World Class Standards TC SCP TEC Status Report to TC SCP Plenary #54 Paul JOLIVET, Chairman, LG Electronics Sebastian HANS, Vice chairman, Oracle SCP(12)000010r1.

World Class Standards

TC SCP TEC Status Report to TC SCP Plenary #54

Paul JOLIVET, Chairman, LG Electronics

Sebastian HANS, Vice chairman, Oracle

SCP(12)000010r1

World Class Standards

2

Meetings Since Last TC SCP Plenary

SCP TEC #42 20 - 24 Feb 2012 Sophia Antipolis, France, hosted by ETSI

SCP TEC ad hoc #144 API-topics 14 - 16 Mar 2012 Berlin, Germany, hosted by Oracle

World Class Standards

3

Discussions, hot topics (1/6)

General issues, meeting schedule An additional meeting on API was scheduled during TEC #42 As usual, dedicated time slots were allocated to some topics so that

experts can organize their schedule, at this meeting• 4FF (a full day)• Contactless related topics (approx half a day)

Discussions on the definitions of the UICC Some contributions trying to include in TS 102 221 or in TS 102 671

(M2M) a definition of the UICC• Mentioned to be a need for external bodies (M2M in particular)• A definition appears in TR 102 216 (TR on vocabulary that is not

maintained anymore

There were objections on the proposals and on the principle itself to add something now

World Class Standards

4

Discussions, hot topics (2/6)

GlobalPlatform related topics References update

• Not all expected GlobalPlatform documents were available during SCP TEC. There was an agreement to restrict reference updates to the only published specifications.

• some CRs at this meeting on TS 102 226• some more CRs to come

The R11 version of the specification was not available during the meeting. Mirror CRs will be presented directly to Plenary when applicable

World Class Standards

5

Discussions, hot topics (3/6)

API related topics 1 CR from Incard on TS 102 241 could not be discuss during the

meeting Discussion on the support for HTTP request when size exceeds

buffer size (related to SCWS API)• Ongoing discussion since several meetings• agreed to merge the proposal from Gemalto and G&D

• discussed during the ad-hoc: a CR based on the Gemalto proposal with enhancements from the G&D proposal is input for the next TEC meeting

Some questions to come from SCP TEST on TS 102 705• discussed during the ad-hoc: 10 of the 44 requested clarification may need a CR or a

CR is already proposed to TEC, all other where resolved

Secure channel API work requires a session gathering all experts• discussed during the ad-hoc: together with the requirements for an eCAT-client API,

needs further a discussion and an API proposal for next TEC

Decision to have an API ad hoc, hosted by Oracle to deal with all topics (a 3-day meeting 14-16 March)

World Class Standards

6

Discussions, hot topics (4/6)

4th Form Factor (1/3) Technical proposals were discussed:

• Apple proposal (supported by multiple operators and smart card manufacturers, as such the one of which most comments were focussed)

• RIM, Nokia and Motorola Mobility proposal• Motorola Mobility update proposal on Apple’s solution (finally withdrawn)

For the information of Plenary, shape of the proposals:

RIM, NokiaMotorola

World Class Standards

7

Discussions, hot topics (5/6)

4th Form Factor (2/3) The same arguments were raised during the meeting (comparing to

TEC #41) Important topics addressed during the discussion

• Triple punch-out/Adapters are concerns for mobile manufacturers and RIM/Nokia claim that one advantage of their proposal is to prevent this, while Apple approach allows it at least for a 6 contact approach

• Need for a tool: it has been mentioned that Apple’s solution implies a reader technology (tray) that can be considered as a tool so that UICC is used

• Orientation mark: there is a global agreement that this feature is required as well as different dimensions to prevent wrong insertion, chamfer could be an option. Motorola proposed to add a notch to the Apple proposal, which was finally not taken into account.

• Time to market: Some operators pointed out that Apple’s proposal is most efficient from the time to market point of view.

World Class Standards

8

Discussions, hot topics (6/6)

4th Form Factor (3/3) An additional argument was raised by Nokia: the compliance of the

solutions to requirement• REQ-11-27-01 08 : The design of the fourth UICC form factor shall prevent

the 4FF from becoming jammed in a Mini-UICC reader

There is an general agreement that none of the solution really address this requirement

Nokia claimed that no decision (and even more, vote) can be made on a solution that does not fulfill the accepted requirement. They also mentioned that they would raise the objection to Plenary

There is no agreement to make a decision on Nokia’s related paper in SCP TEC.

Chairman will raise the question for advice at Plenary

World Class Standards

9

Request for advice

4FF No agreement on the technical solutions Two solutions on the table

• Apple’s proposal supported by most Operators and Smart Card manufacturers

• RIM, Nokia and Motorola Mobility proposal

Both solutions were discussed and minor modifications brought

World Class Standards

Outcome Documents – CRs List of TEC accepted CRs

available in SCP(12)000019

Change Requests 3 CRs to TS 102 226 1 CR to TS 102 622 4 CRs to TS 102 705

Statistics: 8 CRs Releases:

• 3 on Rel-9• 1 on Rel-10• 4 on Rel-11

Categories• 1 Cat A• 1 Cat B• 2 Cat C• 1 Cat D• 3 Cat F

10

World Class Standards

11

Outcome Documents – WIDs

No input

World Class Standards

12

Outcome Documents – TSs

No input

World Class Standards

13

Outcome Documents – LSs

LS directed to SCP None

LS copied to SCP LS on service identifiers (to GlobalPlatform Card committee)

World Class Standards

Next Steps / Milestones

Rel-11 (dates to be assessed in some cases): CAT Secure Channel CAT over AT Security part Contactless P2P Related API 4FF

Other topics• RFID support • eUICC• M2M

14

World Class Standards

Meeting Schedule TC SCP TEC

SCP TEC #43 23-27 April 2012 Sophia-Antipolis, France

SCP TEC #44 10-14 September 2012 Sophia-Antipolis, France

(TBC)

15