PROJECT NAME Humanitarian support to Syria IMPACT Impact Indicator 1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Planned TBD 48,240 198,659 339,580 480,906 1,104,638 Achieved 86,768 318,089 666,488 196% 666,488 Source Baseline/Endline Survey OUTCOME Outcome Indicator 1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Assumptions Planned N 0 36,240 107,523 186,702 253,702 717,198 P 0 43,136 92,837 133,908 249,595 I 12,000 48,000 60,050 93,296 137,845 Total 48,240 198,659 339,589 480,906 1,104,638 Achieved N 70,014 194,024 406,364 218% P 0 66,862 177,421 191% I 16,754 57,163 82,703 138% Total 0 86,768 318,049 666,488 196% 0 0 Achieved Source DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) 27,250,527 27,250,527 27,250,527 INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs) OUTPUT 1: FOOD Output Indicator 1.1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Assumption Planned N 0 56,400 169,206 282,012 394,812 1,128,036 P 0 54,000 108,000 141,000 240,000 I 12,000 18,000 30,960 49,950 68,100 Total 68,400 241,206 420,972 585,762 1,436,136 0 Achieved N 124,374 343,074 431,070 153% P 0 78,703 124,919 116% I 12,000 32,000 48,116 155% Total 136,374 453,777 604,105 144% 0 0 Source: Output Indicator 1.2 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Planned N 7,500 15,000 22,500 30,000 60,000 I 0 0 6,000 12,000 18,000 Total 7,500 15,000 28,500 42,000 78,000 0 *Ability to procure quality items locally Achieved N 0 0 0 0% I 0 0 5,746 96% Total 0 0 5,746 20% 0 0 IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Source 55% INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) 21,381,185 21,381,185 21,381,185 INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs) Output Indicator 2.1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Assumptions Planned P 0 3,000 15,000 21,300 40,200 I 5,754 48,300 85,786 133,280 196,922 Total 5,754 51,300 100,786 154,580 237,122 0 Achieved P 0 3,295 23,114 154% I 5,754 38,454 77,193 90% Total 5,754 41,749 100,307 100% 0 0 Source: Output Indicator 2.2 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Planned N 0 400 1,000 1,636 0 1,636 0 N 1,636 1,251 76% Achieved IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Source: 20% *Distribution lists INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) 2,743,169 2,743,169 2,743,169 INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs) OUTPUT 3: LIVELIHOODS Output Indicator 3.1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Assumptions Planned N 0 0 6,000 6,000 12,000 P 0 65 725 11,640 33,570 I 0 0 0 22,392 44,784 Total 0 65 6,725 40,032 90,354 0 N 0 9,354 156% P 65 65 9% I 0 0 #DIV/0! Total 65 9,419 140% 0 0 Achieved Source IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Output Indicator 3.2 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 15% Planned P 0 0 65 100 250 1,000 Achieved P 65 65 65% Source RISK RATING Baseline and endline surveys/interviews INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) 2,059,866 2,059,866 2,059,866 INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs) OUTPUT 4: CAPACITY BUILDING Output Indicator 4.1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Assumptions Planned P 0 0 1 2 3 5 Achieved P 0 2 2 100% Source *Photography and beneficiary data is possible. Program files will have a detailed plan available for capacity building for each partner highlighting the main gaps. Output Indicator 4.2 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Planned P 0 0 5 10 15 20 Achieved P 0 23 23 230% IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Source RISK RATING 10% Pre and Post training results, Attendance sheets INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) 1,066,307 1,066,307 1,066,307 INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs) Vulnerable men, women and children in Syria protect and sustain themselves against the effects of the Syrian conflict Number of target individuals who have sustained access to basic humanitarian services 86,768 73,968 318,089 294,236 Urgent and medium term needs of vulnerable individuals are met Minimum number of vulnerable individuals throughout Syria who have sustained access to lifesaving humanitarian assistance (nfis, food baskets, livelihoods) (estimated unique beneficiaries) *3222 benefit from 537 new arrival kits - transferred from previous grant ** 3954 benefit through 659 hygiene kits N - 70,014 * P - 0 I - 16,754 ** 3,954 Total - 86, 768 73,968 N - 194,024 192,263 P - 66,862 82,153 I - 57, 163 19,820 Total - 318,049 294,236 N: 406,364 P - 177,421 I - 82,703 Total - 666,488 *Opposition maintains control of targeted geographic area, thereby allowing access to affected population and the maintenance of supply chains. *Markets in Turkey and Syria remain functional and accessible *Border crossings between Turkey and Syria remain open *Baseline and Endline data gathered by M&E Officers on the ground. (dissagregated by age and sex) *Peer agency data on population and internal movements (IDPs) *Feedback mechanism information *Post distribution monitoring *Markets in Turkey and Syria remain functional and accessible *Border re-opens and remains open for duration of project. Suggested changes: Border crossings People supported with monthly food aid throughout Syria Number of monthly full food rations provided to individuals (cumulative) . *1 'ration' = 1 food basket x 6 (average number of people per household) N - 56,400 (33,840) P - 0 I - 12,000 (12,000) Total - 68,400 (45,840) N - 169,206 (101,523) P - 54,000 (40,000) I - 18,000 (15,000) Total - 241,206 (156,523) N - 282,012 (169,886) P - 108,000 (80,000) I - 30,960 (22,000) Total - 420,972 (271,886) N - 394,812 (236,886) P - 141,000 (105,000) I - 49,950 (33,000) Total - 597,222 (374,886) N - 1,128,036 (699,382) P - 240,000 (185,000) I - 68,100 (45,000) Total - 1,436,136 (929,382) *Security situation remains stable enough for Mercy Corps to access beneficiaries ** bracketed number is approximate unique beneficiaries N - 124,374 (66,792) P - 0 I - 12,000 (12,000) 0 Total -136,374 (78,972) N - 343,074 (184,757) P - 78,703 (63,382) (78,703) I - 32,000 (27,000) 15,205 (10,035) Total - 436,982 (273,495) N: 431,070 (387,988) P -124,919 (124,919) I - 48,116 (31,756) Total: 604,105 (544,663) *Relief Committees groups remain actively involved in project *Mercy Corps’ partners have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials. *Number of beneficiaries receiving food assistance, disaggregated by age and sex. *Distribution lists *Post distribution monitoring *Partner reports verified through M&E Officer on the ground (photos, beneficiary lists, satisfaction surveys) *Markets in Turkey and Syria remain functional and accessible *Border crossings between Turkey and Syria remain open *Cash can be transferred locally. Suggested changes: Cash transfer mechanisms inside Syria are functioning. *Able to access and identify vulnerable households based on criteria suggested changes: Mercy Corps is able to access the …of which, number of monthly full food rations provided through vouchers to *included as part of output 1.1 numbers, (therefore not to be included in outcome N - 7500 I - 0 Total - 7500 N - 15,000 I - 0 Total - 15,000 N - 22,500 I - 6000 Total - 28,500 N - 30,000 I - 12,000 Total - 42,000 N - 60,000 I - 18,000 Total - 78,000 N - 0 I - 0 Total - 0 N - 0 I - 0 Total - 0 N - 0 I - 5,746 Total - 5,746 *Ability to work independently and without influence from external actors / authorities *Number of beneficiaries receiving food assistance, disaggregated by age and sex. *Distribution lists *Post distribution monitoring *Partner reports verified through M&E Officer on the ground (photos, beneficiary lists, satisfaction surveys) OUTPUT 2: NFIs Vulnerable Syrians are assisted through emergency non-food assistance Number of individuals benefitting from relief packages distributed (cumulative) * bracketed numbers are expected unique beneficiaries (cumulative) P - 0 I - 5,754 (5,754) Total - 5,754 (5,754) P - 3000 (3000) I - 48,300 (33,810) Total - 51,300 (36,810) P - 15,000 (12,000) I - 85,786 (60,050) Total - 100,786 (72,050) P - 21, 300 (17,000) I - 133,280 (93,296) Total - 173,480 (110,296) P - 40,200 (30,000) I - 196,922 (137,845) Total - 237,122 (167,845) *Mercy Corps’ partners have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials. P - 0 I - 5,754 (5,754) 3,954 (3,954) Total - 3954 (3954) P - 3295 (3295) I - 38, 454 (29,644) 14,899 (9,833) Total - 18,194 (13,128) P - 23,114 (23,114) I - 77,193 (50,947) Total - 100,307 (74,061) *Markets in Iraq, Turkey and Syria remain functional *Borders remain open Suggested changes: Border crossings between Turkey and Syria remain open and border authorities on both sides of border cooperate in transfer of aid commodities to affected communities *Distribution lists *Post distribution monitoring *Partner reports verified through M&E Officer on the ground (photos, beneficiary lists, satisfaction surveys) *Cash can be transferred locally. Suggested changes: Cash transfer mechanisms inside Syria are functioning *Able to access and identify vulnerable households based on criteria. suggested changes: Mercy Corps or partners are able to access the beneficiaries inside Syria. *Ability to work independently and without influence from external actors / authorities *Ability to procure quality items locally *Mercy Corps’ partners have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials Number of family tents distributed to newly arrived IDP households (6 persons per household) N - 400 Total - 400 N - 1000 Total - 1000 N - 1,636 (9186) Total - 1,636 (9186) N - 0 Total - 1,636 N - 1,636 Total - 1,636 *Security situation remains stable enough for Mercy Corps to access beneficiaries N - 0 Total - 0 N - 1,636 (9816) 1251 (7506) Total - 7,506 (7,506) N - 1251 (7506) Total - 1251 (7,506) *Relief Committees groups remain actively involved in project People are supported through agriculture/livelihood interventions throughout Syria Number of people supported through agriculture/livelihood interventions throughout Syria * bracketed numbers are approximate unique beneficiaries **all number include direct and indirect beneficiaries N - 0 P - 0 I - 0 Total - 0 N - 0 P - 65 (65) I - 0 Total - 65 (65) N - 6000 (6000) P - 725 (725) I - 0 Total - 6,725 (6,725) N - 6,000 (6,000) P - 11,640 (11, 640) I - 22,392 (22,932) Total - 40,032 (40,032) N - 12,000 (6,000) P - 33,570 (33,570) I - 44,784 (22,392) Total - 90,354 (61,962) *Acceptable level of security risk for staff, operations and communities, to engage in program N - 0 P - 65 (65) I - 0 Total - 65 (65) N - 9354 (10,870) P - 65 (65) I - 0 Total - 9419 (10,935) *Farmers groups remain actively involved in project *Markets in Iraq ,Turkey and Syria remain functional * Baseline and end line of number of household engaging in traditional livelihood activities * Distribution lists *Borders remain open Suggested changes: Border crossings between Turkey and Syria remain open and border authorities on both sides of Number of vulnerable women and youth who benefit from vocational training Partner organizations have their capacities built to provide assistance, including to meet emergency needs Number of detailed capacity building plans developed for partner organizations *Partner staff members can travel safely to trainings if necessary *Partners can manage risks in order to operate in hard-to-access areas requiring Number of partner organization staff successfully completing the training
55
Embed
[XLS]iati.dfid.gov.ukiati.dfid.gov.uk/iati_documents/5088782.xlsx · Web viewMaaret Sednaya معرة صيدنايا C2407 Hosh Arab حوش عرب C2408 Fayadiyeh الفياضية
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
PROJECT NAME Humanitarian support to Syria
IMPACT Impact Indicator 1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016Planned TBD 48,240 198,659 339,580 480,906 1,104,638
Achieved 86,768 318,089 666,488 196%
666,488SourceBaseline/Endline Survey
OUTCOME Outcome Indicator 1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Assumptions
OUTPUT 3: LIVELIHOODS Output Indicator 3.1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Assumptions
Planned
N 0 0 6,000 6,000 12,000
P 0 65 725 11,640 33,570I 0 0 0 22,392 44,784
Total 0 65 6,725 40,032 90,3540
N 0 9,354 156%P 65 65 9%I 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total 65 9,419 140% 0 0Achieved *Farmers groups remain actively involved in project
Source
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Output Indicator 3.2 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 201615% Planned P 0 0 65 100 250 1,000
Achieved P 65 65 65%Source RISK RATINGBaseline and endline surveys/interviews
INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£)2,059,866 2,059,866 2,059,866
INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs)
OUTPUT 4: CAPACITY BUILDING Output Indicator 4.1 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016 Assumptions
Planned P 0 0 1 2 3 5
Achieved P 0 2 2 100%
Source *Photography and beneficiary data is possible.Program files will have a detailed plan available for capacity building for each partner highlighting the main gaps.
Output Indicator 4.2 Baseline 2014 Milestone 1 (30 Sep 2014) Milestone 2 (31 Dec 2014) Milestone 3 (31 Mar 2015) PROGRESS Milestone 4 (30 Jun 2015) Target 30 Jun 2016Planned P 0 0 5 10 15 20Achieved P 0 23 23 230%
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Source RISK RATING10% Pre and Post training results, Attendance sheets
INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£)1,066,307 1,066,307 1,066,307
INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs)
Vulnerable men, women and children in Syria protect and sustain themselves against the effects of the Syrian conflict
Number of target individuals who have sustained access to basic humanitarian services
86,768 73,968 318,089 294,236
Urgent and medium term needs of vulnerable individuals are met
Minimum number of vulnerable individuals throughout Syria who have sustained access to lifesaving humanitarian assistance (nfis, food baskets, livelihoods)
(estimated unique beneficiaries)
*3222 benefit from 537 new arrival kits - transferred from previous grant
** 3954 benefit through 659 hygiene kits to Iraqi refugees in Al Hassakeh
*Opposition maintains control of targeted geographic area, thereby allowing access to affected population and the maintenance of supply chains. Suggested changes: Controlling authorities cooperates in distribution of aids to affected *Markets in Turkey and Syria remain functional and accessible *Border crossings between Turkey and Syria remain open
*Baseline and Endline data gathered by M&E Officers on the ground. (dissagregated by age and sex)*Peer agency data on population and internal movements (IDPs)*Feedback mechanism information*Post distribution monitoring
*Markets in Turkey and Syria remain functional and accessible *Border re-opens and remains open for duration of project. Suggested changes: Border crossings between Turkey and Syria remain open and border authorities on both sides of border
People supported with monthly food aid throughout Syria
Number of monthly full food rations provided to individuals (cumulative)
.
*1 'ration' = 1 food basket x 6 (average number of people per household)
N - 56,400 (33,840) P - 0 I - 12,000 (12,000)Total - 68,400 (45,840)
N - 169,206 (101,523)P - 54,000 (40,000) I - 18,000 (15,000)Total - 241,206 (156,523)
N - 282,012 (169,886)P - 108,000 (80,000) I - 30,960 (22,000)Total - 420,972 (271,886)
N - 394,812 (236,886) P - 141,000 (105,000) I - 49,950 (33,000)Total - 597,222 (374,886)
N - 1,128,036 (699,382)P - 240,000 (185,000) I - 68,100 (45,000)Total - 1,436,136 (929,382)
*Security situation remains stable enough for Mercy Corps to access beneficiaries
** bracketed number is approximate unique beneficiaries
*Relief Committees groups remain actively involved in project
*Mercy Corps’ partners have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials.
*Number of beneficiaries receiving food assistance, disaggregated by age and sex. *Distribution lists *Post distribution monitoring*Partner reports verified through M&E Officer on the ground (photos, beneficiary lists, satisfaction surveys)
*Markets in Turkey and Syria remain functional and accessible *Border crossings between Turkey and Syria remain open *Cash can be transferred locally. Suggested changes: Cash transfer mechanisms inside Syria are functioning.
*Able to access and identify vulnerable households based on criteria suggested changes: Mercy Corps is able to access the beneficiaries inside Syria.
…of which, number of monthly full food rations provided through vouchers to individuals (cumulative).*included as part of output 1.1 numbers, (therefore not to be included in outcome total)
N - 7500 I - 0Total - 7500
N - 15,000 I - 0 Total - 15,000
N - 22,500 I - 6000Total - 28,500
N - 30,000 I - 12,000Total - 42,000
N - 60,000 I - 18,000Total - 78,000
N - 0 I - 0Total - 0
N - 0I - 0 Total - 0
N - 0I - 5,746Total - 5,746
*Ability to work independently and without influence from external actors / authorities
*Number of beneficiaries receiving food assistance, disaggregated by age and sex. *Distribution lists *Post distribution monitoring*Partner reports verified through M&E Officer on the ground (photos, beneficiary lists, satisfaction surveys)
OUTPUT 2: NFIs
Vulnerable Syrians are assisted through emergency non-food
assistance
Number of individuals benefitting from relief packages distributed (cumulative)
* bracketed numbers are expected unique beneficiaries (cumulative)
P - 0 I - 5,754 (5,754)Total - 5,754 (5,754)
P - 3000 (3000) I - 48,300 (33,810)Total - 51,300 (36,810)
P - 15,000 (12,000) I - 85,786 (60,050)Total - 100,786 (72,050)
P - 21, 300 (17,000) I - 133,280 (93,296)Total - 173,480 (110,296)
P - 40,200 (30,000) I - 196,922 (137,845)Total - 237,122 (167,845)
*Mercy Corps’ partners have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials.
P - 0 I - 5,754 (5,754) 3,954 (3,954)Total - 3954 (3954)
P - 3295 (3295) I - 38, 454 (29,644) 14,899 (9,833)Total - 18,194 (13,128)
P - 23,114 (23,114)I - 77,193 (50,947)Total - 100,307 (74,061)
*Markets in Iraq, Turkey and Syria remain functional
*Borders remain open Suggested changes: Border crossings between Turkey and Syria remain open and border authorities on both sides of border cooperate in transfer of aid commodities to affected communities
*Distribution lists*Post distribution monitoring*Partner reports verified through M&E Officer on the ground (photos, beneficiary lists, satisfaction surveys)
*Cash can be transferred locally. Suggested changes: Cash transfer mechanisms inside Syria are functioning*Able to access and identify vulnerable households based on criteria. suggested changes: Mercy Corps or partners are able to access the beneficiaries inside Syria.*Ability to work independently and without influence from external actors / authorities*Ability to procure quality items locally
*Mercy Corps’ partners have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials
Number of family tents distributed to newly arrived IDP households (6 persons per
household)
N - 400Total - 400
N - 1000Total - 1000
N - 1,636 (9186)Total - 1,636 (9186)
N - 0 Total - 1,636
N - 1,636Total - 1,636
*Security situation remains stable enough for Mercy Corps to access beneficiaries
N - 0Total - 0
N - 1,636 (9816) 1251 (7506)Total - 7,506 (7,506)
N - 1251 (7506)Total - 1251 (7,506)
*Relief Committees groups remain actively involved in project
People are supported through agriculture/livelihood interventions
throughout Syria
Number of people supported through agriculture/livelihood interventions throughout
Syria
* bracketed numbers are approximate unique beneficiaries
**all number include direct and indirect beneficiaries
N - 0P - 0 I - 0Total - 0
N - 0P - 65 (65) I - 0Total - 65 (65)
N - 6000 (6000)P - 725 (725) I - 0Total - 6,725 (6,725)
N - 6,000 (6,000)P - 11,640 (11, 640) I - 22,392 (22,932)Total - 40,032 (40,032)
N - 12,000 (6,000)P - 33,570 (33,570) I - 44,784 (22,392) Total - 90,354 (61,962)
*Acceptable level of security risk for staff, operations and communities, to engage in program
*Markets in Iraq ,Turkey and Syria remain functional
* Baseline and end line of number of household engaging in traditional livelihood activities* Distribution lists
*Borders remain open Suggested changes: Border crossings between Turkey and Syria remain open and border authorities on both sides of border cooperate in transfer of aid commodities to affected communities
Number of vulnerable women and youth who benefit from vocational training
Partner organizations have their capacities built to provide assistance, including to meet emergency needs
Number of detailed capacity building plans developed for partner organizations
*Partner staff members can travel safely to trainings if necessary
*Partners can manage risks in order to operate in hard-to-access areas requiring critical relief
Number of partner organization staff successfully completing the training
RESULTS BREAKDOWN BY LOCATION AND BENEFICIARY TYPE
Notes for partners:-Please note that completion of this table will require multiple entries per output/indicator, linked to geographic location and beneficiary type/demographic.-Ensure that the total sum for each indicator is the same as the total provided in the achieved row of the logframe for the corresponding timeframe. -Ensure that reporting periods provided match those in the logframe. -As a minimum provide results broken down by governarote and district (if sub-district and commune/village/town level information is available, please also provide).
RESULTS BREAKDOWN BY LOCATION AND BENEFICIARY TYPE
-Please note that completion of this table will require multiple entries per output/indicator, linked to geographic location and beneficiary type/demographic.-Ensure that the total sum for each indicator is the same as the total provided in the achieved row of the logframe for the corresponding timeframe.
-As a minimum provide results broken down by governarote and district (if sub-district and commune/village/town level information is available, please also provide).
People supported with monthly food aid throughout Syria
People supported through emergency non-food items
People supported through agricultural/livelihoods interventions
throughout Syria
Partner organisations have their capacities built.
Humanitarian support to Syria
OUTCOME IMPACT
Urgent and medium term needs of
vulnerable individuals in Syria are met
Vulnerable men, women and children in Syria protect and sustain
themselves against the effects of the Syrian
conflict
L
Humanitarian Support to Syria
Results Chain
IMPACT
OUTCOME
OUTPUTS
55%
20%
15%
10%
Vulnerable men, women and children in Syria protect and sustain themselves against the
effects of the Syrian conflict
Urgent and medium-term needs of vulnerable individuals are met
People supported with monthly food assistance throughout
Syria
People supported through emergency non-food items
People are supported through agricultural/livelihoods
interventions throughout Syria
Partner organizations have their capacities built
Humanitarian Support to Syria
Indicators
76,242
76,242
76,242
15,000
94,500
Family tents distributed 2,122
22,500
20,600
4,000
1000
5
25
Target 30 June 2016
Number of individuals who have sustained access to basic humanitarian
services
Number of individuals throughout Syria who receive sustained life-saving
humanitarian assistance
Average number of people reached with monthly food per month (average per
month)
Average number of people reached with monthly food voucer assistance per
month (average per month)
Number of individuals benefitting from relief packages distributed
Number of people who receive hygiene kits
Number of people supported through livelihoods/agricultutal interventions
Number of hectares planted through Mercy Corps assistance
Number of vulnerable women and youth who benefit from vocational training
Number of detailed capacity building plans developed for partner organisations
Number of partner organisation staff completing training
62,500Number of beneficiaries reached by each partner organization
Summary Risk MatrixPotential Risk Mitigation
1. Border closures
2. Deterioration in security situat
4. Markets cease to function
5. Fraudulent use of voucher sys
8. Aid being diverted or stolen.
Perform comparation analysis on market prices and costs to open sub-offices inside Syria. Choose alternative border crossing using commercial transportation company. Establish communication system with distribution partner. Search opportunity for local procurement or voucher/cash programme.
Staff members limit movements based on security assessment of whether some operational areas remain safe for movement. Whenever possible, avoid night travel. Budget should be allocated for expatriate evacuation process, and to procure the equipment need for evacuation. Worst case, temporary suspension of activities.
3. Change of controlling authorities in operating areas
Maintain good relationship with local authorities and monitor political situation.
Procurement/supplier contingencies, ensure local procurement is one of several 'options' for procurement / commodity purchasing, logistics resilience as part of sub-grant project design.
The vouchers will change colour every month and the vendors will be pre-notified which voucher colour is valid for use each month. The vouchers will be printed outside of Syria for greater control so as to prevent fraudulent printing and will be printed on special paper that includes a unique trademark making them both expensive and difficult to reproduce.
6. Misuse of cash transfers to implementing partners
Select partners based on stringent selection criteria and legal vetting. Systematically build the capacity of CBOs, using mutiple and innovative monitoring techniques (beneficiary feedback, self-reporting, third party monitoring) to ensure funding is being used as intended. Multiple cash transfer modalities explored/used for individual partner situations.
7. Downstream Partners unable to manage risks and deliver effectively
Have regular meetings with partner. Build capacity of partners and enforce strict criterias for beneficiary selection to ensure transparency and to avoid miscontent among communities. Ensure minimum standards in place for monitoring and financial management. Good monitoring from Mercy Corps: gather feedback from beneficiary community during post distribution monitoring, and review partners' performance.
Foster community relationship and acceptance. Use minimal stock in warehouse to maintain distributions until warehouse can be restocked, and monitor food storage and handling. Ensure contractor follows term in the contract to provide roadworthy and safe trucks for transport. Always receive clearance before sending trucks to destinations. Ensure at least minimum level security in place at warehouse. Partners inform Mercy Corps immediately when the looting of commodities happens, so that more mitigation measures can be taken.
Detailed Risk Matrix
Potential Risk Mitigation
NORTH SYRIA
Deterioration of political situation Monitor the situation
Clarity in expectations. Prepare alternative contractor.
Work on possibility to have radio communication
Poor food storage Monitor partners' warehouse. Improve/ move MC WH in Azaz. Low staff morale Proper management.
Kilis and other Borders (Atmeh, Reyhanlı, Jawban Bey) are closed temporarily
Communicate with (Turkey) suppliers and Syrian truck company for the overnight possibility and find agreement on extra cost they require. Find alternative points of entry. Communication system with distribution partner needs to be established -- to maintain organization and donor reputation related justify schedule delaya. Search opportunity for local procurement or voucher/cash program.
Kilis Border is closed permanently
Preparing to equip Kilis WH as need for contingency plan, and collect market price related renting trucks, and cost to open sub-office. Find alternative points of entry. Search opportunity for local procurement or voucher/cash program.
Deterioration of security (military, civil: riots, bombing, air strikes) in operational area that requires expat evacuation
Evacuation plan should be in place, and shared w\all MC staff. Budget should be allocated for expatriate evacuation process, and start to procure the equipment need for evacuation. Staff members can limit personal exposure increasing their safety, but there is no control on the impact that might affect cities and partners we work in/with.
Foster community relationship and acceptance. Maintain communication with partners, and continue home visits to beneficiaries' houses.
Whenever possible, avoid night travel. Always receive clearancebefore sending trucks to destinationsEnsure contractor follows term in the contract to provide roadworthy and safe trucks for transport.
Truck company breach of contractTurkcell communication breakdownRelief committees (partner) decide to resign following community pressure
Build capacity of RCs and enforce strict criterias for beneficiary selection to avoid miscontent among communities.
Relief committees (partner) delays the work
Constant follow up on preparation of beneficiary lists and distribution methodologies.
Relief committees (partner) involved in fraud (financial; beneficiary selection)
Verification of beneficiary lists and regular meeting with RCs to monitor their performance and give constructive feedback. Gather inputs from beneficiaries/communities
Relief committees (partner) distributes without monitors
Provide monitors when/whereever possible. Post distribution monitoring is conducted immediately (house visit) after distirbution.
Child Labor in the distribution
PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMME
As above.
As above.
Partners affiliated with armed groups (not neutral anymore)
Good monitoring from Mercy Corps. Review partners' performance and communicate the message to be neutral. If there is proof of non-neutriality, partners can be released from agreement with Mercy Corps.
Awareness education to partners related with child labor issue, and how to do child protection instead.
Looting of commodities in partners warehouse or Mercy Corps warehouse
Alert partners to finish distribution as soon as possible when the situation calms. Empty MC warehouse and distribute the food kits. No stock inside Syria temporarily until situation is safe. Partners have been told to inform Mercy Corps immediately when this happens.
Percentage of beneficiaries are not met criteria (because of less monitoring/no movement-based on security situation) increased.
If security allows, Mercy Corps will do immediate PDM to give feedback to partners about their peformance, and will break the partnership if necessary.
No office in N-Syria can caused of lack communication and coordination, also difficulties of administration support.
Change the communication structures, adjust with the situation. Coordination need to be improved. Communication tools need to be improved.
Mercy Corps staff involved incident with FSA or ISIS because of argued during distribution or/and have relatives involved with armed groups
Identify staffs who has related problem, assessing their situation and potential risk in the future. This will be done case by case. Security team will be involved.
Mercy Corps’ partners in Damascus City have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials cut, by conflict intensity, checkpoints, or other access restrictions.
Participatory risk assessments, operational capacity-development, strong security and access information systems to support safe and secure operational decision-making. Partners already have an operational presence in areas of sub-grant project implementation.
Mercy Corps’ partners in Rif Damascus have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials cut, by conflict intensity, checkpoints, or other access restrictions.
Mercy Corps’ partners in Dera'a have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials cut, by conflict intensity, checkpoints, or other access restrictions.
As above.
As above.
As above.
Markets remain functional
Alternative entry points explored, elsewhere around Syria.
AL HASSAKEH
Theft (trucks or warehouse)
Mercy Corps’ partners in Homs have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials cut, by conflict intensity, checkpoints, or other access restrictions.
Mercy Corps’ partners in Sweida have access to carry out procurement and distribution of materials cut, by conflict intensity, checkpoints, or other access restrictions.
Partners can manage risks in order to operate in hard-to-access areas requiring critical relief
Procurement/supplier contingencies, logistics resilience as part of sub-grant project design.
Cash can be transferred locally.
Multiple cash transfer modalities explored/used for individual partner situations.
Border with Lebanon remains openPhotography and beneficiary data collection is possible.
Case by case planning for feasible monitoring and evaluation systems, if unfeasible due to security considerations. Third-party verification systems enabled, to cover cases where robust partner-led monitoring and documentation systems are insufficient or better corroborated.
Peskabour is closed for humanitarian aid crossings
Choose alternative border crossing using commercial transportation company. Scale up local procurement in Hassakeh. Use minimal stock in Hassakeh warehouse to maintain distributions until warehouse can be restocked.
Deterioration of security in operational area that restricts movement of staff and commodities in Hassakeh
Staff members limit movements based on security assessment of whether some operational areas remain safe for movement. Worst case, temporary suspension of activities and so inform partners and beneficiaries Whenever possible, avoid night travel. Always receive clearance before sending trucks to destinations. Ensure at least minimum level security in place at warehouse.
Relief committees (or other local partners) decide to stop working with Mercy Corps (eg; due to pressure from community or authorities)
Build capacity of RCs and enforce strict criterias for beneficiary selection to ensure transparency. Maintain good relationship with local authorities. Build network for direct distribution channels.
Relief committees (or other local partners) involved in fraud (financial; beneficiary selection)
Verification of beneficiary lists and regular meeting with RCs. Gather feedback from beneficiary community during post distribution monitoring. Ensure minimum standards in place for monitoring and financial management.
Markets no longer functional
Multiple cash transfer modalities explored/used
Intended beneficiaries are not met due to inaccurate or inappropriate beneficiary selection procedure or because of restricted movements.
Monitor secuirity situation to anticipate if movement restrictions might occur. Provide capacity building to partners on beneficiary identification processes, provide tools and techniques. Ensure Mercy Corps field monitors available to support.
Procurement/supplier contingency, ensure local procurement is one of several 'options' for procurement / commodity purchasing
Cash cannot be transferred locally.
Summary Risk MatrixProbability Impact
Medium Medium
High High
Low Low
Medium Medium
Medium Medium
Low Medium
Medium Medium
Medium Medium
Detailed Risk Matrix
Probability Impact
Medium Medium
Low Medium
High Medium
Low Low
Medium Low
Low Low
Low Medium
Low Medium
Low Medium
Low High
Medium Medium
Medium Medium
Low Medium
Medium Low
Medium MediumMedium Medium
Medium Medium
Medium Low
Medium Medium
Low Medium
Medium Medium
Medium Medium
Low Medium
Low Medium
Low Medium
Low Medium
Low Medium
Medium Medium
Medium Low
Medium Medium
Low Low
Medium Low
Medium Medium
Low High
Low Medium
Low Medium
Low Medium
Low Medium
Medium Medium
Low Medium
0
Results Chain
OUTPUTS
55%
20%
15%
10%
0%
Value Threshold
A++ 150.0% 137.5%
A+ 125.0% 112.5%
People supported with monthly food aid throughout Syria
Vulnerable Syrians are assisted through emergency
non-food assistance
People are supported through agriculture/livelihood
interventions throughout Syria
Partner organizations have their capacities built to provide assistance, including to meet
emergency needs
OVERALL OUTPUT SCORE
A 100.0% 87.5%
B 75.0% 62.5%
C 50.0%
n/a 0.0%
Risk Low 1
Medium 2High 3
0
Indicators Planned Achieved Score2015 2015
420,972 604,105 144%
A+
28,500 5,746 20%
100,786 100,307 100%
A
1,636 1,251 76%
6,725 9,419 140%
A
100 65 65%
2 2 100%
A+
10 23 230%
A+
Outputs substantially exceeded expectation
Outputs moderately exceeded expectation
Number of monthly full food rations provided to individuals (cumulative)
…of which, number of monthly full food rations provided through vouchers to individuals (cumulative).
Number of individuals benefitting from relief packages distributed (cumulative)
Number of family tents distributed to newly arrived IDP households (6 persons per household)
Number of people supported through agriculture/livelihood interventions throughout Syria
Number of vulnerable women and youth who benefit from vocational training
Number of detailed capacity building plans developed for partner organizations
Number of partner organization staff successfully completing the training