Biogaspotential i skogsindustriellt slam
Post on 23-Mar-2016
213 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
The impact of solids retention time in the aerated step of a pulp and paper mill effluent treatment on the bio methane potential of
waste activated sludge (Master Thesis )
Danish Mehmood danish.tanoli@gmail.com
0739458132 Chemical Engineering
Karlstad University
Introduction
• Background • Need of non-fossil fuel • Bio Energy concept is growing worldwide • Best alternate for fossil fuels • Most economical way to save energy and power cost within industry
Wastewater treatment in pulp and paper industry
• Primary treatment • All settleable materials are removed from wastewater, this is called primary
sludge
• Biological treatment • Microorganisams convert organic matters into biomass, this called
biological sludge
Sequential batch reactor
Microorganisms in activated sludge
• Two groups of microorganisms are present in activated sludge • Protozoa (single cell) and metazoa multicell • Four different types of protozoa present in activated sludge are amoeba,
ciliates ( free swiming and stalked) and flagellates • Example of metazoa is rotifier
Microorganisams in activated sludge
Results and Discussion
Production of sludge
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
TSS (mg/L)
Number of days
TSS (Effluents)
SRT 2
SRT 10
SRT 20
Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
-‐‑100
200
500
800
1100
1400
1700
2000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
COD (mg/l)
Number of Days
COD (Effluent)
SRT 2
SRT 10
SRT 20
Production of sludge
0
1000
2000
3000
0 10 20 30 40
TSS of sludge
[mg/l]
days of operation
SRT 2 days
SRT 10 days
SRT 20 days
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
0 10 20 30
VSS of sludge
[mg/l]
days of operation
SRT 2 days
SRT 10 days
SRT 20 days
Sludge volume index (SVI)
1077
730
434
103
82
42
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
SRT 2 days SRT 10 days SRT 20 days
Sludge volume index
[ml/g]
Daily sludge production
[mg/day]
Methane yield from lab produced sludges
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 5 10 15 20 25
Methane yield
[Nml]
Days of operation
Specific production SRT 2 days
Specific production SRT 10 days
Specific production SRT 20 days
Total production SRT 2 days
Total production SRT 10 days
Total production SRT 20 days
Methane % from lab produced sludges
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0 5 10 15 20 25
Methane %
Days of operation
SRT 20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0 5 10 15 20 25
Methane %
Days of operation
SRT 10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0 5 10 15 20 25
Methane %
Days of operation
SRT 2
Methane yeild from mill Substrate with different SRT:
0
50
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
Methane Yield (ml)
Days of operation
B 3
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
0 5 10 15 20 25
Methane Yield (ml)
Days of operation
R S
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
Methane Yield (ml)
Days of operation
B 2
Conclusion
Conclusion Lab produced sludge: • Activated sludge produced through SBR has great potential of methane
gas • Sludges of all three SRT gave high yeild of methane gas • SRT 2 showed a higher amount of methane yeild than other two sludges, • Maximum methane production was obtained in first week of operation, this
trend decreased with time
Conclusion Mill sludge: • Sludge from mill showed totally different behaviour than lab produced
sludge • B2 which is most thin sludge gave minimum or almost no methane • B3 gave maximum methane yeild • Methane production (%) increased gradually with time, in first week it was
minimum but increased afterward
top related