Top Banner
M ay23, 2002
16

“Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

Dec 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Trevor Stewart
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

May 23, 2002

Page 2: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

www.crimnet.state.mn.us

Page 3: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

“Business Case”for Integration

• Accountability– Make offenders accountable for behavior

– Make CJ System accountable for its performance

• Cost of Public Safety at all levels- All Operations are information dependant,

yet we operate with very little information

• Tragic Implications for Public Safety

Page 4: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

FELONYCONVICTION RECORD

Crim Sex Conduct 1 12/98Assault with Weapon 3/96Burglary Occupied 6/94

Jon Lee Beasley12/8/52

WARRANTSDakota County Felony 1/1/99

Hennepin County Misdemeanor 2/5/99Carver County Gross Msdr 5/5/99

WEAPONS

PROHIBITED

MISDEMEANORSDomestic Assault 3/3/97Assault 2/15/94DWI 7/4/93DWI 9/15/92

PROBATIONHennepin

ScottDakotaDomestic Restraining Orders: Y

PRE-TRIALRELEASERamsey 11/99Hennepin 6/99

Dakota 5/99

JUVENILEFELONYRECORD

YES

NAME:DOB:

SEXOFFENDER:

YES

Page 5: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

FELONYCONVICTION RECORD

Crim Sex Conduct 1 12/98Assault with Weapon 3/96Burglary Occupied 6/94

Jon Lee Beasley12/8/52

WARRANTSDakota County Felony 1/1/99

Hennepin County Misdemeanor 2/5/99Carver County Gross Msdr 5/5/99

WEAPONS

PROHIBITED

MISDEMEANORSDomestic Assault 3/3/97Assault 2/15/94DWI 7/4/93DWI 9/15/92

PROBATIONHennepin

ScottDakotaDomestic Restraining Orders: Y

PRE-TRIALRELEASERamsey 11/99Hennepin 6/99

Dakota 5/99

JUVENILEFELONYRECORD

YES

NAME:DOB:

SEXOFFENDER:

YES

Page 6: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

AKAKerry Dean GellerKeith Allen BrummerBob StevensonRobert Mark GellerJames HeidelbergRichard Lee OlsonBob GellerRobert James StevensonEric Allen Johnson 

Kerry Dean StevensonDate of Birth: 04/29/58

Alias Dates of Birth:03/29/55, 05/11/58, 01/24/61,05/05/55, 04/29/55, 03/27/48, 04/24/54

Page 7: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

Year Convicted of: County Status: Crt file #

1983 Indecent Conduct Hennepin CCH CAG# 83080022

1984 DWI Hennepin CCH 1535155

1985 Indecent Conduct Anoka Not in CCH K1-85-1172

1986 Indecent Conduct Hennepin CCH CAG# 86109522

1986 Indecent Conduct Ramsey Suspense Pre-TCIS?

1986 DWI Hennepin Suspense CAG#86121271

1987 Indecent conduct Anoka Suspense KX-87-7525

1987 Indecent conduct Anoka Suspense K9-87-7967

1988 Indecent Exposure Hennepin CCH CAG#87151375

1989 Indecent Exposure Hennepin CCH 89056658

1989 Gross Misd DWI Pine Suspense K8-89-534 

1991 Agg Viol – DL Susp Hennepin CCH 91040704

1992 Indecent Conduct Anoka Suspense K8-92-8512

1993 Indecent Conduct Ramsey Suspense KX-93-759

1993 Indecent Conduct Ramsey Suspense K6-93-757

1993 Indecent Exposure Hennepin Suspense CAG # 93022196

1993 Escape from custody Hennepin Suspense CAG#93511838

1994 Theft by check Ramsey Not in CCH K7-94-82

1997 Crim Sex Conduct 5th Ramsey Suspense K2-97-2658

1998 Crim Sex Conduct 5th Hennepin Suspense CAG#97208852

2000 Crim Sex Conduct 5th Anoka Found Guilty – Sentencing scheduled

KX-00-6209

Total Offenses: 21

On State Criminal History Data Base: 6

Total Offenses: 21

On State Criminal History Data Base: 6

Page 8: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

Money For Nothing

• $ 1 Billion/year Statewide Expenditures:– public safety operations– criminal justice processes– corrections

• Excludes capital investments

• Business Value is Dependant on Information

Page 9: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

Key Project Sponsors• Business Groups: Organization of 100

CEO’s of largest MN Corporations, and CEO of largest company in MN

• Victim Organizations: Victim Abduction Task Force(s)

• Key Legislative Sponsors: Both political parties, both legislative bodies

• Public Safety Commissioner & Chief Justice Supreme Court

Page 10: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

Attributes of CriMNet

• Enterprise-wideState Cities

Counties Feds

• Enterprise View of All Functions– Dispatch/Investigation/Apprehension– Charging– Adjudication – Sanction Administration

Page 11: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

Attributes of CriMNet

• All Agencies– Law Enforcement– Detention– Prosecution and Defense– Courts– Probation/Jails/Prisons

• Enterprise Architecture (Models)– Data– Process– Technology– Organization/Governance

Page 12: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

Funding Approach

• State funds state agency projects• State establishes grants for local

agencies– Integration Planning Grants to facilitate

gap analysis against state enterprise models

– Integration Implementation Grants - only after Plan is completed

• Infrastructure

• Local Integration Hubs

• Adaptors

• 50% local match required

Page 13: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

Governance• Integration Governance Board in Statue

– Four Executive Branch Commissioners• Public Safety (Chair)

• Administration

• Corrections

• Finance

– Four Judicial Branch Appointed by Chief Justice

– Integration Task Force comprised of locals, public and corporate members advises Board

• Executive Director Hired by and Reports to Board and permanent /fulltime staff

Page 14: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

Upper Upper MidwestMidwestJusticeJustice

ConsortiumConsortium

Upper Upper MidwestMidwestJusticeJustice

ConsortiumConsortium

REGIONAL INTERGRATION

Page 15: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.
Page 16: “Business Case” for Integration Accountability –Make offenders accountable for behavior –Make CJ System accountable for its performance.

www.crimnet.state.mn.us