July 2, 2012 WC Docket No. 11-42 Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B442, Washington, D.C. 2055 To Whom It May Concern: Attached please find Xchange Telecom’s application in WC Docket No 11-42, for an application to participate in the Broadband Adoption Lifeline Pilot Program. Please contact me with any questions. Mordy Gross General Counsel Xchange Telecom Corp. (646) 722-7285 [email protected]3611 14 th Ave 877.853.8350 Brooklyn, New York 11218 877.853.9378 fax www.xchangetele.com
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
July 2, 2012
WC Docket No. 11-42
Wireline Competition Bureau
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.,
Room 5-B442,
Washington, D.C. 2055
To Whom It May Concern:
Attached please find Xchange Telecom’s application in WC Docket No 11-42, for an application to participate in the Broadband Adoption Lifeline Pilot Program.
Xchange will not limit the broadband offerings in terms of usage. Xchange currently does not
limit data usage and has no intentions of implementing such limits in the near future.
5) Nonrecurring fees
Xchange is seeking a Linkup style fee to recover costs. Xchange charges customers $49.99
activation fee for DSL. This cost recovers fixed costs for Xchange charged to us for Verizon for
a new line install (between $90 to $114) or for a port and hotcut (approximately), and costs of
DSL equipment of $35.
Xchange proposes that the FCC for this pilot should cover the activation fee entirely. The cost
for customers to get broadband is already too high, and cost is a significant barrier for new
customers. Regardless of the technology, there is fixed customer premises equipment charges
that almost all carriers charge – different from the voice scenario, where most carriers waive
such charges.6
6) Focusing on non-subscribers
Xchange has a current base of agents that have brought in more than half of Xchange’s current
customers. These agents know the specific market that they tap into, and in many cases,
personally know the customers. The agents have been an asset in the past in bringing in
customers, and if provided with new products such as a lifeline offering, they will bring in new
customers as well. Moreover, some of the agents have unique relationships within ethnic
communities, such as the Hispanic and Korean neighborhoods of Brooklyn, and can facilitate
ensuring a diverse pilot population.
Where Xchange deploys in the NYCHA buildings, Xchange will work with NYCHA to promote
the lifeline product within the NYCHA buildings. NYCHA residents are inherently lifeline
eligible, and make up a diverse cross-section of the ethnicities of Brooklyn. NYCHA serves as a
small test lab for each type of deployment.
Xchange is partnering with the Older Adults Technology Services (OATS) to both focus on
deployment to eligible seniors and provide them with digital outreach and technology training.
6 From Comcast’s website: “Equipment, installation, taxes, the Regulatory Recovery Fee and other applicable charges (e.g., per-call, toll and international rates) extra. $29.95 activation fee may apply.” From Time Warner’s website – “Additional charges apply for installation, equipment including modem, applicable taxes and fees.”
9
OATS engages, trains and supports older adults in using technology to improve their quality of
life and enhance their social and civic engagement. Because many seniors do not currently have
broadband, it is crucial to focus on deployment of the lifeline program to seniors.
7) Overall Funding Amount
Xchange proposes to sign up the following total of customers, in each tier:
Tier I Tier II Tier III Total
Wireline/DSL 834 834 832 2500
Wireline
(NYCHA)
250 250 250 750
Fixed Wireless 1667 1667 1666 5000
Xchange estimates the total overall funding amount to range in between $1,217,370 and
$1,897,320. The reasoning is as follows:
If Xchange were to immediately sign up every customer, (factually improbable), the cost,
because of the monthly discount provided, would be $1,897,320 – this is thus the maximum.
Tier I Tier II Tier III Total
Wireline/DSL 834 834 832 2500
Wireline
(NYCHA)
250 250 250 750
Fixed Wireless 1667 1667 1666 5000
Total Monthly Cost Total Yearly
Cost
$27,510.00
$41,265.00
$54,960.00
$123,735.00 $1,484,820.00
Linkup $412,500.00
Total $1,897,320.00
10
What is more likely is that Xchange will sign up the customers over a period of 12 months, in an escalating fashion. Below appears a
*Unlimited Local calls within your local calling areaXchange LifeLine plans apply to only to one line per eligible household. Telephone service must be listed in the applicant’s name.Price re�ects e-bill discount of $0.50, Autopay discount ($0.50 for BigTalk Local and Metro, $1.00 for Bigtalk USA), and $2.00/month new customer discount. New Customer discount expires after one year of service. One year service contract required, early termination fees may apply. Territorial restrictions apply. Free minutes are a promotion, and may be discontinued.**Free international minutes are limited to Western Europe and Israel 2
2 of 3
LifeLine BIGtalk USA
Plan C UnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Monthly Charge
INCLUDES ALL TAXES & FEES
Monthly Charge
New York Metro Plans
Local Usage:Regional Usage:Intrastate Usage:Interstate Usage:
Local Usage:Regional Usage:Intrastate Usage:Interstate Usage:
Plan B includes FREE Feature Pack
Plan A includes FREE Feature Pack
LifeLine BIGtalk Local
Plan AMonthly Charge
$24.99*
Local UsageRegional UsageIntrastate UsageInterstate Usage
Unlimited$.099/min0.0690.045
UnlimitedUnlimited0.0690.045
Plan C includes FREE Feature Pack PLUS 200 Free International Minutes**
Feature Pack Includes OurSix Most Popular Features:
*Available Discounts:-$2.00 : New Customer Sign-Up Bonus
( First 12 Months )-$0.50 : AutoPay Discount
-$0.50 : E-Bill Discount
*Available Discounts:-$2.00 : New Customer Sign-Up Bonus
( First 12 Months )-$1.00 : AutoPay Discount
-$0.50 : E-Bill Discount
*Available Discounts:-$2.00 : New Customer Sign-Up Bonus
( First 12 Months )-$0.50 : AutoPay Discount
-$0.50 : E-Bill Discount
All plans include BIGtalk fraud prevention at no charge. Fraud prevention prevents your long distance bill from unnecessary cost overruns by monitoring your toll calls. You can rest assured that your toll bill will never exceed the limit you set. After the limit is reached, a message will route the call to Customer Service to prevent fraudulent use.
Complete y �rme la página 1.Además, haga una copia de su tarjeta de bene�cios del programapor el cual está recibiendo asistencia actualmente o uncomprobante de ingresos en el hogar.Luego, puede utilizar estos medios para enviar estos datos aXchange para que los procesen:
Fax: 212.321.3600
Correo postal:Dollar Phone Enterprise, Inc.232 BroadwayBrooklyn NY 11211
Solicitud del servicio adherido al programa LifeLine de Dollar Phone(Servicio telefónico con descuento en Metro NY)
Nombre del solicitante Número de teléfono particular(Incluya el código de área)
(_____) ______-___________Número de teléfono en el que pueden encontrarme para organizar el servicio
(_____) ______-___________
REQUISITOS
Proporcione su Número de Seguro Social
Proporcione el número de identi�cación de su tarjeta de bene�cios
LEA Y FIRME LA SIGUIENTE DECLARACIÓN
Estoy recibiendo asistencia de: (Marque solamente un programa)
Cupones para alimentos (FS)
Medicaid
Asistencia de la red de protección social
Adjunte una fotocopia de su tarjeta de beneficios.
(No envíe la original)
No envíe documentación original.
(apellido) (primer nombre) (inicial del segundo nombre)
(número) (calle) (número de apartamento, si corresponde)
(ciudad o pueblo) (estado) (código postal)New York
Fax: 212.321.3600Comuníquese con nosotros al: 212.321.3300 www.LifeLineNuevaYork.com
1of 3
Pensión para cónyuges supérstites de veteranos de guerra (SSP),
Pensión por discapacidad para veteranos de guerra
Programa Nacional de Almuerzo Escolar,
ELIJA UN PLAN (Consulte la página 2 para ver los detalles del plan)
Asistencia a la familia
Seguridad de Ingreso Suplementario (SSI)
Programa de Asistencia de Energía para Hogares (HEAP)
Es elegible por los ingresos (IE) pero no está recibiendo los bene�cios. Proporcione pruebas de ladocumentación de ingresos. Consulte el cuadro en la página 3.
Plan A LifeLine Dollar Phone Básico
Paquete de funciones Plus Agregar números privados ($2.95) Plan C LifeLine Dollar Phone EE. UU. Plus
Plan B LifeLine Dollar Phone Local
Método opcional de pago � Master Card � Visa � Discover � Amex � Cheque electrónico
Nombre_________________________________________ N. ° decuenta______________________________________________________________
Fecha de vencimiento________________________________________ Número CVV_______ Número de recorrido del cheque/número ABA_______________________________
1
ENVÍE POR CORREO O POR FAX LA SOLICITUD FIRMADA Y EL COMPROBANTE DE ELEGIBILIDAD A:
Proveedor telefónico actual ______________________________________
DIRECCIÓN Y NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO DEL CLIENTE
Domicilio
Dollar Phone Enterprise, Inc., 232 Broadway, Brooklyn, NY 11211
Carta de autorización: Mediante mi �rma al pie, autorizo a Xchange Telecom Corp a convertirse en mi nuevo proveedor de servicios telefónicos para reemplazar mis servicios de telecomunicaciones actuales en el suministro del servicio local, interurbano (intraLATA), intraestatal (larga distancia) e interestatal de larga distancia. Autorizo a Dollar Phone Enterprise, Inc. y a Xchange Telecom Corp a actuar como mis representantes para efectuar este cambio, e indico a mis servicios de telecomunicaciones actuales que trabajen con el nuevo proveedor designado para realizar el cambio. Comprendo que sólo es posible seleccionar a un proveedor para cada tipo de servicio. Autorizo a Xchange Telecom Corp a suministrar los servicios locales, interurbanos (intraLATA), intraestatales (larga distancia) e interestatales de larga distancia tal como se indica previamente. Certi�co que he leído y comprendo esta Carta de Representación. Asimismo certi�co que tengo dieciocho años de edad o más y que estoy autorizado para cambiar de empresa de telefonía para los servicios de los números de teléfono mencionados.
Cumplimiento de requisitos: Asimismo, certi�co que:. No soy dependiente de otra persona a los �nes de los impuestos federales sobre la renta.. Mi servicio telefónico está registrado a mi nombre.. La dirección que �gura es mi domicilio principal, no una dirección secundaria ni una empresa.. Nadie en mi casa actualmente recibe asistencia de LifeLine a través de otro proveedor telefónico, incluso un proveedor de telefonía celular.. Declaro que se ha incluido toda prueba de ingresos combinados para este hogar. (Consulte el cuadro en la página 3).. Si resulto inelegible para los bene�cios o algunas de las condiciones detalladas anteriormente, me comunicaré inmediatamente con Xchange Telecom, Dollar Phone Enterprise, Inc. y sus subsidiarias y asociadas para informarles que no soy elegible para los servicios de LifeLine.
Términos y condiciones: Certi�co que toda la información anterior es correcta y autorizo a la O�cina de Asistencia Temporaria y Discapacidad de Nueva York, a otros administradores de los programas anteriores, a Xchange Telecom y Dollar Phone Enterprise, Inc., y a sus subsidiarias a intercambiar toda información necesaria para veri�car mi derecho a la tarifa con descuento del servicio LifeLine de Dollar Phone. Comprendo que cuando ya no cumpla los requisitos, si esto ocurre, mi servicio LifeLine de Dollar Phone cambiará a la tarifa residencial regular. Asimismo acepto los términos de servicio publicados en http://www.xchangetele.com/termsofservice.aspx y entiendo que pueden cambiar. En caso de no estar de acuerdo con el cambio, inmediatamente dejaré de utilizar el servicio y me comunicaré con Dollar Phone Enterprise, Inc. Acepto que la continuación del uso del servicio después de la revisión implica la aceptación de dichos términos de servicio. Asimismo acuerdo suscribirme al servicio de limitación de llamadas con tarifa especial de Xchange ("TLS") que bloqueará todas las llamadas con tarifa especial que excedan $_ (si aparece un espacio en blanco, $25.00) por mes. Selecciono el bloqueo de las llamadas con tarifa especial. No opto por TLS.
Firma____________________________________________________ Fecha________/________/________ Identi�cación del agente__________________
(Para Plan A/ Plan B)
Todos los planes incluyen prevención del fraude sin costo. La prevención del fraude evita que su factura de larga distancia tenga cargos adicionales innecesarios controlando sus llamadas a números con tarifa especial. Puede estar seguro de que su factura de llamadas a números especiales nunca excederá el límite que usted �je. A partir de ese límite, un mensaje derivará la llamada a Atención al Cliente para evitar un uso fraudulento.
Productos Complementarios Opcionales de LifeLine Dollar Phone:
Planes y servicios de LifeLine
Planes de New York Metro
*Llamadas locales ilimitadas dentro de su área de llamadas locales.Los planes de LifeLine de Dollar Phone se aplican solamente a una línea por vivienda elegible. El servicio telefónico debe estarregistrado a nombre del solicitante.
Plan ABásico
$1.00/ mes
Plan BLocal
$10.15/ mes
Plan CEE. UU. Plus
$28.60/ mes
$.09/llamada
$.099/minuto
$.069/minuto
$.045/minuto
$1.16estimado conimpuestos
Uso Local
Uso Regional
Uso Intraestatal
Uso InterStatal
Ilimitado
$.099/minuto
$.069/minuto
$.045/minuto
$11.90estimado conimpuestos
Ilimitado
Ilimitado
Ilimitado
Ilimitado
$33.54estimado conimpuestos
Agregar Paquete de funciones por solo $13.95 El Plan C incluye el Paquete
de funciones GRATIS
¡Agregue un Paquete de funciones por solo $13.95
mensuales! El paquete de funcio-nes incluye nuestras cuatro funcio-
nes más populares:
Productos opcionales LifeLine:Mantenimiento de cableado interno $2.49
Buzón de voz $4.95
Paquete de funciones Premium $5.95Buzón de voz Desvío de llamadas*69-Retorno de llamada *66-Rellamada automática
Funciones simples $2.95 (por función) Rechazo de llamadas anónimas con identi�cación Bloqueo del servicio de información telefónica Desvío de llamadas sin respuesta Desvío de llamadas Ultra Desvío de llamadas por línea ocupada Desvío de llamadas variables *69-Retorno de llamada *66-Rellamada automática Marcación rápida 8 Número privado
Identi�cación de llamadas con nombre Llamada en esperaLlamada tripartitaRechazo de llamadas anónimas
· Cupones para alimentos (FS)· Medicaid· Asistencia de la red de protección social· Asistencia a la familia· Seguridad de ingreso suplementario· Programa de asistencia de energía para hogares· Asistencia temporaria para familias necesitadas (TANF)· Pensión para cónyuges supérstites de veteranos de guerra · Pensión por discapacidad para veteranos de guerra· Programa de almuerzo gratuito del Programa Nacional de Almuerzo Escolar
¿Su ingreso doméstico es igual o inferior al 135% del Nivel de Pobreza Federal?
Los servicios de LifeLine de Dollar Phone le proporcionan lo siguiente:
· Línea telefónica con descuento mensual.· Sin necesidad de depósito.
Para solicitar el servicio telefónico con descuento, complete la solicitud y envíela junto con el comprobante de elegibilidad. Tiene la obligación de comprobar su elegibilidad cuando se suscribe a servicios de LifeLine.No envíe documentos originales. Con la solicitud, puede enviar una fotocopia de su tarjeta de bene�cios.Si solamente recibe HEAP, envíe una copia de su aviso de aprobación o una copia de una factura reciente de servicios públicos en la que aparezca su bene�cio de HEAP.
La documentación que comprueba los ingresos incluye lo siguiente:
· Copia de su declaración más reciente de impuestos estatales o federales.· Recibos de pago del último mes.· Declaración de bene�cios del seguro social.· Declaración de bene�cios de la Administración de Veteranos de Guerra.· Declaración de bene�cios por desempleo/indemnización laboral.· Una sentencia de divorcio o documentos de manutención de los hijos(no envíe sus originales).
La documentación que comprueba el programa incluye lo siguiente:
· Una fotocopia de su tarjeta de bene�cios (no envíe sus originales).· Una declaración de bene�cios de jubilación/pensión.
3
3 of 3
El servicio de LifeLine de Dollar Phone hace que el servicio telefónico sea accesible para hog-ares de bajos recursos. Si está inscripto en uno de los programas que se detallan a continu-ación, cali�ca automáticamente para inscribirse en uno de nuestros planes telefónicos con descuento.
Servicio de LifeLine por Dollar Phone
¿Qué es el servicio de LifeLine y cómo cali�co?
· Bloque gratuito de los números 900 y 976.· Restricciones a llamadas gratuitas.
Appendix C – Letters from Previous Community Partners
03/22/2010 20:54 7182306770 BPL OLT PAGE 02/02
BrooklynPublicLibrary
March 22,2010
Dear BTOP Grant Proposal Review Committee:
SS^3^5^K35?£S»^.-
salpxborough's largest WiFi network. P access comPute^ and the
1 access and ski:
Sincerely,
Dionne Mack-HarvinExecutive Director
Of'fkc ofrhc Exccurivi- Dirc«or
Grand Army Ptafca
Brooklyn, New York 11238-5619
www.brookljmpubli c\ i btary.org
March 24, 2010
Mr. Alfred West
President and CEO
Xchange Telecom Corp.
3611 14th Avenue
Suite 215
Brooklyn, NY 11218
Dear Mr. West,
Thank you for informing us of the proposed high-speed broadband access network that
your company, Xchange Telecom Corp., is proposing to construct in Brooklyn, NY. Agudath
Israel of America understands your proposal and supports you in the development of this network.
Agudath Israel of America and its Brooklyn-based community service affiliates provide a
variety of religious, educational, social and charitable services in Flatbush and Boro Park, which
are within your proposed service area. In addition, there are several Agudath Israel synagogues in
these neighborhoods.
Your proposed network would be of great benefit to these Agudath Israel entities and
activities, as well as numerous other charitable organizations, schools and institutions throughout
the proposed service area. The quality of the current broadband service in this area leaves much to
be desired. An enhanced broadband connection will give us the opportunity to provide our
members and service providers with a better system in which to communicate, which would be
critical to their ongoing effectiveness.
It will be our pleasure to work with Xchange as you partner with other Community
Anchor Institutions on a coordinated request for funding in support of this network proposal to the
Broadband Technology Opportunities Program of the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration. Please feel free to contact us for any information you may need to
support our participation in this effort.
Sincerely,
Rabbi David Zwiebel
Executive Vice President
RDZ/bp
03/15/2010 10:53 718-8728901 PSC HEAD START PAGE 02/02
This letter of support is in reference to the proposed high-speed broadband
access network that your company, Xchange Telecom Corp., is planning to constructin Brooklyn, NY. Project Social Care Head Start understands what you are proposingand supports you in this project which will greatly assist the schools, libraries, Medicaland healthcare providers, public safety entities, community colleges and other
institutions of higher education, and other community support organizations in Brooklyn.
Project Social Care Head Start mission is to provide quality, comprehensive early child
development programs and family services to meet the needs of children and families
from three through five years of age in Brooklyn.
Your proposed network will greatly facilitate Project Social Care Head Start's
activities. We currently need a high-speed connection to the Internet to conduct
research in the various aspects of the continuously updated regulations of Head Start.
The current "broadband" provider in our area, Verizon, provides a level of service that is
insufficient for our needs.
We wish to work with your company as you partner with other Community
Anchor Institutions on a coordinated request for funding in support of this network
proposal to the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) of the National
Telecommunications and Information administration (NTIA). We will provide information
necessary to support our participation in such an effort, including information about
current broadband capacity, spending on broadband services, current proposed
network intensive projects, and current contractual commitments.
PTiilip Klein
Executive Director
TVH
cSznLox Ultlzzm
817 c^TtuE-nus. c?T
Bxootyn, JVflf. 11230
(718) 434-867O
Alfred West
President and CEO
Xchange Telecom, Corp.
3611 14th Ave.Suite 215
Brooklyn, NY 11218
Dear Mr. West,
This letter is in reference to the proposed high-speed broadband access network that
Xchange Telecom Corp. is planning to construct in Brooklyn, NY. Brookdale Senior
Center understands what you are proposing and supports you in the development of a
In addition, please make a copy of either your bene�t card or for the program you arecurrently receiving assistance for or proof of household income.
Xchange is responsible for ensuring that USAC, the administrator of the Federal Lifeline Program, has the necessary information required to determine your continued eligibility. This information includes:
. Your Name and Residential Address,
. Your Telephone Number,
. The last four digits of your Social Security Number
. The program based on which you are claiming eligibility, and if income eligibility is being claimed.
You may then submit these to Xchange for processing by:
Fax: 718 663 0202
Mail:Lifeline ServicesXchange TelecomP.O. Box 190433Brooklyn, NY 11219-0433
Letter of Authorization: My signature below authorizes Xchange Telecom Corp to become my
new telephone service provider in place of my current telecommunications utility (ies) for the
provision of local, local toll (intraLATA), intrastate (long distance), and interstate long distance services.
I authorize Xchange Telecom Corp to act as my agent to make this change happen, and direct my
current telecommunications utility (ies) to work with the new provider designated above to e�ect the
change. I understand that only one provider may be selected for each service type. I authorize Xchange
Telecom Corp to provide local, local toll (intraLATA), intrastate (long distance), and interstate long
distance services as indicated above. I certify that I have read and understand this Letter of Agency. I
further certify that I am at least eighteen years of age, and that I am authorized to change telephone
companies for the services to the telephone numbers listed above.
Family Assistance
Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP)
Income Eligible (IE) but not receiving bene�ts. ____ number of individuals in my household Please �ll out proof of income documentation. See eligibility requirements on page 3.
AUTOPAY DISCOUNT Master Card Visa Discover Amex e-Check
Current Telephone Provider _____________________________________________E-mail_____________________________________________
How did you hear about us? __________________________________
Plan C LifeLine BIGtalk USAPlan A LifeLine BIGtalk Local Plan B LifeLine BIGtalk MetroPLEASE CHOOSE ONE PLAN.
(SEE RATE SHEET)
QUALIFICATIONS
CUSTOMER ADDRESS &
PHONE NUMBER
OPTIONAL PAYMENT METHOD
Certi�cation of Eligibility: Additionally I Certify, under penalty of perjury, that:. I understand that Lifeline is a federal bene�t and that willfully making false statements to obtain the bene�t can result in �nes, imprisonment, de-enrollment or being barred from the program. I am not claimed as another person’s dependent for federal income tax purposes.. My telephone service is listed in my name.. The address listed is my primary residence, not a secondary home or business.. My household will receive only one Lifeline service, and that, to the best of my knowledge, no one in my household currently receives lifeline support through another phone carrier including a cell phone provider. I further understand and acknowledge that violation of this one-per-household limitation constitutes a violation of the FCC’s rules and will result in my de-enrollment from the lifeline program.. I declare that that all combined income proof for this household has been included. If I become ineligible for bene�ts or any of the conditions listed above change, I will immediately contact Xchange Telecom within 30 days to let them know I am no longer eligible for LifeLine Services.. If I change my address, I will provide Xchange Telecom with a new address within 30 days. If I provided a temporary address above, I will provide Xchange Telecom with a veri�cation every 90 days of my temporary address. I understand that Lifeline is a non-transferable bene�t and that I cannot transfer the bene�t to any other person.. The information contained in my subscription for is true and correct, to the best of my knowledge,. If I am qualifying on behalf of a dependent or member of my household, I certify that the person whose bene�t card is attached is my dependent or a member of my household. That I can be required to recertify my eligibility at any time, and that my failure to recertify will result inde-enrollment and termination of my lifeline benets.
I A member of my household My dependent (If a dependent or member of household, please indicate name: ___________________________ )
am/is receiving assistance from: (Check only one program)
D.O.B / /
The address stated above is my: Permanent Address Temporary Address
Terms & Conditions: I certify that all the above information is correct and I authorize the New York O�ce of Temporary and Disability Assistance, other agencies administrating the above programs and Xchange Telecom, its subsidiaries to exchange any information necessary to verify my eligibility for the discounted rate Xchange LifeLine Service. I understand that if/when I am no longer eligible, my Xchange LifeLine Service will be changed to the regular residential rate.I further agree to be bound by the terms of service posted at http://www.xchangetele.com/termsofservice.aspx. I understand that they are subject to change. If I do not agree with the change, I will immediately cease use of the service. I agree that my continued use of the service after revision is an acceptance of those terms of service.I further agree to subscribe to Xchange's toll limitation service ("TLS") which will block all toll calls over $_ (if left blank, $25.00) a month I elect toll blocking I opt out of TLSIf I selected e-billing above, I agree to accept any bills and other correspondence sent to the email address that I provide above or any other email address that I provide as if it was physically mailed to me. If I would like to opt out of e-bill, I understand that I must contact Customer Service.
Billing Address (if di�erent than home address)
LifeLine BIGtalk Metro
Plan B
LifeLine BIGtalk Plans And Services
*Unlimited Local calls within your local calling areaXchange LifeLine plans apply to only to one line per eligible household. Telephone service must be listed in the applicant’s name.Price re�ects e-bill discount of $0.50, Autopay discount ($0.50 for BigTalk Local and Metro, $1.00 for Bigtalk USA), and $2.00/month new customer discount. New Customer discount expires after one year of service. One year service contract required, early termination fees may apply. Territorial restrictions apply. Free minutes are a promotion, and may be discontinued.**Free international minutes are limited to Western Europe and Israel 2
2 of 3
LifeLine BIGtalk USA
Plan C UnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Monthly Charge
INCLUDES ALL TAXES & FEES
Monthly Charge
New York Metro Plans
Local Usage:Regional Usage:Intrastate Usage:Interstate Usage:
Local Usage:Regional Usage:Intrastate Usage:Interstate Usage:
Plan B includes FREE Feature Pack
Plan A includes FREE Feature Pack
LifeLine BIGtalk Local
Plan AMonthly Charge
$24.99*
Local UsageRegional UsageIntrastate UsageInterstate Usage
Unlimited$.099/min0.0690.045
UnlimitedUnlimited0.0690.045
Plan C includes FREE Feature Pack PLUS 200 Free International Minutes**
Feature Pack Includes OurSix Most Popular Features:
*Available Discounts:-$2.00 : New Customer Sign-Up Bonus
( First 12 Months )-$0.50 : AutoPay Discount
-$0.50 : E-Bill Discount
*Available Discounts:-$2.00 : New Customer Sign-Up Bonus
( First 12 Months )-$1.00 : AutoPay Discount
-$0.50 : E-Bill Discount
*Available Discounts:-$2.00 : New Customer Sign-Up Bonus
( First 12 Months )-$0.50 : AutoPay Discount
-$0.50 : E-Bill Discount
All plans include BIGtalk fraud prevention at no charge. Fraud prevention prevents your long distance bill from unnecessary cost overruns by monitoring your toll calls. You can rest assured that your toll bill will never exceed the limit you set. After the limit is reached, a message will route the call to Customer Service to prevent fraudulent use.
· Food Stamps (FS)· Medicaid· Safety Net Assistance· Family Assistance· Supplemental Security Income· Veteran’s Surviving Spouse Pension · Veteran Disability Pension· Home Energy Assistance Program· Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
· National School Lunch Program's free lunch program
Is your household income at or below 135% of the Federal Poverty Level?
· Monthly discounted phone line· No Deposit Required
To apply for the discounted phone service, please complete the application and return it along with your proof of eligibility. You are required to prove your eligibility when subscribing to LifeLine services. Do not send original copies. You may send in a photocopy of your bene�ts card with the application. If you only receive HEAP, please send a copy of your approval notice or a copy of a recent utility bill showing your HEAP bene�t.
Proof of Income Documentation Includes:
· Copy of your most recent federal or state tax return· Pay stubs from the last month· Social security statement of bene�ts· Veteran Administration statement of bene�ts· Unemployment/Worker’s Compensation statement of bene�ts· A divorce decree or child support documents (Do not send your original)
Proof of Program Documentation Includes:
· A photocopy of your bene�t card. (Do not send your original)· A retirement/pension statement of bene�ts
3
3 of 3
Xchange LifeLine service makes phone service a�ordable for low income households. If you are enrolled in one of the programs listed below, you automatically qualify to enroll in one of our discounted phone plans.
What is LifeLine Service and How Do I Qualify?
· Free Blocking of 900 and 976 Numbers· Free Toll Restrictions
LifeLine BIGtalk Service By Xchange Services
Please remember:(i) Lifeline is a federal bene�t. Willfully making false statements to obtain the bene�t can result in �nes, imprison-ment, de-enrollment or being barred from the program;(ii) Only one Lifeline service is available per household;(iii) A household is de�ned, for purposes of the Lifeline program, as any individual or group of individuals who live together at the same address and shareincome and expenses;(iv) A household is not permitted to receive Lifeline bene�ts from multiple providers;(v) Violation of the one-per-household limitation constitutes a violation of the Commission’s rules and will result in the subscriber’s de-enrollment from the program; and(vi) Lifeline is a non-transferable bene�t and the subscriber may not transfer his or her bene�t to any other person.
To whom it may concern,
I am hereby affirming, under penalty of perjury, that my household monthly income is $______________, and that neither myself, my dependents, nor a member of my household are currently enrolled in any of the programs needed to qualify for Lifeline. With the income stated above, I am eligible for Lifeline home telephone service from Xchange Telecom.
I Certify that I have ___ members in my household.
To prove my eligibility, I have attached one of the following documents:
_ Prior year's state, federal, or Tribal tax return_ Current income statement from an employer or paycheck stub (please attach 3 months)_ Social Security statement of benefits _ Veterans Administration statement of benefits_ Retirement/pension statement of benefits
I understand that if/when I am no longer eligible, my Xchange LifeLine Service will be changed to the regular residential rate.
I also give Xchange Telecom the right to access my tax records if required.I further agree to be bound by the terms of service posted at http://www.xchangetele.com/termsofservice.aspx. I understand that they are subject to change. If I do not agree with the change, I will immediately cease use of the service. I agree that my continued use of the service after revision is an acceptance of those terms of service.
I attest that the information contained in my application and this letter is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I acknowledge that providing false or fraudulent information to receive Lifeline benefits is punishable by law.
_ Unemployment/Workers' Compensation statement of benefit_ Federal or Tribal notice letter of participation in General Assistance_ A divorce decree, child support award, or other official document containing income information.
Appendix E – Transition Letter to Subscribers
[NAME]
[Account Number]
[ADDRESS BLOCK]
[DATE – at least 45 days before end of program]
Re: Lifeline Broadband Transition
IMPORTANT NOTICE – DO NOT DISCARD
Dear Xchange Customer,
As you are aware, you signed up to be a participant in Xchange’s pilot program with the FCC to
test Lifeline Broadband discounts. The pilot is ending on [pilot end date], and your discount will
end at that time.
We will be transitioning into the new discount approved by the FCC, for [$ amount of FCC
broadband discount]. During the transition period, which will end by [date when FCC discount
will be offered], we will provide you with the new discount as a courtesy for up to three months.
Unless you contact us, we will make no changes to your account other than the discount. If you
want to change your service, please contact us M-Th, 8AM-9PM, and Fr 8AM-4PM, by calling
us at (877) 353-3443.
Sincerely,
Xchange Customer Service
Appendix F – CVs
MGross
Typewritten Text
Micheline Blum Micheline Blum is Distinguished Lecturer and Director of Baruch College Survey Research, overseeing all BCSR surveys for the School of Public Affairs. An expert in public opinion research, Ms. Blum is also the President of the New York Chapter of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Baruch College Survey Research has conducted many large and complex surveys, including public opinion surveys of New York City, New York State, Connecticut and Chicago, and targeted surveys of , public housing residents, executive Directors of Non-Profit Organizations, potential employers of Professional Science Masters graduates, National Urban Fellows alumni over 40 years, CUNY employees, and CUNY students. BCSR clients include the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the New York City Housing Authority, the Institute for Children, Poverty and Homelessness, NY1 News, the United Jewish Appeal, National Urban Fellows, Hunter College School of Public Health, the Human Services Council, the Campaign Finance Institute, New Yorkers for Parks, the New York State Department of Health, and the Long Island-Hudson Valley Anti-Tobacco Coalitions. As an expert in questionnaire design and public opinion polling, Ms. Blum has taught the NYAAPOR “Meet the Masters” question writing workshop for survey researchers, published invited “Ask the Experts” election polling analysis in AAPOR’s online publication, Survey Practice, served on the national AAPOR Council and is an elected member of the Market Research Council. Ms. Blum appears frequently on TV as a polling and election analyst, including as a regular panelist for WPIX News Close-Up on Sunday mornings. She was the NY1 pollster for 13 years and has moderated and presented at many public forums and professional conferences. As President of Blum & Weprin, her clients included NY1, The Daily News, The Dallas Morning News, Newsday, NBC News, The New York Times Magazine, The Star-Ledger, the New York Yankees, the NY State Dept. of Health, Public Agenda, Yale University and the National and NY Urban Leagues. Before founding her own firm, Ms. Blum was Manager of Polling & Election Operations at NBC News for eleven years. Ms. Blum teaches Research and Analysis in the MPA program and recently established a new undergraduate minor in Survey Research, for which Principles of Survey Research and Public Opinion and Public Policy. She is also a member of the CUNY Institutional Review Board. Her M.A. and certification toward a Ph.D. in Psychological Measurement, Evaluation and Statistics are from Teachers College, Columbia University. David Birdsell, Dean of the Baruch College School of Public Affairs, has centered his academic work on the nexus of communication, media, and information technology in politics, government and nonprofit administration. He studies public access to information technology and advises nonprofit and governmental institutions on their communication and technology programs. His recent work on developing public sector leaders has led to the creation of more than 20 leadership programs offered in partnership with government and nonprofit organizations in New York. An expert on political debating and widely published on communication theory and practice, David is a regular guest commentator on debates and other aspects of political communication for local, national, and international television and print media. His work has been supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts, the IBM Endowment for the Study of Business and Government, the Lyndon Baines Johnson Foundation, the New York Community Trust, the JPMorganChase Foundation, the United Way of New York City, the Markle Foundation, and other funders. David serves on the New York City Broadband Advisory Committee, chairs the board of VCG Governance Matters, and is on the board of the New York Census Research Data Center. He is a member of the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration’s Executive Council and chairs that organization’s Data Committee. He received his BA and MA degrees from the University of Virginia and his Ph.D. in Public Communication from the University of Maryland.
MGross
Typewritten Text
MGross
Typewritten Text
BLUM, MICHELINE
EDUCATION:
Teachers College, Columbia University Teachers College, Columbia University
Distinguished Lecturer,School of Public Affairs, September 2007- present
Baruch College, CUNY
Current Courses: Research and Analysis II (PAF9172); Principles of Survey Research(PAF 3105); Public Opinion, Public Policy and Management (PAF 3106)
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Director, Baruch College Survey Research,
School of Public Affairs, Baruch College, CUNY September 2007-present
Oversee all BCSR surveys, BCSR staff, 30 telephone CATI center, proposals, budgets, questionnaire construction, project management, data analysis, reports and presentations.
Design,direct and analyze telephone, online, mail, intercept and mixed-mode surveys for government agencies, nonprofit organizations, media and academic partners on wide range of public affairs topics.
President, Blum &Weprin Associates, Inc. 1990-present
Designed, directed, and analyzed 500+ surveys. Oversee all aspects of public opinion research. Specialize in polling for media and non-profit clients. Clients include: Dallas Morning News; NY1 News; Daily News; New York Times; NBC News; Star-
Ledger; Public Agenda; Newsday; New York Yankees, Yale University, NY State and NYC agencies Manager, Polling & Election Operations, NBC News Election Unit 1979-1990
Directed operation of telephone and exit polling for NBC News, including monthly NBC News/Wall Street Journal polls, all pre-primary, pre-election and exit polls.
Oversaw all sampling, data collection,and poll and election operations. Hired/managed5FT and 200 PTin-house staff, plus up to 5000 exit poll/vote reporters; responsible for multimillion dollar budgets.
Wrote, selected and edited test items, manuals and directions for abilities and achievement tests. Performed statistical item analyses, normed test data, prepared technical data. Alexander G. Wesman Fellow, Teachers College, Columbia University / 1977-1978
Wrote/editeditems forabilities, and intelligence tests& wrote chapter test items for HBJ textbooks. Senior Research Assistant, National Science Foundation Jury Project,
Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University 1974-1976
Experimental design, questionnaire, attitude scale construction, data analysis. Designed measure to analyze jury deliberations; presented findings to NSF, May 1975.
PUBLICATIONS:
Blum, M. (2008). “Evaluating the 2008 Pre-Election Polls and Examining the ‘Convergence Mystery,'” The Experts Reply to the Poll Convergence Mystery. Survey Practice/ American Association for
Public Opinion Research(December 2008). www.surveypractice.org Blum, M. (2001)."State of Black America" (pp. 43-64 and 218-220). The State of Black America
2001/National Urban League Publication. Blum, M. (1994)."Four Pollsters Discuss 1994 Elections and Public Opinion (pp. 78-82). America at the
Polls 1994/Roper Center publication. Blum, M., Muzzio, D. "NYCHA Satisfaction and Perception Survey of Public Housing and Section 8
Residents"(2010). NYC: Sponsored by New York City Housing Authority. Krauskopf, J., Blum, M., Litwin,R., Hughes, J. & Browne, A. “The Helpers Need Help:New York City’s
Nonprofit Human Service OrganizationsPersevering in Uncertain Times”(2009).Sponsored by Human Services Council of New York City
Smith, R., Blum, M. National Urban Fellows (NUF) 40th Anniversary Alumni Survey: “The Changing
Face of Public Service Leadership"(2009). PRESENTED PAPERS, LECTURES, PANELS, PUBLIC APPEARANCES:
Blum, M., Muzzio, D., Kim, M., Mantsios, A., Tsoi, B. “Sex Practices, HIV, and the Knowing-Doing Gap: A Survey of New York City Adults,” American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, Orlando, FL, May 18, 2012.
Blum, M., Pollster and Election analyst: NY1 News 1997-2010. Blum, M., Political, Polling and Election Analyst: WPIX/CW11 News Close-UP : 2004-Present Blum, M., “Meet the Masters,” NYAAPOR, “You Get What You Ask For: Asking Good Questions.”
Invited: 2004, 2008. American Association for Public Opinion Research, National Conference, Session Chair, 1997-2010. OFFICES HELD IN PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES AND RELATED POSITIONS
President, American Association for Public Opinion Research, New York Chapter, 2012-2013
IRB Member, Baruch and CUNY IRBs, September 2010 - Present. RELATED PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
Baruch College Survey Research has conducted many large and complex surveys , including public opinion surveys of New York City, New York State, Connecticut and Chicago, and targeted surveys of executive Directors of Non-Profit Organizations, potential employers of Professional Science Masters graduates, public housing residents, National Urban Fellows alumni over 40 years, CUNY employees, and CUNY students. Sampling is supervised by Professor Martin Frankel.
Related BCSR surveys include: -Two mixed mode (online/telephone) surveys of 1000 CUNY students each in 2010 and 2012; -Online survey of purposive sample of potential NY area employers in 2011 -Telephone surveys of 1000-1600 NYCHA residents in 2010, 2011, 2012,. -Mixed mode(email, mail, telephone) survey of 400 National Urban Fellows alumni. -Online survey of 244 executive directors of social service non-profit organizations. -Large public opinion polls: 2500 NYC for DoHMH 2011; 3600-4500 in 9 NY counties 2008-2011
Blum & Weprin conducted 500+ polls plus many targeted surveys of businesses, municipalities, public officials, insurance agents, physicians, economists, Republican and Democratic national convention delegates
David S. Birdsell 69 W. 9th Street, Apt. 5-B, New York, NY 10011-8958
Voice: 212-674-4301, E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. in Public Communication, University of Maryland, 1986 MA in Speech Communication, University of Virginia, 1981 BA in History, University of Virginia, 1979
FULL-TIME ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT
Baruch College, Dean, School of Public Affairs, 2006-Present Baruch College, Interim Dean, School of Public Affairs, 2005-2006 Baruch College, Executive Director of Academic Programs, School of Public Affairs, 1999-2005 Baruch College, Professor of Public Affairs, 1999-Present Baruch College, Associate Professor of Public Affairs, 1994-1998 Baruch College, Associate Professor of Speech, 1991-1994 Baruch College, Assistant Professor of Speech, 1986-1990 University of Virginia, Lecturer in Speech and Director of Forensics, 1981-1983
SELECTED CONSULTANCIES
New York Public Library, Institutional Research and Communication Technology, 1996-2005 New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, Communication Strategy, 2001-2006 Congressional Management Foundation, Capitol Hill Communication, 1984-2005 Bayer Center for Nonprofit Management, Improving Nonprofit Consulting, 2003-2004 Brooklyn Public Library, Patron and Staff Education for Online Research, 1998-2000, 2004 United States Information Agency, Political Debating, 1996-1998 Advice, Research and Reviews for the Carnegie Corporation, Clark Foundation, Markle Foundation, and New York Community Trust
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
Books
The McGraw-Hill Guide to Presentation Graphics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997).
Carol Winkler, William Newnam, and David S. Birdsell, Lines of Argument: Core Volume (Dubuque: Brown and Benchmark, 1993).
Carol Winkler, William Newnam, and David S. Birdsell, Lines of Argument for Policy Debate (Dubuque: Brown and Benchmark, 1993).
David S. Birdsell Page 2 of 15
Carol Winkler, William Newnam, and David S. Birdsell, Lines of Argument for Value Debate (Dubuque: Brown and Benchmark, 1993).
Kathleen Hall Jamieson and David S. Birdsell, Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating
an Informed Electorate (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).
Journal Articles David S. Birdsell and Leo Groarke, “Outlines of a Theory of Visual Argument,” Argumentation
and Advocacy, 43 (Winter & Spring 2007), 103-113. David S. Birdsell, “George W. Bush’s Signing Statements: The Assault on Deliberation,” Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 10, 2 (Summer 2007), pp. 335-360. The Racine Group (David S. Birdsell, Diana P. Carlin, Shawn Parry-Giles, Edward Hinck, Kathleen Kendall, Michael Leff, Kathryn Olson, Michael Pfau and David Zarefsky), “The Future of Research on Presidential Debates,” Argumentation and Advocacy, (Fall 2002), pp. 1-28. David S. Birdsell, Douglas Muzzio, David Krane, and Amy Cottreau, “Web Users are Looking More Like America,” Public Perspective (April/May 1998), pp. 33-35. Douglas Muzzio and David Birdsell, “The 1996 ’Net Voter,” Public Perspective (December/January 1997), pp. 44-45.
David S. Birdsell and Leo Groarke, “Toward a Theory of Visual Argument,” Argumentation
and Advocacy, 33 (Summer 1996), pp. 1-10.
David S. Birdsell, Douglas Muzzio, Humphrey Taylor, and David Krane, “A New Political Marketplace: The Web Snares Voters,” Public Perspective (June/July 1996), pp. 33-36.
“Kenneth Burke at the Nexus of Argument and Trope,” Argumentation and Advocacy, 29 (Spring 1993), 178-185.
“Beyond the Debate Analogy,” Argumentation and Advocacy, 27 (Winter 1991), 97-99.
“Ronald Reagan on Lebanon and Grenada: Flexibility and Interpretation in the Application of Kenneth Burke's Pentad,” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73 (1987), 267-279; also published in Bernard L. Brock, Robert L. Scott and James W. Chesebro, eds., Methods of Rhetorical
Criticism: A Twentieth-Century Perspective, 3/e (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1990), and in Carl R. Burgchardt, Readings in Rhetorical Criticism (State College, PA: Strata Publishing Company, 1995), 227-239.
Refereed Proceedings
“Using All There is to See: A Response to Mark Vorobej,” Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, CD-ROM, 1998.
David S. Birdsell Page 3 of 15
David S. Birdsell, Douglas Muzzio, Richard Treitman, Kevin Shin Ogino, and Kevin Cancienne, “Using the World Wide Web to Facilitate Course-Related Communication,” Proceedings of the
1997 Ed-Media/Ed-Telecom Conference (Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 1997), 2034-2037, CD-ROM.
“Argumentation in Urban Public and Not-for-Profit Management,” in Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs, eds., Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (Annandale: The Speech Communication Association, 1996), pp. 71-74.
“Enthymemes in Intermediated Public Argument,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard, eds., Proceedings of the Third International
Conference on Argumentation Analysis and Evaluation Vol. II (Amsterdam: SicSat, 1995), pp. 158-167.
“An Enthymematic Approach to Response and a Responsive Approach to Enthymemes,” in Raymie McKerrow, ed., Argument and the Postmodern Challenge: Proceedings of the Eighth
Biennial SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (Annandale: SCA, 1993), 162-165.
“Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: A Response to Muir, Harris and Depoe,” in Donn W. Parson, ed., Argument in Controversy: Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial SCA/AFA
Conference on Argumentation (Annandale: SCA, 1991), 342-44.
“Critics and Technocrats,” in Bruce Gronbeck, ed., Spheres of Argument: Proceedings of the
Sixth Biennial SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (Annandale: SCA, 1989), 16-19.
Herbert W. Simons and David S. Birdsell, “What if Arguers Could as Easily Show as Tell?” in Bruce Gronbeck, ed., Spheres of Argument: Proceedings of the Sixth Biennial SCA/AFA
Conference on Argumentation (Annandale: SCA, 1989), 296-300.
Chapters in Books
“Political Debates,” in Kathleen Hall Jamieson and Kate Kenski, eds., The Oxford Handbook of
Political Communication (New York: Oxford University Press), in preparation. “Kathleen Hall Jamieson,” in Nancy Signorielli, ed., Women in Communication (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1996), pp. 228-235.
“The Technologies of Relatedness,” in Julia T. Wood and Richard B. Gregg, eds., The Future of
the Field (Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1995), pp. 81-100. “What Should Debates Be? Standards of Public Discourse,” in Arthur H. Miller and Bruce E. Gronbeck, eds., Presidential Campaigning and America's Self Images (Boulder: Westview Press, 1994), pp. 128-142.
“Carrie Lane Chapman Catt,” in Karlyn Kohrs Campbell, ed., Women Public Speakers in the
United States, 1800-1925 (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1993), 321-338.
David S. Birdsell Page 4 of 15
Government and Foundation Papers
David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Small Business Resource Center Final: National Telecommunications and Information Administration Technology Opportunities Program Grant Evaluation,” (New York Public Library, September 2006) David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Small Business Resource Center Wave 3: National Telecommunications and Information Administration Technology Opportunities Program Grant Evaluation,” (New York Public Library, July 2006) David S. Birdsell, “Funding for Civic Engagement Programs in New York City: Types of Programs, Patterns of Support, and Comparisons with National Efforts” (New York Community Trust, March 2005). David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “The Science, Industry and Business Library’s ‘SmallBiz’: Demand for Small Business Services in New York City (New York Public Library/Technology Opportunities Program of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, January 2005). David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “The Next Leaders,” (United Way of New York City, October 2003). David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Bridging the Digital Divide: Click on @ the Library Workshop Participant Survey,” Wave 3 (New York Public Library/Picower Foundation: January 2003). David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Bridging the Digital Divide: Click on @ the Library Workshop Participant Survey,” Wave 2 (New York Public Library/Picower Foundation: July 2002). David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Bridging the Digital Divide: Click on @ the Library Workshop Participant Survey, Wave 1 (New York Public Library/Picower Foundation: January 2001). David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Branch Library Survey, 2001,” (New York Public Library: December 2001). David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Characteristics, Habits, and Opinions of Patrons Using the Research Collections of the New York Public Library,” (New York Public Library, December 2000). David S. Birdsell, Rapporteur’s Report, Markle Foundation Conference on Universal Access, February 11, 1999. Available online at http://www.markle.org/news/proj_index.html
David Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Universal Service Baselines,” Research Paper prepared for the Markle Foundation’s Conference on Internet Access, February 11, 1999. Available online at http://www.markle.org/news/proj_index.html David Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Government Programs Involving Citizen Access to Internet Services,” Research Paper prepared for the Markle Foundation’s Conference on Internet Access, February 11, 1999. David S. Birdsell, “Universal Service Scenarios: New York Stories,” Research Paper prepared for the Markle Foundation’s Conference on Internet Access, February 11, 1999.
David S. Birdsell and Herbert W. Simons, “Basic Research Goals: A Comparison of Political Ideologies,” Washington, D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment, 1991, NTIS# PB91-166579.
Other Publications
David S. Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “WeTube the People,” The New York Times, April 20, 2008, Education Life, p. 34. David Birdsell and Leo Groarke (eds.), “Visual Argument Revisited,” special, double edition of Argumentation and Advocacy (Winter and Spring 2007). David Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “A ‘Customer’ Survey for the City,” (Gotham Gazette, April 9, 2007), http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/fea/20070406/202/2141. Review of Darin Barney, Prometheus Wired (University of Chicago Press, 2000), Contemporary Sociology, (Spring 2002).
David S. Birdsell and Rahima Wade, “Student Voices in the Community,” National Curriculum for the Annenberg Public Policy Center’s Student Voices Program, August 2002. “View News Critically,” The PBS Democracy Project, September 2000. Available online at http://www.pbs.org/democracy/readbetweenthelines/news.html
CivicExchange: A Policy Forum for the Nation, <http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/civicexchange>, co-developed with the Whitman Center for the Study of Democratic Culture. (Inactive site)
Vox New York: A Policy Forum for the City, <http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/voxnewyork>, co-developed with the BCTC and the Office of the Public Advocate of the City of New York. (Inactive site)
“No Room for Perot,” The New York Times, Op-Ed, September 18, 1996, p. A-21.
David Birdsell and Leo Groarke (eds.), “Visual Argument,” special, double edition of Argumentation and Advocacy (Summer and Fall 1996).
Ed., “Presidential Debates: Beyond the Debate Analogy,” special edition of Argumentation and
Advocacy, 27 (Winter 1991).
“The Status of Minorities in Higher Education,” Reginald Wilson and Sarah Melendez, eds. (Washington, D.C.: The American Council on Education, 1984).
Selected Presentations & Public Programs
David S. Birdsell and William J. Ferns, “Now Ubiquitous, Not Yet Intensive: Results from Two Studies of NYC Nonprofits’ Use of ICT in 1996 and 2009,” Ghent University, March 20, 2012 (Earlier versions presented at Center for Nonprofit Strategy and Management, April 20, 2009 and as a LISC Webcast, June 3, 2009.) Convener and Moderator, “Executive Education Conference-within-a-Conference,” NASPAA Annual Conference, Kansas City, MO, October 21, 2011 “New Technologies and Political Participation,” two forums for Fulbright Scholars visiting the United States, New York University, June 21 and July 6, 2011 “The 2010 US Midterm Elections: The Vanishing American Consensus,” Ghent University-University College Ghent International Week, Belgium, November 30, 2010. “Interview with Siva Vaidhyanathan and Anya Kamenetz,” Baruch College, November 18, 2010. “Interview with Benjamin Barber,” New York City Technical College, November 16, 2010. Convener and Moderator, “Executive Education Conference-within-a-Conference,” NASPAA Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV, October 1, 2010. “Beyond the Pipeline Metaphor,” the Rangel Center Symposium on Diversity in Public Service, New York, NY, October 30, 2009. “A Communication Curriculum for Nonprofit Administration,” Annual Meeting of the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration, Washington, DC, October 15, 2009. “Social, Political and Economic Forces in New York City and State: 2025,” City University of New York Conference on Financial Management, September 17, 2009. David S. Birdsell and Carol Kellerman, Moderators, NYC Comptroller Primary Debate, Sponsored by the Citizens Budget Commission and the Center for Innovation and Leadership in Government, September 9, 2009. David S. Birdsell and Angelina Delgado, “Non-Credit Partner Programs as a Degree Program Pipeline,” Annual Meeting of the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration, Charleston, SC, October 17, 2008.
David S. Birdsell Page 7 of 15
Panelist, “Investing in Emerging Leaders,” Panel convened by The New York Times, the New York Regional Association of Grantmakers, and the Support Center for Nonprofit Management, New York Times Auditorium, April 14, 2008. “The U.S. Presidential Primary of 2008,” Presentation to UN Security Council Senior Staff, New York City, March 25, 2008 “Presidential Primary Elections,” a Voluntary Visitors Project for Spain, Sponsored by the US Department of State, Baruch College, February 5, 2008. Testimony on the Impact of the New York State Commission on Higher Education Preliminary Report and Recommendations, New York City Council Committee on Higher Education, January 31, 2008. “Presidential Primary Debates,” Baruch Alumni Meeting, Boynton Beach, January 27, 2008. “The ‘Pipeline’ Metaphor and Professional Opportunity,” National Urban Fellows Mid-Year Conference, Minneapolis, January 2008. “Making Sense of the Nonprofit Leadership Literature,” Conference on Nonprofit Leadership, Center for Nonprofit Strategy and Management, Baruch College, December 2007 “The Difficulty of Assessing Public Demand: Broadband Provisioning in New York City,” Presented at the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Conference on Public Service Delivery, June 2007. Extended versions of paper presented in lectures at Tongji University and Shanghai University for Finance and Economics, July 2007. David S. Birdsell and Ann Ruecker, “Community Partnerships in Executive Education: Opening the Umbrella,” Annual Meeting of the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration, Minneapolis, MN, October 20, 2006. Testimony on Behalf of Int. 625-A, Establishing a Broadband Task Force, the New York City Council Committee on Technology and Government, June 10, 2005. Testimony on the DOITT/EDC Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development Report, the New York City Council Committee on Technology and Government, May 2, 2005. Testimony on Use of New York City’s Publicly Owned Cable Television Outlets, The New York City Council Committee on Technology and Government, February 14, 2005. Respondent, “Trends, Technology and Communication in American Politics,” New York City Women’s Club, January 27, 2005. Testimony on Behalf of Int. 17 and Int. 27, The New York City Council Committee on Technology and Government, December 9, 2004.
David S. Birdsell Page 8 of 15
“New York’s Next Nonprofit Leaders,” Annual Meeting of the Alliance for Nonprofit Management, August 2004. “Globalization and Media,” Forum for Fulbright Scholars, June 28, 2004. “Nonprofit Leadership,” Bayer Center for Nonprofit Management, March 4, 2004. “Leadership Development,” Workforce Development Summit of the Addiction Technology Transfer Center Network, January 27, 2004. “The Next Leaders,” Joint Baruch College-United Way of New York City Conference on Executive Development in the Nonprofit Sector, October 23, 2003 “Trends in Executive Turnover,” The New York Regional Association of Grantmakers, June 6, 2003 “Consultant-Client Relationships: Who Expects What from Whom?” Bayer Center for Nonprofit Management, February 28, 2003. Panelist, Roundtable II: NCA White Paper on Presidential Debates, National Communication Association Convention, New Orleans, LA, November 24, 2002. “Assessing Community Technology Programs,” Community Technology Symposium, Columbia University, October 24, 2002. “Student Voices in New York City,” American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 31, 2002. “Who Expects What from Whom? Consultant-Nonprofit Relationships,” Alliance for Nonprofit Management, with Doug Muzzio, June 14, 2002. “Understanding Behaviors and Needs of Patrons at the Branch Libraries,” New York Public Library, with Doug Muzzio, March 2002. “Consultant-Nonprofit Relationships,” New York Nonprofit Network, December 13, 2001. Panelist, Presidential Debate Symposium, Racine, Wisconsin, September 20-23, 2001. Moderator, “Politicians and Media in the 2000 Election,” Teaching Matters, Inc., City Hall, New York City, October 2000. “The Internet in New York’s Service Delivery,” The City Club of New York, May 12, 2000. “Adapting the MPA Curriculum to E-Government” the American Society for Public Administration, Eastern Regional Meeting, New York, October 1999, with Dan Williams.
David S. Birdsell Page 9 of 15
“Access to the Internet at Public Sites,” the American Society for Public Administration, Eastern Regional Meeting, New York, October 1999.
“MN-Politics: Argumentative Practices on a Political Listserv,” Public Address in an Electronic Age: The Sixth Biennial Conference on Public Address, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, September 24-27, 1998. “Politics on the World Wide Web,” Forum for Fulbright Scholars, New York University, July 28, 1998 “Structured Political Argument on the World Wide Web,” presented at the Fourth International Conference on Argumentation, International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, June 16-19, 1998. “It’s Not the Machine, It’s the Pedagogy: Rejecting Technological Determinism in Projecting Faculty Workloads,” presented at the NCSCBHEP Annual Conference, New York, NY, April 20-21. “The Internet: Looking More Like America,” presented at Government and Politics on the Web: Questions of Access, March 17, 1998.
David Birdsell and Douglas Muzzio, “Political Uses of the World Wide Web in the 1996 US Presidential Campaign,” Images of Politics, Amsterdam, October 23-26, 1997.
“Using the World Wide Web for Course-Based Collaboration,” 57th Street Computing Center, City University of New York, October 9, 1997.
David Birdsell, Douglas Muzzio, Richard Treitman, Shin Ogino, and Kevin Cancienne, “Using the World Wide Web to Facilitate Course-Related Communication,” The EDMEDIA/EDTELECOMM Annual Conference of the Association for Computing in Education, Calgary, Ontario, June 14-20, 1997.
“The Role of the New Media: The World Wide Web in Politics and Governance,” the Miller Center Policy Forum, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, May 9, 1997.
“Response to Vorobej,” the Annual Meeting of the OSSA, St. Catherine’s, Ontario, May 14-17, 1997.
David Birdsell, Douglas Muzzio, Humphrey Taylor and David Krane, “The World Wide Web in Campaign ’96,” New York AAPOR, October 9, 1996.
“Personal, Political and Policy Identities on the World Wide Web in the U.S. Presidential Primary Campaign of 1996,” The ISSA-Wake Forest Conference on Argumentation, Venice, Italy, June 23-28, 1996.
David S. Birdsell Page 10 of 15
“The World Wide Web in the Social Science Classroom,” The BCTC Spring Computer Seminars, Baruch College, February 28, 1996. “Representation in Political Television: Expression and Denotation,” The Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA, November 19-22, 1994. “Enthymemes in Intermediated Public Argument,” The Third International Conference on Argumentation, International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 21-24, 1994.
“An Enthymematic Approach to Response and a Responsive Approach to Enthymemes,” The Eighth Biennial SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Alta, Utah, August 4-8, 1993.
“Academic Envy: A Conversation With/Response to John Rodden,” The Art of Conversation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, March 25-27, 1993.
“The 1992 Presidential Debates: Argument and Visual Literacy,” The Annual Meeting of the Modern Language Association, New York, NY, December 27-29, 1992.
“Response to Burnett, et al.,” The Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL, October 28-November 1, 1992.
“Presidential Debates,” The New School for Social Research, July 6, 1992.
“Language and Visual Representations: Le Corbusier,” The University of Maryland Communication Lecture Series, April 24, 1992.
“Argument into Trope/Trope into Argument,” The Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association," Chicago, IL, November 1-4, 1991.
“Response to Muir, Harris and Depoe,” The Seventh Biennial SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Alta, Utah, August 1-4, 1991.
“Architectural Principles and Built Form in the Work of Le Corbusier: Writing a New World,” The Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, Ill., November 1-4, 1990.
“Character Evidence in Presidential Debates,” The Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, CA, November 18-21, 1989.
“Critics and Technocrats,” The Sixth Biennial SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Alta, Utah, August 3-6, 1989.
Herbert W. Simons and David S. Birdsell, “What if Arguers Could as Easily Show as Tell?” The Sixth Biennial SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Alta, Utah, August 3-6, 1989.
David S. Birdsell Page 11 of 15
“Character Evidence in Presidential Debates,” The Annual Meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Ocean City, MD, May 4-7, 1989.
“Argumentation as a Framework for Analysis and Training in Business Communication,” The Eastern Regional Conference of the Association for Business Communication, New York, NY, March 31, 1989.
“Evidence and Format in Presidential Debates: Evolving Standards of Performance and Evaluation,” The Presidential Debates Symposium, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, December 2, 1988.
“Interpreting Evidence in the 1988 Presidential Debates,” The Temple Conference on Discourse Analysis, November 11, 1988.
“The History of Political Debates: A Guide to Contemporary Practices,” The Wisconsin Colloquium, Department of Communication, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, February 5, 1988.
“Narratives, Fantasy Themes and Argumentative Judgment,” paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Annual Convention, Boston, MA, November 6-8, 1987.
“Published Debate Judging Philosophies: The Ethics of Evaluation,” paper presented (by proxy; I was ill and could not attend) at the Eastern Communication Association Annual Meeting, Syracuse, NY, May, 1987.
“Issues and Images in the Presidential Campaign of 1984,” Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Annual Convention, Chicago, IL, November 13-16, 1986.
“Tropological Dimensions of Evidence in Public Policy Argument,” Paper presented at the Conference on Case Studies in the Rhetoric of the Human Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, April 10-12, 1986.
“The History of TV Political Spots,” Lecture presented at The American Film Institute's Faculty Development Workshop on Politics and the Media, Washington, D.C., June 17-21, 1985.
“A Synecdochic Approach to Burke's Master Tropes,” Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Annual Convention, Chicago, IL, November, 1984.
“Act as Coordinating Term,” Paper presented at the Burke Conference, Temple University, April, 1984.
PROFESSIONAL HONORS, PRIZES, FELLOWSHIPS Honorary Induction to Pi Alpha Alpha, 2008 Honorary Induction to Gold Key, 2007 United Way of New York City Community Partner Award (for SPA), 2007 Young Leaders Forum, American-Swiss Foundation, 2000
David S. Birdsell Page 12 of 15
Presidential Service Award, Baruch College, 1999 Presidential Teaching Award Nominee, 1989, 1996, 1998, 1999 Teaching Award, University of Maryland, 1985-86 Provost's Fellow, University of Maryland, 1983-85 Public Service Award, Virginia State University, 1980
GRANTS (as PI or Co-PI only) FIPSE/IFLE, North American Mobility Program Award, $358,000, 2010 The Achelis-Bodman Foundation, Free Institutions (with Thomas Main), $100,000, 2008 The Clark Foundation, Operating Support for Ctr. for Nonprofit Strategy & Mgt., $75,000, 2008 Graduate Research Technology Initiative, $130,000, 2008 The Clark Foundation, Operating Support for Nonprofit Group, $100,000, 2007 The New York Community Trust, Civic Spending by Foundations in NYC, 2005, $10,000 The United Way of New York City, Leadership Development, 2002-2004, $216,000 The Clark Foundation, Technology Programs for Nonprofits, 2003, $70,000 The Annenberg Foundation & Pew Charitable Trusts (subcontract), Revision of Student Voices
(Justice Talking) National Curriculum, 2002, $25,000 The Clark Foundation, Technology Programs for Nonprofits, 2001-2002, $75,000 The Annenberg Foundation & Pew Charitable Trusts (subcontract), Student Voices & Justice
Talking, 2001-2002, $393,000 The JPMorganChase Foundation, Lincoln Douglas Debates, 2001-2002, $50,000 Graduate Research Technology Initiative, $170,000, 2001-2002 The Clark Foundation, “Consultant Relationships in the Nonprofit Sector,” 2001, $57,000 The Clark Foundation, “Technology Planning for Nonprofits,” 1999-2000, $75,000 PricewaterhouseCoopers Fund for the Business of Government, “Internet Access in NYC,” 1999,
$7,500 The Markle Foundation (subcontract), Research Reports on Universal Service, 1999, $6,000 New York State Library (subcontract), Internet Access Training, 1998-1999, $120,000 The Clark Foundation, “The World Wide Web in Nonprofit Administration,” 1998-1999,
$25,000 The Markle Foundation (subcontract), CivicExchange, 1998, $5,000 Graduate Research Technology Initiative, “Laboratory for the Study of Computerization in
Nonprofit Management,” 1996, $100,000 with Baruch Match. Funded Research Incentive Award, Baruch College, Spring 1994, $1,500 Funded Research Incentive Awards (2), Baruch College, Fall 1992, $1,500 Moody Grant, the Lyndon Baines Johnson Foundation, 1987-88, $500 Graduate Research Grant, the University of Maryland, Spring 1986, $500 Graduate Research Grant, the University of Maryland, Fall 1984, $500 Graduate Research Grant, the University of Maryland, Spring 1984, $500 Provost’s Fellow, the University of Maryland, 9/83-6/85, $20,000 annually
Representative to College UG Coordinating Committee, 1996-2004 P&B Committee, 1994-2004 Executive Committee, 1994-2004 Representative to Weissman School of Arts & Sciences, 1994-2005 Curriculum Committee, 1994-2005 Curriculum Subcommittee Chair, 1994-98 Grants Coordinator, 1997-98 Moderator, New York Elections by the Numbers, October 1998 Graduate Curriculum Committee Representative, 1995-97 Chair, Technology Coordinator Search Committee, 1997 Chair, Director of Graduate Recruitment Search Committee, 1997 Design and Oversight of the Lab for Computerization in Nonprofit Administration, 1996-97 Faculty Search Committees (More than Two-Dozen Positions), 1994-2000 Formulation and Coordination of Communication Coursework for the Consortium for Worker
Education, 1996 Community School Board Project, 1996 TO BARUCH: Schwartz Institute Search, 2005 Chief Communication Officer Search 2005 Co-Chair, Facilities Task Force, 2004-2005 AVP for Facilities Search, 2005 College Parliamentarian, 1995-2005 Sexual Harassment Committee, 1995-2002 VP for Information Technology Search, 2001-2002 Public Relations Manager Search, 2001 Vertical Campus Technology Committee, 1995-2001 Management Information Team, 1998-2000 President Search, 1999-2000 Middle States Committee and Task Force Chair, 1998-2000 Member, Faculty Committee on Educational Computer Policy, 1999-2000 Chair, General Faculty Committee on Educational Computer Policy, 1997-1998 & 2000-2001 Vertical Campus Classroom Design Committees, 1997-2001 Panelist, Sexual Harassment Committee, 1995-2001 Chair, Communication Task Force, 1997-1998 Provost’s Committee on Departmental Labs, 1997-1998 Communication Intensive Course Project, Faculty Trainer and Liaison, 1997-1998 Ad-hoc Committee on the Media Center, 1995-98 College Committee on Public Affairs, 1995-97 Member, Task Force on Communication Skills, 1994-98 Search Committee for Director, BCTC, 1996 Open Systems Lab Development, 1995-96 Member, Middle States Interim Assessment, 1994-96 Co-Chair, Task Force II on the School of Public Affairs, 1994 Search Committee for a Media Analyst/Producer in Media Services, 1994 Search Committee for Associate Director of the Grants Office, 1994
David S. Birdsell Page 14 of 15
Search Committee for Coordinator of Training and Publications for the Computer and Technology Center, 1994.
Conference Director, "Globalization and Diversity: Challenges for Affirmative Action," 1994 Title III Committee, 1994 FIPSE Grant Proposal, 1994 (2 proposals) Task Force I on the School of Public Policy, 1993-94; Chair, Subcommittee on Structure, 1993-
94, and Co-author (with Douglas Muzzio) of the Joint Report of the Committees on Mission and Structure, January, 1994
Affirmative Action Committee, 1992-96; Chair, Conference Subcommittee, 1993-94 Weissman Center Director Search Committee, 1993 Baruch College Association, 1992-94 Title III Committee, 1992-93 FIPSE Grant Proposal, 1992 Liberal Arts Summer Advisement, 1987-92 Coordinator, Faculty-Student Debates, 1989, 1991, 1992 Baruch Scholar Review, 1987-97 FIPSE Grant Proposal, 1991 Title III Committee, 1990-91 AAC Grant Proposal, 1990 Associate Dean (SLAS) Search Committee, 1990
MEMBERSHIPS American Forensic Association Association for Public Policy and Management National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration National Communication Association
OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICE Press Source and Commentator on Political Debates, Political Rhetoric, New York City Politics, and Political Uses of the Internet; Print citations include The New York Times; Newsday; The
New York Daily News, The New York Post, The Washington Post; The Los Angeles Times; The
Miami Herald, U.S. News and World Report; newspapers associated with the Reuters, Knight-Ridder and Newhouse services; The Cleveland Plain Dealer; The Philadelphia Inquirer; The
Houston Chronicle; The New Orleans Times-Picayune; The Omaha World Herald; the Raleigh
News and Observer; The St. Petersburg Times; The Hartford Courant, and The Atlanta Journal-
Constitution. International papers and magazines include Focus (Germany); Telerama (France); Weekendabisen (Denmark); The Yomiuri Shimbun (Japan). Appearances include CBS; CNBC; CNN; MSNBC; NBC; Fox News; New York 1; PBS; WABC-TV; Fox-5 TV; WB-11 TV; NPR; NBC Radio; International News Network; the Christian Science Monitor Broadcast System; Radio Pacifica; KFYI Radio, Phoenix, AZ; WTAE Radio, Pittsburgh, PA; KCBS Radio, Nashville, TN; WABC Radio, NY; WNWS Radio, Miami, FL; Bloomberg News Service. Advisory Boards:
Broadband Advisory Committee of New York City (Council Appointee) Computer Center for Visually Impaired People National Campaign to Restore Civil Rights, Media Committee
David S. Birdsell Page 15 of 15
Fiduciary Boards: VCG Governance Matters (Chair) New York Census Research Data Consortium (Executive Committee) FR 23 Road Association NASPAA: Executive Council (Co-chair, Data Committee)
Editorial Board: Communication Studies
COURSES TAUGHT AT BARUCH COM 1010 Speech Communication COM 3020 Communication and Advocacy in Business and Public Affairs COM 3061 Speech Composition and Delivery COM 3070 Persuasion COM 3071 Argumentation and Debate COM 3102 Speech for Executives PAF 3120 Communication in Public Organizations IDC 4050 Feit Seminar (Television and Politics) PAF 9103 Communication in Public Settings PAF 9108 Communication and Information Technology PAF 9137 Telecommunications Policy PAF 9139 Communication Strategy BUS 9550 Management Communication
REFERENCES Chris Cloud, Principal Constellation Advancement [email protected] Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Professor and Director Annenberg Public Policy Center University of Pennsylvania [email protected] Frederick Lane, Emeritus Professor School of Public Affairs Baruch College/CUNY [email protected] James McCarthy, President Suffolk University [email protected]
The FCC has implemented a flat rate for Lifeline rate across all states. The Lifeline subsidy equals $9.25
per month beginning in August 1, 2012. In addition, Xchange is provided with a subsidy from TAF for
NY Lifeline
LinkUp Subsidy
As of April 2, 2012 there is no more linkup subsidy.
Marketing and Outreach Material
The FCC rule on advertising requires ETCs to “publicize the availability of Lifeline service in a manner
reasonably designed to reach those likely to qualify for the service”. ETCs must advertise voice
telephony service using general distributed media (newspapers, radio). Xchange currently advertises
using a mix of these medias. ETCs should target households that do not currently have telephone service,
and target members of any sizable non-English speaking population within their service area. The FCC
has implemented rules to “increase the quality of information ETCs must provide to potential customers.”
As of September 2012, ETCs must include specific marketing and uniform language in all of their
marketing materials and it must be presented in clear, easily understood language. The requirements
include explaining:
That the ETC’s offering is a “Lifeline supported service”; That only eligible customers may enroll in the program; What documentation is necessary for enrollment; That the program is limited to one benefit per household, consisting of either wireline or wireless
service; Lifeline is non-transferable; and That Lifeline is a government benefit program, and consumers who willfully make false
statements in order to obtain the benefit can be punished by fine or imprisonment or can be barred from the program.
**This requirement is currently on hold until OMB approval.
“Marketing materials” includes materials in all media, including but not limited to print, audio, video,
Internet (including email, web, and social networking media), and outdoor signage, that describe the
Lifeline supported service offerings, including application and certification forms.
2
The following outreach methods are recommended:
Notices at public transportation areas, shelters, soup kitchens, and public assistant agencies. Public service announcements Toll free numbers in other languages Print media: Newspapers, direct marketing, telephone directories, etc. Door-to-door and television are proving very successful in some markets Social service agencies, tribal orgs, community centers, AARP, United Way, etc. Outreach material should contain state-specific eligibility criteria.
Under the new FCC rules, USAC will be conducting advertising compliance reviews. These will occur at
least once a year, and will check marketing materials to ensure they include the required language, and
that the eligibility criteria used is up to date. Lastly, USAC will look at the methods an ETC uses to reach
Lifeline eligible consumers. ETCs should not rely only on bill inserts and phone books because these are
sent to current customers with phone service, the ETC is not advertising to those without phone service.
Enrollment Certification & Verification
Every Lifeline prospect must be certified during the enrollment process. The goals of the certification
process are to verify prospect’s eligibility, comply with the FCC’s one-per-household/economic unit rules
and ensure that the prospect is not currently receiving Lifeline service from another provider.
In order to implement this, the Xchange policy is to
Confirm the prospect’s identity (see government issued picture ID or a copy) Confirm program or income eligibility (see proof of income form) Confirm valid household address (validate against USPS or other sources) Confirm that prospects not currently receiving a subsidy (ask prospect, and then perform a
duplicate check into an internal and pooled external database when it becomes available). When the online database becomes available, confirm the prospect against eh online e database.
The certification document remains the cornerstone of the enrollment process. Upload the certification
document only to the billing system. Do not include the supporting documentation, affirm to the system
that you have in fact viewed the documentation.
The following fields of customer information must be captured on the certification document: name,
home address (no PO Box), billing/mailing address if different (may be a PO Box), the government
assistance program(s) in which prospect is currently enrolled, last four digits of social security number
(full social may be required by certain states), date of birth, and prospect’s signature and date.
3
The proof required for enrollment may be accepted in person, via fax, e-mail, or mail. USAC will be
providing ETCs with information on what documentation is sufficient as proof of participation. Upon
receipt of proof, an agent of the ETC must certify that they saw the documentation during the enrollment
process. An ETC should not retain the eligibility documentation provided by the prospect.
For income based eligibility, the acceptable documentation includes:
- Prior year’s tax returns - Current income statement or pay stub - Social Security statement of benefits - Veterans Administration statement of benefits - Retirement/ pension statement of benefits - Unemployment/ Workmen’s Compensation statement of benefits - General Assistance Tribal notice letter - Divorce Decree - Child Support Award - Any other official document with income information
The documentation must cover one full year or three consecutive months of the same document within the
previous twelve months.
Program based eligibility must also be proven via a current or prior year’s statement of benefits from a
qualifying program, letter of participation from the qualifying program, participation document (SNAP
card, Medicaid Card), voucher, or any other official documentation. For each lifeline applicant the ETC
enrolls that relies on eligibility documentation, the company must document the following information:
(1) Type of documentation reviewed, for example: (a) Award letter (b) Voucher (c) Benefits card (d) Income statement
(2) Date or expiration date of documentation (3) Identifying information about documentation submitted (for example, “blue SNAP card” or
“letter from State Health and Human Services Agency”); (4) Date reviewed; (5) Method the documentation was provided, for example;
(a) In person (b) By fax (c) By mail (d) Electronically
(6) Name of ID of employee or agent who reviewed documentation (7) Name on documentation demonstrating program eligibility (if different from name of the
applicant);
4
(8) Certification that individual named on documentation demonstrating program participation is part of the applicant’s household (if different from name of applicant); and
(9) Certification that individual named on documentation demonstrating program eligibility does not already receive lifeline (if different from name of applicant).
ETCs may query state or federal social service or income databases to verify eligibility. The ETC must
retain the following records:
(1) The name of database queried; (2) The date the database was queried; and (3) A copy of the confirmation received, or certification by ETC’s employee that database confirmed
eligibility. Lastly, an ETC may rely on a state agency to verify the applicant’s eligibility. If verified this way, the
ETC must retain:
(1) The name of the agency consulted; (2) The agency contact (3) The date the confirmation of eligibility was received; and (4) A copy of the notice provided by the agency that confirms eligibility.
The certification form will include the following language that explains in plain, easy to understand
language:
Lifeline is a federal benefit. Lifeline Service is available for only one line per household. A household is defined, for purposes of the Lifeline Program, as any individual or group of
individuals who live together at the same address and share income and expenses. Households are not permitted to receive benefits from multiple providers. Violation of the one-per-household limitation constitutes a violation of the Federal
Communications Commission’s rules and will result in your de-enrollment from the program, and potentially prosecution by the United States Government.
The ETC must have the end user attest, under penalty of perjury, that:
The information contained in my application remains true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I acknowledge that willfully providing false or fraudulent information to receive Lifeline benefits is punishable by law and may result in me being barred from the program.
That I am a current recipient of the above program, or have an annual household income at or below 135 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines
I have provided documentation of eligibility if required to do so I attest to the best of my knowledge, that I and no one in my household are receiving a Lifeline
supported service from any other land line or wireless company. I understand that I can only receive one Lifelines subsidy
I understand Lifeline service is a non-transferable service, and that I may not transfer my service to any other individual, including another eligible low-income consumer.
I understand that if my service goes unused for sixty (60) days, I will no longer be eligible for Lifeline benefits and my service will be suspended subject to a thirty (30) day period during which I may use the service or contact the Company to confirm that I want to continue receiving Lifeline service from the Company
5
I will notify my telephone company within thirty (30) days if I no longer qualify for Lifeline. I understand this requirement and may be subject to penalties if I fail to notify my phone company. Specifically, I will notify my company if: I cease to participate in the above federal or state program, or my annual household income
exceeds 135% FPG. I am receiving more than one Lifeline supported service; I no longer satisfy the criteria for receiving Lifeline support. I will notify my phone company within thirty (30) days of moving. Additionally, if my
address listed above is a temporary address, I understand that I must re-verify my address with my telephone company every ninety (90) days. if I fail to respond to my telephone companies’ address verification attempts within thirty (30) days, I may be de-enrolled from my Lifeline service.
I am head of household, and not listed as a dependent on anyone’s tax return. My telephone company has explained the one-per household requirement, and I understand that violation of the one-per-household requirement constitutes a violation of the FCC’s rules and will result in my de-enrollment from the lifeline program, and could result in criminal prosecution by the United States Government.
My telephone company has explained to me that I am required each year to re-certify my continued eligibility for Lifeline at any time, and that if I fail to do so within thirty (30) days, it will result in the termination of my Lifeline benefit.
One Per Household Requirement
The FCC has introduced requirements to provide guidance when multiple Lifeline-eligible subscribers
share a same address. Currently, Lifeline supported services are limited to one subsidy per “household,”
but until now there has not been a specific definition of what a household is. The FCC has defined a
“household” as “any individual or group of individuals who are living together at the same address as one
economic unit.” An economic unit consists of all adult individuals contributing to and sharing in the
income and expenses of a household. USAC has created a certification form to assist ETCs in providing
Lifeline to low income households sharing an address. USAC will also create print and web materials that
ETCs can use to educate customers about the one-per-household rule.
If a prospect is identified in the enrollment process as having the same address as a current Lifeline
customer, the ETC must have the prospect certify on a separate form that they are head of household and
understand the one-per-household rule.
Persons with Temporary Addresses
If a prospect identifies that their address is a temporary one, the ETC must verify with the end user every
90 days that he/ she continues to reside at that address. If an end user fails to respond to the ETC’s
request to verify his/ her address within 30 days, the subscriber must be de-enrolled from the lifeline
6
program. Once the national database is in place, if an end user moves, the ETC must update the database
with the new information within 10 business days of receipt of the information.
** This requirement has been put on hold until future OMB approval.
The ETC is responsible to use best practices to verify the general eligibility of the prospect. The questions
and methods above will go a long way to ensure this. The additional steps below are added for the
purpose of extra protection:
Establish and document fraud/abuse prevention processes, and fraud/abuse correction processes. Systematically monitor sales agent activity for fraudulent behavior. Identify what happens if fraud occurs. Identify what happens if fraud is found after reimbursement has been requested. What processes occur to return the subsidy, contact the end user, de-activate/de-enroll the account, gain back the phone, address the issue with the sales person/sales entity, improve internal processes, notify other ETCs if necessary, etc.?
Annual Certification/Verification
Rules:
All ETC designated companies must re-certify the eligibility of all Lifeline subscribers active on the date
of June 1, 2012, and must do so by the end of 2012. The results of the recertification effort must be
reported to USAC by January 31, 2013.
Beginning in calendar year 2013, ETCs must re-certify their entire base every 12 months, and may do so
on a rolling basis, throughout the year. Upon completion of the recertification process each year, ETCs
will be required to complete and submit the Lifeline ETC certification form to USAC. The form must be
signed by an officer of the company, certifying under penalty of perjury that the company has procedures
in place to confirm consumer eligibility, and that the ETC is in compliance with the certification
procedures and has obtained a valid certification form from each active Lifeline customer.
End users must be given at least 30 days to respond to the annual recertification request. If they fail to do
so they must be given a 30-day notice of pending termination. If they still fail to respond in the
prescribed 30 days, then they must be de-enrolled from the Lifeline program.
The recertification process includes the following requirements:
The end user’s identity must be verified through confirmation of the existing name, address and telephone number on the account.
7
The process must capture the end user’s date of birth and last four digits of social security number. This information will be required for the eventual population of the national duplicate database.
The end user’s verbal responses or touch-tone responses must be captured and stored in a way that allows them to be retrieved on-demand.
Each end user must certify:
The information contained in my application remains true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I acknowledge that willfully providing false or fraudulent information to receive Lifeline benefits is punishable by law and may result in me being barred from the program.
That I am still a recipient of the specific eligibility program, or have an annual household income at or below 135 percent of the FPG.
I am an adult. I understand that I and my household can only have one Lifeline-supported telephone
service. My telephone company has explained the one-per household requirement. I understand that violation of the one-per-household requirement constitutes a violation of the FCC’s rules and will result in my de-enrollment from the lifeline program, and could result in criminal prosecution by the United States Government.
I attest to the best of my knowledge, that I and no one in my household are receiving a Lifeline supported service from any other land line or wireless company (such as Safelink, Assurance, or
Reachout Wireless).
I understand that if my service is unused for sixty (60) days, it will be suspended subject to a thirty (30) day period in which I may use the service or contact the Company to confirm that I want to continue receiving Lifeline service from the Company.
I will notify my telephone company within thirty (30) days if I no longer qualify for Lifeline. I understand this requirement and may be subject to penalties if I fail to notify my phone company. Specifically, I will notify my company if: I cease to participate in the above federal or state program, or my annual household income
exceeds 135% FPG. I am receiving more than one Lifeline supported service; I no longer satisfy the criteria for receiving Lifeline support.
I will notify my phone company within thirty (30) days of moving. If I fail to respond to my telephone companies’ address verification attempts within thirty (30) days, I may be de-enrolled from my Lifeline service.
My telephone company has explained to me that I am required each year to re-certify my continued eligibility for Lifeline, and that if I fail to do so within thirty (30) days of notification, it will result in the termination of my Lifeline benefit.
Best Practices:
There are a number of ways in which an end user can recertify: a call to customer service (inbound and
outbound calls), a call to an IVR, website, email, fax, mail, or text.
State Eligibility Dip:
8
All active customers in a state that maintains a lifeline eligibility database can be recertified by way of a
successful dip into that database. Since the database is not yet set up, we will implement this for 2013.
Once Xchange dips, any customers whose eligibility is not confirmed by the database must be
disconnected. If the ETC is informed that a customer is no longer eligible via the state eligibility dip, the
ETC must send the end user a 30 day termination letter explaining that their lifeline credit will be
removed.
Outreach Process:
In consideration of the holiday season, Xchange will start recertification in October, for all remaining,
active subscribers:
1. Send them an email (if available) with instructions to call the IVR/Customer Service, or go to the company’s website to complete the recertification process. The email should only detail the certification requirements and encourage the end user to recertify at their choosing, it should not require the end user to begin the recertification process.
2. On November 1st, send a mailer to each active end user who has not yet recertified. This mailer should detail the recertification process and explain the options for recertifying. Each mailer should include a hard copy of the ETC recertification form that may be mailed back to the ETC at no expense to the end user. This mailer should also include language explaining to the end user that if they fail to respond in 30 days, their lifeline discount may be terminated. The letter should be highlight that this is a “final notice” in bold lettering to illustrate the significance.
3. On December 1st, any end user who has not responded to the recertification request must be sent a 30 day termination letter explaining that their lifeline discount will be terminated due to their failure to respond to the recertification request.
By December 31st, all end users who have not completed the recertification process should be removed
from the ETC’s lifeline platform and Form 497. The results of the recertification should be compiled and
must be reported to USAC by January 31, 2013.
De-enrollment
An end user must be de-enrolled from the Lifeline program for the following reasons:
End users are required to inform the ETC within 30 days if they no longer qualify for the Lifeline subsidy. If an ETC becomes aware that the end user no longer qualifies, they must de-enroll the end user from the Lifeline program and may not request reimbursement for the end user.
If an ETC has “reasonable basis” to believe that an end user no longer meets the eligibility criteria for Lifeline, the ETC must notify the subscriber of impending termination of service and allow the end user 30 days to demonstrate eligibility before terminating service.
9
With the introduction of programs like the IDRP process, if USAC informs an ETC that a subscriber is a duplicate or that more than one of the subscriber’s household is receiving a Lifeline benefit, then the ETC must de-enroll the end user with 5 business days.
As mentioned above, if an end user does not respond to and ETC’s annual recertification attempts within 30 days, the ETC must send the subscriber a notice giving the end user another 30 days to demonstrate eligibility. If the end user fails to certify, they must then be de-enrolled from the program.
Non- Usage: only an issue for providers of no cost service or prepaid services. Since Xchange always
charges and bills post, the customer always receives a bill and has an incentive to notify if the service is
not relevant.
Bill Presentment
ETC must show all charges and all credits/subsidies on every bill so that the end user can be assured of
what they are receiving, even if the bill to the customer will be zero-rated. For example, the actual
monthly charge must be shown along with the Lifeline credit, and the actual activation fee must be shown
along with the Linkup credit.
Other miscellaneous fees and charges must not be included in, or lumped into, the tax section of the
invoice. They must be identified in their own section of the invoice and clearly detailed.
Carriers eligible for Lifeline must not charge Lifeline subscribers for the following:
Federal Universal Service Fee related to local calling charges Local Number Portability Fee Security deposit related to local service Toll Limitation Service (Toll Block or Toll Control)
Lifeline service cannot be terminated for outstanding charges related to long distance service, nor can
they be charged interest on billing installments.
ETC Annual Reporting
The FCC has mandated that ETC must annually report the company name, holding company, operating
companies, affiliates, branding or dba names, and USAC identifiers. This report must include:
all outages that lasted more than 30 minutes and potentially affected at least 10% of customers or 911 special facility;
number of complaints per 1,000 handsets
10
certification of compliance with service quality standards and consumer protection rules; certification that the ETC can function in an emergency; and information describing the terms and conditions of any voice telephony service plan offerings
offered to Lifeline subscribers. This report will be required annually and must be sent to the FCC, USAC, and any State commission.
USAC will provide the format for these annual reports.