1 BIOENERGY 1. Session - Mapping of existing infrastructures Kai Sipilä VTT Processes, Finland Future Needs for Research Infrastructures in Energy 1.6.2005.
Post on 31-Mar-2015
214 Views
Preview:
Transcript
1
BIOENERGY
1. Session - Mapping of existing infrastructures
Kai Sipilä
VTT Processes, Finland
Future Needs for Research Infrastructures in Energy1.6.2005 in Brussels, DG Research
2
1. Drivers in Europe: - EU White Paper 6 --> 12 % Renewables- Bioenergy up to 130 Mtoe/a -> from where ?- Directives on RES-electricity, CHP and Biofuels- Landfill directive: urban and industrial waste
2. ERA Bioenergy in 2002 – key conclusions
3. EC New instruments in 6. FWP, e.g.- Bioenergy Network of Excellent (NoE)- IP`s: Chrisgas (syngas) and Renew (transport fuels thermochemical)- ERANET Bioenergy (6 member states)
4. Technology Platforms, e.g. - Biofuels for Transport- Forest Industry Platform
5. Other networks, e.g. - EUREC, (EREC, Eubia, Aebiom etc.)- IEA Bioenergy Agreement – 21 countries
6. Bioenergy RTDD priorities: fuel supply, biofuels, bioelectricity, biorefinery
7. Research Infrastructure criteria in general
8. Conclusions and input for the future steps
3
Ris
k
No
velt
y
Res
earc
h
Implementation to industrial and Commercial Market
Basic Research
ApliedResearch
IndustrialProjects
To commercialoperations
THE INNOVATION CHAIN to be included to the European Research Infrastructures
Demonstrations
Newinnovations
NewRI´s
4
RENEWABLE ENERGY PENETRATION EU15 IN 2010
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Geothermal
Wave
Waste
Biomass
Solar Active
Photovoltaics
Hydro
Wind Best PracticePresent Policies
Source : TERES II
Mtoe
Bioenergy in 1995 Bioenergy target for 2010 in EU ---------------->
2020 2010 Biofuels for transport 6/8 %
Forest industry wood demand in 2010
RES-E
agrobiomasswoody biomass
18 / 36 Mtoe ?
Forest, agroand waste offerequal volumes !
5
EU-25 Bioenergy RTD in 2002:
• total volume about 220 M€/a and 20 M€ EC funding (10 %)
• > 7 000 researcher
• > 150 RTD organisations
• > 150 RTD programmes
Co-ordinated by Prof. Josef Spitzer, JR, AUT
“ERA Actions should aim at:- Supporting transfer of existing knowledge and developed technologies to minimize “double work”- Organizing joint RTD initiatives on topics requiring further development”
BIO-ENERGYENLARGED PERSPECTIVES
Results (1)
• Existing knowledge and developed technologies– Liquid/gaseous biofuels: Ethanol from sugar/starch crops, biodiesel, biogas
– Combustion of wood and wood residues: Medium and large scale boilers, steam cycle power production
• Modifications and optimizations may be needed– To account for local conditions
– To improve operation and economy
Source: ERA Bioenergy Final report
BIO-ENERGYENLARGED PERSPECTIVES
Results (2)Topics requiring further development
– Feedstock production and pre-treatment• Forestry residues, biogenic MSW fraction, short rotation crops• Standardized solid fuels production and trade• Systems studies on land use change and non-energy market competition
– Conversion processes• Advanced gasification for power and syngas production• Ethanol from wood in “integrated production plants”• Bio-oil from flash pyrolysis• Adaptation of combustion engines and gas turbines for biofuels, e.g. for IGCC plants
– End use integration• Co-combustion of biofuels with fossil fuels• Accounting models for Kyoto-related benefits• Small scale combustion with automatic operation and emission control• Fuel logistics and vehicle adaptation• Concentrate on “high volume low cost” applications
Source: ERA Bioenergy Final report
8
NoE BioenergyNoE Bioenergy
Euroopan kartta ja partnereiden liput
New instrument:• 8 partners• Good European coverage • Duration 5 years, 2004-08• Budget 8 M€
Mission:• To establish a durable integrated European
research structure to promote the introduction of successful bioenergy chains
• Jointly executed research to overcome the barriers to bioenergy
C O M M U N I C A T I N G E U R O P E A N R E S E A C O M M U N I C A T I N G E U R O P E A N R E S E A R C H R C HW h a t ’ s i n i t f o r y o u ?W h a t ’ s i n i t f o r y o u ? Brussels, 11-12 May 2004
9
Consortium competenceConsortium competence
CHP, largescale systems,forest industry
Climate issues,small scaleapplications
Biogenicwaste toenergy
Environment,socio-
economics
Agro-biomass Biofuels for
transport
Training,education,
dissemination
Land usechange and
biomassresources
VTT, Finland
Joanneum Research, Austria
ECN, NetherlandsINRA, France
IIIEE , Sweden
Aston University, UK
EC BREC, Poland
ForschungzentrumKarlsruhe, Germany
PermanentBioenergyR&D Centre
C O M M U N I C A T I N G E U R O P E A N R E S E A C O M M U N I C A T I N G E U R O P E A N R E S E A R C H R C HW h a t ’ s i n i t f o r y o u ?W h a t ’ s i n i t f o r y o u ? Brussels, 11-12 May 2004
Bioenergy NoE
Interactions and SEA of Bioenergy NoE
Joint activities:Master courses and PhD`s
Seminars, WorkshopsConferences
NoE Web siteNews sharingNew projects
DG TREN (IEE):ThermalNetEUbioNetIIIP`s
IEA Bioenergy
ERA-NET – BioenergyIP`sOther networksOther projects
National projects
NoE
DG RTD:
11
Forest biomassin future also
urban waste and strawBiofuel production
Biofuels: pellets bio oils, SNG EtOH/MeOH SynDiesel
Bark
Woodresidues
Pulp & PaperMill
Woodhandling
Barkboiler
PowerHeat
PowerSteam
Refinery
Crude Oil
BIOREFINERY IN FOREST INDUSTRY ? - benefit of raw material, polygeneration, large scale -
BioPower
Tax incentives, policieswill prioritize businessinterest
< 500 MWf
< 300 MWf
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
FT Upgraded Liquids (C5+) Methanol
Pro
du
cti
on
co
sts
, EU
R/M
Wh
Feed 0 EUR/MWh
Feed 10 EUR/MWh
Feed 20 EUR/MWh
Forest residues based products, 15 €/MWh
Raw material price - case: 300 MWfuel, ~250 M€ investment, 10 %
Syngas/Fuels Forest BioRefinery
Refinery-gate price for gasoline, diesel
Refinery-gate price + diesel excise duty (FIN)
Solid recovered fuels, 0 €/MWh ?
Source: Paterson McKeough
13
Source: Esa Kurkela
Synthesis gas from biomass to liquid biofuels,hydrogen, synthetic methane and chemicals
- liquid biofuels or H2 in medium-to-large scale plants
Synthesis gas R&Din 1980’s
Sweden, Germany;USA, Finland
Synthesis gas R&Din 1980’s
Sweden, Germany;USA, Finland
HTWplant
in Oulu
HTWplant
in Oulu
Catalyticreformingknow-how
Catalyticreformingknow-how
VTT-UCGOptimised
syngas R&DPDU-scale
Development
VTT-UCGOptimised
syngas R&DPDU-scale
Development
Other pilot/demo plantsBerrenrath, Hawai,
Studsvik, Vermonth, Gussing
Other pilot/demo plantsBerrenrath, Hawai,
Studsvik, Vermonth, Gussing
Large FT-fuel plantsbased on entrained-flow gasificatrion > 1000 MW
Waste-tosynfuelR&D
Waste-tosynfuelR&D
Entrained-flowcoal gasification technlogy
with biomass pyrolysis/torrefaction
Entrained-flowcoal gasification technlogy
with biomass pyrolysis/torrefaction
Industrialpilot/demoIndustrialpilot/demo
Demonstrationat 200 MW-scaleDemonstration
at 200 MW-scale
R&D on Hydrogen economiesR&D on Hydrogen economies
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 20201985 2025 20301995 2000 2005 2010 2015 202019851985 2025 2030
Hydrogen technologies
Biorefineries in pulp and paper mills or refineries
fluid-bed gasifiers 200-400 MW
14
Conclusions
Research Infrastructures is an interesting and important instrument for European Bioenergy RTD
EU Directives set challenging targets, additional instruments are needed Key priorities: - fuel chain and logistics (forest, agro and biogenic waste)
- transportation fuels production
- new power production technologies
- new integrated concepts like Biorefineries Criteria for RI, e.g. - key priority areas in the 7. FWP RTD work plan
- novelty, industrial commitment and convincing innovation chain
- access to European RTD institutions and actors, existing
RTD infrastructure investments significant
- networking of the RI-investments, permanent bodies ?
The present new EC instruments, like NoE Bioenergy, IP`s, and the potential new Technology platforms can offer present activities and new ideas. Networks like EUREC, EREC etc. will also have visions and concrete proposals to be integrated to future brainstorming with the bioenergy RTD actors.
15
Thank you !
top related