Top Banner
Considerations for teaching Second Language Writing (Sara Cushing Weigle) Chapter 15 By Muzaffer Çetin
35
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Writing

Considerations for teaching Second Language

Writing (Sara Cushing Weigle) Chapter 15

By Muzaffer Çetin

Page 2: Writing
Page 3: Writing
Page 4: Writing
Page 5: Writing
Page 6: Writing

• Writing is very crucial for second/foreign language curriculum. Globalization, internet have made written communication essential for biz, education and in many fields across cultures.

• To teach writing effectively, we need to understand the nature of L2 writing ability. 2 sides: cognitive ( set of skills individual has) and sociocultural as a means of communication within a particular setting aimed at achieving specific goals)

What is L2 writing?

Page 7: Writing

Cognitive perspective, L2 writing is combination of writing ability in L1 and and L2 proficiency. Even in native language composing a text is highly complex task that involves the consideration of many factors at the same time. When L2 is added to the mix, the picture becomes much more complex: writers need to focus on finding appropriate word to express their ideas accurately. If one has good L1 skills he can transfer these skills to L2.

Page 8: Writing

From sociocultural perspective writing is seen as part of a socially and culturally situated set of literacy practices shared by a particular community. Process of learning to write is the process of becoming a member of a discourse community.E.g. in academic writing there are different conventions for publishing articles in different disciplines/certain linguistic/stylistic choices such as passive voice. It can be good writing in one discourse community but not in another.

Page 9: Writing

İn short

• Writing teachers must have an understanding of both perspectives to plan and deliver instruction to address the writing needs of their sts

Page 10: Writing

Student background and needs

The goal of writing curriculum must start with the needs of sts. One important factor is age and educational background of writers. Foreign lang learners study english for personal enrichment for school/career reasons.

Page 11: Writing

Eye/ ear learner

• Ear learners those who have learned enginformally through oral interactions.

• Eye learners those who have strengths in formal vocabulary/explicit knowledge of grammar but lack of fluency and naturalness of ear learners.

• Teacher will have t adjust their lessons to accommodate the needs of these different learner types.

Page 12: Writing

• Comparing L1 and L2 writers: L2 writing is more constrained more difficult less effective than L1 writing.

• L2 writers need more of everything: more practice writing, more familiarity with genres, more practice with vocabulary, grammar, feedback

Page 13: Writing

Process approach

Instead of producing several different single-draft essays, emphasis is on supporting sts through various stages of writing: pre-writing, brainstorming, outlining, drafting, giving feedback, receiving feedback, revising. (activity time)

Page 14: Writing
Page 15: Writing

Reading&writing connections

• One can not be taught without the other, intimately connected. Writing teachers’ responsibility is to teach certain aspects of reading

• Reader response theory : readers’ active participation in understanding a text and develop effective reading strategies. Sts are active meaning makers. Reflecting on reading processes can lead to an understanding of composition processes.

Page 16: Writing

Writing to readInvolves using writing as a way of interpreting and understanding a text. Examples of writing to read activities include writing about a topic in preparation for reading about it.

Page 17: Writing

• Students with limited proficiency/limited linguistic resources may have difficulty in paraphrasing, simplification, composing ideas.

Page 18: Writing

The role of grammar and error correction in writing

Beginning writing teachers tend to be very sensitive about correcting students’ errors in writing to avoid errors but there should be balance in error correction and production of a writing.

Page 19: Writing
Page 20: Writing

Syllabus provides a road map for sts and teachers to clarify expectations/class policies.

Page 21: Writing

Scaffolding in writing

Page 22: Writing

• Pre-writing- writing- revising-editing

• Pre-writing phase: setting up assignment, providing input by texts, visual, videos, introducing grammar vocabulary

• Writing phase drafting/ feedback(peer, teacher) ample time for incubation and rewriting

Page 23: Writing

Pre-writing activities

• Getting started is difficult

• Get over initial anxiety, planning out their ideas, and start writing.

• Target: linguistic development/fluency/idea generation/building up knowledge about topic

• Free-writing activities nonstop writing generates list of ideas or thoughts associated with topic/mind-mapping

Page 24: Writing
Page 25: Writing
Page 26: Writing

• In process approach, after finishing draft, stsneed to receive feedback the revise and edit paper on the basis of this feedback. Good feedback is essential for revision. It is recommended commenting primarily on content before commenting on language issues. Process of idea generation is always one step ahead of accuracy of sentences. Then language issues come.

Page 27: Writing

Peer feedback

• Peer feedback reduce the amount of teacher workload. Benefits of peer feedback

Page 28: Writing
Page 29: Writing
Page 30: Writing

• Over the past 20 years, writing increasingly involves keyboarding, social media, online discussion boards, blogs, wikis, more opportunities for genuine interaction with new audiences.

• Synchronous real time, chat, skype, instant messaging,

• asynchronous, email,

• Hypermedia authoring designing webpages

Page 31: Writing

New trends

• Electronic media can be asset to writing courses. Teachers must be trained to use these new tech. Teacher education should include teaching them possibilities and limitations of using corpus tools for teaching.

• Automated scoring system assessment/increased speed and reliability of using computers to score writing compared to human raters.

Page 32: Writing

Cons to automated essay scoring system

• Many writing teachers oppose it : they contradict nature of writing which is form of communication. Computers can not read they can count. Errors are not dealt with contextually. E.g. non standard linguistic forms such as double negatives, while often inappropriate in academic writing but perfectly acceptable in some less formal genres

Page 33: Writing
Page 34: Writing

Turnitin.com

Page 35: Writing