Top Banner
AW3 Concurrent Session 11/11/15 11:30am “Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong” Presented by: Tom Gimpel SofterWare, Inc Brought to you by: 340 Corporate Way, Suite 300, Orange Park, FL 32073 888-268-8770 · 904-278-0524 · [email protected] · www.techwell.com
23

Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Jan 21, 2018

Download

Software

TechWell
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

AW3 ConcurrentSession11/11/1511:30am

“Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong”

Presented by:

Tom Gimpel

SofterWare, Inc

Broughttoyouby:

340CorporateWay,Suite300,OrangePark,FL32073888-268-8770·904-278-0524·[email protected]·www.techwell.com

Page 2: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Tom Gimpel SofterWare, Inc

Tom Gimpel is Vice President of Product Development and Delivery for SofterWare: a market leader for over 30 years in software solutions for non-profit organizations, childcare centers, camps, and schools. In this role, Tom is responsible for overseeing product development, software engineering, and quality control efforts for all of SofterWare’s product lines (including DonorPerfect Online, WebLink, DonorPages, and EZ-Care) for more than 25,000 customers. Tom has spent more than 25 years in software development leadership at numerous companies. Prior to joining SofterWare, Tom was SVP/Chief Software Architect at GMAC Commercial Mortgage and a frequent speaker at industry conferences. Tom is an agile development champion, and a former Microsoft Customer Advisory Board Member with expertise in enterprise development and software integration approaches, as well as a three-time recipient of the “Digital Innovation” and "Top 30 People to Watch" awards by the Realcomm conference, an industry technology organization. Tom also created SofterWare’s first mobile application for iPhone and Android.

Page 3: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

! Tom$Gimpel$Vice$President$–$Product$Development$

Objec&ves)

! So)What’s)the)Problem?)

! How)can)we)do)be:er?))

! How)the)process)works)

! What)we)found)

Page 4: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

So)What’s)the)Problem?)

There)is)no)problem!))We)already)KNOW)what)our)customers)want,)RIGHT?'!  Support'says…“WE'talk'to'them'all'day,'we'know'what'will'make'

them'stop'calling”'''

!  Sales'says…'“WE'talk'to'them'on'calls'and'at'conferences,'we'know'what'will'sell”''

!  Product'Owners'Say…“It’s'in'the'roadmap.'Besides'this'is'easy,'of'course'we'should'just'do'it'and'get'it'out'there'”'

!  Employees'who'volunteer'for'an'NPO'say...''“I'WORK'at'an'NPO,'I'know'what'ALL'NPO’s'need”''''

!  Development'Says…'“Oooooh'preKy'shiny!''They’ll'love'this'–'and'it’s'only'3LOC!”'

Besides…'! “People'don’t'know'what'they'want'unQl'you'show'it'to'them.”'''

Steve$Jobs$)))who)pre:y)much)stole)it)from…)

! “If'I’d'asked'them'what'they'wanted,'they'would'have'told'me''

‘faster'horses.’”'Henry$Ford'

)

)

Page 5: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Here’s)the)problem…)

Never)

45%)

Rarely)

19%)

Some&mes)

16%)

OPen)

13%)

Always)

7%)

Func<onality$Use$

Nearly)65%)of)func&onality)built)rarely)or)never))gets)used.)

Source:)The)Standish)Group)

Having)the)most)features?)

!  Tumblr$and$Twi@er)had)a)frac&on)of)the)func&onality)of)WordPress)

or)Blogger.)Over)two)million)blog)posts)every)day.)

!  iPhone)X)fewer)features)at)launch)than)Nokia)and)BlackBerry)

!  Pinterest$–)millions)of)posts)per)day)with)none)of)the)func&onality)

of)Facebook$

!  GmailB)a)frac&on)of)what)MicrosoP)Hotmail)had)a)launch)X))used)by)

millions)of)people)worldwide.)

Page 6: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Features)sell..)But)usability)sa&sfies)

)

!  “Feature'lists'sell'so'long'as'customers'don’t'get'a'chance'to'use'the'product.'But'once'consumers'have'used'a'product,'preferences'change.'Suddenly'usability'maKers'(more).”'

“Simple)and)Usable)Web,)Mobile,)and)Interac&on)Design))

by)Giles)Colborne”)

Kano?))

!  Introduced)by)Noriaki)Kano)in)1984)!  Tokyo)University)Professor/Winner)of)the)Demming)Prize)in)1997)

!  Kano)challenged)the)tradi&onal)Customer)Sa&sfac&on)Models)that)“More)is)Be:er”))

!  i.e.)“the'more'features'you'include'/'or'the'beKer'you'do'them,'the'more'saQsfied'the'customers'will'be.”)

!  Provides)a)structure)to)help)priori&ze)which)features/services)to)include)based)on)varying)characteris&cs)of)

customer)sa&sfac&on))

!  So)Kano)is)a)person,)a)philosophy,)and)a)process))

)

Page 7: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

What’s)Wrong)with)a)“Regular”)Survey?))

!  Let’s)try)one.)Rank)the)following)features)1.  Easy)to)Use)

2.  Solves)my)problems)

3.  Walks)my)dog)

4.  Deletes)all)data)randomly)

5.  Shoots)lasers)into)my)eyes)when)the)wrong)key)is)pressed)

!  Ranking)doesn’t)dis&nguish)between)what)I)MUST'have,)and)what)I)WANT)or)LIKE.))

!  Ranking)alone)doesn’t)tell)me)how)MUCH)I)like)a)feature))

!  Ranking)doesn’t)tell)me)if)I)DON’T)like)a)feature)

What’s)Different)about)Kano?)

! Based)on)the)premise)that)

)))))))))))not'all'features'saQsfy'equally))!  Performance)on)certain)a:ributes)produces)higher'levels'of'saQsfacQon'than'others.)

!  Performance)on)other)a:ributes)will)NOT)produce)higher)sa&sfac&on,)no'maKer'how'well'you'do'them'

!  A)model)that)also)a:empts)to)take)into)account)“DissaQsfacQon”))

!  Kano)takes)into)account)a)customer’s)gut)reac&on)–)how)they)feel'

)

Page 8: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

When)Would)You)Use)It?))

! Project)Selec&on))–'which'project'should'we'work'on?'

! New)Product)Development))

–'which'features'should'we'include?'! New)Service)Development)

X)How'much'effort'should'we'put'into'this?)! Determine)Market)Strategies)

_'Is'there'an'unfulfilled'need?'

)

When)Wouldn’t)You)Use)Kano?)

Page 9: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Tradi&onal)Product)/)Service)Dimensions)

Satisfaction

Dissatisfaction How well we

deliver it. Service Performance

Performer (one dimensional): Satisfaction increases at roughly the rate of effort put into delivery.

“The'beKer'/'more'''you'deliver'this,'the'beKer'

I''will'like'it.''The'worse/less'you'deliver'it,'the'less'saQsfied'I'am”'

Kano)Model)Dimensions)Satisfaction

Dissatisfaction

How well we deliver it.

Service Performance

“The'beKer'you'deliver'this,'the'beKer'I'like'it.'The'worse/less''you'deliver'it,'the'less'saQsfied'I'am'

“You'deliver'this'really'well,'but'it'doesn’t'

make'me'any'happier'so'I'don’t'care.“'

“I'like'this,'even'though'your'delivery'(or'

implementaQon)'of'this'sQnks.”'

“You'deliver'this'poorly,'or'I'don’t'like'this'feature,'so'I’m'not'

saQsfied.”'

Kano)adds)new)focus)here)

Page 10: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Satisfaction

Dissatisfaction

How well we deliver it.

Service Performance

Attractor/Exciter: I like this. Perform these well and satisfaction goes up at an even higher rate.

“I'didn’t'expect'this,'but'love'that'I'got'

it.”'

“The'beKer''you'deliver'this,'the'beKer'I''will'like'it.'The'worse'you'deliver'it,'the'less'saQsfied'I'am”'

Performer (one dimensional): Satisfaction increases at

roughly the rate of effort put into delivery.

“I'expect'this.''Performing'it'beKer'won’t'increase'my'saQsfacQon''beyond'a'

certain'point”'

Must Be (Expected Quality): Must be present. Not having this will reduce satisfaction. Doing it well may not increase satisfaction beyond a point.

Kano)Model)Dimensions)

Kano)Model)Dimensions)Satisfaction

Dissatisfaction

How well we deliver it.

Service Performance

Reverser: Actually lowers customer satisfaction the more executed.

“I'don’t'like'this,'and'the'more'/'beKer'you'do'it,'the'worse'it'becomes.'

Indifferent: Perceived as making no difference at all

“Doesn’t'affect'my'saQsfacQon'in'any'direcQon,'no'maKer'how'well'or'how'

poorly'it’s'done.'

Page 11: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Hypothe&cal)Examples)(obviously'real'results'depend'on'real'user'responses)'

Performer$(one$dimensional):$$!  Ability)to)assign)a:endees)to)a)table)and)rearrange)them)easily.))

“The'easier'and'more'flexible'it'is,'the'more'I'like'it.'The'harder''it'is,'the'less'I'like'it.”'A@ractor/Exciter:$$!  A)feature)that)will)autoXarrange)tables)when)the)user)was)expecQng)just)the)

ability)to)arrange)tables.))

“Wow,'this'made'what'I'had'to'do'much'easier.'I’m'really'excited!”)$Must$Be$(Expected):)))!  Runs)on)Windows)(or)Mac,)or)Linux).))

“I'only'care'that'it'runs'on'my'placorm.'It'will'lower'my'saQsfacQon'if'it'doesn’t'run'on'my'placorm,'but'won’t'raise'it'if'it'runs'others.”''

Reverser:))!  Adver&sing)embedded)in)the)applica&on.))

“I'don’t'like'that'you'do'this,'and'the'more'you'do'it,'the'less'I'like'it.”'Indifferent:))!  Integrates)with)an)accoun&ng)system,)and)I)don’t)use)an)accoun&ng)system.))

“Having'doesn’t'make'me'happier,'not'having'it'doesn’t'bother'me.”'

So)which)ones)should)we)choose?)

! Well…)No.))

! Why?)Because)those)items)we)DON’T)do)will)

decrease)sa&sfac&on.))

!  It’s)always)about)net)sa&sfac&on)of)the)combina&on)of)features)you)choose)

)

Well,'that’s'easy.'Just'do'the'“AKractors”''and'the'“Performers”'right?''

Satisfaction

Dissatisfaction

How well we deliver it.

Service Performance

Attractor/Exciter: I like this. Perform these well and satisfaction goes up at an even higher rate.

“I'didn’t'expect'this,'but'love'that'I'

got'it.”'

Having'these''and'performing'them'well'make'me'happy.''Not'having'these'make'me'

unhappy.”'

Performer (one dimensional): Satisfaction increases at roughly the rate of effort put into delivery.

“I'expect'this.''Performing'it'beKer'won’t'increase'my'saQsfacQon''beyond'a'

certain'point”'

Must Be (Expected Quality): Must be present. Not having this will reduces satisfaction. Doing it well may not increase satisfaction..

Page 12: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

The)Goal)of)Using)Kano)then)Is:)

!  Meet)the)minimum)

requirements)and)effort)for))

all)of)the)MustBbe)a:ributes)

!  Add)value)with)the)Performer$$(oneBdimensional)a:ributes)

!  Iden&fy)and)invest)in)A@rac<ve)(Exciter)$a:ributes)to)really)enhance)the)experience)(higher)

sa&sfac&on)for)the)buck))

!  Ensure)that)we)are)not)inves&ng)in)any)Indifferent)a:ributes)or)crea&ng)any)Reverse$a:ributes.)

Satisfaction

Dissatisfaction

How well we deliver it.

Service Performance

Attractor/Exciter: I like this. Perform these well and satisfaction goes up at an even higher rate.

“I'didn’t'expect'this,'but'love'that'I'

got'it.”'

Having'these''and'performing'them'well'make'me'happy.''Not'having'these'make'me'

unhappy.”'

Performer (one dimensional): Satisfaction increases at roughly the rate of effort put into delivery.

“I'expect'this.''Performing'it'beKer'won’t'increase'my'saQsfacQon''beyond'a'

certain'point”'

Must Be (Expected Quality): Must be present. Not having this will reduces satisfaction. Doing it well may not increase satisfaction..

Remember:'

! RaQngs'are'not'based'on'what'WE'think,'they’re'based'what'our'CUSTOMERS'think!''

! Different'customers'will'rate'the'same'feature'differently'depending'on'their'needs.''

!  It’s'the'right'combinaQons'we’re'looking'for.''

Page 13: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

So)How)Does)The)Kano)Process)Work?)

Research & Brainstorm •  Brainstorm list of

features and functionality

Develop Survey • Develop Kano Survey • Distribute

Track & Score Responses • Record Survey results

in Matrix and Calculate Kano Score

•  Plot results on Kano Model

Build Your Strategy • Use the results to

develop strategy •  Product Development •  Service Development

What’s)different)About)a)Kano)Survey?)

!  Kano)Model)Survey)always)uses)2)forms)of)ques&on.)

!  “FuncQonal'form”)vs.)“DysfuncQonal'Form”)

!  “How)would)you)feel)if)the)product)had'feature)X?”)!  “How)would)you)feel)if)the)product)didn’t'have'feature)X?”)

!  Kano)always)offers)the)same)answer)choices)–)to)

EVERY)ques&on:))

!  “I'like'it.''I'expect'it.''I'do'not'care.'I'can'live'with'it.''I'dislike'it.”'

Page 14: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Example:)Requirements)Survey)

Func&onal)

Form)of)the)

ques&on)

If)the)TV)has)Neplix)builtXin,)

how)do)you)feel?)

1.)I)Like)it.)

2.)I)Expect)it.)

3.)Do)not)care.))

4.)Can)Live)With)It.))

5.)I)Dislike)It.)

If)the)TV)does)NOT))have)

Neplix,)how)do)you)feel?)

1.)I)Like)it.)

2.)I)Expect)it.)

3.)Do)not)care.))

4.)Can)Live)With)It.))

5.)I)Dislike)It.) ✔

Dysfunc&onal)

Form)of)the)

ques&on)

DP)

Mobile)

Kano)

Survey)

Page 15: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Func&onal)vs.)Dysfunc&onal)Comparison)

If))the)TV)has)

Neplix)capability)

built)in,)how)do)

you)feel?)

1.)I)Like)it.)

2.)I)Expect)it.)

3.)Do)not)care.))

4.)Can)Live)W

ith)

It.))

5.)I)Dislike)It.)

1.)I)Like)it.)

2.)I)Expect)It.)

3.)Do)not)care.))

4.)Can)Live)With)It.))

5.)I)Dislike)It.)

Q)

R)

R)

R)

R)

A)

I)

I)

I)

R)

A)

I)

I)

I)

R)

A)

I)

I)

I)

I)

O)

E)

E)

E)

Q)

O)–)One)dimensional)or)Linear)

I)=)Indifferent)

A)–)A:rac&ve))(Exciter/Delighter))

DysXFunc&onal)

Func&onal)

E)–)Expected)(Must)Have))

R)–)Reversal)

Q)–)Ques&onable)Response)

SMS)Tex&ng)

Example)

“Expected”)

Summarize)Customer)Answers)

Feature A E O R Q I Total Grade #1 3 6 14 23 O

#2 5 6 11 1 23 O

#3 6 1 4 1 11 23 I

#4 13 10 23 E

#5 11 1 2 9 23 A

Customer Requirement is: A: Attractive R: Reverse Q: Questionable Result E: Expected O: One Dimensional I: Indifferent

Page 16: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Develop)Coefficients)of)Sa&sfac&on)

!  Extent)of)Sa&sfac&on:)))))))))))))))))))Extent)of)Dissa&sfac&on:)

))))))))))))))))A+O$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$O+E$

$$$$$$$$$$A+O+E+I$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$(A+O+E+I)$!  Tell)us)how)much)“sa&sfac&on”)having)this)will)add)

!  Or)how)much)“dissa&sfac&on”)it)will)have)by)NOT)including)it)

)Customer Requirement is: A: Attractive R: Reverse Q: Questionable Result E: Expected O: One Dimensional I: Indifferent

Results)DP$Mobile$Online$Kano$Survey$Ques&on)(worded)in)the)Func&onal)form))

answ

ers)

A) E) I) O) R)

Final)

answer)

csXCoefficeint)

Extent)of)

Sa&sfac&on)

csXCoefficeint)

Extent)of)

Disa&sfac&on)

allowed you to edit, add, and update information?

14)

5) 4) 1) 3) 1) A$ 0.615) X0.538)allowed you to access Pledge information?

15)

4) 5) 2) 4) 0) E$ 0.533) X0.600)allowed you to access Tribute screen information?

15)

5) 1) 6) 3) 0) I$ 0.533) X0.267)allowed you to access Bio screen information?

14)

4) 5) 1) 4) 0) E$ 0.571) X0.643)allowed you to access the Other Info screen information?

15)

4) 5) 4) 2))) E$ 0.400) X0.467)allowed you to access Links screen information?

14)

7) 0) 4) 3))) A$ 0.714) X0.214)access the alternate Addresses screen information?

14)

5) 1) 6) 2))) I$ 0.500) X0.214)allowed you to access your customized user-defined fields?

14)

5) 4) 2) 3))) A$ 0.571) X0.500)allowed you to create Selection Filters to search for donor (Main/Bio) information?

14)

1) 3) 3) 7) 0) O$ 0.571) X0.714)allowed you to create Selection Filters to search for gift/pledge information?

14)

4) 3) 1) 6) 0) O$ 0.714) X0.643)automatically created a contact when you emailed or called a donor from the app?

14)

9) 3) 0) 1) 1) A$ 0.769) X0.308)allowed you to take pictures and save/display them on the donor screen in DonorPerfect?

14)

8) 0) 2) 3) 1) A$ 0.846) X0.231)the Donors Near Me feature worked in Canada?

14)

1) 0) 13) 0) 0) I$ 0.071) 0.000)the Donors Near Me feature worked in Europe?

14)

1) 0) 13) 0) 0) I$ 0.071) 0.000)had the ability to search for basic gift info (top 100 gifts/donors) within a date range?

14)

4) 4) 2) 4) 0) A$ 0.571) X0.571)allowed you to enter gifts? 14)

7) 2) 1) 2) 2) A$ 0.750) X0.333)

A: Attractive R: Reverse Q: Questionable Result E: Expected O: One Dimensional I: Indifferent

Page 17: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Add/Edit/Update)Data)

)access)Pledge)Info?)

)access)Tribute)Info?)

)access)Bio))Info?)

)access)Other)Info)Info?)

)access)Links))Info?)))access)Alt))Addresses))Info?)))))

)access)userXdefined)fields?)))

)create)Sel)Filters))for)donor)

(Main/Bio))Info?)

)create)Sel)Filters))for)giP/

pledge)Info?)))

automa&cally)created)a)contact)

when)you)emailed)or)called)a)

donor?)

)take)pictures))and)save/display)

them)on)the)donor)screen)in)

DonorPerfect?)

Donors)Near)Me)in)Canada?)

Donors)Near)Me)feature)

Europe?)))

)search))basic)giP)info)(top)100)

giPs))within)a)date)range?)))

)enter)giPs?)

X1.000)

X0.900)

X0.800)

X0.700)

X0.600)

X0.500)

X0.400)

X0.300)

X0.200)

X0.100)

0.000)

0.000) 0.100) 0.200) 0.300) 0.400) 0.500) 0.600) 0.700) 0.800) 0.900) 1.000)

<<<<BBBBBB$In

creaase$in$Dissa<sfac<on

$if$NOT$includ

ed$

Sa<sfac<on$Axis$(Sa<sfac<on$Increase$in$Sa<sfac<on$if$Included$BBBBBBBB>>>>>)$DPO$Mobile$Coefficients$of$Sa<sfac<on/Dissa<sfac<on$

Based'on'DPO'Mobile'Kano'survey'_'15'respondants'_'3/8/2012')

POP)QUIZ:)So)which)one)would)you)

pick?)

had the ability to search for basic gift info (top 100 gifts/donors) within a date range? 14) 4) 4) 2) 4) 0)A$ 0.571) X0.571)

allowed you to enter gifts? 14) 7) 2) 1) 2) 2)A$ 0.750) X0.333)

csBCoefficient$Extent$of$

Sa<sfac<on$

csBCoefficient$Extent$of$

Dissa<sfac<on$

!  Both)are)“A”)–)A:ractor/Exciters)

! Answer…)First)one…)Why?)

!  Because)doing)the)first)one)(.571X.333)=.238$)net)sa&sfac&on)!  But)(.750X.571)=.179$

!  But…'It'depends'on'what'ELSE'you'pick..'Or'don’t'pick!'

Page 18: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Best)Part?)You)can)let)the)model)

decide!)• Since)you)know)the)net)sa&sfac&on)for)each)feature…)• And)if)you)provide)es&mates)and)a)budget,)you)can)

build)a)model)in)excel…)

• Kano)can)even)let))you)calculate))

the)highest)possible))

net)sa&sfac&on))

you)can)deliver!')

Do)the)“Sa&sfac&on)Shuffle")DPO$Mobile$App$Kano$Survey$

E>O>A>I)Ques&on)(worded)in)the)Func&onal)form))A$=$A@rac<ve$(Exciter/Delighter)$$$O$=$One$Dimensional$B$Linear$$$E=$Expected$(Must$Have)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$I$=$Indifferent$$$$R$=$Reversal$(Inconsistant$Response)) Final)

answer)

csXCoefficeint)

Extent)of)

Sa&sfac&on)

csXCoefficeint)

Extent)of)

Disa&sfac&o

n)

$$

Effort$Es<mate$

Selected)Total)Sa&sfac&on)

Selected)Total)Dissa&sfac&on)

Net)Aggregate))

Sa&sfac&on) Cost$in$Hours$allowed you to access Links screen information? A$ 0.714) X0.214) Y$ 22.00$ 4.874$ B3.595$ 1.2784$ 176.00$

automatically created a contact when you emailed or called a donor from the app?

A$ 0.769) X0.308) Y$ 22.00$

allowed you to take pictures and save/display them on the donor screen in DonorPerfect?

A$ 0.846) X0.231) Y$ 22.00$

access the alternate Addresses screen information? I$ 0.500) X0.214) Y$ 20.00$

allowed you to enter gifts? A$ 0.750) X0.333) $$ 30.00$

allowed you to access Tribute screen information? I$ 0.533) X0.267) $$ 15.00$

the Donors Near Me feature worked in Canada? I$ 0.071) 0.000) Y$ 10.00$

the Donors Near Me feature worked in Europe? I$ 0.071) 0.000) Y$ 10.00$

allowed you to access your customized user-defined fields? A$ 0.571) X0.500) Y$ 20.00$

... allowed you to edit, add, and update information? A$ 0.615) X0.538) Y$ 25.00$

allowed you to create Selection Filters to search for gift/pledge information?

O$ 0.714) X0.643) Y$ 25.00$

had the ability to search for basic gift info (top 100 gifts/donors) within a date range?

A$ 0.571) X0.571) $$ 10.00$

allowed you to access Pledge information? E$ 0.533) X0.600) $$ 15.00$

allowed you to access the Other Info screen information? E$ 0.400) X0.467) $$ 15.00$

allowed you to access Bio screen information? E$ 0.571) X0.643) $$ 15.00$

allowed you to create Selection Filters to search for donor (Main/Bio) information?

O$ 0.571) X0.714) $$ 20.00$

Total:)227) 8.805) X6.244)

296.00$

Page 19: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Results?)Out)of)hundreds)of)

combina&ons)

!  Best)Combina&on)was)nearly)50%'higher'than'easiest'!  Best)Combina&on)was)270%'beMer'than'the'worst'

)

Same$130$Hour$Investment$

Net$Sa<sfac<on$

Best)Combina&on) 2.11)

Worst)Combina&on) X1.22)

Do)the)Easiest) 1.44)

Another)survey)we)did)with)Kano)

!  Chat$Requirements:$Iden&fied)a)list)of)approx)34)criteria.)))

!  Created)the)survey)and)executed)it)to)15)par&cipants)

!  Generated)the)results)and)plo:ed)them)How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)the)ability)to)ensure)they)could)only)be)contacted)by)buddies?)(I.e.)they)must)invite)friends)to)join)their)buddy)

list)and)only)friends)can)contact)them.))))

How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)could)monitor)the)chats)to)uphold)SoPerWare's)reputa&on?)))

How)would)you)feel)if)the)solu&on)had)fast)response)&mes?)))

How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)recognize)contributors)(on)a)profile)level))for)the)number)and/or)quality)of)submissions?)

(official)approval)ra&ng)by)SoPerWare))))

How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)run)reports)based)on)chats?)(certain)topics)/)keywords,)what)users)are)saying)about)us)or)

DonorPerfect)etc.))))

How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)filter)swear)words)and)the)ability)to)warn,)freeze,)or)boot)users)based)on)this)feature?)))

How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)moderate)chats?)(Event)host)answering)ques&ons)and/or)guiding)the)topic)of)conversa&on))))

How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)report)on)usage)sta&s&cs?)))

How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)include)social)networking)cloud)monitoring?)(what)is)being)said)on)Facebook,)Twi:er,)etc.))))

How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)rate)the)effec&veness)of)the)submission)/)chat)session?)))

How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)see)how)many)users)are)logged)into)chat?)

How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)create)their)own)chat)rooms?)))

How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)schedule)events?)))

How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)u&lize)screen)sharing?)))

How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)create)their)own)profile)to)be)viewed)by)other)users?)(Informa&on)might)include)user)loca&on,)

organiza&on)name,)interests,)level)of)exper&se,)number)of)submissions,)etc...))))

How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)the)ability)to)search)by)various)aspects)of)other)users')profiles?)(Find)an)animal)shelter,)Florida)nonprofits,)

childcare)centers)in)Philly,)etc.))))

How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)optXin)&)out)of)"groups")and/or)create)their)own)"groups"?)(based)on)interests,)loca&on)etc.))))

Page 20: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

eXperts$Online$Kano$Survey$Ques&on)(worded)in)the)Func&onal)form))

answ

e rs)

A) E) I) O) R)

Final)

answer)How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)the)ability)to)ensure)they)could)only)be)contacted)by)buddies?)(I.e.)they)must)invite)friends)to)join)their)buddy)list)and)only)friends)can)contact)them.))))

14)

3) 3) 2) 5) 1) O$How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)could)monitor)the)chats)to)uphold)SoPerWare's)reputa&on?))) 14)

4) 5))) 5))) E$How)would)you)feel)if)the)solu&on)had)fast)response)&mes?))) 14)

4) 5) 3) 1) 1) E$How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)recognize)contributors)(on)a)profile)level))for)the)number)and/or)quality)of)submissions?)(official)approval)ra&ng)by)SoPerWare))))

14)

6) 3) 2) 2) 1) A$How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)run)reports)based)on)chats?)(certain)topics)/)keywords,)what)users)are)saying)about)us)or)DonorPerfect)etc.))))

14)

7) 3) 1) 3))) A$How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)filter)swear)words)and)the)ability)to)warn,)freeze,)or)boot)users)based)on)this)feature?))) 13)

3) 8) 1) 1))) E$How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)moderate)chats?)(Event)host)answering)ques&ons)and/or)guiding)the)topic)of)conversa&on)))) 13)

5) 4) 4))) )) A$How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)report)on)usage)sta&s&cs?))) 13)

3) 10))) )) )) E$How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)include)social)networking)cloud)monitoring?)(what)is)being)said)on)Facebook,)Twi:er,)etc.)))) 13)

5) 1) 7))) )) I$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)rate)the)effec&veness)of)the)submission)/)chat)session?))) 13)

4) 4) 2) 3))) A$How)would)you)feel)if)SoPerWare)had)the)ability)to)see)how)many)users)are)logged)into)chat?) 13)

5) 5))) 3))) A$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)create)their)own)chat)rooms?))) 13)

5) 1) 6))) 1) I$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)schedule)events?))) 13)

5))) 8))) )) I$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)u&lize)screen)sharing?))) 13)

7) 1) 3) 1) 1) A$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)create)their)own)profile)to)be)viewed)by)other)users?)(Informa&on)might)include)user)loca&on,)organiza&on)name,)interests,)level)of)exper&se,)number)of)submissions,)etc...))))

13)

4) 6) 1) 2))) E$How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)the)ability)to)search)by)various)aspects)of)other)users')profiles?)(Find)an)animal)shelter,)Florida)nonprofits,)childcare)centers)in)Philly,)etc.))))

13)

4) 5) 3) 1))) E$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)optXin)&)out)of)"groups")and/or)create)their)own)"groups"?)(based)on)interests,)loca&on)etc.)))) 13)

6) 3) 2) 2))) A$How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)the)ability)to)search)past)threads)(chat)sessions)?)(This)could)be)useful)if)a)user)needs)to)refer)to)a)past)chat,)possibly)when)contac&ng)Support))))

13)

3) 6) 2) 2))) E$How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)the)ability)to)set)a)status)to)indicate)whether)they)are)busy,)available)etc.?))) 13)

4) 7) 1) 1))) E$How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)a)typing)status)alert?)("Tom")vs.)"Tom)is)typing...")))) 13)

9) 1) 2) 1))) A$How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)the)ability)to)detect)when)the)other)user)closes)the)chat)window?))) 13)

5) 4) 2) 2))) A$How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)the)ability)to)chat)privately?))) 13)

7) 3) 2))) 1) A$How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)a)"crawler")that)would)display)recent)chats?)(op&onal)on)/)off)))) 13)

6))) 4) 1) 2) A$How)would)you)feel)if)the)user)had)the)ability)to)create)tagged,)preXtyped)responses)to)be)saved)for)future)use?))) 13)

9))) 3))) 1) A$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)rate)other)users?))) 13)

5) 1) 4) 1) 2) A$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)rate)the)effec&veness)of)each)chat)session?))) 13)

5) 2) 2) 3) 1) A$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)send)links,)files,)etc.?)(much)like)Google)Chat)'Send)Files')op&on)))) 13)

5) 1) 2) 3) 2) A$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)print)chat)transcripts?))) 13)

2) 2) 5) 4))) I$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)leave)offline)messages?))) 13)

9))) 3) 1))) A$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)search)and)use)the)exis&ng)knowledge)base)from)within)eXperts)Online??))) 13)

4) 6))) 3))) E$How)would)you)feel)if)the)solu&on)searched)through)past)threads/solu&ons)before)beginning)a)chat)session?)The)top)10)preXapproved)SoPerWare/client)results)would)be)displayed,)and)the)user)would)have)the)ability)to)see)all)posts)if)desired.)Then,)if)the)

13)

5) 3) 2) 2) 1) A$How)would)you)feel)if)users)had)the)ability)to)use)a)whiteXboard)(communal)drawing)board))during)their)chat)session?))) 13)

6))) 7))) )) I$How)would)you)feel)if)users)could)u&lize)voice)chat?))) 13)

4))) 7) 1) 1) I$How)would)you)feel)if)USERS)had)the)ability)to)see)how)many)users)are)logged)into)chat?) 13)

4) 3) 3) 3))) A$

)only)contact)by)buddy)

SW)monitor)chat)

fast)response)&mes)

recognize)contributors)(on)a)

profile)level))run)reports)based)on)chats)

filter)swear)words)

moderate)chats)

report)on)usage)sta&s&cs)

social)networking)cloud)

monitoring)

rate)chat)effec&veness)

count)of)users)logged)in)

create)their)own)chat)rooms)

schedule)events)

u&lize)screen)sharing)

create)their)own)profile)

search)by)profiles)

create)their)own)"groups")

search)past)chat)sessions)

set)a)busy)status)

typing)status)alert)

detect)closed)chat)window)

chat)privately)

)"crawler")displays)recent)chats)

create)preXtyped)responses)

rate)other)users)

rate)chat)effec&veness)

send)links,)files)

print)chat)transcripts)

leave)offline)messages)

search)knowledge)base)

searched)past)threads)before)

chat)

whiteXboard)

voice)chat)

uses)see)count)logged)in)

X0.900)

X0.800)

X0.700)

X0.600)

X0.500)

X0.400)

X0.300)

X0.200)

X0.100)

0.000)

0.000) 0.100) 0.200) 0.300) 0.400) 0.500) 0.600) 0.700) 0.800) 0.900)

<BBB$Dissa<

sfac<o

n$if$no

t$perform

ed$

$

Sa<sfac<on$if$included$BBB>$$

Page 21: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Kano)can)be)used)alongside)other)

metrics)

•  Customer$Weigh<ng$•  Compe<<ve$Benchmarks$•  Company$culture$or$philosophy$•  Capability$to$sell)

Summary)of)Kano)Model)

!  The)Kano)Approach)then:)!  PROACTIVELY)X)Uses)survey)result)to)determine)a)level)of)sa&sfac&on)and)

dissa&sfac&on)for)possible)features/service)offerings)

!  Helps)dis&nguish)between)what)customers)“Like”,)“Need”,)and)“Expect”)

!  Divides)them)into)Categories)

!  MustBe/Expected)Quality)

!  One)Dimensional)(Performer))

!  A:ractor/Delighter)!  Reversers/Indifferent)

!  Allows)you)to)determine)net)sa&sfac&on)of)combina&ons)

!  Can)be)used)to)build)a)sa&sfac&on)ROI)“Best)bang)for)the)buck”))

Page 22: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

So)In)Conclusion…)Remember)

!  It's)a)tool.)Not)the)solu&on)but)part)of)it.)

!  It's)a)Predic&ve)Sa&sfac&on)Metric.)

!  It)accounts)for)dissa&sfac&on)as)well)as)sa&sfac&on.)

!  It)forces)some)introspec&on)of)our)less)formalized)

priori&za&on)and)intui&ons.)

!  It's)not)infallible.)

!  At)worst)it's)a)complement)to)alterna&ve)methods)

such)as...)

Alterna&ves)to)Kano?)

?)

Page 23: Your Agile Prioritization Process Is Probably Wrong

Ques&ons?)

References)

!  Erica)Lynn)Farmer,)CMQ/QE)Kano)Model)(slideshare))

!  Walder,)D.,)(1993).)Kano’s)model)for)understanding)customerXdefined)quality.)Center'For'Quality'of'Management'Journal,'39,)65)–)69.)

!  Jacobs,)R.,)(1997).)Evalua&ng)customer)sa&sfac&on)with)media)products)and)services.)European'Media'Management'Journal,'32,)11)–)18.)

!  Ungvari,)S.,)(1999).)Adding)the)third)dimension)to)auqlity.)Triz'Journal,'40,'31)–)35.)

!  Sauerwein,)E.,)Bailom,)F.,)Matzler,)K.,)&)Hinterhuber,)H.)(1996).)The)kano)model:)How)to)delight)your)customers.)InternaQonal'Working'Seminar'on'ProducQon'Economics,'19,'313)X)327)

!  Zultner,)R.E.)&)Mazur,)G.)H.)()2006).))The)Kano)Model:)Recent)Developments.))The'eighteenth'symposium'on'Quality'FuncQon'Deployment.))