Water Research 39 (2005) 5241–5249 Zero net growth in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention G. Laera, A. Pollice , D. Saturno, C. Giordano, A. Lopez CNR IRSA, Via F. De Blasio 5, 70123 Bari, Italy Received 9 February 2005; received in revised form 10 October 2005; accepted 10 October 2005 Abstract A bench-scale membrane bioreactor was operated with complete sludge retention in order to evaluate biological processes and biomass characteristics over the long term. The investigation was carried out by feeding a bench-scale plant with real sewage under constant volumetric loading rate (VLR ¼ 1.2 gCOD L react 1 h 1 ). Biological processes were monitored by measuring substrate removal efficiencies and biomass-related parameters. The latter included bacterial activity as determined through respirometric tests specifically aimed at investigating long term heterotrophic and nitrifying activity. After about 180 days under the imposed operating conditions, the system reached equilibrium conditions with constant VSS concentration of 16–18 g L 1 , organic loading rate (OLR) below 0.1 gCOD gVSS 1 d 1 and specific respiration rates of 2–3 mgO 2 gVSS 1 h 1 . These conditions were maintained for more than 150 days, confirming that an equilibrium had been achieved between biomass growth, endogenous metabolism, and solubilization of inorganic materials. r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Membrane bioreactors; Biomass activity; Complete sludge retention; Municipal wastewater 1. Introduction The main advantages of membrane bioreactors (MBR) with respect to traditional activated sludge systems were summarized as (i) longer sludge retention times (SRT) independent of the hydraulic retention time (HRT), (ii) smaller footprint, (iii) complete removal of solids and nearly complete removal of effluent micro- organisms, (iv) high removal ratios for most contami- nants, (v) reduced sludge production, and (vi) rapid start-up of biological processes (Stephenson et al., 2000; Visvanathan et al., 2000). All these aspects are currently under investigation, and a debate is still open on the most appropriate operating procedures to maximize treatment performance with respect to opera- tional costs. The latter mainly relate to membrane cleaning, sludge wastage, and aeration, and these are all affected by the operational concentration and features of the sludge within MBR. A possible strategy for operational cost limitation is reduction of sludge with- drawal, despite increased aeration costs (Yoon et al., 2004). Theoretical investigations have evidenced that bio- mass production can be limited in MBR by appropriate operational strategies (Lu et al., 2001; Xing et al., 2003). Some authors suggested that these systems could be operated at high sludge concentrations (15–25 gSS/L) by limiting biomass withdrawal, thus minimizing bacterial growth. The main drawbacks of this operating proce- dure were indicated as oxygen transfer limitations and ARTICLE IN PRESS www.elsevier.com/locate/watres 0043-1354/$ - see front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.010 Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 080 5020511; fax: +39 080 5313365. E-mail address: alfi[email protected] (A. Pollice).
9
Embed
Zero net growth in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0043-1354/$ - se
doi:10.1016/j.w
�Correspondfax: +39080 53
E-mail addr
Water Research 39 (2005) 5241–5249
www.elsevier.com/locate/watres
Zero net growth in a membrane bioreactor withcomplete sludge retention
G. Laera, A. Pollice�, D. Saturno, C. Giordano, A. Lopez
CNR IRSA, Via F. De Blasio 5, 70123 Bari, Italy
Received 9 February 2005; received in revised form 10 October 2005; accepted 10 October 2005
Abstract
A bench-scale membrane bioreactor was operated with complete sludge retention in order to evaluate biological
processes and biomass characteristics over the long term. The investigation was carried out by feeding a bench-scale
plant with real sewage under constant volumetric loading rate (VLR ¼ 1.2 gCODLreact�1 h�1). Biological processes were
monitored by measuring substrate removal efficiencies and biomass-related parameters. The latter included bacterial
activity as determined through respirometric tests specifically aimed at investigating long term heterotrophic and
nitrifying activity. After about 180 days under the imposed operating conditions, the system reached equilibrium
conditions with constant VSS concentration of 16–18 gL�1, organic loading rate (OLR) below 0.1 gCODgVSS�1 d�1
and specific respiration rates of 2–3mgO2 gVSS�1 h�1. These conditions were maintained for more than 150 days,
confirming that an equilibrium had been achieved between biomass growth, endogenous metabolism, and solubilization
of inorganic materials.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Membrane bioreactors; Biomass activity; Complete sludge retention; Municipal wastewater
1. Introduction
The main advantages of membrane bioreactors
(MBR) with respect to traditional activated sludge
systems were summarized as (i) longer sludge retention
times (SRT) independent of the hydraulic retention time
(HRT), (ii) smaller footprint, (iii) complete removal of
solids and nearly complete removal of effluent micro-
organisms, (iv) high removal ratios for most contami-
nants, (v) reduced sludge production, and (vi)
rapid start-up of biological processes (Stephenson
et al., 2000; Visvanathan et al., 2000). All these aspects
are currently under investigation, and a debate is still
e front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserve
nitrification. The experimental plant was continuously
monitored for DO, temperature, pH, and transmem-
brane pressure (TMP).
Biological processes were operated by maintaining a
constant volumetric loading rate (VLR), defined as the
amount of COD daily fed per liter of reactor’s volume.
This was obtained by keeping a constant permeate flux
and influent concentration. The system was continu-
ously fed on pre-settled municipal wastewater screened
at 1mm, stored at 4 1C and stirred. The feed concentra-
tion was maintained within a constant range by diluting
the real sewage with tap water when needed.
The plant was started up without any biomass
inoculum, and during the whole experimental period
no sludge was intentionally removed from the reactor
except for measurements of suspended solids. Biomass
samples were withdrawn from the reactor once or twice
per week and analysed for total suspended solids (TSS)
and volatile suspended solids (VSS) according to
standard methods (Standard Methods, 1995). Very
limited amounts of sludge were lost during on-site
membrane cleaning and these were accounted for in the
evaluation of biomass growth and the other sludge-
related parameters. As a general rule of this investiga-
tion, biomass samples were always returned to the
reactor after non-destructive determinations. The lim-
ited amount of biomass that tended to stick to those
parts of the reactor close to the surface level was daily
removed and returned to the sludge bulk. Sludge
management practices during the experiment are sum-
marized in Table 1.
The volume of sludge removed and not returned to
the reactor was estimated to be about 35mL/week on
average, corresponding to 0.83 gTSS/week.
Average values of the biomass yield were calculated
over periods of 3 weeks by taking into account the
sludge losses. In these periods the yield was obtained by
adding the amount of biomass lost to the discrete
integration of the area below the growth curve, and
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 2
Operational parameters of the bench-scale complete retention
MBR
Parameter Unit Average Std.
Dev.
Min Max
Flux Lm�2 h�1 16.4 1.2 9.4 17.6
TMP mbar 154 106 15 500
DO mgO2L�1 2.4 1.1 0.4 7.5
Temperature 1C 20.9 4.5 12.1 29.6
pH 6.8 0.3 5.4 7.7
Table 1
Sludge extracted from the reactor during the experiment
Event Unit Amount Frequency Returned
to plant
TSS+VSS determination mL 20 Weekly No
Sludge characterizationa mL 250 Weekly Yes
Membrane cleaning g 1.8 —b No
Respirometry mL 300 Weekly Yes
aNon-destructive viscosity and filterability tests were regularly performed on sludge samples.bOn-site module rinsing was performed 7 times during the whole experimental period, with a frequency that depended on the
patterns of pressure growth (see following paragraph).
G. Laera et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 5241–5249 5243
dividing by the cumulative COD removed in the same
period.
Respirometry was performed after aerating the sludge
samples overnight to obtain endogenous respiration
conditions. The respirometer adopted was a ‘‘static
gas–static liquid’’ system operated by measurement of
the liquid phase DO concentrations, and its description
was provided elsewhere (Spanjers et al., 1998; Pollice
et al., 2004).
The influent municipal wastewater was sampled three
times per week and analysed for TSS and VSS, total
COD, N-NH4, TKN, N-NO2, and N-NO3. The perme-
ate was sampled daily and analysed for the same
parameters. All analyses were performed according to
standard methods (Standard Methods, 1995). The ion
chromatographic method for the determination of
nitrate and nitrite was modified adopting an UV
detector (at 220 nm) instead of the conductivity detector.
3. Results
3.1. Plant performance
The bench-scale MBR was operated for 336 days with
a constant volumetric loading rate of 1.2 gCODLreact�1 d�1
and process performance, sludge accumulation, and
biomass features were monitored over time. The main
operational parameters are provided in Table 2, and the
average characteristics of the influent wastewater and the
permeate are reported in Table 3.
The filtration performance of the membrane module is
described in Fig. 1, where the evolution over time of flux
and TMP are reported. The normal cleaning procedure
of the module was on-site jet rinsing of the fibers with
moderately pressurized tap water and was performed
when the TMP approached 500mbar. This procedure
was effective in restoring good permeability, and the
membrane was chemically cleaned only when the
positive effect of rinsing tended to last too short. This
happened just twice in 1 year of operation (days 63 and
296, Fig. 1), and a good efficiency of chemical cleaning
in restoring the membrane’s permeability was observed.
A sub-critical flux behaviour is also evidenced, with a
critical TMP value of 150mbar for this system that was
independent of the sludge concentration, and above
which the fouling rate rapidly increased. Similar patterns
were observed in other research works, although their
interpretation with respect to flux sustainability is still
debated (Ognier et al., 2001; Cho and Fane, 2002;
Guglielmi, 2002; Le Clech et al., 2003; Pollice et al.,
2005).
3.2. Biomass accumulation
Fig. 2 shows biomass accumulation in the reactor
under constant VLR, and compares these data with
previous results obtained in short-term tests (Pollice
et al., 2004). This comparison evidenced similar sludge
accumulation patterns for three different VLRs, with
higher initial growth rates for higher VLR. Moreover,
sludge accumulation was very limited during the last 150
days of operation and the system reached an equilibrium
sludge concentration of 17.371.1 gVSSL�1. The VSS/
TSS ratio was rather stable over the whole experimental
period, and an average value of 7572% was maintained
after the initial 50 days.
Further evidence that the equilibrium was reached in
the long-term was provided by the calculation of the