www.capitalhealth.ca CDM Registry Project Dr. Richard Lewanczuk Regional Medical Director Chronic Disease Management Capital Health
Mar 31, 2015
www.capitalhealth.ca
CDM Registry Project
Dr. Richard LewanczukRegional Medical Director
Chronic Disease ManagementCapital Health
www.capitalhealth.ca
CDM Registry Project- Purposes
• Create population-based registry and dashboard to monitor and improve care
• Deploy the registry in AB Netcare Portal environment
• Facilitate linkage to primary care physicians and enrolment into regional programs
• Enable care coordination between primary care and specialty services within and across regions
• Provide decision support tools
www.capitalhealth.ca
The Value Proposition
For RHAs and AHW
• Assist clinicians in delivery of Chronic Disease patient care.
• Data populated and used by Primary Care clinicians.
• System-wide dashboard to monitor performance of delivery
models.
• Metrics to support appropriate allocation of funding and
resources.
• Clinical data linked to system-wide financial data for
economic analysis
www.capitalhealth.ca
The Value Proposition
For Patients
• Enhanced health outcomes and quality of life through early and accurate delivery of appropriate medical services.
• Timely access to appropriate medical services and facilities.
www.capitalhealth.ca
The Value Proposition
For Primary Care
• A single comprehensive Chronic Disease patient registry integrated with clinic registry and system processes.
• Automated tools to improve health outcomes for managed vs. unmanaged patients
• Improved linkage between regional services and primary care
• Improved efficiency
www.capitalhealth.ca
How did we get here?
• Each region had
• Business processes to identify patients, supported by IT
• Established programs and services to support CDM patients
• Executive support to create a shared patient profile viewer and dashboard system
• Established a clinical advisory group (primary care and regional service providers) who
• Identified critical data elements
• Validated business processes, reporting requirements
• Participated in User Acceptance Testing
www.capitalhealth.ca
Identification criteria
• HbA1c > 7.0• fbs >7.0• random glucose > 11.1
www.capitalhealth.ca
What is it ?
www.capitalhealth.ca
Registry - Aggregate Dashboard
www.capitalhealth.ca
Dashboard Trend
www.capitalhealth.ca
Dashboard Drilldown Patient List
www.capitalhealth.ca
Dashboard Drilldown Flow
Dashboard
ViewerPatient List
www.capitalhealth.ca
Patient Profile Viewer
• Primarily used by providers without access to registry
• Contains a summary of clinical information including
• Care Co-ordination -Medications
• Co-morbidities / Complication
• Markers of Disease Progression
• Screening for Further Complications
• Health Status and Management Against Goals
www.capitalhealth.ca
Registry – Patient Viewer
www.capitalhealth.ca
How did we support primary care clinicians to identify patients?
Capital Health:
• Used existing platform to facilitate identification, management and early intervention
• Extracted aggregate lists of patients from the Lab Repository
• Validated patient lists and diagnoses against physician clinic records
• Registered patients
• Provided standard reports
• Provided on-going support and training
www.capitalhealth.ca
What are expected outcomes ?
Care Impacts
• Improved understanding of patient populations
• More focused intervention on the highest risk group
• Improved identification of “at risk” group
• Ability to identify patients whose health status has changed
www.capitalhealth.ca
Outcomes expected (cont’d)
System Impacts
• Improved ability to identify unattached patients
• Better understanding of supports that are needed both technology and service related
• Improved communication between providers
• Data captured in a common method to enable economic analysis.
www.capitalhealth.ca
Outcomes realized to date
• Common data definitions, messaging standards, and dashboard indicators identified
• Set up for system to system communication
• Clinicians are on board with a vision
www.capitalhealth.ca
Corollary Outcomes
• Reusable work for multiple chronic conditions
• Foundational elements help with other types of clinical system builds
• Improved support for family practice
www.capitalhealth.ca
Where do we go from here?
• Expand the deployment to additional primary care physicians
• Expand the deployment across additional disease conditions
• Integrate the registry with existing EMRs
• Expand deployment across the province
www.capitalhealth.ca
Fun with data
% of Capital Health diabetic patients at HbA1c targets
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
%
6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 >12
allcommunityRDP
BP Control in Regional Diabetes Program
0
20
40
60
80
100
% a
t ta
rget
DBP SBP
Source: Capital Health Regional Diabetes Program
<140
<130<80
<90
LDL and HbA1c Control in Regional Diabetes Program
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
% a
t ta
rget
LDL HbA1c
Source: Capital Health Regional Diabetes Program
<7.0
<8.4
<2.5
<2.0
proportion of hypertensive and dyslipidemics on pharmacotherapy in Regional Diabetes Program
0102030405060708090
100
%
higher lower
target
BP
LDL
Source: Capital Health Regional Diabetes Program
>130
>2.0>2.5
>140
www.capitalhealth.ca
How do family doctors compare to specialists in diabetes management in CH ?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
%
controlled sub-optimal uncontrolled
PCNs
specialists
Patients initially uncontrolled (HbA1c >8.4%)After 6 months:
We need to know who the patients are(Registry)
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
Population prevalence
admin datalocal data
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Population incidence
Age/Sex Standardized Prevalence by Source
0123456789
pre
vale
nce %
all male female
CCHS 05/06 ADSS 06 CH
Source: Capital Health Regional Diabetes Program
Performance
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
pre
vale
nce
%
CH criteria-with Dx-without DxCH missed:
Sensitivity 87%, PPV 90%
www.capitalhealth.ca
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
401-
4 yr
s.
5-9
yrs.
10-1
4 yr
s.
15-1
9 yr
s.
20-2
4 yr
s.
25-2
9 yr
s.
30-3
4 yr
s.
35-3
9 yr
s.
40-4
4 yr
s.
45-4
9 yr
s.
50-5
4 yr
s.
55-5
9 yr
s.
60-6
4 yr
s.
65-6
9 yr
s.
70-7
4 yr
s.
75-7
9 yr
s.
80-8
4 yr
s.
85+
yrs
.
% C
rite
ria
Me
t
LREP Female LREP Male ADSS Female ADSS Male
Administrative vs Registry Data
www.capitalhealth.ca
0
kilometers
3015
11
12
13
15
1009
03
08
02
07
04
0106
05
142007 Unique Patients Diabetes
per 100 Sept 2007 CH A/G Adj Pop
9 or Greater (4)8 to < 9 (5)7 to < 8 (4)6 to < 7 (2)
Capital Health Finance: Funding & Methodologies: af/xdx_WtdPop_Diabetes.wor Jan 22, 2008
Projection, Nevada 2701, Easter Zone (1983 metres)
Diabetes Prevalence Community Map