World Views – Part 1 The Filters By Which We View the World Linda Young POLS 400 International Political Economy Wilson Hall – Room 1122 Fall 2005
Dec 17, 2015
World Views – Part 1
The Filters By Which We View the World
Linda YoungPOLS 400International Political EconomyWilson Hall – Room 1122
Fall 2005
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Liberal, Realist, and Historical Structuralist Perspectives
Each have analytical and normative components– Analytical component (how it helps us understand the world)– Normative component (commitment to a value)
Economic Liberalism: based on a commitment to a market economy
Cannot be disproved or proved by empirical research
Realism: commitment to the nation state and the use of the nation state as a unit of analysis– Gilpin is a state-centric realist, using its analytical capability to understand the world, but his normative commitment is liberal in nature
Structuralist: structure determines outcome– Includes Marxism, dependency theory and world systems theory
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
State-Centric Realism
Recognizes the central role of the state, security and power in international affairs
Anarchic nature of the international system– Does not mean constant warfare – means that there is no higher authority that the state can appeal to in times of trouble
Primacy of the state in international affairs– Principal actor – No body sovereign over it
Central concerns of the state are military security and political independence – power and power relations are important – but power can be military power, economic power, or political power
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Other Actors
Firms and multilateral organizations
But, “the economic and foreign policies of a society reflect the nation’s interest as determined by the dominant elite of that society”
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
How Did This Perspective Develop?
Contributed to the development of the state by emphasizing central state authority vis-a-vis external forces– Power and wealth legitimate goals of the state– Power achieved through the accumulation of gold and silver– Unification of territory through emphasis on the state
Promotion of exports – restriction of imports– Trade as a zero-sum game
Mercantilist Period: Europe 15-18th centuries
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Economic Policies Following Mercantilism
Ideas and Consequences about Gold
But not all countries can run trade surpluses
Trying to can lead to “beggar thy neighbor” policies (critique by Adam Smith) Example is the interwar period Declined in post-WWII (liberalism strong then)
Much evidence in trade negotiations today – free trade theoretically best unilaterally, but counties won’t
Zero-sum world with states concerned with absolute gains and losses
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Economic Nationalism as a Form of Mercantilism
Focused on the development of the domestic economy – key concern the relationship between economic power and political power– State must assist in development– Give subsidies to domestic industries to help
them compete
Examples? Newly industrializing countries (NIEs)?
From Alexander Hamilton to Ross Perot andthe “giant sucking sound”
Alexander Hamilton
RossPerot
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Neo Mercantilism
Government promotion of their industries
The same idea – just new clothing – less visible forms of promoting domestic industry
Lessen dependence on oil imports
Realism had a resurgence in the late 1970s-80s – Disarray due to ending of the cold war
and also the uncertainty in the world economy
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Assumptions of Realism
1. States are the major actors in international affairs
2. States behave as unitary rational agents that act to protect their vital interests
3. International anarchy is the principal force shaping the actions of states
4. States in anarchy are preoccupied with power and security, are predisposed toward conflict, and often fail to cooperate even in the face of common interests
5. International institutions affect the prospect for cooperation only marginally
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Gilpin
Realism is an analytical perspective not a moral commitment to the nation state Realist some regret lack of restraint on the
state and lack of moral commitment Difference between realism and
nationalism: Realists paint a picture of what they see without endorsing it
Robert Gilpin
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
USA
Great Britain
Hegemonic Stability Theory
Two hegemons in Western history: Britain (19 century) and United States (post WWII)
Hegemon when there is an extremely unequal division of power
International system most stable when a dominant power is willing to pursue policies to create and maintain a liberal economic order and when it is powerful enough (controls enough resources) to do so
Without a hegemon, more difficult to maintain an open trading regime
Other factors can accountfor an open trading regime
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Consequences of Hegemony
Necessary, sufficient, for an open and stable world order?
Creates international regimes: sets of implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules and decision making procedures for a particular area – US endorsed an open trading system (but not an open financial system, not agriculture nor textiles)
Debate over the importance of declining hegemons to the decline of regimes
Perhaps a world with states of equal power could negotiate better regimes
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Liberalism (liberal/liberty- same Latin root)
Immanuel Wallerstein
US Declaration of Independence Reaction to abuses by the state and the church
US Declaration of Independence
NOT a political perspective as commonly thought with an active role for the state in helping the poor
Liberalism defined by belief in freedom under the law, individual rights and free markets
Wallerstein: liberalism began with the French Revolution with the idea of political change and need for the state to be legitimated by the people – conservatives resisted that – so for minimal state and individual liberty
Long history of condemning the role of the government in the market
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Liberal View of Society
Society and economies constructed so that individual initiative is critical
Positive-sum game – the free market Free market as an essential part of the liberal society
– invisible hand Liberals believe in the importance of the freedom of the
individual – right to be treated as ethical subjects not means or objects
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Liberal View of the Market
Liberals see the outcome of the market as being restrained by competition – so that while an individual acts with self-interest, the outcome is positive
– But market power is restrained in this case
Mercantilists see competition as cut throat with losers – you need power to get what you want
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Liberal View of Politics
John Locke in England
Thomas Jefferson in the US
Citizens have certain positive rights (freedomof speech and freedom of the press)
And negative rights (freedom from state authority-unlawful arrest)
With a conflict, diffused power and the guarantee of certain rights will result in resolution of conflict peacefully
Thomas Jefferson
John Locke
Freedom of
the Press of Speech
Freedom of
Liberal View of Foreign Relations
Cooperation and harmony– Free trade – free commerce makes a nations industry
efficient and maximizes welfare– Economic ties between countries diminish the need for
security Britain’s corn laws – relationship between economic policy
and political representation
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)– Liberalism as an important destructive force due
to role in revolutions, etc. – weakened central authority
– Wanted more than the accumulation of wealth– Wanted social progress and intervention by the
state – provision of education, etc.
John Stuart Mill
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
John Keynes and Keysianism
More active role for the economy
Beliefs shaped by the failure of market economies in the great depression
Because of risk and uncertainty, individuals could act rationally and the result could be destructive
John Keynes
Consequences of thrift – less goods consumed, and thus fewer workers needed – can create an unwanted outcome
State must act in these circumstances – should spend
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Keynes influenced the development of our multilateral institutions – embedded liberalism
IMF to correct lack of demand – state to step into correct failures of the market
State with an important role in the macro economy
Embedded liberalism has a broader meaning
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
New Meaning of Liberalism
In the 1960s and 1970s the state had a bigger role Liberal meant an emphasis on the market and it came to
mean an emphasis on state action in many realms– Space exploration, the Vietnam war, civil rights and
regulation of business and the environment– Reaction by Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Critiques of Realism
Tend to ignore North-South issues Emphasis on relative gains undermines international
institutions
Too much emphasis on politics – early postwar stress on security a drawback