å Á ¢ Ð m ¡ ô ß ¨ ½ ¢ Ð ¬ ë ¡ ¢ ÿ Á ¢ ¯ ¨ m à ó ¡ ¨ ó § Â Ü û² ü ó ¡ ¾ g ¤ Ø ó ¡ ¾ ø p ö à ü m ¡ ¾ ß . ½ . ¨ ó Â Ü û– å Á ¢
Post on 23-Apr-2018
231 Views
Preview:
Transcript
– . .
.3 7
–- .*.
–Abstract Most of the changes, developments, features and reflections concerningGlobalization have a great worldwide impact on the Banking Industry in anycountry, of which the Algerian banking industry. Whereby, the economic impactof globalization on the Banking Industry may be positive and negative as well.The basic impacts represent restructuring of the banking industry and thetransformation to the comprehensive banks, re-engineering the banking industrytowards the financial derivatives as well as necessarily complying with Baselaccords that manifesting competitive banking system after the Financial ServicesLiberalization Agreement, banking merger, and weakening the power of theCentral Bank to manage the monetary policy. This study surveys efforts of the Arab Central Banks’ reform policies e.g. EgyptCentral Bank, Jordan Central Bank and, Central Bank of Sudan, along with theefforts by the International Monetary Fund to help the national banks to face therequirements posted by Globalization and International Competition. Moreover,the study also stated discussed the challenges facing the Algerian BankingSystem in the Globalization era, thus, it surveyed its historical developments andthe current structure. It also analyzed some of the available information alongwith evaluation the reform policies that were implemented by the AlgerianCentral Bank. It detected the strategic requirements for the Algerian banks in thecontext of globalization in form of Institutional building suitable for activatingthe competition and building strategic coalition and financial engineering. Along with this survey, the study recommended that the Algerian BankingSystem should necessarily benefit from the current situation whereby, no limitsand restrictions when it does business with its national external clients, to workforward to know the market requirements and the nature of competition facing it.In addition to that, it needs to build clear strategies for domestic and internationalmarkets, empowering the financial resources via increasing capital, merge ofsmall and weak banks to create giant effective ones, working towards to qualifythe human resources through training suit with the updating and developingrecent banking industry and, improving the financial inspection procedures andincrease its confidence
*– . :abuamona@sudanmail.net
– . .
.3 8
:
.
.
.
.
– . .
.3 9
:
.
.
:1 (.2 ().(3 ( .4 (.
1-1: :
1
(Globalization) .
.
.
– . .
.3 10
:- :
. :
. :
.
.
..
.
.
1-2: :)Economic
Globalization (
– . .
.3 11
.
] [
)Supernational ( .
.
.
: * :
. *:
. *:.
:.
*:.
– . .
.3 12
.
2.
1-3 : :
.
.
.
Universal Banks .
..
3 .
– . .
.3 13
.
.
)(
.
.
4.
5.
.
.
.
– . .
.3 14
.
6.
:
.
:
2-1: :
.
. .
.
– . .
.3 15
.
2-2::
.
.
.
.
2-3::
1988
8
%1992
II
– . .
.3 16
: *. * . * .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
– . .
.3 17
2-4 :
:1994
::
. :.
:.
.
.
2-5: :
. .
:
.
.
– . .
.3 18
2-6: :
500
2%
.
.
.
:
.
.
– . .
.3 19
.
.
.
:
3-1 :1991
.
- :
.
– . .
.3 20
..
.
.
- ::-
-.- .- .- .- .
"37 "1992
.
– . .
.3 21
3-2:1989
.
.
." ":1-
).(2-
.
:1-
.2- .3- .
– . .
.3 22
.1- :-
.-
.-
50%
.2- :
:-
.-
.- :
. .
3- :
.
– . .
.3 23
3-3::
)1999–2002.(
.
)2000–2002(
.
1-)1999–2002(:
.
.
.
1999 .:--:
– . .
.3 24
.
.
.-:
.7
.-:
.
.
.
– . .
.3 25
.-:
:-
.-.-
.-
.-
.-
.-
.-:
– . .
.3 26
.
.
..
-:.
.
.
.
2-)2000–2002:(
.
– . .
.3 27
.
.
.:-
-:
2003 .
.-:
.
3-)2003
–2007(8::--
.
– . .
.3 28
-
.
3-4::.
.
.)1(
:-
)1(
.
.
.
– . .
.3 29
:
2004
.
4-1: :24
.
..
.1963
) ( .
:
– . .
.3 30
1- :1966
.2-:1967
..
.3-:1966
.4-:1964
..
5-:1963
) .(.
4-2 : :
)1 (.
– . .
.3 31
)1(
2004
1(2(3(Final EP4(5()
(
1(2(3(4(5(6(7( 8(–9(
10(11(12(13(14(
15( 16(17(18(19(20(
.
1(2(3(
1(2(3(
4(5(6(7(
– . .
.3 32
4-3 :
1-:)2(
2002-2004
%2004
%2003
%2002
33.1% 875271 33% 849040 33.6% 75165385% 744395 84.7% 718905 85.4% 642168 *
1.2% 10350 1.5% 12945 1.2% 8843 *
13.8% 120526 13.8% 117190 13.4% 100642 *
66.9% 176522 67% 1724043 66.4% 148519090,3% 1594161 90.1% 1553246 88.6% 1316433 *9.7% 171063 9.1% 170797 11.4% 168757
2640495 253083 2236843
)2 ( :)1 (33%
33.6 %20022004.66.4%67% .
.
.)2 (
85%
– . .
.3 33
13.6 %
)1.3.(%
)3 (89.6%10.1%
. .
)1()2()3(
2002-2004.
)2(
2002-2004
(1)
2004-2002
33.60%
66.40%
85.40%
1.20%
13%
– . .
.3 34
)3(
2002-2004
2-)3(
2001-2004
% 2004
%2003
%2002
%2001
55.2 771671 56 773568 49.6 627908 47.6 513315
44.8 626912 44 606598 50.4 638819 52.4 565133 *
100 1389858 100 1380166 100 1266799 100 1078448
)3 ( :
89%
11%
– . .
.3 35
1-20012003 .
.2-)2 (
..
.)4(
2000-2004
)3(
2001-2004
4-4 ::
47.60%
52.40%
– . .
.3 36
.:-
1-.2-.3-.4-
.5-
.
)90-10(14/4/1990 .
.
""
:1-
.2-
.
– . .
.3 37
3- .
4-
." "
:1-
.2-.3-
.4-
.5-
.
– . .
.3 38
*:
5-1:
.....
.
5-2 :
::
.:
*-..1994
– . .
.3 39
.
.
.
5-3:
.
.
.
5-4:
– . .
.3 40
.
.
.
5-5:.
.
. .
." "
. .
.
– . .
.3 41
:
.:1-
.2-
.3-
.4-
.5-
.6-.7-
.
– . .
.3 42
8-:
)(.
) (.)(.
– . .
.3 43
1-199825.
2-17-191420
21717199954–56.3-200128.4-1725-51.6-222
1999173.7-1999–20023.8-.)3 (
2001.
)1 (92003.)2 (.
1993 .)3 (
1993 .)4 (.2001)5 (
2002.)6 ( 1994 .)7 (
1998 .
– . .
.3 44
)8 ( 17-191420
217 17 1999.)9 (2001)10 (2221999.)11 ()3(
2004 .)12 ( 1991.
top related