Top Banner
Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008
54

Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Dec 11, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing

Matthew Just, Esq.

8 March 2008

Page 2: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Workshop Outline

1. Introduction to Drafting2. Contract Language3. Principles of Contract Interpretation4. Contract Drafting Basics5. Contract Elements in Detail6. Boilerplate Provisions7. Patent Licensing8. Solution to the Patent Licensing Scenario9. Final Thoughts

Page 3: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

1. Introduction to Contract Drafting

• What is the goal of contract drafting?

• How can a contract be precise?

• Who should draft the contract?

Page 4: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

2. Contract Language

What makes contract language “special”?

• Mixture of languages

• Desire to avoid ambiguity

• Habit

• Pressure to conform

Page 5: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Examples of Unusual Language

• Doublets and Triplets

• Deeming

• Here-, there-, and where- words

• Other old-fashioned language

Page 6: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Obligations, Authorisations and Conditions

• Avoid the overuse of “shall”

Use “will” to state a future fact Use “shall” to state an obligation Use “may” to state an option or a right Use “must” to state a condition precedent

Page 7: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Special Issues for Chinese Writers

• Articles (a, an, the)

• Tense

• Grammar (particularly prepositions)

• Punctuation

• (Over)Use of Chinese-English dictionaries

Page 8: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Characteristics of Plain English

1. Short sentences2. Definite, concrete, everyday language3. The active voice4. Tabular presentation of complex information5. Separate paragraphs and sections, with headings, for

separate concepts6. The absence of highly legal jargon or highly technical

business terminology and use of Latin or other foreign languages

7. The absence of double or multiple negative8. The use of multiple columns of text if the font is small

Page 9: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Benefits of Drafting in Plain English

• Increased Efficiency and Understanding

• Fewer Errors

• Positive Image for the Legal Profession

• Compliance with statutory Requirements

• BUT: There is resistance!

Page 10: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

3. Principles of Contract Interpretation

I. The document must be read as a whole

II. The Literal and Golden Rules

III. Ut res magis valeat quam pereat

IV. Contra Proferentem

V. Noscitur a sociis

Page 11: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Principles of Contract Interpretation

VI. Ejusdem generis

VII. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius

VIII. Commercial (purposive) Purpose

IX. UCC §3-114 on Contradictory terms.

Page 12: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

4. Structure of a Contract

• Title• Introductory paragraph• Preamble / Recitals / WHEREAS Clauses• Definitions• Operative Clauses • Representations, warranties, covenants,

indemnities, guaranties, releases• Events of default and remedies• Boilerplate• Signature Block• Exhibits and Attachments

Page 13: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Titles

• All CAPITAL letters

• Centered and Underlined

• Use a generic term

Page 14: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Introductory Paragraph

Example:

• This Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made by and between XYZ Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Licensor"), a corporation with principal offices at 1 Main Street, Buffalo, New York, and ABC Company, a limited company with principal offices at 250 Zhong Zhen Road, Taipei, Taiwan (hereinafter referred to as "Licensee").

Page 15: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Preamble / Recitals

• WHEREAS …

Facts about:• Relationship and goals of the parties• Nature of the transaction• Other related transactional documents

… The parties agree as follows:

Page 16: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Definitions

Inclusive:

“Intellectual Property” means intellectual

property as that term is generally used and

includes all patents, copyrights, and trademarks.

Exclusive:

“Intellectual property” means patents, copyrights,

and trademarks.

Page 17: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Signature Block

The Parties agree to the terms of this

Agreement above.

Licensor

XYZ Inc. By: ________Name: John SmithTitle: President

Licensee

ABC CompanyA Limited CompanyBy: __________Name: Kevin ChangTitle: Owner

Page 18: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

5. Contract Elements in Detail

• Representations and Warranties

• Covenants

• Conditions Precedent

• Remedies

• Language to soften provisions

Page 19: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Representations and Warranties

• Distinction is not normally important

• They tend to be coupled:

“Party represents and warrants that…”

• Creates a snapshot of the facts• Important for assigning risk and due diligence• Drafted in present or past tense

Page 20: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Covenants

• Affirmative covenants• Negative (Restrictive) covenants• Financial covenants

Example:

“Licensee shall pay Licensor a royalty of fivepercent (5%) of Licensee's selling price for eachLicensed Product manufactured, used, or sold byLicensee in the Territory or imported by Licenseeinto the Territory.”

Page 21: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Conditions Precedent

• Requirements that must be satisfied before a party has to perform or before the contract is enforceable

• Simultaneous Closing vs. Delayed Closing

Page 22: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Remedy Provisions

• Triggering Event Remedy

Four types– Termination– Acceleration– Indemnification– Liquidated Damages

Page 23: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Remedy: Termination

“In the event Operator defaults in the performance of any covenant or agreement made hereunder, as to payments of amounts due hereunder or otherwise, and such defaults are not remedied to the Supplier’s satisfaction within ten (10) days after notice of such defaults, the Supplier may thereupon terminate this agreement and all rights hereunder of the Operator but such termination shall not affect the obligations of the Operator to take action or abstain from taking action after termination hereof, in accordance with this agreement.”

Page 24: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Remedy: Acceleration

“Whenever, within the sole judgment of Seller, the credit standing of Buyer shall become impaired, Seller shall have the right to demand that the remaining portion of the contract be fully performed within ten (10) days.”

Page 25: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Remedy: Indemnification

• Breaching party indemnifies (pays back) innocent party for all costs, damages and losses suffered as a result of the breach

• Could be limited by baskets or caps.

Page 26: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Remedy: Liquidated Damages

• Specific payment upon occurrence of certain event.

Could be unenforceable (a penalty):

• Is the actual damage from breach difficult to calculate?

• Was a good faith effort made to estimate the damage?

Page 27: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Softening Remedies

• Materiality

“[Breach]…in any material respect.”

• Grace (cure) Periods

Page 28: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Softening Contract Provisions

Good Faith

Reasonable Efforts

Diligent Efforts

Best Efforts

Str

on

ger

Page 29: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

6. Boilerplate Provisions

What does “boilerplate” mean?

• Miscellaneous

• Pre-litigation planning

• NOT unimportant!

Page 30: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Arbitration

• Why go to arbitration?

Example Clause:

“Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or its breach, is to be settled by arbitration administered by [organization] in accordance with its [subject matter] Rules.”

• Arbitration or Mediation?

Page 31: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Choice of Law

• ALWAYS include this provision• Which law should you choose?

Example:

“This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, without regard to its choice of laws principles.”

Page 32: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Consent to Jurisdiction

• Choice of forum provision

Example:

“Each party shall submit to any court of competent jurisdiction for purposes of the enforcement of any award, order or judgment. Any award, order or judgment pursuant to arbitration is final and may be entered and enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction.”

Page 33: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Waiver to Trial by Jury

• Why waive the right to a jury?

Clause must be:

• Binding on both parties

• Conspicuous – bold or CAPS

Page 34: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Counterparts

• Contract may be executed separately by parties

• Common for international agreements

Page 35: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Headings

• What is the proper function of headings?

Example: “The descriptive headings of the Articles,

Sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience only, do not constitute a part of this Agreement, and do not affect this Agreement’s construction or interpretation.”

Page 36: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Severability

• Remove (sever) void provision and interpret the remainder

• Remainder must still represent the bargain

Page 37: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Integration

• The contract is the whole agreement

• No other oral or written promises

• Invokes the Parol Evidence Rule

Page 38: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Waivers

• No Oral Waivers

• Effect of failure or delay to enforce rights

• Written waivers are limited to one occasion

Page 39: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Amendments

• In Writing• Signed• Identify the original agreement

Example: “The parties may amend this Agreement

only by a written agreement, signed by the parties, that identifies itself as an amendment to this Agreement.”

Page 40: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Assignment and Delegation

• Assignment of rights or delegation of duties to a third party

• Only with prior written consent from other party

• Issue of control – important to know who you are dealing with

Page 41: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Costs and Expenses

• Parties cover their own expenses unless otherwise stated.

• Minor, but it avoids arguments

Page 42: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Further Assurances

• Attempts to deal with unforeseen circumstances

Example:

“The parties agree to do such further acts and things and to execute and deliver such additional agreements and instruments as may be reasonably necessary to give effect to the purposes of this Agreement and the parties’ agreements hereunder.”

Page 43: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

7. Patent Licensing

• What is a license?

• Types of Licenses– Exclusive License– Non-Exclusive License– Paid-Up License– Running Royalty License– Cross License

Page 44: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Structure of a License Agreement

• Title• Introductory Paragraph• Preamble / Recitals• Definitions• Grant• Royalties• Representations and Warranties• Term and Termination• Boilerplate provisions • Signature Block

Page 45: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Definitions

• Licensed Patents

• Licensed Products

• Territory

Page 46: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Patent Marking

• Why is marking important?

• Licensor may ask to inspect Licensee’s products

Page 47: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Patent Enforcement

• Who should sue infringers?

• Do we always want to sue infringers?

• How should the court award (compensation) be distributed?

Page 48: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Representations and Warranties

• What should the Licensor promise?– That the patent is valid?– That the Licensor can grant a license?– That there are no rights of third parties?

• What should the Licensee promise?– Paying Royalties?– Best efforts in selling product?

Page 49: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Improvements

• Licensor’s Improvement– Can the Licensee use it?– Additional Fee?

• Licensee’s Improvement– Can Licensor use it? If so, to what extent?– If patentable, who gets the new patent?

Page 50: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Indemnification

• Licensor may want to be indemnified against tort actions in relation to use of the final product

• Licensee indemnification depends of bargaining power

Page 51: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

Royalty Rate

• Agreed on in negotiations and put into contract

• If disputed, Georgia-Pacific 15 factors may be relevant

Page 52: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

8. Solution to the Patent License Scenario

• Exclusive or non-exclusive?

• Paid-up or Running Royalty?

• Territory?

• Improvements?

• What if a dispute arises?

Page 53: Workshop on Contract Drafting and Patent Licensing Matthew Just, Esq. 8 March 2008.

9. Final Thoughts: Precedents

• Where can we find precedents?

• Use multiple, relevant precedents

• Get first and final drafts

• Think before copying