7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
1/26
'Watching the Watchdog'Malaysian Media Coverage of GE13
Preliminary Results Release 2
26/04/13
Dr Tessa J. HoughtonSchool of Modern Languages and Cultures
Director of the Centre for the Study of Communications and CultureUniversity of Nottingham Malaysian Campus
in collaboration with
Comments and feedback welcomed at:
[email protected] 523 4575
or
Masjaliza HamzahExecutive Officer
Centre for Independent [email protected]
016 338 6603
The work is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0
http://www.nottingham.edu.my/Modern-Languages/index.aspxhttp://www.nottingham.edu.my/Modern-Languages/CentrefortheStudyofCommunicationsandCulture/index.aspxmailto:[email protected]://cijmalaysia.org/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/http://www.nottingham.edu.my/Modern-Languages/CentrefortheStudyofCommunicationsandCulture/index.aspxmailto:[email protected]://cijmalaysia.org/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/http://www.nottingham.edu.my/Modern-Languages/index.aspx7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
2/26
Table of ContentsWatching the Watchdog Release 2: Malaysian voters deprived of fair and objective informationabout politicians in GE13........................................................................................................................................3Section 1: Media Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures..........................................................................4
1.1 Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures..........................................................................4Figure 1: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures..........................................................4
Figure 2: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs. Opposition vs.Independent/Other........................................................................................................................................5Figures 3-6: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs. Oppositionvs. Independent/Other - Bernama vs. Newspapers vs. Television vs. Online News.........................5
1.2 Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources..........................................................8Figure 7: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources.......................................... 8Figure 8: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures As Sources: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other............................................................................................................ 9Figures 9-12: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other - Bernama vs. Newspapers vs. Television vs. Online News.. .9
1.3 Tone of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures............................................................................12Figure 13: Negative Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures.......................................................12Figure 14: Positive Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures..........................................................13Figure 15: Tone of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs. Opposition vs.Independent/Other.....................................................................................................................................14
1.4 Tone of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures As Sources: 'Attack Politics' or NegativeCampaigning......................................................................................................................................................15
Figure 16: Attack Politics: Which Politicians and Political Figures Employ 'Attack Politics' MostOften?............................................................................................................................................................ 15Figure 17: Attack Politics: Which Coalition Employs Attack Politics Most Often?..........................16
Section 2: A Brief Methodology..........................................................................................................................17Section 3: Appendix 1 Tables..........................................................................................................................19Section 4: Appendix 2 Coding Scheme......................................................................................................... 24
2
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
3/26
Watching the Watchdog Release 21: Malaysian voters deprivedof fair and objective information about politicians in GE13
In scrutinising the GE13 coverage provided by the most popular and influential Malaysian media, theWatching the Watchdog media monitoring project2 found that citizens of Malaysia are beingdeprived of fair and objective information about the individual politicians who are taking part in theelections. What follows are our key results:
Who is talked about the most? And how are they talked about?
The volume of mention-level coverage given to politicians from both coalitions is relativelyequitable overall, but some interesting variations are present at the medium-specific andpolitician-specific levels.
Najib Razak is the politician given the single most mentions overall i.e. he is the politicalfigure discussed the most, by a significant margin.
Bernama talk aboutopposition politicians much more than they talk aboutBN politicians. In contrast, the television news broadcasts talk aboutBN politicians the most.
The online media discuss independent political figures more than any of the other threemediums.
BN politicians are given the most positive coverage by a significant margin, while PRpoliticians are given the most negative coverage and attacked the most by significantmargins.
Who is used as a source the most? And who engages in attack politics the most?
Of all the politicians and political figures tracked, Najib Razak, Muhyiddin Yassin, andMahathir Mohamad are most commonly used as sources by the media overall, with theircombined use as sources (46.9%) larger than that of the rest of the top 10 sources combined,and representing almost half of all source usage tracked.
Due in large part to the dominance of this trio, BN politicians are used much more oftenas sources overall than PR politicians, who are used as sources roughly the same amountas independent political figures.
Again, notable medium-specific variations are present:
Bernama and the television news broadcasts barely use PR politicians as sources, insteaddevoting most source use to BN followed by independent political figures.
Muhyiddin Yassin is the source carrying out the highest proportion of all 'attack politics',followed by Najib Razak and Mahathir Mohamad. Together, these three BN politicians areresponsible for 64.5% of all political attacks made overall.
This is only partially attributable to their high source use.
1 Release 2 is focused on politicians and political figures only. It is based on data collected overseven days (7/4/13 15/04/13) for 26 media/publications.
2 Watching the Watchdog project monitors coverage from 29 media newspapers, television newsbroadcasts, online news sites as well as the national press agency, in four languages (English,Bahasa Malaysia, Mandarin, and Tamil); in Sabah and Sarawak as well as in Peninsular
Malaysia, during the month spanning April 7
th
to May 7
th
2013. It is a collaboration between theUniversity of Nottingham Malaysia Campus and the Centre for Independent Journalism.
3
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
4/26
Section 1: Media Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures
1.1 Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures
Figure 1: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures
Only the top 20 most mentionedname-tracked politicians and political figures are shown onthis graph.
Of all name-tracked politicians and political figures, Najib Razak receives the most mentionsby a significant proportion (30.4%), followed by Anwar Ibrahim (12.63%) and Lim Kit Siang(9.5%).
Refer to Table 1 for full figures.
4
Najib Razak
Anwar Ibrahim
Lim Kit Siang
Chua Soi Lek
Mahathir Mohamad
Lim Guan Eng
Nik Aziz
Muhyiddin Yassin
Khalid Ibrahim
Hadi Awang
Tian ChuaIbrahim Ali
Ng Yen Yen
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Azmin Ali
Nurul Izzah
Karpal Singh
Rafizi Ramli
Liow Tiong Lai
Taib Mahmud
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
30.43
12.63
9.46
6.05
5.98
4.92
3.69
3.01
2.54
2.44
2.271.77
1.5
1.42
1.3
1.26
1.19
0.95
0.9
0.76
Coverage Volume
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
5/26
Figure 2: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other
When the mentions of individual politicians and political figures are combined and mergedinto their respective coalitions, the collective mentions given to each major coalition'sconstituent politicians across all media types are fairly equitable i.e. similar volumes ofcoverage are given at the individual level to each coalition.
Refer to Table 2 for figures.
Figures 3-6: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other - Bernama vs. Newspapers vs. Television vs. OnlineNews
Interestingly, Bernama appear to mention opposition politicians most often. Our hypothesis(based on their very low use of PR politicians as sources and high use of BN politicians andindependent figures as sources see Figure 9) is that this stems from a high proportion ofdiscussion aboutopposition politicians being carried by Bernama, rather than using them as
5
50.6745.52
3.81
BN
PR
Independent/Other
Bernama
BN
PR
Independent/Other
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
6/26
sources.
Refer to Table 3 for figures.
The newspapers give relatively equitable volumes of mention-level coverage to politiciansfrom both coalitions.
Refer to Table 3 for figures.
The television news gives over three-quarters of their mention-level coverage to individualpoliticians and political figures from BN, and devotes very little coverage to PR politicians.
Refer to Table 3 for figures.
6
Newspapers
BN
PR
Independent/Other
Television
BN
PR
Independent/Other
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
7/26
The online media devote more of their mention-level coverage of politicians and politicalfigures to those from BN as opposed to those from PR.
Of all mediums, they devote the largest proportion of their mention-level coverage ofpoliticians and political figures to those not aligned with either coalition, i.e. independentsand others.
Refer to Table 3 for figures.
7
Online
BN
PR
Independent/Other
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
8/26
1.2 Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources
Figure 7: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources
Of the politicians and political figures tracked, Najib Razak, Muhyiddin Yassin, and MahathirMohamad are most commonly used as sources by the media.
Their combined use as sources (46.9%) is larger than that of the rest of the top 10 sourcescombined, and represents almost half of all source usage tracked.
This dominance is apparent in the next graph which shows combined source use from eachcoalition across all politicians tracked.
Election Commission Spokespeople are used as sources more often than any PR politicians.
NB: Source usage/access is important as it represents the extent to which politicians are givenaccess/the ability to speak to the public through the media, as opposed to merely being
spoken about in the media.
Refer to Table 4 for figures.
8
Najib Razak
Muhyiddin Yassin
Mahathir Mohamad
Election Commission Spokesperson
Chua Soi Lek
Lim Kit Siang
Anwar Ibrahim
Lim Guan Eng
Hadi Awang
Ambiga Sreenevasan
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
27.05
11.83
8.11
6.93
6.31
6.28
5.74
3.16
2.51
1.58
Source Usage Volume
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
9/26
Figure 8: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures As Sources: Governmentvs. Opposition vs. Independent/Other
Across all media, politicians from BN are used as sources much more often (55.4%) thanpoliticians from PR (20.7%) or independent political figures (23.9%).
Refer to Table 4 for figures.
Figures 9-12: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources:
Government vs. Opposition vs. Independent/Other - Bernama vs. Newspapers vs.Television vs. Online News
Bernama use sources from BN (51.3%) very much more often than sources from PR (5.19%).
Bernama also use independent sources (43.5%) much more often than sources from PR.
Refer to Table 11 for figures.
9
55.4
20.71
23.89
BN
PR
Independent/Other
51.3
5.19
43.51
Bernama
BN
PRIndependent/Other
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
10/26
The newspapers also use BN politicians as sources most often, and then give relatively equalsource usage to PR and independent politicians and political figures.
Refer to Table 5 for figures.
Similar to Bernama, television news uses BN politicians the most as sources, and gives muchmore source usage to independent politicians and political figures to politicians from PR.
When viewed in combination with the data in Figure 5, we can say that at the individualpolitical figure or politician level, the television news is comprised largely of BN politiciansbeing used as sources and being spoken about (by themselves, or by others).
Refer to Table 5 for figures.
10
58.221.13
20.67
Newspapers
BN
PR
Independent/Other
55.79
3.95
40.26
Television
BN
PR
Independent/Other
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
11/26
The online media also use BN politicians as sources the most often, but are the most equitable
overall in terms of who they use as sources compared to the other mediums. Refer to Table 5 for figures.
11
44.45
28.15
27.4
Online
BN
PR
Independent/Other
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
12/26
1.3 Tone of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures
Figure 13: Negative Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures
In terms of the tone of mentions of named politicians and political figures, Anwar Ibrahimreceives the highest proportion of negative mentions (17%) and the highest proportion ofattacks (25%).
Lim Kit Siang and Niz Aziz are the next most negatively mentioned/attacked (16.6% / 7.2%and 13.1% / 7.7% respectively).
Mahathir Mohamad and Najib Razak come in at fourth and fifth most negativelymentioned/attacked (8.3% / 10.6% and 8.3% / 10% respectively).
Refer to Table 6 for full figures.
12
Anwar IbrahimLim Kit Siang
Nik Aziz
Mahathir Mohamad
Najib Razak
Chua Soi Lek
Lim Guan Eng
Tian Chua
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Azmin Ali
Karpal Singh
Nurul Izzah
Hadi Awang
Taib Mahmud
Muhyiddin Yassin
Khalid Ibrahim
Alfred Jabu
G. Palanivel
Nizar Jamaluddin
Baru Bian
Elizabeth Wong
Ibrahim Ali
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Attacked Negative
Coverage Volume
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
13/26
Figure 14: Positive Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures
In terms of the tone of mentions of named politicians and political figures, Najib Razakreceived the highest proportions of both positive (58.1%) and neutral mentions (31%) byvery significant margins.
Mahathir Mohamed received the second most positive mentions (6.9%), then Lim Guan Eng(3.9%), Lim Kit Siang (8.3%), and Anwar Ibrahim (3.2%).
Refer to Table 7 for figures.
13
Najib Razak
Mahathir Mohamad
Lim Guan Eng
Lim Kit Siang
Anwar Ibrahim
Muhyiddin Yassin
Chua Soi Lek
Khalid Ibrahim
Musa Aman
Nurul Izzah
Hadi Awang
Tian Chua
Ibrahim Ali
Ng Yen Yen
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Liow Tiong Lai
Nik Aziz
Chong Chieng Jen
Azmin Ali
Taib Mahmud
Baru Bian
Hishamuddin Hussein
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Neutral Posi tive
Coverage Volume
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
14/26
Figure 15: Tone of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other
Overall, BN politicians are given the highest proportion of positive mentions by a verysignificant margin (77.26% as opposed to PR's 20.2%).
Overall, PR politicians are given the highest proportion of negative mentions by a significantmargin (60.65% as opposed to BN's 32.34%).
Overall, PR politicians receive the highest proportion of attacks by a significant margin(71.5% as opposed to BN's 25.84%).
Refer to Table 8 for figures.
14
Attacked
Negative
Neutral
Positive
Attacked
Negative
Neutral
Positive
Attacked
NegativeNeutral
Positive
BN
PR
Independent/Other
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
25.84
32.34
51.11
77.26
71.5
60.64
45.04
20.2
2.65
7.023.86
2.54
Coverage Volume
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
15/26
1.4 Tone of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures As Sources: 'AttackPolitics' or Negative Campaigning
Figure 16: Attack Politics: Which Politicians and Political Figures Employ 'Attack Politics'
Most Often?
Muhyiddin Yassin (24.7%) is the tracked source carrying out the highest proportion of all'attack politics', followed by Najib Razak (21.3%) and Mahathir Mohamad (18.5%).Together, these three BN politicians are responsible for 64.5% of all political attacks made.
Of the opposition figures used/tracked as sources, Lim Kit Siang is responsible for the highestproportion of all political attacks (13.9%), followed by Lim Guan Eng (4.5%) and AnwarIbrahim (4.3%).
Refer to Table 9 for figures.
15
Muhyiddin Yassin
Najib Razak
Mahathir Mohamad
Lim Kit Siang
Lim Guan Eng
Anwar Ibrahim
Nik Aziz
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Hadi Awang
Chua Soi Lek
Musa Aman
Nazri Aziz
Taib Mahmud
Baru Bian
Hassan Ali
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
24.68
21.34
18.47
13.85
4.46
4.3
3.03
1.59
0.96
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.32
0.32
Attack Volume
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
16/26
Figure 17: Attack Politics: Which Coalition Employs Attack Politics Most Often?
Overall, BN coalition politicians are responsible for the highest proportion of attack politicscarried by the media (67.68%), with the vast bulk of this overall coalition proportionstemming from the three BN/UMNO figures identified in the previous graph.
Refer to Table 9 for figures.
16
67.68
27.07
5.25
BN
PR
Independent/Other
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
17/26
Section 2: A Brief Methodology
Media/Publications Analysed (n = 29 3* = 26):
Media Types/Languages
Newspapers TelevisionBroadcasts
Online Media News Wire/Agency
English
New Straits TimesTV2 English
NewsMalaysiakini
English
BernamaEnglish
The Star
The Sun
Daily Express(Sabah) NTV7
Edition 7Malaysian Insider
EnglishBorneo Post(Sarawak)
BahasaMalaysia
UtusanTV1 BeritaNasional
MalaysiakiniBahasa Malaysia Bernama
BahasaMalaysia
(7/4/13 10/4/13 only)
Sinar Harian
Harian Metro
Utusan Borneo(Sabah) TV3 Buletin
UtamaMalaysia InsiderBahasa MalaysiaUtusan Borneo
(Sarawak)
Mandarin
Sin Chew Jit PohTV2 BeritaMandarin
*Data for these publications isnot included within this report
due to resourcing issues, but will beincluded in later iterations.
Oriental Daily
China Press
See Hua Daily (Sabah)8TV Mandarin
NewsSee Hua Daily(Sarawak)
TamilMakkal Osai
Malaysian Nanban*
Number of data points/references identified and analysed: n = 79015
Number of articles identified and analysed: n = 15791
Data Collection
Our data collection is done by 70 monitors who were trained using the methodology below under thesupervision of 8 team leaders. The coders many of whom are university students are based inKlang Valley, Penang, Kota Kinabalu, and Kuching. The team leaders are made up of academics,researchers and students.
The data was collected or 'coded' using sentence-level content analysis.
Stories 'coded' were selected according to the following criteria: They were within the Malaysian news section/s of the newspapers including the front page, or
were the paper's editorial (if they run one).
17
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
18/26
They were from pre-defined 'Malaysian News' areas of the news websites monitored, with'snapshots' taken at 8pm daily.
They were from within the TV news broadcasts.
They were more than 1/3 about the election, and were news stories as opposed to columns,opinions pieces, letters, etc (with the exception of the paper's own editorial, if present).
Within each story, category/operator references were identified and coded at the sentence level(from period to period). The 21 categories identified and their sub-categories or 'operators' areoutlined in Appendix 2. These 21 categories form the 'unit of analysis' for this study.
Tone (positive, negative, neutral, attacking, or attacked) was determined based on matching eachreference to a media frame or frames, supportable via emotive/descriptive/subjectivelanguage/vocabulary utilised by the either the news personnel or the source beingquoted/paraphrased. As such, tone is not based upon coder opinion but on linguistic data. Coderswere instructed to 'code as neutral' whenever there was a lack of linguistic data to support apositive/negative/attacking/attacked frame, or whenever they were unsure/conflicted.
Data Analysis
The data was analysed using the open source software package GNU Octave (a multi-disciplinarymathematical data analysis programme capable of SPSS/NVIVO-level statistical analysis, as well asmuch higher-level mathematical analysis). Scripts were composed to count occurrences of key data-codes, as specified by the project's finite code-listing set (see Appendix 2), for every row of codeddata (i.e. every reference). Where appropriate, code-count occurrences have been normalised toprovide the percentage of these key-code occurrences.
18
http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
19/26
Section 3: Appendix 1 Tables
19
TABLE 1
Politician/Political Figure
0.12614
0.22425
1.4156
12.628
1.3034
0.30834
0.16819
0.39243
6.0547
0.1822
Elizabeth Wong 0.042046
0.42046
2.4387
Hassan Ali 0.16819
0.23826
Ibrahim A li 1.7659
0.070077
0.43448
1.1913
Khalid Ibrahim 2.5368
0.16819
4.9194
9.4604
0.89699
5.98460.028031
0.44849
3.0133
0.63069
30.427
Ng Yen Yen 1.4996
3.6861
0.30834
1.2614
0.95305
0.25228
0.0140150.75683
0.25228
2.2705
0.12614
0.12614
0.19622
0
0.21023
Percentage (men-
tion)
Abdul Rahman Dahlan
Alfred Jabu
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Anwar Ibrahim
Azmin Ali
Baru Bian
Bernard Dompok
Chong Chieng Jen
Chua Soi Lek
Dzulkefly Ahmad
G. Palanivel
Hadi Awang
Hishamuddin Hussein
James Masing
Jeffrey Kitingan
Karpal Singh
Khalid Samad
Lim Guan Eng
Lim Kit Siang
Liow Tiong Lai
Mahathir MohamadMaximus Ongkili
Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu
Muhyiddin Yassin
Musa Aman
Najib Razak
Nik Aziz
Nizar Jamaluddin
Nurul Izzah
Rafizi Ramli
Rosmah Mansur
Siti Mariah MahmudTaib Mahmud
Teresa Kok
Tian Chua
Tony Pua
William Mawan
Wong Ho Leng
Wong Soon Koh
Yong Teck Lee
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
20/26
20
TABLE 2
Politician/Political Figure Party etc. Percentage Coalition Percentage
MCA 8.45129
BN 50.665258
Ng Yen Yen
MIC 0.42046
PBB 0.98108
PBS 0.028031
PRS 0.070077
SPDP 0.12614
SUPP 0
UMNO 40.41999
UPKO 0.16819
DAP 16.53817
PR 45.522221
PAS 7.246035
PKR 21.738016
Elizabeth Wong
Khalid Ibrahim
1.4156
Independent 3.8122
Hassan Ali Independent 0.16819
Ibrahim Ali 1.7659
0.25228
SAPP 0.21023
Chua Soi Lek
Liow Tiong Lai
G. Palanivel
Alfred Jabu
Taib MahmudMaximus Ongkili
James Masing
William Mawan
Wong Soon Koh
Abdul Rahman Dahlan
Hishamuddin Hussein
Mahathir Mohamad
Muhyiddin Yassin
Musa Aman
Najib Razak
Bernard Dompok
Chong Chieng Jen
Karpal Singh
Lim Guan Eng
Lim Kit Siang
Teresa Kok
Tony Pua
Wong Ho Leng
Dzulkefly Ahmad
Hadi Awang
Khalid Samad
Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu
Nik Aziz
Nizar Jamaluddin
Siti Mariah Mahmud
Anwar Ibrahim
Azmin Ali
Baru Bian
Jeffrey Kitingan
Nurul Izzah
Rafizi Ramli
Tian Chua
Ambiga Sreenevasan Bersih
Perkasa
Rosmah Mansur '1st lady'
Yong Teck Lee
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
21/26
21
TABLE 3
BN 32.54394
PR 44.97022
Independent 2.36682
Newspapers
BN 48.580057
PR 39.238054
Independent 2.36682
Television
BN 74.05982
PR 17.10519
Independent 2.25564
Online
BN 52.358844
PR 30.619457
Independent 7.215564
Bernama
TABLE 4
Politician/Political Figure Coalition Percentage
6.306
BN 55.40167
8.1139
11.829
1.1388
27.046
0.22776
0.74021
5.7367
PR 20.71172
0.44128
2.5053
0.31317
Khalid Ibrahim 1.3523
3.1601
6.2776
0.92527
1.5801
Independent 23.88615
Hassan Ali 0.46975
6.8754
2.9039
5.1246
Election Commission Spokesperson 6.9324
Percentage
(source)
Chua Soi Lek
Mahathir Mohamad
Muhyiddin Yassin
Musa Aman
Najib Razak
Nazri Aziz
Taib Mahmud
Anwar Ibrahim
Baru Bian
Hadi Awang
Jeffrey Kitingan
Lim Guan Eng
Lim Kit Siang
Nik Aziz
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Vox Pop Male
Vox Pop Female
Public Opinion/Vox Pop General
TABLE 5Publication Type Coalit ion Percentages
BN 51.2993
PR 5.19478
Independent 43.5062
Newspapers
BN 58.19836
PR 21.1346
Independent 20.66671
Television
BN 55.78996
PR 3.94738
Independent 40.26336
Online
BN 44.4535
PR 28.145611
Independent 27.400681
Bernama
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
22/26
22
TABLE 6
Politician/Political Figure Attacked Negative
0 0.21277
0.35398 0.42553
2.4779 1.4894
24.956 17.021
2.3009 3.1915
0.17699 0.6383
0 0
0 0.85106
6.5487 3.4043
0 0.21277
Elizabeth Wong 0.17699 0
0.35398 0.6383
1.0619 0.42553
Hassan Ali 0 0.42553
0 0.42553
Ibrahim A li 0.17699 4.6809
0 0
0 1.06381.2389 0.85106
Khalid Ibrahim 0.53097 6.5957
0 0.21277
5.4867 4.4681
16.637 7.234
0.17699 0.42553
8.3186 10.638
0 0
0 0.21277
0.70796 2.3404
0 0
8.3186 10Ng Yen Yen 0.17699 1.4894
13.097 7.6596
0.35398 0.6383
1.2389 2.1277
0.17699 0.85106
0 0
0 0
0.88496 2.1277
0 0.21277
3.8938 6.1702
0 0
0 0.212770.17699 0
0 0
0 0.42553
Abdul Rahman Dahlan
Alfred Jabu
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Anwar Ibrahim
Azmin Ali
Baru Bian
Bernard Dompok
Chong Chieng Jen
Chua Soi Lek
Dzulkefly Ahmad
G. Palanivel
Hadi Awang
Hishamuddin Hussein
James Masing
Jeffrey KitinganKarpal Singh
Khalid Samad
Lim Guan Eng
Lim Kit Siang
Liow Tiong Lai
Mahathir Mohamad
Maximus Ongkili
Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu
Muhyiddin Yassin
Musa Aman
Najib Razak
Nik Aziz
Nizar Jamaluddin
Nurul Izzah
Rafizi Ramli
Rosmah Mansur
Siti Mariah Mahmud
Taib Mahmud
Teresa Kok
Tian Chua
Tony Pua
William MawanWong Ho Leng
Wong Soon Koh
Yong Teck Lee
TABLE 7
Politician/Political Figure Neutral Positive
0.11862 0.25413
0.098853 0.12706
1.4433 0.88945
12.297 3.1766
1.206 0.38119
0.29656 0.38119
0.19771 0.25413
0.39541 0.50826
6.9395 3.0496
0.21748 0
Elizabeth Wong 0.039541 0
0.45473 0.25413
3.0447 1.1436
Hassan Ali 0.11862 0.25413
0.23725 0.38119
Ibrahim Ali 1.7596 1.1436
0.039541 0
0.49427 0.127061.4037 0.25413
Khalid Ibrahim 2.412 3.0496
0.17794 0.25413
4.9229 3.939
9.7074 3.3037
1.0083 0.88945
4.9031 6.8615
0.019771 0.12706
0.59312 0.12706
2.9458 3.1766
0.53381 2.2872
30.961 58.069Ng Yen Yen 1.8189 0.88945
2.4713 0.76239
0.3361 0
1.206 1.2706
1.1467 0.12706
0.3361 0.12706
0.019771 0
0.71174 0.38119
0.29656 0.12706
1.9573 1.1436
0.17794 0
0.11862 0.25413
0.21748 0.12706
0 0
0.19771 0.12706
Abdul Rahman Dahlan
Alfred Jabu
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Anwar Ibrahim
Azmin Ali
Baru Bian
Bernard Dompok
Chong Chieng Jen
Chua Soi Lek
Dzulkefly Ahmad
G. Palanivel
Hadi Awang
Hishamuddin Hussein
James Masing
Jeffrey KitinganKarpal Singh
Khalid Samad
Lim Guan Eng
Lim Kit Siang
Liow Tiong Lai
Mahathir Mohamad
Maximus Ongkili
Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu
Muhyiddin Yassin
Musa Aman
Najib Razak
Nik Aziz
Nizar Jamaluddin
Nurul Izzah
Rafizi Ramli
Rosmah Mansur
Siti Mariah Mahmud
Taib Mahmud
Teresa Kok
Tian Chua
Tony Pua
William Mawan
Wong Ho Leng
Wong Soon Koh
Yong Teck Lee
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
23/26
23
TABLE 8
BN
Attac ked 25.84076
Negative 32.34023
Neut ral 51.107245
Positive 77.25582
PR
Attac ked 71.50401
Negative 60.63799
Neut ral 45.037172Positive 20.20329
Independent
Att ac ked 2.65489
Negative 7.02136
Neutral 3.85533
Positive 2.5413
TABLE 9
Politician/Political Figure Coalition Percentage
0.79618
BN 67.67572
18.471
24.682
0.79618
21.338
0.79618
0.79618
4.2994
PR 27.07062
0.31847
0.95541
0
Khalid Ibrahim 0.15924
4.4586
13.854
3.0255
1.5924
Independent 5.25482
Hassan Ali 0.31847
1.4331
0.47771
1.2739
0.15924
Percentage(source +attacking)
Chua Soi Lek
Mahathir Mohamad
Muhyiddin Yassin
Musa Aman
Najib Razak
Nazri Aziz
Taib Mahmud
Anwar Ibrahim
Baru Bian
Hadi Awang
Jeffrey Kitingan
Lim Guan Eng
Lim Kit Siang
Nik Aziz
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Vox Pop Male
Vox Pop Female
Public Opinion/Vox PopGeneral
Election CommissionSpokesperson
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
24/26
Section 4: Appendix 2 Coding Scheme
1. Politician or Political Figure (Mentioned)
1. Abdul Rahman Dalan
2. Alfred Jabu3. Ambiga Sreenevasan4. Anwar Ibrahim5. Azmin Ali6. Baru Bian7. Bernard Dompok8. Chong Chieng Jen9. Chua Soi Lek10. Dzulkefly Ahmad11. Elizabeth Wong12. G. Palanivel13. Hadi Awang14. Hassan Ali15. Hishamuddin Hussein
16. James Masing17. Jeffrey Kitingan18. Karpal Singh19. Khalid Ibrahim20. Khalid Samad21. Lim Guan Eng22. Lim Kit Siang23. Liow Tiong Lai24. Mahathir Mohamad25. Maximus Ongkili26. Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu27. Muhyiddin Yassin28. Musa Aman
29. Najib Razak30. Ng Yen Yen31. Nik Aziz32. Nizar Jamaluddin33. Nurul Izzah34. Rafizi Ramli35. Rosmah Mansur36. Siti Mariah Mahmud37. Taib Mahmud38. Teresa Kok39. Tian Chua40. Tony Pua41. William Mawan42. Wong Ho Leng
43. Wong Soon Koh44. Yong Teck Lee45. Other
2. Politicians or Political Figure (Used as a Source)
1. Ambiga Sreenevasan (Bersih)2. Anwar Ibrahim (PKR)3. Baru Bian4. Chua Soi Lek5. Hadi Awang6. Hassan Ali7. Jeffrey Kitingan8. Khalid Ibrahim
9. Lim Guan Eng
10. Lim Kit Siang11. Mahathir Mohamad12. Muhyiddin Yassin
13. Musa Aman14. Najib Razak15. Nazri Aziz16. Nik Aziz17. Taib Mahmud18. Vox Pop Male19. Vox Pop Female20. Public Opinion/Vox Pop General21. Election Commission Spokesperson22. Other
3. Party or Coalition
1. BN (Barisan Nasional)
2. DAP (Democratic Action Party)3. Gerakan (Malaysian People's Movement
Party)4. MCA (Malaysian Chinese Association)5. MIC (Malaysian Indian Congress)6. PAS (Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party)7. PBB (Parti Besaka Bumputera Bersatu)8. PBS (Parti Bersatu Sabah)9. PKR (People's Justice Party)10. PR (Pakatan Rakyat)11. PRS (Sarawak People's Party)12. PRM (Parti Rakyat Malaysia)13. PSM (Parti Sosialis Malaysia)
14. SAPP (Sabah Progressive Party)15. SPDP (Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party)16. SUPP (Sarawak United People's Party)17. UMNO (United Malays National Organisation)18. UPKO (United Pasokmomogun Kadazandusun
Murut Organisation)19. Other
4. Organisations
1. Bersih2. Community-based organisations.3. Democracy- or human rights-oriented
organisations (excluding Bersih)4. Environmentally-oriented organisations5. Ethnicity-oriented organisations6. JATI7. Perkasa8. Professionals organisations9. Religious organisations.10. Trade Unions11. Womens' rights or issues focused organisations.12. Youth or student focused organisations13. Election Commission14. Other
24
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
25/26
5. Policy Issues
1. Vision Policies or Programmes1. 1Malaysia2. GTP (Government Transformation
Programme)3. ETP (Economic Transformation Programme)4. NKRA (National Key Results Areas)
5. NEP/'Bumiputeraism'6. PAS's Welfare State7. PKR's Buku Jingga8. NEM (New Economic Model)9. 'Transformasi'10. BN Manifesto11. PR Manifesto12. Other
2. Environment1. Deforestation/Land Rights2. Recycling3. Lynas4. Polluting Industries (non-Lynas)5. Damming Projects6. Other
3. Economy/Development1. Recession2. Welfare3. Unemployment4. Poverty5. Privatisation6. Growth/FDI7. FTA/Globalisation8. Inflation/Price Rises9. Infrastructure
10. Housing11. Other
4. Education1. Vernacular Schools2. Access3. PPSMI4. Academic Freedom5. System6. PTPTN7. Other
5. Foreign Policy1. Western World
2. Singapore (Mentions of)3. Singapore (Comparison with)4. China5. India6. Islamic World7. Israel/Palestine8. Indonesia9. Other
6. Domestic Policy, Crime, & National Security1. Immigration2. Illegals/Refugees3. Terrorism (not Lahad Datu)
4. Crime5. Lahad Datu Incident
6. Other
7. Oppressive Legislation1. ISA (Internal Security Act)2. AUKU/UUCA (Universities and University
Colleges Act 1971)3. Sedition Act4. PPPA (Printing Presses and Publication Act)
5. PAA (Peaceful Assembly Act 2012)6. SOSMA (Security Offences (Special
Measures) Act 2012)7. Other
8. Health1. 1Care2. Other
9. Religion1. Apostasy2. Islamic State3. Hudud4. Conversion (into Islam)5. 'Allah' issue6. Other
6. Non-Policy Issues
1. Ethnicity1. Malaysia2. Chinese3. Indian/South Asian4. Orang Asli5. Orang Asal, Sabah & Sarawak6. Thai7. Portuguese/Eurasian
8. Malay Rights9. Other
2. Religion1. Islam2. Buddhism/Taoism3. Hinduism4. Christianity5. Sikhism6. Religious Freedom (non-apostasy related)7. Interfaith Dialogue/Unity8. Interfaith Friction9. Other
3. Democracy & Human Rights1. General Corruption2. Electoral Corruption3. Media Freedom4. Electoral Reform5. Electoral Legislation6. 2-Party System7. Protest/Rallies8. Other
4. Socioeconomic Sectors1. Middle Class/Professionals2. Working Class
3. Aristocracy/Monarchy4. Civil Service
25
7/28/2019 WtW.prelim.release.2
26/26
5. Military and Police6. FELDA7. Plantation/Estate Workers8. Chine New Villagers9. Senior Citizens/Retirees10. RELA/Wataniah11. Urban12. Rural
13. Cost of Living14. Other
5. Territory1. Kuala Lumpur2. Labuan3. Putrajaya4. Johor5. Kedah6. Kelantan7. Malacca8. Negeri Sembilan9. Pahang10. Perak11. Perlis12. Penang13. Sabah14. Sarawak15. Selangor16. Terengganu17. Sarawak Independence18. Sabah Independence
6. Mudslinging1. Anwar/Sodomy2. Altantuya3. Rosmah
4. Penang CM5. Selangor CM6. NFC
7. Arms Deals8. Psy/CNY Concert9. Project IC10. Taib Mahmud and Logging Expose11. Other
7. Gender
1. Sexuality
2. Women in politics3. Personal/Private life4. Womens' Issues5. LGBT/Q6. Appearance7. Sexism8. Other
8. Electioneering1. Event-specific Gifts2. Handouts3. Timely Developments4. Election Promises5. Baby-kissing6. Cybertroopers/Social Media War7. Other
26