INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Women and Agricultural Technology Use James Warner, IFPRI-Addis Ababa ([email protected]) Gender and Agriculture: Reviewing the evidence and the way forward MoA WAD-ATA-IFPRI June 17, 2016 Getfam Hotel, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Introduction—The importance of Gender and Technology
Definition—Female Friendly Technology (FFT) 5 Issues of Gender Mainstreaming and
TechnologyFocus:
Issue 4-Total & Gendered Labor Allocation Specific Considerations for FFT Conclusion
Page 2
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Introduction—Gender and Technology
I. Consider the Context of Technology Adoption within the agricultural household
• Typical Analysis—With/Without technology what is effect on productivity/production
Deeper analysis—what are effects on:• Labor total allocation/re-distribution, drudgery• Resource allocation or re-allocation (inputs)• Output decisions (marketed/consumed)
II. Interventions fail because larger context is not considered
Page 3
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Definition of FFT(both physical and knowledge based)Optimal FFT should include all 5:
A. Increase productivityB. Reduce women’s labor responsibilities
• Reduce existing time constraints and/or drudgery
C. Increase their independence and controlD. Enhance decision making within their
householdE. Technology that is designed in consultation
with women
Page 4
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
5 Issues of Context for Gender, Productivity and Technology
Page 5
Agriculture Household Model*
Household Decision-Making*
Productivity, Access and Control*
Labor Allocation
Cultural Norms and Practices
Cooperative Conflict Model
Extension, Education
Complementary Resources—Credit, Inputs
Double Burden, “Women’s” Work
Oxen Use, Research Focus
Men Productivty
Women Productivity
Gender Aware and Transformative Technology Policy
=
=
=
=
=
Men’s Productivity Women’s Productivity
* = Greater emphasis for women in male-headed households
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
5 Issues of Gender and Technology
#1—Household Model—Cooperative conflict#2—Decision-making within the household#3—Access and Control#4—Labor allocation—Total & gendered #5—Cultural Norms and Practices
Page 6
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[7]
93 HHs in Amhara—2015 Survey
#4—Understanding Labor AssignmentsA—Total Labor Time—Women work more
Male Head Female Spouse Female Head0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
Series5OtherFood Prep/CookingFarming/Livestock
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[8]
93 Married HHs in Amhara
#4B—Total Labor Time—Men are farming and women are multi-tasking
Overall lack of existing farm implements for FHH (axe, sickles, hoes, plows, etc.).
2012 ATA baseline data
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[13]
One of the biggest issues surrounding new technology adoption is the lack of complimentary input packages
• Complementary inputs include land/land security, labor, credit, fertilizers, improved seed, hand held implements or larger machinery combined with the primary technology intervention generally optimizes efficiency
• Access to credit--Research, covering 35 gender and technology research papers, concluded that access to technology was most hindered by a lack of credit.
in most countries the share of female smallholders who can access credit is 5–10 percentage points lower than for male smallholders
ii. Complementary Inputs-Credit is key
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[14]
Labor, time and energy-saving technologies for household tasks
• e.g. fuel-efficient stoves, backyard gardens, technological and institutional innovations for greater access to water and energy
e.g. improved charcoal stoves in Kenya reduced fuel wood collection by 10 hours a month.
iii. Consider diverse tech. for diverse tasks
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[15]
Most technological innovations assume a relatively unlimited supply of labor or flexible family labor commitments that does not conform to women’s actual labor constraints.
Women are working near full capacity (more so than men) on their various tasks, to increase labor they must substitute from other activities. This creates the potential for welfare reducing impacts for women if they are required to assist in the new technology.
iv. Tech-Labor saving not labor creating
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[16]
An extensive review of literature suggests that access to formal education and agricultural extension services are key determinants of the use and adoption of new technologies and improved farming practices
The issue of education and technology adoption for women has several components both longer-term structural changes (eg. formal education), medium-term (eg. adult education), and shorter term potential (eg. targeted single technology awareness campaigns).
v. education for knowledge based tech.
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[17]
Typical of the assumptions provided by the traditional household model, extension agent’s knowledge is, at times, given to the male spouse with the implicit understanding that he should pass it on to his wife.
vi. Extension Services
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[18]
Agricultural Transformation—What is the role of women in agr. as Ethiopia moves toward middle income status?
Mechanization—Ethiopia is beginning to see significant use of mechanized technologies (i.e. tractors). In some areas of Oromia region now becoming fairly common that farmers rent some form of mechanized services to plow, harvest or thresh their crops ( > 10%). Suitable for women?
Commercialization—Emphasis on increasing cash crops, market orientation. FHH are smaller and less commercially oriented.
New communication and information technologies—Mobile Phones, bio-metrics, Credit input voucher program--smart card stickers, etc.
vii-Emerging issues
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[19]
Review the context before new technology implementation Men believe spouses are competent even if they don’t let them
have much say. Talk to women farmers Women are a heterogeneous group.
Women work full time on multiple activities-need labor-saving technology—Direct—agr. production, Indirect—HH work
Credit and other complementary inputs help tech adoption Consider segregated agriculture work (weeding, harvest/post-
harvest) high women labor contribution Knowledge Based Tech.—Extension, education, women’s
community groups
Conclusion
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
[20]
On the issue of women and technology access and use, this research advocates for moving from a gender blind perspective to a gender aware prospective for near-term policy formulation. This would represent a major step forward for Ethiopian technology policy.
Working towards a gender transformative
strategy (where institutions evolve and women are equal partners) is a goal that should be a longer-term objective for policymakers.