Woodlin Elementary

Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary School Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary School Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolWoodlin Elementary School

Woodlin Elementary

State of the SchoolAnnual Summary of Data and Results

leading into the 2012-2013 School Year


Together We Explore, Learn, and Succeed

Enrollment Trends Population Demographics mClass Reading

Reading benchmark testing-Grades K, 1, 2 MAP-R

Measures of Academic Progress in Reading –Grades 3, 4, 5

MSAMaryland School Assessment-Grades 3, 4, 5

Math UnitBy course enrollment based on end of year

mastery-Discontinued TN2

Terra Nova Two-Grade 2-Discontinued Climate Survey Data

Annual survey-staff, random sample of parents, grade 3, 5 students

Woodlin Performance Data


Enrollment Trends

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

100

200

300

400

500

600

700


2012-2013Demographic Data

Hispanic Asian American Indian

Black Multi-Racial

Pacific Is-lander

White05

101520253035404550

17

60.2

27.8

4.50

44.6


2012 Special Populations

% of Population0

5

10

15

20

25

13.2

9

20.5

SPED ESOL FARMS


Reading End of Year BenchmarksmClass Data

2010 2011 20120

20

40

60

80

10093 94 93

91 97 95

7991 90

Percent of Students Meeting Benchmark

Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2


Reading BenchmarksSpring 2012 Data

Black Asian Hispanic White0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%84%

100%

93% 96%96%

100%

88%97%

83%

100%

61%

98%

Percent of Students Meeting Benchmark

Grade K Grade 1 Grade 2


Spring 2012 MAP-R% Meeting Target RIT for Grades 3-4-5- combined

201230%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%88.00% 80.90%

100.00%

71.00%

94.90%

All Black Asian Hispanic White


Spring 2012 MAP-R% Meeting Target by Race for Grades 3-4-5

Black Asian Hispanic White All30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

71.4

100.0

71.4

97.7

88.487.5

80.0

66.6

100.0

87.084.6

75.072.7

87.883.7

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5


MAP-R (Measures of Academic Progress- Reading)

% Meeting Target RIT by Spring 2012

2011 20120

102030405060708090

8488.4

72.5

8782 83.7

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5


MAP-P (Measures of Academic Progress-Primary Math)

% Meeting Target RIT by Spring 2012

20126065707580859095

100

88.4 87

Grade K Grade 1 Series3


MSA Cut ScoresReading Math

Grade Proficient Advanced

3

388

456

4

371

437

5

384

425

Grade Proficient Advanced

3

379

441

4

374

433

5

392

453


2010 2011 2012 201350556065707580859095

100

81.2

85.9

90.693.2

79.4

84.5

89.791.5

Reading Math

AMO Targets


Maryland Accountability Program

AMO Progress Reduce by half the percentage of students in the “all

students” group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years.

School Progress Index Achievement Growth Gap Reduction College & Career Readiness

14


Maryland School Progress Index

Elementary/Middle Schools

• MSA Mathematics Proficiency• MSA Reading Proficiency• MSA Science Proficiency

Achievement

• MSA Mathematics Proficiency• MSA Reading Proficiency• MSA Science Proficiency

Gap Reduction

• MSA Mathematics Proficiency• MSA Reading Proficiency

Growth

High Schools

• Mathematics Proficiency• English Proficiency• Science Proficiency

Achievement

• Mathematics Proficiency• English Proficiency• Science Proficiency• Cohort Graduation Rate• Cohort Dropout Rate

Gap Reduction

• Under Review…

College & Career Readiness

15


SPI Calculation Example: Elementary/Middle School

Variable Achievement Growth GapContent Area Math Read Sci Math Read Math Read SciSubgroups “All Students” “All Students” All NCLB Subgroups

Weight

30% 30% 40%

(Math, Reading, and Science equally weighted at

1/3 each)

(Math, and Reading equally weighted at

1/2 each)

(Math, Reading, and Science equally weighted

at 1/3 each)

Indicator Contribution 0.291 0.286 0.426School Index 1.005

16

School Index range from 0 to greater than 1.0 = No targets met1 = All targets met1+ = Targets exceeded


Reading MSA 2012

All Black or AA

Asian Hispanic of Any Race

White Multi-Racial

FARMS SPED LEP70

75

80

85

90

95

100

92.589.8

100

90.2

95.8

100

90.6 90.6

96.2

Percent Proficient/Advanced

The target for each group is different and based on2011 baseline performance. The goal is to reduceThe percent of students scoring “basic” by 50% Over the baseline by the year 2017


Math MSA 2012

All Black or AA

Asian Hispanic White Multi FARMS SPED LEP40

50

60

70

80

90

10090.2

83.1

92.385.4

95.8100

86.8

75

92.3

Percent Proficient/Advanced

The target for each group is different and based on2011 baseline performance. The goal is to reduceThe percent of students scoring “basic” by 50% Over the baseline by the year 2017


MSA TrendsAchievement Gap [Reading]

2010 2011 201275

80

85

90

95

100

Black or AA Asian Hispanic White


MSA TrendsAchievement Gap [Math]

2010 2011 201270

75

80

85

90

95

100

Black or AA Asian Hispanic White


MSA TrendsReading

FARMS, SPED, LEP

2010 2011 201284

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

96.2

92

90.6

100

94.7

90.6

100

94.4

96.2

FARMS SPED ELL


MSA TrendsMath

FARMS, SPED, LEP

2010 2011 20120.0

10.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0

7580

86.8

74.381.6

75

95.588.9 92.3

FARMS SPED ELL


2012 Alt-MSA% Students Proficient/Advanced

2011 20120.0

10.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0100.0 100.0100.0 100.0

Math Reading


Selected Celebrations All grade levels (K-2) had more than 90% of students

meet the reading target! 3% increase of last year’s 4th graders and 11% increase of

5th graders on MAP-R! 7 of 8 subgroups met or exceeded the Reading MSA

benchmark of 90.6%! (benchmark prior to reauthorization)

FARMS students increase by 7% on Math MSA and almost 12.5% increase over the past 2 years!


Climate SurveyBackground Information

20120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 87%

34%

Student Response Rate Parent Response Rate


Climate SurveyHighlighted Gains

(Gains greater than 3.0% points)Student Survey Students are well behaved (↑19.5%) Students care about one another in this school (↑17.2%) There is an adult at school I can talk to when I have a problem (↑18.2%) It is easy to talk to teachers about things that bother me(↑18.5%) Bully and Teasing is a problem (26.3% and 23.8%)

Parent Survey No gains of 3.0% or higher on the parent survey.


Climate SurveyHighlighted Areas of Need

Student Survey I feel safe at school (↓6.7%) My teachers listen to my ideas (↓6.3%) I get along with students in this school (↓2.1%)

Parent Survey School does a good job of welcoming families of diverse

cultures (↓2.6%) School does a good job of informing me about meetings

and special events (↓4.1%) The school has a clear process for addressing concerns

(↓9.3%)


Climate SurveyTop 3 Areas

Student Survey School staff encourages students to respect others

(97.2%) My teachers help me when I don’t understand (96.3%) My teachers have high expectations for me to do well in

school (95.3%)

Parent Survey Teacher expect my child to do well in class

(96.9%) My child feels safe at school (96.9%) My child’s teachers expect my child to do

well in class (96.9%) Provides a variety of ways to volunteer

(96.8%) School leadership is accessible when

needed (98.9%)


Climate SurveyLowest 3 Areas

Student Survey It is easy to talk to teachers about things that bother me

(64.8%) If I got in trouble, the school staff would treat me fairly

(68.6%) My belongings are safe in this school (69.0%)

Parent Survey The school has a clear process for addressing my

concerns (85.6%) My child’s teacher takes action to resolve my concerns

(92.5%) It is easy for me to talk to my child’s teacher about things

concerning my child (88.8%)


Climate SurveyStaff Trends: Top 3

Strengths (100%) Collaborate w/ colleagues Help & support from colleagues Teachers motivate students to learn School has high expectations for academic

performance Teachers are well prepared to teach Safe place to work Would recommend as a good place to work

Relative Areas of Need The number of students given to me is

manageable (66.7%) I have time during workday to plan

instruction for my students (50.0%) System-wide professional development

opportunities meet my needs (68.9%) Bathrooms are kept well supplied (48.9%)


Climate SurveyStaff Survey

Strengths Comparison to County

Protects In-structional Time

Shared Leadership Feedback on my work

Positive Morale0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

72

93.6 89.195.7

71.5 75 70.4 70

Woodlin MCPS


Climate SurveyTeasing: Percent positive response

2010 2011 20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

6571

52.1

21.7

15.313.3

46.2

54.3

36.2

Students Parents Staff

Trending downward


Climate SurveyBullying : Percent positive response

2010 2011 20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

61.9 64.2

43.5

24

16.7

16.5

38.5

17.4

17.4

Students Parents Staff


Action Items &Next Steps

Effective co-teaching Relationships and High

Expectations!!! Academic Focus Clubs Inquiry groups on areas

of professional growth during staff meetings

Woodlin Elementary

Documents

meeting target rit

reading grades

schoolannual summary

math unitby course enrollment

random sample of parents