-
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 111 (2015)
16
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
j o ur na l ho mepage: www.elsev ier .com/ locate / jpba
Chemometric analyses for the characterization oseeds of
Descurainia sophia (L.) based on HPLC n
Xidan Zhoua, Liying Tanga, Hongwei Wua, Guohong Zhoua,
TinShunxin Lib, Zhuju Wanga,
a Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese
Medical Science, Beijing 100700, Chinab Department o
a r t i c l
Article history:Received 6 DeReceived in reAccepted 8
MaAvailable onlin
Keywords:Descurainia soHigh-performwith diode arrMultivariate
sProcessing mechanismPlantago depressa Willd
hort fmany
DSS s whreforwas ee diffeecha
1. Introduction
Descuraito family Brfor the treamiddle Asiaexploited tomote
urinamost Chinechallenges oview of the ants, it seemor
microscoaccurately a
Currentlimportant r
Abbreviatio(L.); HCA, hierDA, partial leaWilld.; RDSS,
tmedicine.
Corresponof Chinese MedChina. Tel.: +8
E-mail add
which can systematically characterize the constituents of
samples
http://dx.doi.o0731-7085/ nia sophia (L.) Webb ex Prantl, an
annual dicot belongingassicaceae (Cruciferae), has been used in
folk medicinestment of throat diseases, measles and smallpox in
the
[1,2]. In China, its seeds (DSS) have been extensively relieve
cough, prevent asthma, reduce edema and pro-tion for thousands of
years [3,4]. However, parallel tose medicinal herbs, DSS have been
encountering thef varietal complexity and counterfeit
incorporation. In
morphological specicity and high similarity of adulter-s
inaccessible that either morphological characteristicspic
characteristics could be able to distinguish themnd handily.y, the
chromatographic ngerprint technique plays anole in the quality
control of Chinese medicinal herbs,
ns: DAD, diode array detector; DSS, the seeds of Descurainia
sophiaarchical cluster analysis; PCA, principle components
analysis; PLS-st squares discriminant analysis; PDS, the seeds of
Plantago depressahe roasted seeds of Descurainia sophia (L.); TCM,
traditional Chinese
ding author at: Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China
Academyical Science, No. 16 Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimennei Ave., Beijing
100700,
6 10 64033301; fax: +86 10 64033301.ress: [email protected] (Z.
Wang).
and focus on the identication and assessment of the
components[5]. Due to the complexity and world-wide applicability
of Chineseherbs, chromatographic ngerprinting has been accepted
interna-tionally as a strategy to assess the quality of such
substances [6].In this paper, HPLC-DAD was applied to construct the
chromato-graphic ngerprints.
Processing is a characteristic pharmaceutical skill which
sig-nicantly discriminates western medicine from Chinese
medicine.Proper processing may remove or reduce the toxicity,
drastic prop-erties and side effects, promote therapeutic effects
and modify thenature and action. Hence, in order to guarantee the
safety and effec-tiveness, it is signicant and necessary to control
and regulate thequality of processed products. As for DSS, due to
the drastic effectsand potential side-effects in the case of raw
DSS, processed DSShave been dominating in clinical application [7].
As described inthe textbook, the raw DSS are usually indicated for
ascites andhyposarca while the roasted DSS are mainly used for
cough anddyspnea because roasting can moderate the extremely cold
natureand protect lung from drastic damage [8]. Thus, it is
necessary todiscriminate raw and roasted DSS in clinical practice.
Recently,chemometrics have been increasingly applied to the
botanicaland geographical characterization and authentication of
food andmedicine [918]. In this study, HPLC ngerprints of the raw
androasted DSS were compared, and the ngerprint data sets
weresubmitted for classication to several chemometrics methods,
such
rg/10.1016/j.jpba.2015.03.0102015 Elsevier B.V. All rights
reserved.f Chinese Medicine, Nanyang Medical College, Nanyang,
Henan 473000, China
e i n f o
cember 2014vised form 5 March 2015rch 2015e 17 March 2015
phia (L.)ance liquid chromatographyay detector
ngerprintstatistical analysis
a b s t r a c t
The seeds of Descurainia sophia (L.) (sChina, have attracted the
attention of present study, the raw and processedon HPLC
ngerprints. Moreover, peakraw and roasted DSS were found. Thewith
multivariate statistical analysis which were mainly responsible for
thlight on illustrating the processing midentication of
authenticity.f raw and processedgerprints
g Wanga, Zhenzhen Koua,
or DSS below), with a long history of medicinal utilization in
Chinese medicine practitioners for the potent efcacy. In thewere
differentiated by several chemometrics methods basedich were mainly
responsible for the differentiation betweene, the method of the
chromatographic ngerprints combinedffective and reasonable in
orientating chemical constituentsrentiation between raw and roasted
materials, thus sheddingnism. Whats more, this method can also be
applied in the
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
-
2 X. Zhou et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical
Analysis 111 (2015) 16
as principle components analysis (PCA), hierarchical cluster
analy-sis (HCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis
(PLS-DA).According to the statistical results combined with the
chromato-graphic ngerprints, peaks responsible for discrimination
betweenraw and prcourse of pr
As mentmedicinal mother mediIn this studWilld. (PDSHCA was alto
explore adulteratindifferent pr
2. Materia
2.1. Materi
21 batchmedicinal hlocated in BProvince (SChen, DepaThen,
RDSS(chosen ranprocessing tion, 10 batChinese herbeen foundcation
andon their diftics, it turnewhile the rsamples weminimize aroasted
vouMateria Me
PhosphoSinopharm tonitrile anThermoFishwas lteredEquipment
2.2. Sample
The testefor 1 min, aple powder80% methanextract,
themembrane,analysis. Thfor HPLC asamples sta
2.3. Chrom
All HPLseries (Shana LPG-3400an injectorment, a
DADworkstation
(4.6 mm 250 mm, 5 m) (Shanghai, China) was used. The mobilephase
consisted of 1% phosphoric acid (A) and acetonitrile (B).The
gradient program was developed as follows: 1014% B for012 min, keep
14% B for 1218 min, 1419% B for 1830 min, stay
for 3 min,
min.raturd th
ethod
testsed aslicatiy. Siallel d byratur
ata a
C ch autosing.tion s) (Co
wasmonhenmmoativeted sr statnd Pm.
ults
ptimi
ordetion tion)nol, 81 h, 1e rean uso folventitionted crepa
h.
ptimi
bile nolan, wc behtter ns (fred, l to iiffereocessed DSS were
found and how they change in theocessing was also analyzed.ioned
above, there are plenty of adulterants of DSS inarkets. Meanwhile,
DSS are mixed with the seeds of
cinal herbs as a result of the huge price difference [19].y,
HPLC ngerprints from the seeds of Plantago depressa) were also
obtained to compare with that of DSS, andso conducted to
differentiate them. Moreover, in orderthe inuence on the quality of
PDS caused by varyingg degree, chromatographic ngerprints of
mixtures ofoportions of DSS and PDS were performed.
ls and methods
als and reagents
es of raw DSS were purchased from different Chineseerbs
suppliers in the Chinese herbal medicine marketozhou, Anhui
Province (Samples 19) and Anguo, Hebeiamples 1021), and
authenticated by professor Suiqingrtment of Pharmacognosy of Henan
University of TCM.
(Samples 2235) were produced by roasting raw DSSdomly from 21
batches of raw samples) according to themethod described in Chinese
Pharmacopeia. In addi-ches of PDS (Samples 3645) were obtained from
thebal medicine market in Anguo where these seeds have
occasionally mixed with DSS. After the careful identi-
authentication of these 10 batches of samples basedference in
morphological and microscopic characteris-d out that only samples
38, 44, 45 were unadulteratedemaining were more or less mingled
with DSS. All there stored in a dry ambience at constant
temperature tony changes through degradation, and all the raw
andcher specimens were deposited in institute of Chinesedica, China
Academy of Chinese Medical Science.ric acid (guaranteed reagent)
was purchased fromChemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Ace-d methanol for HPLC analysis were supplied byer Scientic Inc.
(Shanghai, China). The water used
with the solvent lter (Tianjin Jinteng Experiment Co., Ltd.,
Tianjing, China).
preparation
d samples were crushed into powder with a pulverizernd passed
through a 65 m-mesh sieve. Each sam-
(1.0 g) was weighed accurately and reuxed in 20 mLol solution
for 30 min. The residue was sifted from then this solution was
ltered with a 0.45 m microporous
and a 5 L aliquot of the ltrate was injected for HPLCe extract
solutions of all the samples were summitednalysis within 24 h after
preparation to maintain thebility.
atographic conditions
C analyses were performed with a Dionex U-3000ghai, China)
equipped with a SR-3000 Solvent Rack,SDN Quaternary Pump, a
WPS-3000SL Auto sampler,
with a 100 L loop, a TCC-3000RS Column compart--3000RS detector
and Chromeleon 7 chromatography. A Thermo Scientic Acclaim TM
120-C18 column
19% B 40505155tempe5 L an
2.4. M
All preparby repper dain parassessetempe
2.5. D
HPLgratedprocesevalua2004 Asampleones aplate. Tand coThe
relcalculafurthe16.0, aprogra
3. Res
3.1. O
In extracextracmetha(0.5 h, test. Thtive thwas altion soIn
addextracwere pfor 0.5
3.2. O
Momethasolutiographiwas besolutiocompahelpfuLast, d035 min,
1925% B for 3540 min, maintain 25% B for 2540% B for 5051 min, and
nally hold 40% B for
The ow rate was kept at 1.0 mL/min and the columne was
maintained at 30 C. The injection volume wase detective wavelength
was selected at 330 nm.
ology validation
below were carried out on the raw DSS extract solutions
described in Section 2.2. The precision was determinedng HPLC
injections of the same sample solution 6 timesx independent samples
were extracted and analyzedfor the evaluation of repeatability. The
stability was
measuring a single sample solution stored at roome for 0 h, 2 h,
4 h, 8 h, 16 h, and 24 h.
nalysis
romatographic data of the 45 tested samples were inte-matically
and exported as *.AIA format les for further
First, the *.AIA les were imported into the similarityystem for
chromatographic ngerprint of TCM (Versionmmittee for the
Pharmacopeia of PR China.). A reference
selected stochastically from the most representationalg the
middle of analysis sequence to generate a tem-, all of the samples
were overlaid based on the template,n peaks were rstly aligned to
the ones in the template.
retention time (RRT) and relative peak area (RPA)
wereimultaneously and can be exported as an excel le foristical
analysis. HCA and PCA were obtained by SPSSLS-DA was conducted by
the SIMCA-p 13.0 software
and discussion
zation of extraction conditions
r to obtain satisfactory extraction efciency, themethods
(reuxing, ultrasonic and cold-macerating, extraction solvents (20%
methanol, 40% methanol, 60%0% methanol and 100% methanol) and
extraction time.5 h, 2 h, and 2.5 h) were optimized by using
univariatesult indicated that reuxing extraction was more
effec-ltrasonic extraction and cold-macerating extraction. Itund
that 80% methanol was the most efcient extrac-
among the tested different concentrations of methanol., it was
demonstrated that most components could beompletely within 0.5 h.
Finally, the sample solutionsred by reuxing extraction with 20 mL
80% methanol
zation of chromatographic conditions
phases, such as methanolwater, acetonitrilewater,cid aqueous
solution, and acetonitrileacid aqueousere examined and compared to
obtain good chromato-avior. As a result, acetonitrileacid aqueous
solutionthan others. Moreover, different kinds of acid aqueousormic
acid, acetic acid and phosphoric acid) were alsoit was demonstrated
that phosphoric acid was moremprove the peak shape and resolution
of many peaks.nt concentrations of phosphoric acid (0.2%, 0.5%,
0.8%,
-
X. Zhou et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical
Analysis 111 (2015) 16 3
Fig. 1. The chromatographic ngerprints of DSS and PDS samples:
(A) DSS; (B) RDSS; (C) PDS sample 43 and (D) PDS sample 45.
and 1%) wecondition w
3.3. Method
RRT andthe estimatresults wertions (RSD)2.69% respetively; and
all results inHPLC-DAD
PLC
atchorres
nm, rintsatogrl peappea, 24en itre compared, and the data
indicated that the optimalas acetonitrile1% phosphoric acid aqueous
solution.
ology validation
RPA of ten characteristic peaks were calculated forion of
precision, repeatability and stability, and thee as follows:
precisionthe relative standard devia-
of RRT and RPA were found not to exceed 0.41% andctively;
repeatabilitybelow 0.19% and 2.77% respec-stabilityless than 0.27%
and 4.04% respectively. Thus,
3.4. H
45 btheir cat 330ngerpchromsevera41 disaas 4, 22
Wh
dicated that the quality of the studied samples and
themeasurements were stable and under control.
was appare44, 45 were
Fig. 2. (A) HCA of DSS and RDSS samples and (B) HCA ofngerprints
of DSS, RDSS and PDS
es of samples included 21 DSS, 14 RDSS and 10 PDS, andponding
chromatographic ngerprints were recordedwhich were showed in Fig.
1. For the chromatographic
of DSS and RDSS, it can be intuitively seen that manyaphic peaks
changed to varying degrees. For example,ks (25, 21) areas declined
obviously, and even peaks 28,red after processing. On the contrary,
many peaks, such, 26, 32 and 33, were present in the RDSS.
comes to the chromatographic ngerprints of 10 PDS, it
nt that the chromatographic ngerprints of samples 38,
different from that of the remaining samples because
DSS and PDS samples.
-
4 X. Zhou et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical
Analysis 111 (2015) 16
of the great variance of the existing conditions of ve main
peaks(13, 16, 18, 20, 25) located in 717 min, which were precisely
thecharacteristic and common peaks of DSS. In accordance with
theidentication result above, chromatographic ngerprints also
pro-vided more accurate and intuitive evidence.
3.5. HCA for identication of DSS and RDSS, DSS and PDS
HCA is a means of structuring a complex set of observationsinto
unique, mutually exclusive groups (clusters) of subjects sim-ilar
to each other with respect to certain characteristics [20,21].HCA
results of DSS and RDSS were showed in Fig. 2A. In a whole, itwas
evident that DSS and RDSS samples were clearly clustered intotwo
groups, which means that the processing procedures causedchanges in
the composition and/or content of components in DSS.
As for DSS and PDS, the HCA result (Fig. 2B) also conrmed
theobvious difference obtained by the chromatographic
ngerprintsdirectly, which perspicuously classied 10 PDS samples
into twogroups: 38, 44, 45 and the remaining samples.
3.6. PCA for identication of DSS and RDSS
Specically, PCA takes a data matrix of n objects by p
variables,which may be correlated, and summarizes it by
uncorrelated axes(principal components) that are linear
combinations of the originalp variables [22,23]. To achieve a
balance between clarity of repre-sentation and oversimplication, 52
peaks (variables), which werepresent in at least 10 samples, were
selected to conduct statisticalanalysis. The PC1 versus PC2 biplot
(Fig. 3) accounted for 57.38%data variance (PC1 = 45.80%, PC2 =
11.58%), and two clusters of DSSand RDSS were identied. The RDSS
objects with relatively high
Fig. 3. PCA biplots PC1-PC2 (57.38% data variance explained) of
DSS and RDSS sam-ples (the red circles represent 52 variables; the
blue circles stand for 35 samples).(For interpretation of the
references to color in this gure legend, the reader isreferred to
the web version of this article.)
positive scores on PC1, grouped together fairly tightly, while
mostDSS objects bunched together with negative PC1 scores. On PC2,
thetwo groups both had positive and negative scores. Thus, DSS
werediscriminated from RDSS on PC1. According to the contributions
toPC1 of all variables, it can be easily seen that many variables
wereresponsible for the composition of PC1, among them peaks 4,
26,24, 22 and 25 featured strongly in identifying DSS and RDSS.
Fig. 4. (A) PLS DSS and RDSS samples; (C) VIP (variable
importance for the project) plot ofPLS-DA of DSS-DA score scatter
plot of DSS and RDSS samples; (B) PLS-DA loading scatter plot of
and RDSS samples.
-
X. Zhou et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical
Analysis 111 (2015) 16 5
Fig. 5. Chrom DS; S2S5: 40% DSS + 6 : 80%
3.7. PLS-DA
As a supdifference aresponsibleations withcomponentDA was
alsoand RDSS whow 35 obsshowed theother patte
Moreovewhich dispthe dummyvicinity of tbetween thto the Y
variwere strong
In orderdiscriminat(Fig. 4C) wavariables boplot, many vthese
variabAmong theming consisteR2Y = 0.989the data an
3.8. The estmixtures of
Althoughnating DSSlimited bectication. Tdifferent pe90%. As it
is clustered todistributed
orateecoms w
fromssaryf difg adtely.
clus
ummPLS-Dinat
sultsplayeed af
it plly, srly, tatographic ngerprints of PDS mixed with
different percentages of DSS (S1: 100% P0% PDS; S6: 50% DSS + 50%
PDS; S7: 60% DSS + 40% PDS; S8: 70% DSS + 30% PDS; S9
for identication of DSS and RDSS
ervised recognition pattern, PLS-DA can maximize themong the
groups and aid in the screening of the markers
for class separation rather than explaining the vari-in a data
set [24,25]. In order to nd the potentials for the discrimination
between DSS and RDSS, PLS-
performed. First, a reasonably good separation of DSSas obtained
in the scatter plot (Fig. 4A), which displayedervations were
situated with respect to each other and
possible presence of outliers, groups, similarities andrns in
the data.r, the loading scatter plot (Fig. 4B) was also
conducted,layed the relation between the X-variables (52) and
Y-variables (2). By default, X-variables situated in thehe
Y-variables have the highest discriminatory powere classes. As
showed, variables 25, 4, 26, 24, stand closeables and far from the
origin, guring that such variablesly responsible for
discrimination.
to weigh the effect of importance of every variable onion, the
VIP (variable importance for the project) plot
incorpually bsampleeffectsis necetures ovaryinaccura
4. Con
In svised discrimThe re22, 32 emergmakesmentaSimilas performed,
which summarized the importance of theth to explain X and to
correlate to Y. According to the VIPariables had VIP-values larger
than 1, which meant thatles were primarily responsible for the
discrimination., 26, 24, 4, 25, 32, 22 had the largest VIP-values,
keep-nt with the analytical result above. With R2X = 0.528,, Q2 =
0.976, the PLS-DA model was demonstrated to td predict new data
well.
ablishment of chromatographic ngerprints ofdifferent proportions
of DSS and PDS
microscopic identication was efcient in discrimi- from PDS, the
application of the technique has stillause of its failure to
provide valid information on quan-hus, chromatographic ngerprints
of PDS mixed withrcentages of DSS were performed, ranging from 10%
toseen from Fig. 5, the chromatographic peaks of PDS weregether
after 30 min, while the peaks of DSS were mainlyin 520 min range.
When more than 30% DSS was
authenticitple more efof morpholidenticatiople, sensitivChinese
me
Acknowled
The authcation of al
References
[1] R.E. Blackrainia sop817824
[2] N.P. Bekkseeds, Ch
[3] K. Sun, Xthe seeds: 10% DSS + 90% PDS; S3: 20% DSS + 80%
PDS; S4: 30% DSS + 70% PDS;DSS + 20% PDS; S10: 10% DSS + 90% PDS;
S11: 100% DSS).
d into PDS, the front peaks belonging to DSS have grad-e the
main and strong peaks. Consequently, these
ere likely to produce completely different medicinal those pure
PDS when applied in clinic. As a result, it
to establish the chromatographic ngerprints of mix-ferent
proportions of DSS and PDS. That will provideulterating degree for
reference more intuitively and
ion
ary, whether the unsupervised HCA and PCA or super-A, both
proved to be satisfactory for matching anding the chromatographic
ngerprints of DSS and RDSS.
of PCA and PLS-DA indicated that peaks 26, 24, 4, 25,d
dominating roles. Obviously, many new componentster roasting. The
accurate orientation of these peaksossible to explain the
dissimilarity of efcacy funda-hining a spotlight for revealing
processing mechanism.his method can also be applied in the
identication of
y, which can detect the divergence among every sam-fectively and
precisely, making up for the subjectivityogical identication and
inconvenience of microscopicn. The developed method was
demonstrated to be sim-e and reproducible, and will be widely
adapted to otherdicinal herbs.
gments
ors are grateful to professor Suiqing Chen for authenti-l the
samples.
shaw, Control of stinkweed (Thlaspi arvense) and ixweed
(Descu-hia) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), Can. J. Plant Sci.
70 (1990).er, N.T. Ulchenko, A.I. Glushenkova, Lipids from
Descurainia sophiaem. Nat. Compd. 4 (2005) 346347.. Li, J.M. Liu,
J.H. Wang, W. Li, Y. Sha, A novel sulphur glycoside from
of Descurainia sophia (L.), J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 7 (2005)
853856.
-
6 X. Zhou et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical
Analysis 111 (2015) 16
[4] D.C. Tang, Processing of Chinese medicinal herbs, in:
Science of Chinese Mate-ria Medica, Publishing House of Shanghai
University of Traditional ChineseMedicine, Shanghai, 2003.
[5] C. Tistaert, B. Dejaegher, Y. Heyden, Chromatographic
separation techniquesand data handling methods for herbal
ngerprints: a review, Anal. Chim. Acta690 (2011) 148161.
[6] Y.N. Ni, Y.H. Lai, S. Brandes, S. Kokot, Multi-wavelength
HPLC ngerprints fromcomplex substances: an exploratory chemometrics
study of the Cassia seedexample, Anal. Chim. Acta 647 (2009)
149158.
[7] W.H. Lv, M.F. Ma, H.Y. Jiang, Evolution and exploration of
application ofprocessing of the seeds of Descurainia sophia (L.),
Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med. 28(2006) 517519.
[8] Q.F. Gong, Science of Processing Chinese Materia Medica,
Chinese Press of Tra-ditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 2003.
[9] I.K. Karabagias, A.V. Badeka, S. Kontakos, S. Karabournioti,
M.G. Kontominas,Botanical discrimination of Greek unioral honeys
with physico-chemical andchemometric analyses, Food Chem. 165
(2014) 181190.
[10] S.A. Drivelos, K. Higgins, J.H. Kalivas, S.A. Haroutounian,
C.A. Georgiou, Datafusion for food authentication. Combining rare
earth elements and trace metalsto discriminate Fava santorinis from
other yellow split peas using chemometrictools, Food Chem. 165
(2014) 316322.
[11] A. Palacios-Morillo, J.M. Jurado, A. Alcazar, F.D. Pablos,
Geographical charac-terization of Spanish PDO paprika by
multivariate analysis of multielementalcontent, Talanta 128 (2014)
1522.
[12] R. Moreno-Rojas, P.J. Sanchez-Segarra, F. Camara-Martos,
M.A. Amaro-Lopez,Multivariate analysis techniques as tools for
categorization of Southern Spanishcheeses: nutritional composition
and mineral content, Eur. Food Res. Technol.231 (2010) 841851.
[13] K. Chudzynski, J. Falandysz, Multivariate analysis of
elements content of LarchBolete (Suillus grevillei) mushroom,
Chemosphere 73 (2008) 12301239.
[14] S. Husted, B.F. Mikkelsen, J. Jensen, N.E. Nielsen,
Elemental ngerprint anal-ysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare) using
inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry, isotope-ratio mass spectrometry, and multivariate
statistics,Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 378 (2004) 171182.
[15] F. Camin, K. Wietzerbin, A.B. Cortes, G. Haberhauer, M.
Lees, G. Versini, Appli-cation of multielement stable isotope ratio
analysis to the characterization ofFrench, Italian, and Spanish
cheeses, J. Agric. Food Chem. 52 (2004) 65926601.
[16] C.H. Yu, C.Z. Wang, C.J. Zhou, B. Wang, L. Han, C.F. Zhang,
X.H. Wu, C.S. Yuan,Adulteration and cultivation region identication
of American ginseng usingHPLC coupled with multivariate analysis,
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 99 (2014)815.
[17] M.P. La, F. Zhang, S.H. Gao, X.W. Liu, Z.J. Wu, L.N. Sun,
X. Tao, W.S. Chen, Con-stituent analysis and quality control of
Lamiophlomis rotata by LC-TOF/MS andHPLC-UV, J. Pharm. Biomed.
Anal. 102 (2015) 366376.
[18] W.H. Wang, H.J. Dong, R.Y. Yan, H. Li, P.Y. Li, P. Chen, B.
Yang, Z.M. Wang, Com-parative study of lanostane-type triterpene
acids in different parts of Poria cocos(Schw.) Wolf by
UHPLC-Fourier transformation MS and UHPLC-triple quadru-ple MS, J.
Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 102 (2015) 203214.
[19] D. Guo, N.N. Chen, Identication of Descurainia sophia and
Semen plantaginis byHPCE, China Pharm. 20 (2009) 683684.
[20] K. Ann-Kathrin, G.T. William, W.M. Meinhardt, Hierarchical
cluster analysis(HCA) of microorganisms: an assessment of
algorithms for resonance Ramanspectra, Appl. Spectrosc. 65 (2011)
165170.
[21] S.K. Yan, W.F. Xin, G.A. Luo, Y.M. Wang, Y.Y. Cheng, An
approach to develop two-dimensional ngerprint for the quality
control of Qingkailing injection by high-performance liquid
chromatography with diode array detection, J. Chromatogr.A 1090
(2005) 9097.
[22] I.E. Frank, J.H. Friedman, A statistical view of some
chemometrics regressiontools, Technometrics 35 (1993) 109135.
[23] T. Naes, U. Indahl, A unied description of classical
classication methods formulticollinear data, J. Chemom. 12 (1998)
205220.
[24] M. Barker, W. Rayens, PLS for discrimination, J. Chemom. 17
(2003) 166173.[25] S. Bougeard, M. Hana, E.M. Qannari, Continuum
redundancyPLS regression:
a simple continuum approach, Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 52 (2008)
36863696.
Chemometric analyses for the characterization of raw and
processed seeds of Descurainia sophia (L.) based on HPLC
fingerpr...1 Introduction2 Materials and methods2.1 Materials and
reagents2.2 Sample preparation2.3 Chromatographic conditions2.4
Methodology validation2.5 Data analysis
3 Results and discussion3.1 Optimization of extraction
conditions3.2 Optimization of chromatographic conditions3.3
Methodology validation3.4 HPLC fingerprints of DSS, RDSS and PDS3.5
HCA for identification of DSS and RDSS, DSS and PDS3.6 PCA for
identification of DSS and RDSS3.7 PLS-DA for identification of DSS
and RDSS3.8 The establishment of chromatographic fingerprints of
mixtures of different proportions of DSS and PDS
4 ConclusionAcknowledgmentsReferences