8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
1/34
Epigenetics andthe EnvironmentalRegulation of the Genomeand Its Function
Tie-Yuan Zhang and Michael J. Meaney
Sackler Program for Epigenetics and Psychobiology of McGill University, Douglas Ment
Health University Institute and the Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Montreal,Quebec, H4H 1R3 Canada; email: [email protected]
Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2010. 61:43966
TheAnnual Review of Psychologyis online atpsych.annualreviews.org
This articles doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163625
Copyright c2010 by Annual Reviews.All rights reserved
0066-4308/10/0110-0439$20.00
Key Words
maternal care, stress responses, DNA methylation, gene x
environment interactions, glucocorticoid receptor
Abstract
There are numerous examples in psychology and other disciplines o
the enduring effects of early experience on neural function. In this article, we review the emerging evidence for epigenetics as a candidate
mechanism for these effects. Epigenetics refers to functionally relevanmodifications to the genome that do not involve a change in nucleotid
sequence. Such modifications include chemical marks that regulate th
transcription of the genome. There is now evidence that environmental events can directly modify the epigenetic state of the genome. Thu
studies with rodent models suggest that during both early develop
ment and in adult life, environmental signals can activate intracellulapathways that directly remodel the epigenome, leading to changes ingene expression and neural function. These studies define a biologica
basis for the interplay between environmental signals and the genomin the regulation of individual differences in behavior, cognition, an
physiology.
439
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
2/34
Phenotype: any
observablecharacteristic or traitof an organism, such asits morphology,development,biochemical orphysiologicalproperties, or behavior
Contents
INTRODUCTION .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440GENE TRANSCRIPTION .. . . . . . . . . 441
Chromatin Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . 442Regulation of Glucocorticoid
Receptor Expression . . . . . . . . . . . . 443
ENVIRONMENTALPROGRAMMING OF
GENE EXPRESSION..... . . . . . . . . 444EPIGENETIC REGULATION
OF THE GENOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446Epigenetics and the
Social Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449THE FUNCTIONAL
IMPORTANCE OF THESOCIAL IMPRINT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451
ACTIVITY-DEPENDENT
REGULATION OFTHE EPIGENOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452Summary (and Perhaps
Some Constraints) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455
EPIGENETICS ANDMENTAL HEALTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 456
CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 458
INTRODUCTION
Psychology has seen a major transition in
personality theory. Personality traits were oncethought to emerge under the dominion of
influences associated with nurture. The post-natal family environment was considered as the
primary candidate force in the developmentof individual differences in personality. This
perspective changed dramatically in responseto integration of the biological sciences into
personality psychology. First, evolutionary ap-proaches established the idea that the brain and
its development, like any other organ, are sub-
ject to evolutionary forces. Second, behavioralgenetics (Ebstein 2006, Kendler 2001, Plomin
& Rutter 1998) provided evidence for a relationbetween variation at the level of the genome
and that in personality and mental health.Although efforts to quantify the independent
contribution of genetic and environmental
influences are fraught with complications (e
geneenvironment interactions, nongenommechanisms of inheritance), measures of co
cordance in specific traitsbetween monozygo
and dizygotic twins, among other approachsuggest a pervasive influence of genetic var
tion. Indeed, it is impossible to imagine thatfunction of brain cells could occur independ
of variations in the genes that encode proteins that regulate neuronal functions.
Genomic variation at the level of nucleotsequence is associated with individual diff
ences in personality and thus with vulnerabity and resistance to a wide range of chro
illness (Ebstein 2006, Meyer-LindenbergWeinberger 2006, Rutter 2007). Such var
tions can take multiple forms, including vaation at the level of (a) a single nucleotide (i
single-nucleotide polymorphisms or SNP
(b) variation in the number of nucleotide peats (i.e., variable number of tandem repeat
VNTRs), or (c) chromosomal reorganizatiEach form of variation can potentially alter
nomic function and thus phenotype. The chlenge for psychology is that of conceptually
tegrating findings from genetics into the stuof personality and our understanding of t
pathophysiology of mental illness. Howand uder what conditions does genomic variation
fluence brain development and function? Hmight relevant findings from the field of g
netics influence the design of public policy a
therapies in psychology?It is important to note the simple f
that genes encode for protein, not functiThus, as described below, the effects of gene
variation are contextually determined and bconsidered as probabilistic. Cellular functi
can only be understood in terms of the constdialogue that occurs between the genome a
its environment. The environment regulathe cellular signals that control the operat
of the genome. The objective of this reviis to describe recent advances in molecu
biology, notably in the field of epigenetics, a
to suggest that epigenetic mechanisms areideal candidate mechanism for the effects
environmental signals, including events su
440 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
3/34
as social interactions, on the structure and
function of the genome (Harper 2005). Theintent is to first consider the processes by which
cellular signals, referred to as transcription
factors, regulate the activity (or expression)of a gene. The biological primacy of gene
environment interactions is apparent from thesimple realization that the levels and the activ-
ity of these transcription factors is controlledby environmental signals. Thus the operation
of the genome is dependent upon context. Thequestion concerns the mechanisms responsible
for such contextual influences. We suggestthat epigenetics is one such process and can
account, in part, for instances in which envi-ronmental events occurring at any time over
the lifespan exert a sustained effect on genomic
function and phenotype.Epigenetics signals refer to a series of chem-
ical modifications to the DNA or to regionssurrounding the DNA. The transcriptional
activity of the genome is regulated by signals,transcription factors, that physically bind to
specific DNA sites. The importance of epige-netics mechanisms lies in the ability to regulate
the ease with which transcription factors canaccess the DNA. Epigenetic signals can thus
determine the capacity for environmentalregulation of the genome. There is emerging
evidence for the idea that epigenetic marks are
directly altered in early life by environmentalevents and thus influence the development
of individual differences in specific neuralfunctions that underlie cognition and emotion.
More recent studies suggest that dynamicalterations in these same epigenetic signals are
crucial for the synaptic remodeling that medi-ates learning and memory. Thus, epigenetics
provides a remarkable insight into the biologythat governs the function of the genome in
response to environmental signals.
GENE TRANSCRIPTION
The most compelling evidence for the pre-
dominance of geneenvironment interactionsin cellular function emerges from the study of
gene transcription [Gilbert (2006) provides a
Gene transcriptionthe synthesis of RNAunder the direction DNA. RNA synthesis the process oftranscribing DNA
nucleotide sequenceinformation into RNsequence informatio
Receptor: a proteinembedded in eitherthe plasma membranor cytoplasm of a ceto which a mobilesignaling molecule(ligand) may bind. Tsignaling molecule cbe a peptide, ahormone, a
pharmaceutical drugor a toxin, and whensuch binding occursthe receptor goes inta conformationalchange that ordinariinitiates a cellularresponse
Chromatin: thecombination of DNARNA, and protein thmakes upchromosomes. The
major components ochromatin are DNAand histone proteins
very clear and well-illustrated description]. The
transcription of the genome is a highly regu-lated event. At the heart of this process lies a
class of proteins referred to as transcription fac-
tors. As the name implies, these proteins havethe ability to bind to regulatory elements of the
gene and to activate or repress gene transcrip-tion. Importantly, the expression and activation
of the transcription factors themselves are dy-namically regulated by environmental signals.
Many of the earliest cellular responses to envi-ronmental stimuli involve either the activation
of pre-existing transcriptional signals throughchemical modifications such as phosphoryla-
tion (i.e., the addition of a phosphate) of spe-cific amino acids of the protein, or an increase
in gene expression that results in the rapid syn-
thesis of proteins (e.g., immediate early geneproducts) that then serve to regulate the ac-
tivity of other genes. This includes genes thatare involved in synaptic plasticity. The bind-
ing of transcription factors to DNA sites is thebiological machinery for the dynamic gene
environment interactions that result in alteredrates of gene transcription.
Figure 1 portrays the organization of theglucocorticoid receptor gene as an example of
genomic organization and a target for discus-sion below. The schema is actually somewhat
misleading. For reasons of graphic simplicity,
we often describe the organization of a geneor the interactions between transcription
factors and DNA as if the DNA were a linearmolecule to which transcription factors gain
unimpeded access. The reality of proteinDNA interactions is very different. Figure 2
presents the classic crystallographic analysis ofthe organization of DNA (Luger et al. 1997).
DNA is organized into units referred to asnucleosomes, each of which contains about
145150 base pairs wrapped around a coreregion of histone proteins (Turner 2001). The
histones and DNA together are referred to as
chromatin; the nucleosome is the organizationof chromatin. Under normal conditions there
is a tight physical relation between the histoneproteins and its accompanying DNA, resulting
in a rather closed nucleosome configuration.
www.annualreviews.org Epigenetics and the Environment 441
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
4/34
..tggg16cggggg17cgggag.
11 14 15 1617 18 19 110 111 2
NGFI-A
GR Promoter 17 Sequence
9
Regulatory (non-coding) region Coding region
Figure 1
A schema describing the organization of the rat glucocorticoid receptor gene including 9 exon regions.Exons 29 participate in the coding for the glucocorticoid receptor protein. Exon 1 is composed of multipregulatory regions, each of which is capable of activating gene transcription (i.e., promoter sequences). Tactivity of the various exon 1 promoters is tissue-specific, with evidence suggesting that certain promotersare more active in areas such as liver or thymus, and others are more active in brain (e.g., exon 1 7; based oMcCormick et al. 2000; see Turner & Muller 2005 for comparable data in humans). The use of multiplepromoters permits regulation in one tissue independently from other regions (i.e., increased glucocorticoreceptor in pulmonary tissues prior to birth that is necessary for respiratory competency at parturition, whmaintaining reduced glucocorticoid receptor levels in brain, where glucocorticoid effects might inhibitneurogenesis). The consensus binding site for nerve growth factorinducible factor A (NGFI-A) lying witthe exon 17promoter is highlighted. The reader should note that this organization is not necessarily typicRegulatory elements (promoters or enhancers) can exist between exons (i.e., within introns) or at sites thaare either 5 or 3 to the coding region, sometimes at considerable distances.
Enzyme: a molecule,usually protein, thatcatalyzes (i.e., increasesthe rate of ) a specificchemical reaction
Histone deacetylases(HDACs): a class ofenzymes that removeacetyl groups from an-N-acetyl lysineamino acid on a
histone. The action ofHDACs is thus theopposite to that ofhistoneacetyltransferases, andHDACs are associatedwith transcriptionalsilencing
This restrictive configuration is maintained,
in part, by electrostatic bonds between thepositively charged histones and the negatively
charged DNA. The closed configurationimpedes transcription factor binding and
is associated with a reduced level of geneexpression. An increase in transcription factor
binding to DNA and the subsequent activationof gene expression commonly requires chem-
ical modification of the chromatin that occurson thehistone proteins. The primary targets for
such events are the amino acids that form thehistone tails extending from the nucleosome
(Figure 2). These modifications alter chro-matin in a manner that either increases or
decreases the ability of transcription factorsto access regulatory sites on the DNA thatcontrol gene transcription.
Chromatin Modifications
The dynamic alteration of chromatin structure
is achieved through modifications to thehistone
proteins at the amino acids that form the
stone protein tails that extend out from tnucleosome (Figure 2). These modificatio
are achieved through a series of enzymes tbind to the histone tails and modify the
cal chemical properties of specific amino ac(Grunstein 1997, Hake & Allis 2006, Jenuw
& Allis 2001). For example, the enzyme histoacetyltransferase transfers an acetyl group on
specific lysines on the histone tails. The adtion of the acetyl group diminishes the posit
charge, loosening the relation between the stones and DNA, opening the chromatin a
improving the ability of transcription factorsaccess DNA sites. Thus, histone acetylation
specific lysine sites is commonly associatedwactive gene transcription.
The functional antagonists of the histo
acetyltransferases are a class of enzymes knoas histone deacetylases (HDACs). These e
zymes remove acetyl groups and prevent fther acetylation, thus maintaining a clo
442 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
5/34
chromatin structure, decreasing transcription
factor and gene expression. Both the acety-lation and deacetylation of histones are dy-
namic processes that are regulated by environ-
mental signals. Indeed, a number of proteinsthat were known to be associated with tran-
scriptional activation (e.g., transcriptional co-factors) have been identified as histone acetyl-
transferases. These factors enhance the efficacyof transcription factors by opening chromatin
and thus increasing the binding of the factor tothe regulatory regions of the gene.
The reader should note that there are ac-tually multiple modifications to histone tails,
including methylation (in this case on the hi-stones), phosphorylation, and ubiquitination.
For the sake of simplicity, the discussion is lim-
ited to histone acetylation/deacetylation.
Regulation of GlucocorticoidReceptor Expression
The neurotransmitter serotonin (5-
hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) regulates glu-cocorticoid receptor gene transcription in
hippocampal neurons (Figure 3; Mitchell et al.1990, 1992; Weaver et al. 2007). This effect
is dependent upon the binding of the tran-
scription factor nerve growth factorinduciblefactor A (NGFI-A) to a specific binding site
on the exon 17 glucocorticoid (GR) promoter(Figure 1). The importance of this interaction
can be precisely defined. For example, mutatinga single nucleotide, in this case simply exchang-
ing a cytosine for an adenine, in the regionof the promoter that normally binds NGFI-A
abolishes the ability of NGFI-A to associatewith the exon 17 promoter and eliminates
the effect of NGFI-A on gene transcription(Weaver et al. 2007). However, the ability of
NGFI-A to bind to the exon 17 promoter is
regulated by another protein, a transcriptionalcofactor, the CREB-binding protein, that is
activated by the same 5-HT-cyclic adenosinemonophosphate (cAMP)/cyclic nucleotide
dependent kinases (PKA)-signaling cascadethat results in the increased levels of NGFI-A
(Figure 3). The CREB-binding protein is a
Histoneacetyltransferases:enzymes that acetylalysine amino acids ohistone proteins bytransferring an acety
group from acetyl Cto form -N-acetyllysine. Histoneacetylation isassociated with theactivation of genetranscription
Promoter: a regionDNA that facilitatesthe transcription of particular gene.Promoters aretypically located nea
the genes theyregulate, on the samstrand and upstreamfrom the coding regi
histone acetyltransferase. The association of
the CREB-binding protein with the exon 17promoter is accompanied by an increase in
the acetylation of a specific lysine on the tail
of histone 3 of the exon 17 promoter (Weaveret al. 2004, 2007). Thus, 5-HT activates both
NGFI-A and the CREB-binding protein.Interestingly, NGFI-A and the CREBbinding
protein physically associate with one anotherprior to DNA binding. The CREBbinding
protein acetylates histones associated withthe exon 17 promoter, enhancing the abil-
ity of NGFI-A to bind and activate genetranscription.
Environmental signals alter 5-HT activity.Indeed, the effect of 5-HT on glucocorticoid
receptor expression reflects the dependency
of gene transcription on signals that derivefrom environmental events (note that the
relevant environmental event may be internalor external to the organism; e.g., a change
in the availability of glucose, an electricalimpulse, or a social interaction). Such effects
underlie the dynamic interdependence of geneand environment. However, psychologists, and
in particular developmental psychologists, arefamiliar with more enduring environmental
influences; instances where experience inearly life has shaped neural development and
function in a manner that is sustained into
adulthood. Such effects are considered as thebasis for environmental influences over the de-
velopment of individual differences. In certaincases, the sustained effects of early experience
have been associated with structural alterationsin neural circuits that mediate specific func-
tions. The process of sexual differentiationamong vertebrates provides excellent examples
where environmental signals lead to differencesin morphology and thus to gender. However,
more recent studies suggest another form ofenvironmentally regulated plasticity that exists
at the level of genome itself. Such effects ap-
pear to involve the modification of epigeneticmarks on the DNA. These studies suggest
that environmental events alter the activity ofspecific intracellular signals that modify the
nature of the epigenetic marks at specific sites
www.annualreviews.org Epigenetics and the Environment 443
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
6/34
in the genome, leading to sustained effects on
gene expression and thus neural function.
ENVIRONMENTALPROGRAMMING OFGENE EXPRESSION
Studies in developmental psychobiology and
physiology are replete with examples of theenvironmental programming of gene expres-
sion. Such studies commonly report that a vari-ation in the early environment associates with
changes in gene expression and biological func-tion that persists into adulthood and thus well
beyond the duration of the relevant environ-mental event. In the rat, for example, prena-
tal nutrient deprivation or enhanced exposure
to hormonal signals associated with stress sta-bly alter, or program, the activity of genes in
the liver and other sites that are associatedwith glucose and fat metabolism, including the
gene for the glucocorticoid receptor (Batesonet al. 2004; Gluckman & Hanson 2004, 2007;
Jirtle & Skinner 2007; Meaney et al. 2007;Seckl & Holmes 2007). These findings are as-
sumed to represent instances in which the op-eration of a genomic region in adulthood varies
as a function of early environmental influences.The results of recent studies suggest that such
programming effects can derive from gene
environment interactions in early life that leadto a structural alteration of the DNA, which
in turn mediates the effects on gene expressionas well as more complex levels of phenotype
( Jirtle & Skinner 2007, Meaney 2007, Meaney& Szyf 2005). These studies were performed
in rodents but were inspired by the vast lit-erature reporting the pervasive effects of fam-
ily environment on health outcomes in humans(Repetti et al. 2002). No less compelling are the
results of studies on maternaleffects in plants,insects, reptiles, and birds showing that varia-
tions in nongenomic signals of maternal ori-
gin associate with sustained effects on the phe-notype of the offspring (Cameron et al. 2005,
Mousseau & Fox 1998, Rossiter 1998).The objective of these studies is to examine
the biological mechanisms whereby variations
in motherinfant interactions might directly
fluence gene expression and behavior (Mean2001). Such studies focus on variations
maternal behavior that lie within the normrange for the species, in this case the Norw
rat, and that occur in the absence of a
experimental manipulations (i.e., naturally curring variations in motherpup interaction
Variations on maternal care in the rat are stuied with simple, albeit very time-consumi
observations on animals in their home ca(Champagne 2008, Champagne et al. 200
One behavior, pup licking/grooming (Lemerges as highly variable across mothers. P
LG is a major source of tactile stimulatifor the neonatal rat that regulates endocr
and cardiovascular function in the pup (Ho2005, Levine 1994, Schanberg et al. 1984). T
question then was whether such variations
pup LG might directly alter the developmof individual differences in behavior a
physiology. For the studies reviewed hethe focus is on the development of individ
differences in defensive responses.Subsequent findings revealed considera
evidence for the effect of maternal care the behavioral and endocrine responses
stress in the offspring. The male or femadult offspring of mothers that natur
exhibit increased levels of pup LG (i.e., toffspring of high-LG mothers) show m
modest behavioral and endocrine responses
stress compared to animals reared by low-Lmothers (Caldji et al. 1998, Francis et al. 19
Liu et al. 1997, Menard et al. 2004, Toki et2007, Weaver et al. 2004). Specifically,
offspring of high-LG mothers show reducfearfulness and more modest hypothalam
pituitary-adrenal (HPA) responses to strCross-fostering studies, where pups born
high-LG mothers are fostered at birth low-LG mothers (and vice versa), revea
direct relationship between maternal cand the postnatal development of individ
differences in behavioral and HPA respon
to stress (Caldji et al. 2000, 2003; Francis et1999; Weaver et al. 2004). In these studies,
rearing mother determined the phenotype
444 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
7/34
Hypothalamus
Pituitary
Adrenals
Hippocampus Hippocampus
Glucocorticoids
() ()
()
()
()
()
()
CRF
ACTH
()
Hypothalamus
Pituitary
AdrenalsGlucocorticoids
()
CRF
ACTH
()
Figure 4
A schema outlining the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the nexus of which are the
corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) neurons of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. CRF isreleased into the portal system of the anterior pituitary, stimulating the synthesis and release ofadrenocorticotropin (ACTH), which then stimulates adrenal glucocorticoid release. Glucocorticoids act onglucocorticoid receptors in multiple brain regions, including the hippocampus, to inhibit the synthesis andrelease of CRF (i.e., glucocorticoid negative feedback). The adult offspring of high-LG mothers, bycomparison to those of low-LG dams, show (a) increased glucocorticoid receptor expression, (b) enhancednegative-feedback sensitivity to glucocorticoids, (c) reduced CRF expression in the hypothalamus, and(d) more modest pituitary-adrenal responses to stress.
the offspring. Thus variations within a normal
range of parental care can dramatically alterphenotypic development in the rat.
The effects of maternal care on the devel-opment of defensive responses to stress in the
rat involve alterations in the function of thecorticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) systems
in selected brain regions (Figure 4). The CRF
system furnishes the critical signal for the acti-vation of behavioral, emotional, autonomic, and
endocrine responses to stressors (Bale & Vale2004, Koob et al. 1994, Plotsky et al. 1989). As
adults, the offspring of high-LG mothers showdecreased CRF expression in the hypothalamus
as well as reduced plasma ACTH and gluco-
corticoid responses to acute stress by compar-ison to the adult offspring of low-LG mothers(Francis et al. 1999; Liu et al. 1997; Weaveret al.
2004, 2005). Circulating glucocorticoids act atglucocorticoid receptor sites in corticolimbic
structures, such as thehippocampus, to regulate
HPA activity (Figure 4). Such feedback effects
commonly inhibit hypothalamic CRF expres-
sion. The high-LG offspring showed signif-icantly increased hippocampal glucocorticoid
receptor expression, enhanced glucocorticoidnegative feedback sensitivity, and decreased hy-
pothalamic CRF levels. Indeed, the magnitudeof the glucocorticoid response to acute stress
is significantly correlated with the frequency of
pup LG during the first week of life, as is thelevel of both hippocampal glucocorticoid re-
ceptor andhypothalamicCRF expression (all rs>0.70; Liu et al. 1997). Importantly, pharmaco-
logicalmanipulationsthatblocktheeffectoftheglucocorticoid receptor eliminate the maternal
effect on the HPA response to stress, suggesting
that the differences in hippocampal glucocorti-coid receptor expression are directly related tothose at the level of HPA function.
Pup LG is a major source of tactile stimula-tion for the neonate. Experimental models that
directly apply tactile stimulation, through the
stroking of the pup with a brush, provide direct
www.annualreviews.org Epigenetics and the Environment 445
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
8/34
evidence for the importance of tactile stimu-
lation derived from pup LG. Thus, strokingpups over the first week of life increases hip-
pocampal glucocorticoid receptor expression
( Jutapakdeegul et al. 2003) and dampens be-havioral and HPA responses to stress (Bur-
ton et al. 2007, Gonzalez et al. 2001). Like-wise, manipulations of lactating mothers that
directly increase the frequency of pup LGalso increase hippocampal glucocorticoid re-
ceptor expression and decrease HPA responsesto stress (Francis et al. 1999, Toki et al. 2007).
Manipulations, notably stressors imposed onthemother, that decrease pupLG areassociated
with increased behavioral and HPA responsesto stress and are associated with decreased hip-
pocampal glucocorticoid receptor expression
and increased hypothalamic expression of CRF(Champagne & Meaney 2006, Fenoglio et al.
2005).The offspring of the high-LG and low-LG
mothers also differ in behavioral responses tonovelty (Caldji et al. 1998, Francis et al. 1999,
Zhang et al. 2004). As adults, the offspringof the high-LG mothers show decreased star-
tle responses, increased open-field exploration,and shorter latencies to eat food provided in
a novel environment. There are also behav-ioral differences in response to more precise
forms of threat. Thus, the offspring of low-
LG mothers show greater burying of an elec-trified probe in the defensive burying paradigm
(Menard et al. 2004), which involves an activeresponse to a threat. These differences in be-
havioral responses to stress are associated withaltered activity in the CRF system that links
the amygdala (and bed nucleus of the stria ter-minalis) to the noradrenergic cells of the locus
coeruleus (Caldji et al. 1998, Zhang et al. 2004).The results of these studies suggest that the
behavior of the mother toward her offspringcan program stable changes in gene expres-
sion that then serve as the basis for individual
differences in behavioral and neuroendocrineresponses to stress in adulthood. The maternal
effects on phenotype are associated with sus-tained changes in the expression of genes in
brain regions that mediate responses to stress
and form the basis for stable individual diff
ences in stress reactivity. These findings pvide a potential mechanism for the influen
of parental care on vulnerability/resistancestress-induced illness over the lifespan. But
critical issue is simply that of how mater
care might stably affect gene expression. Hare variations in the social interactions betw
the mother and her offspring biologically ebedded so as to stably alter the activity of s
cific regions of the genome? The answersthese questions appear to involve the abil
of social interactions in early developmentstructurally modify relevant genomic regio
For the sake of this review, we focus on the mternal effect on the regulation of hippocam
glucocorticoid receptor expression.
EPIGENETIC REGULATIONOF THE GENOME
The molecular processes that lead to the inittion of gene transcription involve modificatio
to the histone proteins that form the core ofnucleosome (Figure 2). Such modificati
open chromatin, permitting transcriptfactor binding and the activation of g
transcription. A second level of regulat
occurs not on the histone proteins, but rathdirectly on the DNA. Indeed, the classic e
genetic alteration is that of DNA methylatiwhich involves the addition of a methyl gro
(CH3) onto cytosines in the DNA (Bird 19Holliday 1989, Razin & Riggs 1980). DN
methylation is associated with the silencof gene transcription. This effect appears
be mediated in one of two ways (Bird 200First, wide swaths of densely methylated DN
preclude transcription factor binding to DNsites, thus silencing gene expression. The s
ond manner is subtler and probably far mo
prevalent in regions with more dynamic vaations in gene transcription, such as the bra
In this case, selected cytosines are methylatand the presence of the methyl group attra
a class of proteins know as methylated-DNbinding proteins (Klose & Bird 2007). Th
proteins, in turn, attract an entire cluster
446 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
9/34
proteins that form a repressor complex, which
includes active mediators of gene silencing.The HDACs are a critical component of the
repressor complex. HDACs prevent histone
acetylation and favor a closed chromatin statethat constrains transcription factor binding
and gene expression (Figure 2and see above).Compounds that inhibit HDACs can thus
increase transcription from methylated DNA.When we think of genomic influences, we
most commonly imagine effects associated withvariation in nucleotide sequence. Yet this is only
one form of information contained within thegenome. Despite the reverence afforded DNA,
a gene is basically like any other molecule inthe cell; it is subject to physical modifications.
As described above, these modifications alter
the structure and chemical properties of theDNA and thus gene expression. Collectively,
themodifications to the DNA andits chromatinenvironment can be considered as an additional
layer of information that is contained within thegenome. This information is thus epigenetic in
nature (the name derives from the Greek epimeaning upon and genetics). The acetylation
of histone proteins or the methylation of DNAare examples of epigenetic modifications. Epi-
genetic modifications do not alter the sequencecomposition of the genome. Instead, these epi-
genetic marks on the DNA and the histone pro-
teins of the chromatin regulate the operation ofthe genome. Thus, epigenetics has been de-
fined as a functional modification to the DNAthat does not involve an alteration of sequence
(Waddington 1957). Although this definitionhas been subjected to revision (Bird 2007, Hake
& Allis 2006), the essential features of epige-netic mechanisms are (a) structural modifica-
tions to chromatin either at the level of the hi-stone proteins (Figure 2) or the DNA, (b) the
associated regulation of the structure and func-tion of chromatin, (c) the downstream effects
on gene expression, and (d) the fact that these
effects occur in the absence of any change innucleotide sequence.
The methylation of DNA in mammals is anactive biochemical modification that selectively
targets cytosines and is achieved through the
actions of enzymes, DNA methyltransferases,
that transfer the methyl groups from methyldonors. There are two critical features to DNA
methylation: First, it is a stable chemical modi-fication, and second, it is associated with the si-
lencing of gene transcription (Bestor 1998, Bird
2002, Bird & Wolffe 1999, Razin 1998).Until very recently, it wasthought that DNA
methylation patterns on the genome were over-laid upon the genome only during early peri-
ods in embryonic development. Indeed, DNAmethylation is considered as a fundamental
feature of cell differentiation. It is importantto consider a simple feature of cell biology:
All cells in the body generally share the sameDNA. Thus, the processes of cell specializa-
tion, whereby liver cells specialize in functionsrelated to energy metabolism and brain cells
establish the capacity for learning and memory,
involve silencing certain regions of the genomein a manner that is specific for each cell type.
Genes associated with gluconeogenesis are si-lenced in brain cells but remain active in liver
cells. Such processes define the function of thecell type (e.g., Fan et al. 2005). DNA methyla-
tion is considered as a mechanism for the ge-nomic silencing that underlies cell specializa-
tion. Such events occur early in developmentand are considered to be highly stable,such that
dedifferentiation (whereby a cell loses its spe-cialization) is rare and often is associated with
organ dysfunction.Thus DNA methylation was considered
both unique to early periods in develop-
ment and irreversible. Experimental modelscommonly used to study DNA methyla-
tion further reinforced this view. DNAmethylation-induced gene silencing mediates
two of the most commonly studied examplesof the epigenetic silencing of genes, namely
X-chromosome inactivation and gene im-printing. Mammalian females bear two copies
of the X-chromosome. The inactivation ofone copy of the X-chromosome occurs in
all mammalian females and is essential fornormal function (i.e., maintaining a constant
gene dosage in males and females). The
silencing of the X-chromosome is associated
www.annualreviews.org Epigenetics and the Environment 447
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
10/34
with DNA methylation (Mohandas et al. 1981,
Riggs & Pfieffer 1992; but also see Hellman& Chess 2007 for a more current update).
The second example of epigenetic-mediated
gene silencing is that of gene imprinting (daRocha & Ferguson-Smith 2004, Reik 2001),
a remarkable subject in its own right and onewith considerable implications for growth and
development (Charalambous et al. 2007). Forhumans and other mammals, the expression of
specific genes is determined by the parent oforigin. For certaingenes, the copy derived from
the mother is active while that emanating fromthe father is silenceda maternally imprinted
gene. In other cases, it is the reverse: The copyof the gene inherited from the father is active
while that from the mother is silenceda
paternally imprinted gene. The silent copyis methylated in DNA regions that regulate
gene expression and thus is inactive. Again,the epigenetic marks associated with gene
imprinting are established very early in life.These marks, as well as those associated with
X-chromosome inactivation, are largely stable.Collectively, these models have left biolo-
gists with the impression that under normalconditions, DNA methylation occurs early in
embryonic life and is irreversible. DNA methy-lation was considered to be an actively dy-
namic process only during periods of cell di-
vision and differentiation (see above) such thatin mature postmitotic cells, further alteration
of methylation patterns was improbable. More-over, the extensive loss of cytosine methylation
in the models described above is associated withpathology. This perspective was further rein-
forced by findings showing that an alterationof DNA methylation at critical genomic tar-
gets (i.e., tumor suppressors) is associated withcancer (Eden et al. 2003, Feinberg 2007, Laird
2005).At this point, dynamic changes in DNA
methylation were of considerable interest for
developmental biologists but somewhat less sofor psychologists, who study the aftermath of
more subtle variations in neuronal differentia-tion that occur in later periods of development
or even in the fully mature brain. The issue for
developmental psychologists concerns less
process by which cells specialize as neuroand more the issues related to why neurons
one individual function differently from thof another, or how neurons might dynamica
later alter functional properties in relation
experience (i.e., activity-dependent neuroplasticity). The studies reviewed below prov
an importantrevision to this perspective. This now considerable evidence in neuroscien
and other fields, including immunology aendocrinology/metabolism, that the state
DNA methylation at specific genomic siteindeed dynamic even in adult animals (B
2007, Jirtle & Skinner 2007, Meaney & S2005). Moreover, alterations in DNA methy
tion are emerging as a candidate mechanismthe effects of early experience in individual d
ferences in neural function as well as in learn
and memory. Thus, although the assumptioconcerning DNA methylation appear valid
the examples cited above, recent studies revthat DNA methylation patterns are activ
modified in mature (i.e., fully differentiatcells including, and perhaps especially, n
rons, and that such modifications can occuranimals in response to cellular signals driv
by environmental events ( Jirtle & Skin2007, Meaney & Szyf 2005, Sweatt 2009). F
example, variations in the diet of mice durgestation or later in development, such as
early postweaning period, can stably alter methylation status of the DNA (Cooney et
2002, Waterland & Jirtle 2003, Waterla
et al. 2006, Whitelaw & Whitelaw 200Likewise, both mature lymphocytes (Bruniq
& Schwartz 2003, Murayama et al. 2006) aneurons (e.g., Champagne 2008, Champag
et al. 2006, Lubin et al. 2008, Martinowet al. 2003, Sweatt 2009) show changes in t
DNA methylation patterns at critical genomregions in response to environmental stim
that stably alter cellular function. The abiof environmental signals to actively remo
epigenetic marks that regulate gene expressis a rather radical change in our understand
of the environmental regulationof gene expr
sion. Such epigenetic modifications are th
448 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
11/34
a candidate mechanism for the environmental
programming of gene expression.
Epigenetics and theSocial Environment
The section below describes studies of themolecular basis for the effects of maternal care
on the development of individual differencesin gene expression and stress responses. The
mechanism for this interaction is epigenetic, in-volving alterations in DNA methylation at spe-
cific sites in the genome. In summary, variationsin motherinfant interactions in theratalter the
extra- and intracellular environment of neuronsin selected brain regions. Such alterations di-
rectly modify the epigenetic marks on regions
of the DNA that regulate the transcription ofthe glucocorticoid receptor, which in turn reg-
ulates the HPA response to stress. These epige-neticmarksarestable,enduringwellbeyondthe
period of maternal care, and provide a molec-ular basis for a stable maternal effect on the
phenotype of the offspring. Thus, the behaviorof the mother directly alters cellular signals that
then actively sculpt the epigenetic landscape ofthe offspring, influencing the activity of specific
regions of the genome and the phenotype of theoffspring.
The critical feature of the maternal effects
described above is that of persistence. The dif-ferences in the frequency of pup LG between
high- and low-LG mothers are limited to thefirst week of postnatal life. And yet the differ-
encesingeneexpressionandneuralfunctionareapparent well into adulthood. How might the
effects of an essentially social interaction stablyalter the expression of the genes that regulate
the activity of neural systems that mediate en-docrine and behavioral responses to stress? To
address this question, we focused on the sus-tained effect of maternal care on glucocorticoid
receptor gene transcription in the hippocampus
as a model system for the environmental pro-gramming of gene expression.
The focus of the epigenetic studies isthe NGFI-A consensus sequence in the
exon 17 promoter (Figure 1) that activates
glucocorticoid receptor expression in hip-
pocampal neurons. The tactile stimulationassociated with pup LG increases 5-HT activ-
ity in the hippocampus. In vitro studies with
cultured hippocampal neurons show that 5-HTacts on 5-HT7 receptors to initiate a series of
intracellular signals that culminate with an in-crease in the expression of NGFI-A as well as in
the CREB-binding protein (Figure 3). Com-parable effects occur in vivo. Manipulations
that increase pup LG by lactating rats result inan increased level of cAMP as well as NGFI-A
(Meaney et al. 2000). Pups reared by high-LGmothers show increased NGFI-A expression
in hippocampal neurons as well as an increasedbinding of NGFI-A to the exon 17promoter se-quence (Weaver et al. 2007, Zhang et al. 2009).
Moreover, the binding of NGFI-A to the exon17 promoter sequence is actively regulated by
motherpup interactions, such that there isincreased NGFI-A bound to the exon 17 pro-
moter immediately following a nursing bout,but not at a period that follows 25 minuteswith-
out motherpup contact (Zhang et al. 2009).NGFI-A and the CREB-binding protein
form a complex that binds directly to the exon17 promoter sequence and actively redesigns
the methylation pattern at this region of the
genome (Weaver et al. 2004, 2007). Thus, asadults, the offspring reared by high-LG moth-
ers show very modest levels of methylationat the 5 CpG of the NGFI-A consensus se-
quence (Figure 5). This effect on methylationis very precise. Located only a few nucleotides
removed from this site is the 3 CpG site(Figures 1 and 5), the methylation status of
which is unaffected by maternal care.A rather novel aspect of the effect of ma-
ternal care on DNA methylation was apparentin the results of a simple developmental study
examining the methylation status of the 5 and
3 CpG sites from late in fetal life to adulthood(Weaver et al. 2004). Neither the 5 nor the
3 CpG sites within the NGFI-A bindingregion is methylated in hippocampal neurons
from fetal rats, whereas both sites are heavilymethylated on the day following birth, with
no difference as a function of maternal care.
www.annualreviews.org Epigenetics and the Environment 449
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
12/34
These findings reflect what is referred to as
de novo methylation, whereby a methyl groupis applied to previously unmethylated sites.
However, between the day following birth and
the end of the first week of life, the 5 CpGis demethylated in pups reared by high-LG,
but not low-LG, mothers. This differencethen persists into adulthood. Importantly, the
period over which the demethylation occursfalls precisely within that time when high- and
low-LG mothers differ in the frequency of pupLG; the difference in pup LG between high-
and low-LG mothers is not apparent in thesecond week of postnatal life (Caldji et al. 1998,
Champagne 2008, Champagne et al. 2003).The demethylation of the 5 CpG siteoccurs
as a function of the same 5-HT-activated sig-
nals that regulate glucocorticoid receptor geneexpression in cultured hippocampal neurons
(Weaver et al. 2007). Thus, when hippocam-pal neurons of embryonic origin are placed in
culture and treated with 5-HT, which mimicsthe extracellularsignal associated with maternal
LG,the5 CpG site is demethylated; there is noeffectatthe3 CpG site. The binding of NGFI-
A to the exon 17 site is critical. Hippocampalneurons that are rendered incapable of increas-
ing NGFI-A expression through antisense or
siRNA treatment show neither the demethyla-tion of the 5 CpG site nor the increase in glu-
cocorticoid receptor expression (Weaver et al.2007). Likewise, a mutation of the NGFI-A
site (exchanging a C for an A at the 3 CpGsite) that completely abolishes the binding of
NGFI-A to the exon 17 promoter also pre-vents the demethylation of the 5 CpG. Finally,
the infection of hippocampal neurons with avirus containing a nucleotide construct engi-
neered to express high levels of NGFI-A pro-duces demethylation of the 5 CpG of the exon
17 promoter sequence and increases glucocor-
ticoid receptor expression.These findings suggest that maternal lick-
ing of pups increases NGFI-A levels in thehippocampal neurons of the offspring, thus al-
tering DNA methylation. But there is a compli-cation. If DNA methylation blocks transcrip-
tion factor binding and the 5 CpG site of
the exon 17 promoter is heavily methylated
neonates, then how might maternally activaNGFI-A bind to and remodel the exon 17
gion? And why is the effect apparent at the
but not the 3 CpG? The answer to these qutions appears to involve other transcriptio
signals that are affected by maternal care. Lels of the transcription factorspecific protein
(SP-1) and the CREB-binding protein are aincreased in the hippocampus of pups reared
high-LG mothers (Weaver et al. 2007, Zhaet al. 2009). The exon 17 promoter contain
DNA sequence that binds SP-1, and this gion overlaps with that for NGFI-A. SP-1 c
actively target both methylation and demethlation of CpG sites (Brandeis et al. 1994). T
5CpG site is the region of overlap in the bin
ing sites. The CREB-binding protein, on tother hand, acts as a histone acetyltransfera
an enzyme capable of acetylating histone taincluding the exon 17 region, opening ch
matin and permitting the binding of transcrtion factors such as NGFI-A and SP-1. Incre
ing histone acetylation can lead to transcriptfactor binding at previously methylated si
and the subsequent demethylation of these gions (Fan et al. 2005, Szyf et al. 2005). Th
we suggest that the binding of this complex
proteins, NGFI-A, the CREB-binding proteand SP-1 is critical in activating the process
demethylation. The results to date are certaiconsistent with this model, but we should n
that we have yet to firmly establish the idetity of the enzyme that is responsible for t
demethylation of the 5 CpG site.These findings suggest that materna
induced increases in hippocampal NGFlevels can initiate the remodeling of DN
methylation at the regions of the DNA thregulate glucocorticoid receptor expressi
The NGFI-A transcription factor binds
multiple sites across the genome. If NGFI-related complexes target demethylation, th
one might assume that other NGFI-A-sensitregions should show a maternal effect on DN
methylation and gene expression comparato that observed with the glucocorticoid rec
tor. Zhang and colleagues (2009) showed t
450 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
13/34
the hippocampal expression of theGAD1gene
that encodes for glutamic acid decarboxylase,an enzyme in the production of the neuro-
transmitter GABA, is increased in the adult
offspring of high-LG mothers. This effect isassociated with altered DNA methylation of
an NGFI-A response element in a mannercomparable to that for the glucocorticoid
receptor gene. Moreover, as with the effecton the glucocorticoid receptor, an in vitro
increase in NGFI-A expression mimics theeffects of increased pup LG. The function of
GABAergic neurons in the limbic system is alsoregulated by maternal care (Caldji et al. 1998,
2000, 2003) and is a major target for anxiolytic
agents. These findings are therefore likelyrelevant for the decreased fearfulness observed
in the adult offspring of high-LG mothers.In summary, the maternallyinduced changes
in specific intracellular signals in hippocampalneurons can physically remodel the genome.
The increased binding of NGFI-A that derivesfrom pup LG appears critical for the demethy-
lation of the exon 17promoter. We suggest thatthis process involves accompanying increases in
SP-1 and the CREB-binding protein, and thatthe combination of these factors results in the
active demethylation of the exon 17 promoter.
It should be noted that there are important fea-tures of this model that remain to be clearly de-
fined, includingthe identificationof theenzymethat is directly responsible for the demethyla-
tion. Nevertheless, the events described to daterepresent a model by which the biological path-
ways activated by a social event may become im-printed onto the genome. This imprint is then
physically apparent in the adult genome, result-ing in stable alterations (or programming) of
gene expression.
THE FUNCTIONALIMPORTANCE OF THESOCIAL IMPRINT
A critical issue is that of relating the epige-
netic modifications at specific DNA regionsto function. The presence of a methyl group
on the 5 CpG of the NGFI-A binding site is
functionally related to glucocorticoid receptor
gene expression in adult animals. In vitro stud-ies reveal that the methylation of the 5 CpG
site reduces the ability of NGFI-A to bind
to the exon 17 promoter and activate gluco-corticoid receptor transcription (Weaver et al.
2007). These findings are consistent with themodel described above, whereby DNA methy-
lation impedes transcription factor binding andthus the activation of gene expression. The
next question concerns the in vivo situationand function at a level beyond that of gene
expression.In contrast to the situation with neonates,
there is no difference in NGFI-A expressionas a function of maternal care among adult
animals: Hippocampal levels of NGFI-A are
comparable in the adult offspring of high-and low-LG mothers. However, the altered
methylation of the exon 17 promoter wouldsuggest differences in the ability of NGFI-A to
access its binding site on the exon 17promoter.Chromatin-immunoprecipitation assays, which
permit measurement of the interaction be-tween a specific protein and a defined region of
the DNA, reveal increased NGFI-A associationwith the exon 17promoter in hippocampi from
adult offspring of high- compared to low-LG
mothers (Weaver et al. 2004, 2005). This dif-ference occurs despite the comparable levels of
NGFI-A. These findings show that in the livinganimal, under normal conditions, there is more
NGFI-A associated with the exon 17promoterin hippocampal neurons of adult animals reared
by high- compared with low-LG mothers.There is also evidence that directly links
the maternal effect on the epigenetic state ofthe exon 17 promoter to the changes in glu-
cocorticoid receptor expression and HPA re-sponses to stress. Recall that the methylation
of specific CpG sites can diminish transcrip-
tion factor binding through the recruitmentof repressor complexes that include HDACs.
The HDACs deacetylate histone tails, thusfavoring a closed chromatin configuration. In-
deed, the exon 17 promoter is more promi-nently acetylated in hippocampi from adult off-
springof high- compared with low-LGmothers
www.annualreviews.org Epigenetics and the Environment 451
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
14/34
(Weaver et al. 2004, 2005). This finding is con-
sistent with the increased transcription of theglucocorticoid receptor gene in animals reared
by high- versus low-LG mothers. A subsequent
study (Weaver et al. 2004) examined the ef-fects of directly blocking the actions of the
HDACs in the adult offspring of high- and low-LG mothers by directly infusing an HDAC in-
hibitor into the hippocampus daily for four con-secutive days. The treatment with the HDAC
inhibitor produces a series of predictable re-sults that reflect a cause-effect relation between
DNA methylation andgene expression. First, asexpected, HDAC blockade eliminates the dif-
ferences in the acetylation of the histone tails(open chromatin) of the exon 17 promoter inhippocampal samples from high- and low-LG
mothers. Second, the increased histone acety-lation of the exon 17promoter in the offspring
of low-LG mothers is associated with an in-crease in the binding of NGFI- A to the exon
17promoter in the offspring of low-LG moth-ers, eliminating the maternal effect on NGFI-
A binding to the exon 17 promoter. Compa-rable levels of NGFI-A binding to the exon
17 promoter then eliminate the maternal ef-fect on hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor
expression, such that glucocorticoid receptor
levels in the adult offspring of low-LG motherstreated with the HDAC inhibitor are compa-
rable to those in animals reared by high-LGmothers. And most importantly, the infusion of
the HDAC inhibitor reversed the differences inthe HPA response to stress.
HDAC inhibition increases NGFI-A bind-ing to the exon 17 promoter in the offspring
of low-LG mothers. The studies with neonatesreveal that increased NGFI-A binding results
in the demethylation of the 5 CpG. In vitro,the introduction of a viral tool that leads to the
increased expression of NGFI-A is sufficient
to demethylate the exon 17 promoter. Weaveret al. (2007) argue that the binding of NGFI-A
is critical for the demethylation of the 5CpGsite. The same effect is apparent in vivo and
even with the adult animals used in the stud-ies described above. HDAC infusion into the
hippocampus increases NGFI-A binding to the
exon 17promoter in the adult offspring of lo
LG mothers and decreases the level of methytionof the 5CpG site onthe exon17promo
Another study (Weaver et al. 2005) show
that the reverse pattern of results could be otained in response to the infusion of meth
nine into the hippocampus. The methioninfusion produced greater methylation of
5CpG in the offspring of high-LG mothedecreasedNGFI-Abinding andGR expressi
and increased HPA responses to stress (Weaet al. 2005).
Although these studies employ rather crupharmacological manipulations, the results
criticalastheysuggestthatfullymatureneurin an adult animal express the necessary en
matic machinery to demethylate or remeth
late DNA. The importance of this plasticat the level of DNA methylation is revea
in subsequent studies of cognition (see belowhich suggest that dynamic modification
DNA methylation in critical neuronal poplations in adult animals is involved in spec
forms of learning and memory.
ACTIVITY-DEPENDENTREGULATION OF
THE EPIGENOME
The maternal effect on the epigenetic state
the glucocorticoid receptor exon 17 promoand glucocorticoid receptor gene expression
apparent over the first week of life and occin response to an increased NGFI-A signa
hippocampal neurons. The increased exprsion of NGFI-A and its binding to the exon
GR promoter over the first week of life are avated by maternal behavior (Weaver et al. 20
Zhang et al.2009). An increase in theexpressof NGFI-A is associated with synaptic plast
ity and with learning and memory (Dragun
1996, Jones et al. 2001, Knapska & Kaczma2004, Li et al. 2005, ODonovan et al. 199
Thus it is not surprising that the offspringhigh-LG mothers show increased synaptic d
sity both in early life (Liu et al. 2000) ain adulthood (Bagot et al. 2009, Bredy et
2003, Champagne et al. 2008, Liu et al. 200
452 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
15/34
Such events occur as a function of a series of
activity-dependent changes in neuronal activ-ity triggered by the action of glutamate at the
NMDA receptor site (Ali & Salter 2001, Bear &
Malenka 1994, Malenka & Nicoll 1993, Morris& Frey 1997). Thus, it is possible that envi-
ronmentally driven changes in neuronal tran-scriptional signals could potentially remodel
the methylation state of specific regions of theDNA (Meaney & Szyf 2005, Sng & Meaney
2009). These effects could, in turn, prove es-sential for sustained alterations in synaptic
function.Learning and long-term memory com-
monly require changes in gene expression andprotein synthesis (Alberini et al. 1995, Kandel
2001, Lynch 2004). As described above, gene
transcription is associated with chromatinremodeling engineered by enzymes that
modify the histone proteins within chromatincomplexes. A number of the intracellular
signals that are crucial for learning and mem-ory are in fact enzymes that modify histone
proteins. One example is that of the CREB-binding protein, which functions as a histone
acetyltransferase and is strongly implicated incognitive function (e.g., Alarcon et al. 2004).
Thus, contextual fear conditioning, which isa hippocampus-dependent learning paradigm
whereby an animal associates a novel context
with an aversive stimulus, is accompanied byincreased acetylation of histone H3 (Levenson
et al. 2004). Likewise, there is evidence for theimportance of epigenetic modifications of his-
tones in the amygdala during fear conditioning(Yeh et al. 2004). Interestingly, extinction of
the conditioned fear response is associatedwith increased histone acetylation in the pre-
frontal cortex, which mediates the inhibitionof conditioned fear responses (Bredy et al.
2007). The CREB-binding protein is probablyinvolved in the relevant histone modifications.
Mice that are heterozygous for a dysfunction
form of the CREB-binding protein showsignificant impairments in multiple forms of
hippocampal-dependent, long-term memory(Bourtchouladze et al. 2003, Korzus et al. 2004,
Wood et al. 2006; also see Guan et al. 2002,
Vecsey et al. 2007). Importantly, the cognitive
impairments are reversed with HDAC ad-ministration, suggesting that CREB-binding
protein-induced histone acetylation mediateseffects on learning and memory.
There is also evidence for the importance of
dynamic changes in DNA methylation at spe-cific sites during learning and memory. Fear
conditioning results in the rapid methylationand transcriptional silencing of the gene for
protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), which suppresseslearning. The same training results in the
demethylation and transcriptional activation ofthe synaptic plasticity gene reelin. These find-
ings imply that both DNA methylation anddemethylation might be involved in long-term
memory consolidation.BDNF has been implicated in adult neu-
ral plasticity, including learning and memory
(West 2001). Thegenomic structure of the Bdnfgene contains multiple promoters that gener-
ate mRNAs containing different noncoding ex-ons spliced upstream of a common coding exon
(Timmusk et al. 1993). This organization issomewhat like that described above for the glu-
cocorticoid receptor (Figure 1). In the case ofBDNF, the exon IV promoter in rat is activated
upon membrane depolarization in cultured cor-tical and hippocampal neurons by means of
KCl, which leads to calcium influx, activatingsignaling cascades and inducing the expression
of an array of genes that are involved in neuralplasticity (West 2001).
Importantly, the activity-dependent Bdnf
gene is also regulated through epigenetic modi-fications that involve dynamic changes in DNA
methylation and the association of methylated-DNA binding proteins to the relevant sites
on the bdnf promoter. Thus, increased DNAmethylation of the exon IV promoter at sites
that bind to transcriptional activators is associ-atedwiththepresenceofthemethylated-DNA-
binding protein, MeCP2, and a decreased levelof bdnf expression. This transcriptionally
quiescent state prior to depolarization is alsoassociated with the presence of histone deacety-
lases (i.e., HDAC1) and mSIN3A, which form
a common repressor complex. Membrane
www.annualreviews.org Epigenetics and the Environment 453
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
16/34
Proteinphosphorylation:a modification ofproteins in which aspecific amino acid(serine, a threonine or
a tyrosine) isphosphorylated by aprotein kinase by theaddition of a covalentlybound phosphategroup. In such cases ofphosphoregulation,the protein switchesbetween aphosphorylated and anunphosphorylatedstate, with one in anactive form and the
other inactive
depolarization of the neuron leads to a de-
crease in CpG methylation and a dissociationof MeCP2-related repressor complex from the
exon IV promoter. As described above for the
glucocorticoid receptor, the decrease in CpGmethylation is then associated with an increase
in histone acetylation and the binding of thetranscription factor, CREB. CREB is known
to activatebdnfexpression. These data suggestthat DNA methylation at a particular site can
suppress activity-dependent transcription of
Bdnf. These findings also indicate that DNA
methylation patterns in postmitotic neuronscan undergo dynamic changes in response to
neuronal activation, and a lower level of DNAmethylation correlates with a higher level of
Bdnfgene transcription in neurons.
Interestingly, MeCP2 levels increase as neu-rons mature (Zoghbi 2003). The high level of
MeCP2 protein in mature neurons is consis-tent with a possible role for MeCP2 in synaptic
remodeling associated with learning and mem-ory (Zhou et al. 2006). Further supporting a
roleforMeCP2inmaturesynapticfunctionandplasticity, Mecp2-null mice exhibit abnormali-
ties in dendritic arborization (Chen et al. 2003,Kishi & Macklis 2004), basal synaptic transmis-
sion (Moretti et al. 2006), presynaptic function(Asaka et al. 2006, Moretti et al. 2006, Nelson
et al. 2006), excitatory synaptic plasticity (Asaka
et al. 2006, Moretti et al. 2006), and hippocam-pal and amygdalar learning (Moretti et al. 2006,
Pelka et al. 2006). Zhou et al. (2006) found thatneuronal activity (membrane depolarization) is
associated with a phosphorylation of MeCP2 atSerine421 that led to its dissociation from the
bdnfexon IV promoter and an increase in bdnfexpression (also see Chen et al. 2003). Impor-
tantly, activity-dependent increases in BDNFlevels are blocked in cells bearing a mutant
version of MeCP2 that is unable to undergophosphorylation. Glutamate is a primary neural
signalforsynapticplasticity,andbothglutamate
as well as the direct activation of its NMDAreceptor produced MeCP2 phosphorylation in
neurons. Glutamate activates NMDA recep-tors, resulting in a neuronal calcium influx and
the activation of calcium-modulated kinase II
(CaMKII), which regulates synaptic plastic
(Lisman et al. 2002). Zhou et al. (2006) fouthat CaMKII actively phosphorylates MeCP
The protein phosphorylation occurringMeCP2 in response to neuronal activation
a transient event. The results described abo
(Martinowich et al. 2003) suggest that nronal activation can lead to changes in DN
methylation, which is a potentially more stabepigenetic alteration that could conceiva
result in a long-term change inbdnfexpressiThus far, this review has considered
relation between DNA methylation, histoacetylation/deacetylation, transcription fac
binding, and gene expression. However, this evidence that the chromatin alteratio
can alter DNA methylation. Thus, HDinhibitors result in an increase in histo
acetylation, enhanced transcription fac
binding, and decreased DNA methylatiSuch effects were described above in relation
DNA methylation and glucocorticoid recepexpression (Weaver et al. 2004, 2005). Thus
is possible that (a) neuronal activation leadsthe transient phosphorylation of MeCP2 a
its dissociation from the exon IVbdnfpromoand (b) an increase in histone acetylation a
CREB binding, producing increased bexpression; and that (c) the histone acetylat
and CREB binding are also associated wDNA demethylation, as described above
the case of the glucocorticoid receptor histone acetylation and NGFI-A bindi
Such events could underlie a common proc
of activity-dependent modification of DNmethylation (Meaney & Szyf 2005).
Studies by Sweatt and colleagues suggthat the changes in DNA methylation at t
exon IVbdnfpromoter are involved in specforms of learning and memory (Sweatt 200
Bdnf gene expression increases in the hpocampus with contextual and spatial learn
and appears essential for the synaptic remoeling that accompanies such forms of learni
and memory (Hall et al. 2000, Linnarsson et1997). NMDA receptor activation is criti
for both contextual (Maren & Quirk 20
and spatial (Morris et al. 2003) learning
454 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
17/34
well as for the increase in bdnf expression that
accompanies such events. Lubin et al. (2008)found that contextual fear conditioning was
associated with a demethylation of the exon IV
bdnfpromoter and an increase in bdnfexpres-sion: Both effects were blocked with a gluta-
mate receptor antagonist.Taken together, thesefindings suggest that the activity-dependent
changes in neuronal activity that associatewith learning and memory induce a dynamic
alteration in DNA methylation that, in turn,subserves the sustained changes in gene expres-
sion critical for long-term memory. Althoughthis remains a working hypothesis, the findings
discussed above further emphasize the degree
to which neuronal activation can structurallyremodel the genome and alters its operation.
Interestingly, there is also evidence that en-vironmental influences prevailing during early
development may determine the capacity forsuch activity-driven, epigenetic modifications.
Disruptions to motherinfant interactions dur-ing early development are associated with alter-
ations in hippocampalbdnfexpression (Branchiet al. 2006; Lippman et al. 2007; Roceri et al.
2002, 2004; but also see Griesen et al. 2005)and increased DNA methylation at the exon IV
bdnfpromoter (Roth et al. 2009). Rearing micein a communal nest, with three mothers and
their litters, increases maternal care toward the
offspring, which in turn is associated with in-creased BDNF expression (Branchi et al. 2006).
And in the rat, the offspring of high-LG moth-ers show decreased MeCP2 association with the
exon IVbdnfpromoter (Weaver et al. 2007) andincreased bdnfexpression (Liu et al. 2000). Such
maternal effects might bias in favor of reducedcapacity for epigenetic remodeling at this crit-
ical site and restrain synaptic plasticity associ-ated with learning and memory.
Summary (and PerhapsSome Constraints)
Studies over the past five years have created
considerable enthusiasm for epigenetic mod-els of the effects of early experience, synaptic
plasticity, and neural function. The hypothesis
underlying this approach considers epigenetic
effectsongeneexpressionasacandidatemecha-nism for the effects of environmental signals on
the future behavior of the organism. This hy-
pothesis is particularly attractive for those ex-amining the sustained effects of early experi-
ence or of chronic, biologically relevant eventsin adulthood (e.g., environmental enrichment,
chronic stress) on gene expression and neuralfunction. Mature neurons undergo consider-
able changes in phenotype and are thereforean ideal cell population for epigenetic regu-
lation. Nevertheless, there are constraints onthe influence of epigenetic marks. For exam-
ple, the effects of DNA methylation on geneexpression are influenced by the organization
of the relevant genomic region. DNA methy-
lation appears to have a reduced effect ongene expression in regions that have a very
high density of cytosine-guanine paired sites(Weber et al. 2007). Moreover, much of the
DNA within a cell is packed tightly in het-erochromatin (Fraser & Bickmore 2007) and
is probably inaccessible to environmentally in-duced chromatin remodeling signals. Thus, the
infusion of an HDAC inhibitor directly intothe adult hippocampus alters the expression of
only about 2% of all the genes normally ex-pressed in the rat hippocampus (Weaver et al.
2006). Were the entire genome subject to dy-
namic epigenetic regulation such as describedabove for thebdnfgene, then we could expect
this percentage to be substantially higher. Itis likely that there is a pool of genes that re-
tains the capacity for dynamic environmentalregulation through epigenetic mechanisms. Of
course this begs questions concerning the fac-tors that determine the nature and contents of
suchpools.These considerations notwithstand-ing, it appears that with neurons, a number of
genes are closely related to synaptic plasticityand neural function and are subject to dynamic
regulation through epigenetic mechanisms, in-
cluding DNA methylation.Epigenetics refers to a collection of chemi-
cal modifications that occur to histones or di-rectly on the DNA. These modifications, in
turn, alter gene transcription. One might argue
www.annualreviews.org Epigenetics and the Environment 455
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
18/34
that in defining such mechanisms we have, in
effect, simply better defined the processes thatregulate gene transcription. Although the value
of such findings is obvious for molecular biol-
ogy, how might such processes revise our think-ing at the level of the systems sciences? We
suggest that these findings provide researcherswith a renewed appreciation of the environ-
mental regulation of cellular activity. We nowunderstand the physical basis for the Hebbian
synapse (Hebb 1958), whereby environmen-tal signals activate intracellular pathways that
result in the remodeling of synaptic connec-tions in a manner that influences subsequent
activity at relevant sites. There is a physicalreference for the process of neuroplasticity.
Epigenetic modifications provide the mecha-
nism for a comparable level of plasticity at thelevelof the genome. We once thought of synap-
tic connections as being fixed, immutable tofurther changes beyond some critical period in
development. Studies of synaptic plasticity re-vised our appreciation of the brain, revealing
instead a dynamic tissue, subject to constant re-modeling through the environmental activation
of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. Thestudy of epigenetics suggests a comparable pro-
cess at the level of the genome, also once con-sidered a constant, static source of influence.
Indeed, we must emphasize that epigenetic
modifications do not alter DNA sequence. Theproduct of the glucocorticoid receptor gene is
unaffected by epigenetic marks. However, it ap-pears that the operation of thegenomeis indeed
subject to environmental regulation in a man-ner that may be no less dynamic than that of
synaptic connections.Recent studies from Nestler and colleagues
reveal considerable epigenetic modification atspecific genomic sites associated with chronic
stress or repeated exposure to psychostimulantdrugs, both of which produce sustained influ-
ences on behavior (Nestler 2009, Renthal et al.
2009). Although such effects have yet to bereported for DNA methylation, modifications
of histone proteins are associated with expo-sure to drugs of abuse and stressors in rodent
models (Renthal et al. 2009, Renthal & Nestler
2008). These findings suggest that epigene
states, including DNA methylation, are alteby a wide range of biologically relevant eve
(Meaney & Szyf 2005, Renthal & Nestler 20Szyf et al. 2005). Such epigenetic modificatio
might therefore underlie a wide range of s
ble changes in neural function following expsure to highlysalient events (e.g.,chronic stre
drugs of abuse, reproductive phases such as penting) and are thus logical mechanisms
environmentally induced alterations in menhealth (Akbarian & Huang 2009, Jiang et
2008, Tsankova et al. 2007).
EPIGENETICS ANDMENTAL HEALTH
Emerging evidence links the alterations in gexpression associated with DNA methylati
to psychiatric illness. Cortical dysfunctionschizophrenia is associated with changes
GABAergic circuitry (Benes & Berretta 200This effect is associated with a decrease
the expression of the GAD1 gene that ecodes for a specific form of glutamic acid
carboxylase (GAD67), one to two key enzymfor GABA synthesis in cortical interneuro
There is compelling evidence for the decrea
expression of GAD67 in cortical tissues frschizophrenic patients (Akbarian & Hua
2006, Costa et al. 2004). The dysregulaGAD67 expression in the chandelier GA
neurons is thought to result in disruptionsynchronized cortical activity and impairm
of executive functions in schizophrenia subje(Lewis et al. 2005). Likewise, allelic variation
GAD1is associated with schizophrenia (Straet al. 2007).
In addition to GAD67, there is alsodecrease in cortical expression of reelin
schizophrenic brains (Eastwood & Harris
2003); reelin is closely associated with syntic plasticity. The same GABAergic neurons
the schizophrenic brain that express reelin aGAD67 exhibit an increase in DNA meth
transferases 1 (DNMT1; Veldic et al. 200DNMT1 is a member of a family of
zymes that transfers a methyl group from t
456 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
19/34
methyl donor S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM)
onto cytosines, thus producing DNA methy-lation. The promoter for thereelingene shows
increased methylation in the brains of patients
with schizophrenia compared with control sub-jects (Abdolmaleky et al. 2005, Grayson et al.
2005). Kundakovic et al. (2007) showed that theinhibition of DNMT1 in neuronal cell lines re-
sulted in the increased expression of both reelinand GAD67. The increase in gene expression
was associated with a decreased association ofMeCP2, further suggesting that these differ-
ences are associated with alteration in DNAmethylation. Recall that maternal care directly
alters DNA methylation of the GAD67 pro-
moter in the rat (Zhang et al. 2009). This effectis associated with a decrease in DNMT1 ex-
pression and reduced MeCP2 association withtheGAD1promoter.
An important question is that of the devel-opmental origins of such differences in DNA
methylation. A set of recent studies (McGowanet al. 2009) suggests that epigenetic modifi-
cations might occur in humans in responseto variations in parentoffspring interactions.
DNA was extracted from hippocampal samplesobtained from victims of suicide or from
individuals who had died suddenly from othercauses (auto accidents, heart attacks, etc.).
The samples were obtained from the Quebec
Suicide Brain Bank, which conducts forensicphenotyping that includes a validated assess-
ment of psychiatric status and developmentalhistory (e.g., McGirr et al. 2008). The studies
examined the methylation status of the exon 1Fpromoter of the glucocorticoid receptor, which
corresponds to the exon 17promoter in the rat(Turner & Muller 2005). The results showed
increased DNA methylation of the exon 1Fpromoter in hippocampal samples from suicide
victims compared with controls, but only if
suicide was accompanied with a developmentalhistory of child maltreatment. Child maltreat-
ment, independent of psychiatric state, pre-dicted the DNA methylation status of the exon
1Fpromoter. As in the previous rodent studies,the methylation state of the exon 1F promoter
also determined the ability of NGFI-A to bind
to the promoter andactivate gene transcription.
Although such studies are obviously correla-tional and limited by postmortem approaches,
the results are nevertheless consistent with
the hypothesis that variations in parental carecan modify the epigenetic state of selected
sites of the human genome. Moreover, thefindings are also consistent with studies that
link childhood abuse to individual differencesin stress responses (Heim et al. 2000). Child-
hood abuse is associated with an increase inpituitary ACTH responses to stress among
individuals with or without concurrent majordepression. These findings are particularly
relevant, since pituitary ACTH directly reflectscentral activation of the HPA stress response,
and hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor
activation dampens HPA activity. The findingsin humans are consistent with the rodent
studies cited above investigating epigeneticregulation of the glucocorticoid receptor
gene and with the hypothesis that early lifeevents can alter the epigenetic state of relevant
genomic regions, the expression of which maycontribute to individual differences in the risk
for psychopathology (Holsboer 2000, Neigh& Nemeroff 2006, Schatzberg et al. 1985).
Certain limitations need to be considered aswe integrate epigenetics into the study of psy-
chopathology. The study of epigenetic mech-
anisms in humans is complicated by the factthat epigenetic marks are often tissue-specific.
For example, the brain contains some neu-rons that synthesize and release dopamine as
a neurotransmitter and others that rely onacetylcholine. We might assume that among
dopaminergic neurons, the genes associatedwith the capacity for acetylcholine production
are silenced, likely through some level of epi-genetic regulation. Such processes are inherent
in the specialization of brain cells, as with allother differentiated cells in the body. This pro-
cess of specialization involves epigenetic reg-
ulation and implies that the epigenetic marksvary from cell type to cell type. Indeed, there is
considerable variation in epigeneticmarks fromone brain region to another, perhaps even more
so than variation within the same brain region
www.annualreviews.org Epigenetics and the Environment 457
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
20/34
across individuals (Ladd-Acosta et al. 2007).
Brain samples are for the most part beyonddirect examination in the living individualat the
level of molecular analysis. This often leaves us
with measures of DNA extracted from bloodor saliva and with the question of whether the
epigenetic marks within such samples actuallyreflect those within the relevant neuronal pop-
ulation. Thus, for the time being advances inthe study of neuroepigenetics will rely heavily
on relevant models with nonhuman species aswell as complementary studies of samples from
postmortem human brains.
CONCLUSIONS
It is now evident that genomic variation at
the level of nucleotide sequence is associatedwith individual differences in personality and
thus with vulnerability and resistance to a widerange of chronic illness (Ebstein 2006, Meyer-
Lindenberg & Weinberger 2006, Rutter 2007).The challenge is how to conceptually integrate
thefindings from genetics into psychology. Theoperation of the genome is regulated by cellu-
lar signals that are responsive to environmentalconditions. Thus, the effects of genetic varia-
tion are contextually determined and therefore
best considered as probabilistic. Genetic vari-ations influence cellular activity and, depend-
ing upon current and past environmental con-ditions, will bias toward particular functional
outcomes. The molecular events that mediategene transcription reveal the interdependence
of gene and environment (Sokolowski 2001,Sokolowski & Wahlsten 2001). Oddly, what is
perhaps the most profound comment on thisissue dates back several years. In response to
a question from a journalist considering therelative importance of nature versus nurture
in defining individual differences in personal-ity, Hebb responded that such comparisons are
akin to asking what contributes more to the
area of rectangle, the length or the width? Therecent flush of studies examining gene x en-
vironment effects on personality and vulnera-bility/resistance to mental illness (Caspi et al.
2003, Meaney 2009, Rutter 2007, Suomi 2006)
reflects the interdependence of genetic and
vironmental influences, such that the effectone level can only be understood within t
context of the other. Indeed, developmenprocesses are best considered as the outco
of a constant dialog between the genome a
its environment (Bateson 1994; Gottelieb 191998; Lewontin 1974).
The gene x environment perspective is cical in the establishment of an understand
of the development of individual differencesneural function and personality. Until recen
most experimental approaches were limitedidentifying factors that could influence neu
development. Our own studies of maternal cin the rat are a case in point. This research
amines the effects of variation in maternal cin animals that are housed from weaning o
ward under identical conditions. We systema
cally minimize variation from weaning onwaThis approach permits conclusions as to the p
tential effects of variations in maternal care bcannot estimate the importance of such effe
for individual differences in adult function uder natural conditions. Indeed, environmen
enrichment in the postweaning period can verse effects associated with the variations
maternal care (Bredy et al. 2004, Champag& Meaney 2006, Zhang et al. 2006). Likew
studies of monozygotic-dizygotic twins exaine what are, in effect, differences in paren
gene dosage while minimizing variation in
early environment. Such approaches have pvided convincing evidence that genetic fact
caninfluence thedevelopment of individualdferences, but do not identify how. Indeed,
challenge is to define how, when, and unwhich conditions specific genetic or enviro
ment factors operate to regulate developmeHerein lies the enormous contribution of t
gene x environment perspective, particulawhen integrated into longitudinal studies
development.The excitement concerning the findin
in the area of epigenetics derives from
realization that such mechanisms could fothe biological basis for the interplay betwe
environmental signals and the genome. T
458 Zhang Meaney
8/11/2019 Zhang Meaney 10 AnnRPsychol Epigenetics Review
21/34
studies reviewed here suggest that (a) epi-
genetic remodeling occurs in response tothe environmental activation of the classic
activity-dependent cellular signaling path-
ways that are associated with synaptic plasticity,(b) epigenetic marks, particularly DNA methy-
lation, are actively remodeled over early devel-opment in response to environmental events
that regulate neural development and function,and (c) epigenetic marks at histone proteins and
the DNA are subject to remodeling in responseto environmental influences even at later stages
in development. We have highlighted examplesof environmental influences that are of obvious
relevance for psychologists. However, increas-
ing evidence from animal studies indicates thatprenatal and early postnatal environmental
factors, including nutritional supplements,xenobiotic chemicals, and reproductive tech-
nologies, can alter the epigenetic state ofspecific genomic regions ( Jirtle & Skinner
2007).These findings suggest that epigenetic re-
modeling might serve as an ideal mechanismfor phenotypic plasticitythe process whereby
the environment interacts with the genome toproduce individual differences in the expression
of specific traits. One could easily imagine that
such processes mediate observed discordancesbetween m