X-1R Lubrication and Fuel Products presentation X-1R Corporation has over 160 products, but we would like to focus on 2 of our product solutions. (If.

X-1R Lubrication and Fuel Products presentation

X-1R Corporation has over 160 products, but wewould like to focus on 2 of our product solutions.

(If used together average fuel savings increases greatly)

XR20-DEmissions and Fuel Reduction Treatment

Provides: fuel savings, engine cleaning and emission reduction in one product(This product has treated 5 Billion Gallons + of Fuel)

X-1R XLF HD Engine Treatment

Provides: proven friction and heat reduction, increases MPG(This product moves the 12 million pound space shuttle crawler)

X-1R Diesel Fuel TreatmentXR20-D (Fuel Economy Improvement)

• Proven Fleet Fuel Savings- in Multiples of Cost of Product• Meets or exceeds the joint EMA/TMC pump grade specification for

detergency and accelerated thermal stability • Meets and exceeds NCWM premium diesel fuel specs for injector

cleanliness and thermal stability and thermal stability • Meets or exceeds Cummins CES 60032 requirements • Contains demulsifies for water interaction control • Superior Performance- Cummins L-10 Injector deposit test. CRC rating

<10• Removes deposits that deteriorate fuel economy & emissions• Passes Class 8 Truck Fuel Filter Plugging Test

X-1R Diesel Fuel TreatmentXR20-D (Emission Reduction)

• Reduces PM’s (particulate matter) emissions- 64% idling, 15% operations

• Technology Approved for Texas L.E.D. for Emission Reduction- Shell, Valero and Citgo have treated 5 billions gallons of diesel fuel, to date.

• Testing for Emission Reduction performed by Olson Ecologic Engine • Letter from California Air Resource Board (C.A.R.B) confirming effective

emission reduction technology• Recommendation from R20 California Environmental Board

3 Month Test- 8 School Bus's Bentonville Arkansas School Fleet

Conclusion of Test- AFDT-9811 achieved

PAIR # 1 PAIR # 2Bus Number 87 Bus Number 89 Bus Number 90 Bus Number 95

DateStarting Mileage

Ending Mileage

Fuel Used (gal)

Miles per Gallon

DateStarting Mileage

Ending Mileage

Fuel Used (gal)

Miles per Gallon

DateStarting Mileage

Ending Mileage

Fuel Used (gal)

Miles per Gallon

DateStarting Mileage

Ending Mileage

Fuel Used (gal)

Miles per Gallon

02/14/08 86,991 87,053 9.00 6.89 02/14/08 85,166 85,229 10.00 6.30 02/14/08 109,190 109,247 8.00 7.13 02/14/08 122,214 122,292 10.00 7.8002/19/08 87,053 87,121 10.00 6.80 02/19/08 85,229 85,298 11.00 6.27 02/19/08 109,247 109,318 10.00 7.10 02/19/08 122,292 122,372 11.00 7.2702/22/08 87,121 87,301 26.25 6.86 02/22/08 85,298 85,449 24.00 6.29 02/22/08 109,318 109,476 22.00 7.18 02/22/08 122,372 122,599 29.00 7.8302/26/08 87,301 87,485 25.00 7.36 02/26/08 85,449 85,574 26.00 4.81 02/26/08 109,476 109,649 24.00 7.21 02/26/08 122,599 122,753 21.00 7.3302/28/08 87,485 87,609 16.00 7.75 02/28/08 85,574 85,699 16.00 7.81 02/28/08 109,649 109,764 13.00 8.85 02/28/08 122,753 122,905 21.00 7.2403/04/08 87,609 87,766 22.00 7.14 03/05/08 85,699 85,867 26.00 6.46 03/06/08 109,764 109,992 30.00 7.60 03/04/08 122,905 123,106 27.00 7.4403/10/08 87,766 87,982 28.00 7.71 03/11/08 85,867 86,105 30.00 7.93 03/12/08 109,992 110,222 30.00 7.67 03/07/08 123,106 123,293 25.00 7.4803/24/08 87,982 88,292 38.00 8.16 03/14/08 86,105 86,324 28.00 7.82 03/25/08 110,222 110,557 41.00 8.17 03/13/08 123,293 123,600 41.00 7.49

03/26/08 123,600 123,909 40.00 7.737.47 6.77 7.68 7.53

PAIR # 3 PAIR # 4Bus Number 92 Bus Number 93 Bus Number 94 Bus Number 96

DateStarting Mileage

Ending Mileage

Fuel Used (gal)

Miles per Gallon

DateStarting Mileage

Ending Mileage

Fuel Used (gal)

Miles per Gallon

DateStarting Mileage

Ending Mileage

Fuel Used (gal)

Miles per Gallon

DateStarting Mileage

Ending Mileage

Fuel Used (gal)

Miles per Gallon

02/14/08 81,991 82,048 10.00 5.70 02/14/08 67,051 67,104 9.00 5.89 02/14/08 79,586 79,657 9.00 7.89 02/14/08 79,465 79,533 10.00 6.8002/19/08 82,048 82,108 11.00 5.45 02/19/08 67,104 67,164 10.00 6.00 02/19/08 79,657 79,725 10.00 6.80 02/19/08 79,533 79,601 10.00 6.8002/22/08 82,108 82,275 29.00 5.76 02/22/08 67,164 67,310 24.00 6.08 02/22/08 79,725 80,021 38.00 7.79 02/22/08 79,601 79,787 26.00 7.1502/26/08 82,275 82,389 16.00 7.13 02/26/08 67,310 67,416 15.00 7.07 02/26/08 80,021 80,186 26.00 6.35 02/26/08 79,787 79,923 15.00 9.0702/28/08 82,389 82,504 19.00 6.05 02/28/08 67,416 67,520 15.00 6.93 02/28/08 80,186 80,332 17.00 8.59 02/28/08 79,923 80,066 19.00 7.5303/06/08 82,504 82,730 34.00 6.65 03/06/08 67,520 67,727 30.00 6.90 03/03/08 80,332 80,514 21.00 8.67 03/04/08 80,066 80,327 34.00 7.6803/12/08 82,730 82,959 34.00 6.74 03/13/08 67,727 67,988 37.00 7.05 03/07/08 80,514 80,696 28.00 6.50 03/12/08 80,327 80,658 43.00 7.7003/25/08 82,959 83,260 41.00 7.34 03/11/08 80,696 80,890 26.00 7.46 03/26/08 80,658 80,987 41.00 8.02

03/14/08 80,890 81,160 28.00 9.6403/26/08 81,160 81,381 29.00 7.62

6.54 6.69 7.74 7.69

  T/C Ratio  No Additive With Additive   

Pair # 1 0.91 1.03 0.132 13.2% Fuel Savings Pair # 2 1.02 1.12 0.098 9.8% Fuel Savings Pair # 3 0.98 1.01 0.031 3.12% Fuel Savings (data incomplete) Pair # 4 1.01    0.071 7.1% Fuel Savings

8.3 % Diesel Fuel Savings Field Test

See television news story on X-1R http://www.x1r.com/

8.3% Fuel Savings- 90 day test

Ø     

CUMMINS L-10 TEST PROCEDURE: ¨  Using a 1990 Cummins L-10 engine, the procedure was designed to simulate the severe injector carbonizing problems that were first experienced in 1988 L-10 and NT engines. This field problem caused engines to lose as much as 15% of their maximum power in as little as 40,000 miles. The test cycle is as follows: 

Step Time RPM Load1 15 sec. 2300 55-65 FHP2 15 sec. 2300 Closed throttle motoring3 Repeat steps 1 and 2 for a total of 125 hours

 ¨      To pass the L-10 test requires a CRC rating of the plunger of less than 10 and an average injector flow loss of less than 6%. L-10 TEST ENGINE

Fail Rating =20.8

Pass Rating =2.7

Rating Area

CUMMINS L-10 INJECTOR PLUNGER before and after XR20 Use.

CUMMINS L-10 TEST RESULTS

¨      BASE FUEL WAS CAT 1K REFERENCE FUEL  ¨      CASE 1: FRONT ENGINE: ADDITIVECO CONNCENTRATION WAS 126 PPMV ¨      CASE 2: FRONT ENGINE: ADDITIVE CO CONCENTRATION WAS 113 PPMV ¨      CASE 3: REAR ENGINE: ADDITIVE CO CONCENTRATION WAS 333 PPMV  ¨      A PLUNGER RATING OF LESS THAN 10 I 10 IS A “PASS”

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CR

C P

lun

ger

Rat

ing

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3

CUMMINS L-10 PLUNGER RATINGS

Base Fuel Base + Detergent

X-1R HD - Industrial Engine TreatmentX-1R HD Proven in engines with High (EP) Conditions Anti-Wear Technology proven and endorsed by NASA Comprehensive Anti-Corrosion Inhibitors- prevents Rust

Formation for all metal surfaces Formulated to Increase host Oil Life- up to 20% Increases Heat and Pressure ranges for synthetic and natural oils Dramatically Reduces Engine Heat Caused by Friction Protects Engine from cold starts and loss of oil pressure Improves Fuel Economy & Horsepower

X-1R HD Engine Treatment-Load Bearing Test

The Falex Corporation

As clearly seen in the graph the addition of X-1R Concentrate at 6% to the Texaco Rando R&O 32 increased the fluid film strength by approximately 50.4%. While at the same time reducing the wear measurements by approximately 85.7%

Note: The percentage value was taken from 100 kgf, where both fluids were last measured concurrently. The Texaco Rando R&O 32 seized at 126 kgf, therefore there were no reading available for this product after that point. However the Texaco Rando R&O 32 with the X-1R Concentrate continued to perform to 250 kgf.

Summary: As visibly documented above, protection values of the lubes with the addition of the X-1R Concentrate were, for all intent and purposes, doubled and the reduction in wear was even greater. Therefore fewer breakdowns, less downtime, and diminished mechanical failures should be apparent.

Credentials

American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

Swedish National Testing and Research Institute

Oakland University-Dept. of Mechanical Engineering

The Falex Corporation AMI American Motorcycle Institute, Inc.

NASA University of Florida – Dr.

Gerald J. Micklow QC Laboratories Herguth Laboratories Morgan McClure Racing Elliott Brothers Racing Hav-A-Tampa Dirt Series. Pro Cup Racing Series 2014

Racing Teams

X-1R has stood up to rigorous testing by:

X-1R Technology Testing

Fuel Economy Test – Gerald Micklow, Ph.D., President, Performance Engineering, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Dr. Gerald Micklow, President of Performance Engineering: an American Society of Mechanical Engineers comprehensive test plan was performed for the validation of fuel economy improvements. This was done according to industry standards and American Society for Testing Standards.

X-1R was proven to increase fuel economy an average of 7-10% verified by American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

Load Bearing Test – Falex Corporation

The protection values of the lubricants with the addition of the X-1R Concentrate at 6% ratio were for all intents and purposes doubled and the reduction of wear was even greater. Therefore fewer breakdowns, less downtime and diminished mechanical failures should be apparent.

Metal Treatment – QC Laboratories

QC Laboratories test results confirms and validates X-1R impregnates the surface of ferrous metals, in metal to metal contact situations, thereby increasing the Rockwell-B-Hardness from 35 Rb to 72 Rb.Wear Reduction – Dr. Gary Barber, Ph.D., Oakland University, Dept. of Mechanical EngineeringUnder the supervision of Dr. Gary Barber, a consulting engineer for Detroit Diesel, tests were performed and concluded that X-1R reduced wear up to 47%.

X-1R Technology Testing

Vibration Analysis – Delco RemyA controlled maintenance users group performed vibration analysis testing on X-1R. The results show that adding X-1R to premium SH rated oil and grease significantly reduced vibration in their equipment. It resulted in higher productivity, longer equipment life, less downtime and less effects in manufactured parts.Oil Analysis – Herguth Laboratories, Inc.Spectrochemical data shows compatibility of X-1R with name brand lubricants and shows X-1R does not affect viscosity of oil.

X-1R is Non-Conductive – U.E.C.

U.E.C. Electrical test report shows X-1R does not conduct electricity and has exceeded OSHA’s requirements of 69KV.

Swedish Tribology Test

Swedish National Testing and Research Institute confirms tribological testing with X-1R added to oil, increased the surface density of the metal, therefore, reducing wear.

NASA – Kennedy Space CenterKennedy Space Center: The predictive engineering technology group proved X-1R when added to a common lubrication oil or a superior high quality performance oil will significantly reduce operating temperatures in equipment.