Yohannes GebreMichael: Participatory climate-change adaptation building on local innovation

Participatory climate-change adaptation building on local

innovationYohannes G/Michael & Ann Waters-Bayer

Facing the reality of climate change

Weather extremes will occur more frequently

Rising temperatures will favour agents of tropical diseases.

Agricultural production could decline by 50% by 2020.

By 2025, about 480 million people in Africa could be living in water-stressed areas.

Many African crop farmers will be shifting to livestock-keeping

Natural phenomenon is non liner and less predictable

Living with climatic variability

Climatic variability is not a new phenomenon in Ethiopia

From 1540 to 1800 AD, 26 major droughts and famines were recorded.

The “great Ethiopian famine” happened in the period 1889–92.

Pastoralist had been the victims and have developed mechanisms to cope with high climate variability.

Thus, they were practising adaptation long before the concept of “climate change” emerged

Pastoralists’ adaptation to climate variability

Pastoralists’ livelihoods primarily based on livestock that graze natural pasture.

Globally, it is assumed that up to 200 million people are pastoralists.

In Africa, it is assumed to be up to 40 million people

In Ethiopia, up to 15 million and using more than 60% of the territory.

Mobility is one of the most successful strategies used by most pastoralists.

Pastoralists’ adaptation…(2)

Mobility has multiple functions including: - gaining access to water and pasture

- avoiding pests and diseases

- avoiding conflicts and risks of livestock raiding

- conserving biodiversity

Pastoralists keep different animals in order to: - reduce risks and improve overall productivity

- obtain food, means of transport and income from marketing

- exploit different ecological niches

Pastoralists’ adaptation…(3)

Similarly, vegetation in the drylands has many purposes, such as:pasture, bee forage, materials for tools, medicinal plants, materials for rituals, wild fruits, fuelwood and early-warning indicators of impending drought

General attributes of viable pastoral production systems are: flexibility, dynamism, multi-functionality, complementarity and reciprocity in resource use

The paradox: productive and adaptable yet vulnerable pastoralists

Traditional pastoral systems can produce up to ten times more food per unit area than can modern ranching.

In Ethiopia, pastoralists keep about three-quarters of all goats in the country, one quarter of the sheep, 20% of the cattle and all of the camels.

The livestock sector ranks second after coffee in generating foreign exchange for Ethiopia: up to US$ 50 million per annum.

The paradox…(2)

Many policymakers in Ethiopia have a vision to settle the pastoralists, considering them to be backward, primitive and a cause of poverty and land degradation.

Many of the prime areas used by pastoralists for dry-season grazing are allocated for government farms, private investors and national parks.

This increasing marginalisation is making pastoralists more vulnerable to the effects of droughts and climate change.

Moreover, insufficient attention is given to the deep-rooted knowledge and adaptation practices of pastoralists and their customary institutions for dealing with land-management issues.

Determinants of pastoralists’ vulnerability to climate change

Change in responsibility for herd management

Herd size

Livestock species kept

Strength of customary socio-political institutions

Geographical location of resource exploitation

Land-use systems

Particular emphasis by pastoralists on the degree of good governance in customary institutions

Why look at local innovation?

Recognising local innovativeness leads to more equal partnership in R&D

Local innovations are sources of valuable new knowledge based on deep-rooted experience

Stimulates appropriate and pro-poor adaptation

An entry point that increases self-confidence and motivation to adapt

Greater likelihood of sustainability

PROLINNOVA: PROmoting Local INNOVAtion in ecologically oriented agriculture and NRM

Global learning network

Functional since 2003

Members include more than 150 organisations of multiple stakeholders (state and non-state)

Currently, 18 countries involved

VisionA world in which women and men farmers play decisiveroles in research and development for sustainable livelihoods

MissionTo foster a culture of mutual learning and synergy in local innovation process in agriculture and NRM

Goal To develop and institutionalise partnerships and methods that promote processes of local innovation for ecologically sound use of natural resources

Approach and concepts in study on local innovation and climate change

PROLINNOVA initiated an exploratory study with funds made available by the Netherlands (DGIS).

In 2008, some PROLINNOVA partners in Ethiopia, Nepal and Niger started studies on local innovation in the face of climate change.

This paper is based on results in Ethiopia from semi-structured interviews and discussions with different stakeholders, both individuals and focus groups in Afar, Somali and S.Omo

Approach and concepts…(2)

Innovation

Discovery of new and better ways of doing things

Not something inherited but could be building on existing technology / practice

Could also involve modification of introduced technologies

Every pastoralist has to be an innovator to some degree.

Approach and concepts…(3)

Adaptation

A continuous learning process

A response to actual or expected risks

Integrates mitigation in its process

Can be spontaneous or planned

Can involve technological or institutional/ management change or process

Can arise from a challenge or an opportunity

Challenges in understanding local innovation

Difficulties in separating climate-change impacts from other pressures on pastoral systems

Distinguishing between indigenous practices and local innovation

Recognising small but possibly important changes

Keeping a longer-term perspective

Keeping pace with fast change

Some of the pastoralists contacted

Pastoralists’ emerging responses to climate change

Developing their own cut and carry feeding system

Settlement around water points

Purchasing with credit

Changing herd composition

Settlement on islands in dryland lakes

Diversification of livelihood sources

Use of motor vehicles to transport water, fodder and/or animals

Use of Traditional early warning systems

Empowerment of traditional institutions

Major features of the local innovations

Wide range of different types of innovation

Group innovations

Multi-functionality of innovations

Diversification of livelihoods

Traditional early warning systems

Cut and carry feed from national parks

Increased rearing of small animals

Multipurpose use of trucks (water / livestock)

Prolonged flooding leads to more weeds: used as fodder followed by zero tillage

Opportunistic cropping

Lessons learned and the way forward

Recognising local innovativeness by pastoralists provides an entry point for a bottom-up approach to supporting climate-change adaptation, starting with local capacities and ideas.

Local innovation in adaptation to climate change needs to be assessed together with other environmental, socio-economic and policy changes.

Documentation of adaptation needed as a continuous process for a better understanding of community competence to adapt and of need for joint experimentation and policy reorientation.

Lessons learned…(2)

The focus should be not so much on specific innovations, but rather on documenting local innovation as a process.

Recognition of pastoralist innovation could lead to more equal partnership in formal research and development activities.

Results of such joint innovation processes would have a higher likelihood of sustainability than would starting interaction with external interventions that are foreign to the pastoralists.

Thank you