Yusuke Minami* Tomoaki Iwai**, Yutaka Shoukaku** * Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology Kanazawa University ** College of Science and Engineering Kanazawa University 30 th Annual Conference on Tire Science and Technology September 13-14, 2011 Akron, Ohio, USA
56
Embed
Yusuke Minami* Tomoaki Iwai**, Yutaka Shoukaku** * Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology Kanazawa University ** College of Science and Engineering.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Yusuke Minami* Tomoaki Iwai**, Yutaka Shoukaku**
* Graduate School of Natural Science and TechnologyKanazawa University
** College of Science and EngineeringKanazawa University
30th Annual Conference on Tire Science and TechnologySeptember 13-14, 2011Akron, Ohio, USA
1. Introduction and objective
2. Apparatus and methodFriction experiment and conditionObservation methodObservation area
3. Results and discussionsCoefficient of frictionObservation in leading areaObservation in trailing area
4. Conclusions
Table of contents
1. Introduction and objective
2. Apparatus and methodFriction experiment and conditionObservation methodObservation area
3. Results and discussionsCoefficient of frictionObservation in leading areaObservation in trailing area
4. Conclusions
Table of contents
Studless Tire
Studless tires are designed for use in winter conditions, such as snow and ice
Soft tread compoundIncrease the contact area
A lot of sipes in the tread pattern
Wipe and evacuation the water
Characteristics of studless tires
FIG.1 Tread of studless tire
FIG.2 Porous rubber surface
Porous rubber is tread compound that has numerious pores both surface and inside.
The tread rubber of studless tire has been devised in various ways.
Design of tread pattern and sipesVarious hard materials in tread rubber
glass fibers, ceramics, nut shell ・・・Development of tread compound
・ The water removal between tire tread and road surface by water absorption effect of the pores.
Effect of the porous rubber
FIG.3 Water removal image
The real contact area between the tire and the wet road is believed to be increased
・ The decrease in elastic modulus of the rubber
The removal of the water for absorption by the pores on surface of porous rubber, as the details of the process was not clearly understood.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of water absorption by the pores in contact area during sliding under wet conditions.
Objective
1. Introduction and objective
2. Apparatus and methodFriction experiment and conditionObservation methodObservation area
3. Results and discussionsCoefficient of frictionObservation in leading areaObservation in trailing area
(c) Particles at t2 superimposed on the image at t1
(d) Movement direction of each particles from t1 to t2
- Visualized water flow-
FIG. 10 Principle of the particle tracking velocimetry (PTV)
(x3. y3)
(x4. y4)(x1. y1)
(x2. y2)
- Visualized water flow-
(a) t1 (b) t2
(x1. y1)
(x3. y3)
(x4. y4)
(c) Movement direction of each particles from t1 to t2
FIG. 11 PTV considered relative displace between pore and particles
Δy
(x2. y2)
- Visualized water flow-
(a) t1 (b) t2
(x1. y1)(x2. y2)
(x3. y3)
(x4. y4)
(c) Movement direction of each particles from t1 to t2
(d) Superimposed image considering the relative distance between pore and particles
(x3. y3)
(x1. y1) (x2. y2)(x4. y4)
FIG. 11 PTV considered relative displace between pore and particles
(x3. y3)
(x4. y4)(x1. y1)
(x2. y2)
Δy
(x1. y1-Δy) (x2. y2-Δy)
Δy
Rubber specimen
The surface transitioned from noncontact to contact with the mating prism.
The surface of transitioned from contact to noncontact with the mating prism.
Leading area
Trailing area
Mating prism
FIG. 12 Definition of the area of contact
Observation area
Rolling direction
1. Introduction and objective
2. Apparatus and methodFriction experiment and conditionObservation methodObservation area
3. Results and discussionsCoefficient of frictionObservation in leading areaObservation in trailing area
4. Conclusions
Table of contents
FIG. 13 Variation in coefficient of friction with the pore diameter under wet conditions
Coefficient of friction
Fig. 12 Variation in coefficient of friction with the pore diameter under wet conditions
Coefficient of friction
The coefficient of friction of the rubber specimen with pores was larger than that of the rubber specimen without pores.
2mm
2mm
(c) 0.6s (d) 0.8s
(b) 0.4s(a) 0.2s
FIG. 14 Rubber surface of leading area observed by the total internal reflection method
Observation in leading area
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
ber
2mm
(c) 0.6s (d) 0.8s
(b) 0.4s(a) 0.2s
FIG. 14 Rubber surface of leading area observed by the total internal reflection method
Observation in leading area
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
ber
2mm
Front edge
2mm
(c) 0.6s (d) 0.8s
(b) 0.4s(a) 0.2s
FIG. 14 Rubber surface of leading area observed by the total internal reflection method
Observation in leading area
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
ber
2mm
Rear edge
2mm
2mm
(c) 0.6s (d) 0.8s
(b) 0.4s(a) 0.2s
air
water
rubber
water and air exist coincide in the pore
The pore contained an air bubble during the sliding.
Observation in leading area
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
ber
2mm
2mm
(c) 0.6s (d) 0.8s
(b) 0.4s(a) 0.2s
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
berair
water
rubber
The front edge became noncontact with the mating prism.
Observation in leading area
2mm
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
ber
(a) Orthographic images of particles at time t2
(b) Displacement of particles and pore from t1 to t2
FIG. 15 Orthographic image of particles and the flow results of PTV in leading area
(iii) t2=0.6s (iv) t2=0.8s(ii) t2=0.4s(i) t2=0.2s
(iii) From t1=0.4s to t2=0.6s
(ii) From t1=0.2s to t2=0.4s
(i) From t1=0s to t2=0.2s
(iv) From t1=0.6s to t2=0.8s
Observation in leading area
FIG.16 Superimposed image considering the relative distance between pore and particles
The water did not intrude into the pore when the pore was rubbed.
The water flowing along the edge of pore was observed.
Observation in leading area
The water flow detouring the pore is due to the air bubble in the pore. The air bubble in the pore pushed aside the water.
The water flowing along the edge of pore was observed.
air
water
rubber
The pore contained the air bubble during the sliding.
2mm
2mm
Observation in leading area
2mm
2mm
(c) 0.6s (d) 0.8s
(b) 0.4s(a) 0.2s
FIG. 17 Rubber surface of trailing area observed by the total internal reflection method
Observation in trailing area
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
ber
2mm
2mm
(c) 0.6s (d) 0.8s
(b) 0.4s(a) 0.2s
The air in the pore remained even if the pore left the prism.
Observation in trailing area
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
ber
2mm
2mm
(c) 0.6s (d) 0.8s
(b) 0.4s(a) 0.2s
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
ber
The front edge was not contact with the mating prism as with leading area, and the rear edge of the pore contacted with mating prism even if the pore left the mating prism.
Observation in trailing area
2mm
Slid
ing
dire
ctio
n of
rub
ber
(a) Orthographic images of particles at the time t2
(b) Displacement of particles and pore from t1 to t2
FIG. 18 Orthographic image of particles and the flow results of PTV in trailing area
(iii) t2=0.6s (iv) t2=0.8s(ii) t2=0.4s(i) t2=0.2s
(iii) from t1=0.4s to t2=0.6s
(ii) from t1=0.2s to t2=0.4s
(i) from t1=0s to t2=0.2s
(iv) from t1=0.6s to t2=0.8s
Observation in trailing area
FIG. 19 Superimposed image considering the relative distance between pore and particles
The water flowed along the pore edge.
No particles were observed to cross the rear edge.
Observation in trailing area
The water flowed along the pore edge and didn’t cross the rear edge.
2mm
2m
mThe rear edge of the pore contacted with mating prism even if the pore left the mating prism.
The rear edge of the pore was probably rubbed strongly against the prism and wiped the water.
Observation in trailing area
1. Introduction and Objective
2. Apparatus and methodFriction experiment and conditionObservation methodObservation area
3. Results and discussionsCoefficient of frictionObservation in leading areaObservation in trailing area
4. Conclusions
Table of Contents
1. The coefficient of friction of the rubber specimen with pores was larger than that of without pores under wet condition.
2. The pore contained an air bubble during sliding under wet condition.
3. The front edge of the pore was not contact with the mating prism. On the other hand, the rear edge of the pore contacted with mating prism even if the pore left the mating prism.
4. The water flow detouring the air bubble in the pore was also observed.
Conclusions
Thank you for your kind attention
-Observation of contact area (Leading area)-
-Observation of contact area (Trailing area)-
(a) t1 (b) t2
(c) Particles at t2 superimposed on the image at t1
(d) Movement direction of each particles from t1 to t2
・ Observation method- Visualized water flow-
・ Observation method- Visualized water flow-
(a) t1 (b) t2
(x1. y1)(x2. y2)
(x3. y3)
(x4. y4)
(c) Movement direction of each particles from t1 to t2
(d) Superimposed image considering the relative distance between pore and particles
Δy
(x3. y3)
(x1. y1) (x2. y2)
(x4. y4)
(x1. y1-Δy)
(x3. y3)
(x2. y2-Δy)
(x4. y4)
FIG. 7 PTV considered relative displace between pore and particles.
Studded Tire
Roughening the ice
Providing better frivtion between the ice and the soft rubber
Increased the road wear by the studs
Characteristics of studded tires
FIG Studded tireUse of studs is regulated in most countries, and even prohibited in some located
Studless tires are designed for use in winter conditions, such as snow and ice
Friction force of Studded Tire
Fig Concept of tread pattern design for snow and ice covered road
Fig Rate of frictional force under various road condition
Rubber friction force
Rubber friction force FF = FH + ( FA + FD)
FH : Hysteresis Friction
Energy loss caused by deformation of tread derived from road roughness
Rubber
Road surface
FA : Adhesion FrictionEnergy loss caused by adhesion between tread and road
Rubber
Road surface
FD : Digging FrictionEnergy loss caused by scratching road surface and wearing of rubber itself
Rubber
Road surface
: Friction improving coefficient developed by displacement of water friction
Fig. Variation in coefficient of friction with the pore diameter