, Norming, Storming,

Performing (Tuckman, 1973).

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

•Permeability

•Coalitions•Capturing •Role reversal•Dysfunctional discipline

Beasts in interagency teams

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Group processes than inhibit team cohesion

Team Splitting and allocation of roles (Belbin, 1981).

Conformity seen as a higher priority than evidence based decision making (Harris, 1999).

Group think- under stress ,or dominant leader, consensus overrides looking at alternative courses of action.

Group polarization, more extreme decision making than in isolation.

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Responsibility held by a manager means they cannot admit ignorance or dispensability resulting in poor decision making (Harris, 1999).

Team cohesion has an influential role in the management process (Henning Brodersen, 2004).

Colleagues seen as an important source of support versus making decisions very difficult (Henning Brodersen, 2004).

Group processes than inhibit team cohesion

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

•Ability to access a diversity of perspectives.

•Reduce the likelihood of clients falling into gaps in service provision.

•Reduced conformity to professional/ organisational shackles.

•Ability to form more informed beliefs about the strengths of other organisations.

•Increased flexibility in matching internal resources to external demands.

Beauty of Interagency working

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Please draw a current map of your organisational, or professional cultures.

You can circle any alliances or coalitions.

Post exercise reflection

How would the map created by other

agency members differ?

How would you like the map to look in the future?

What would be the first step towards this aim?

Exercise

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

Building clear structures.

Communication.

Groups and meetings.

Lines of accountability.

Feedback loops (Campbell, 2001).

Whole Team Training (Henning Brodersen, 2004).

What can we do to enhance the beauty of interagency working?

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

top related