Wireless Sensor Networks Service discovery and Mobility Ricardo Silva, Jorge Sá Silva, Cláudio Geyer, Luciano da Silva and Fernando Boavida {rnsilva,sasilva,boavida}@dei.uc.pt. {geyer,lucc}@inf.ufrgs.br. Pólo II - Pinhal de Marrocos, 3030-290 Coimbra, PORTUGAL
28
Embed
Wireless Sensor Networks Service discovery and Mobility Ricardo Silva, Jorge Sá Silva, Cláudio Geyer, Luciano da Silva and Fernando Boavida...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Wireless Sensor NetworksService discovery and Mobility
Ricardo Silva, Jorge Sá Silva, Cláudio Geyer, Luciano da Silva and Fernando Boavida{rnsilva,sasilva,boavida}@dei.uc.pt. {geyer,lucc}@inf.ufrgs.br.
Pólo II - Pinhal de Marrocos, 3030-290 Coimbra, PORTUGAL
Objectives StagesWSN – Architectures and ProtocolsDevice and Service Discovery (DSD)
- YouCatchMe and ICatchYou- Impact on battery life time
A new handover approach for Multi-Sink environments- ICatchYou without the Update method.- ICatchYou with RSSI check support.
Multicast communication over 6lowPAN-Multicast vs. Unicast over 6lowPAN.
Real scenario – Medicalcare.comFuture Work
Objectives• Study the WSN paradigms.• Explore and evaluate the main architectures of WSNs. • Improve the capabilities of WSNs by the IPv6 use.
– Design and implementation of new features, allowing mobility, self-configuration, self-handling, improving also the autonomy.
• Evaluate the impact of IP and the new features in WSNs.• Contribute to the international research community.• Implement the developed work in real scenarios.
– Networks constituted by autonomous devices, with:• Low complexity.• Low memory and processor capacity.• Short communication range.• Low data rates.• Low cost.• Energy limited.• …
– Based in IEEE802.15.4[1] standard, supporting two types of devices:• FFDs – Full Function Devices.• RFDs – Reduced Function Devices.• Duty Cycles.• CSMA/CA.
– Advantages:• Efficient and reliable.• The Sink node knows all nodes in the network.• There is an update database.• No remove method is necessary.• Use of the TTL.
– Disadvantages:• It is difficult to achieve the right TTL value for the right application.
Protocol Version Initial (mV) Final (mV) Difference (mV)
6lowPAN w/o discov. 2545,38 2535,07 10,31
TTL=30 2435,07 2404,65 30,42
TTL=60 2404,65 2384,77 19,88
TTL=90 2384,77 2370,07 14,07
XMesh 2678,45 2659,43 19,02
802.15.4 2582,11 2571,51 10,06
Multi-Sink Node• Why?
– The main multi-hop protocols were designed for ad-hoc networks with conventional and more powerful devices.
– The synchronization between neighbors and all information maintenance, necessary to implement multi-hop, is extremely complex, heavy and energetically expensive.
– The future trend is the total coverage, accomplishing with the 4G concept.
– It is lighter a handover system than a multi-hop solution. Possible solution:
• ICatchYou without Update Method,• Use the RSSI value to select the best sink node.
– Each time the TTL value expires, the node starts to require a new registration.– As defined by ICatchYou, each node broadcasts a REG message until receive a
Medicalcare.com– Controls in real time the patients vital signs. – Provides an user-interface for remote access.– Based on ICatchYou, supporting the Multi-Sink Node architecture and
multicast communication.– Introduces a new concept of
References[1] IEEE Std. 802.15.4 – 2006 “IEEE Standard forInformation technology-Telecommunications and information exchange between
systems- Local and metropolitan area networks- Specific requirements - Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPAN)”.
[2] H.Pham, S. Jha, “Addressing Mobility in Wireless Sensor Media Access Protocol,” IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems, 2004
[3] L. Bing, Y. Ke, Z. Lin and Z. Huimin, “Mac Performance and Improvement in Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks,” Eighth ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2007
[4] H. Água et all, “A MAC protocol for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks with Bursty Traffic Monitoring Application,”RTCM, Jun., 2008
[5] http://www.xbow.com/Home/HomePage.aspx [6] http://nescc.sourceforge.net/ [7] http://www.tinyos.net/ [8] http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/6lowpan-charter.html[9] R. Hinden, Nokia, S. Deering and Cisco Systems, “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture,” IETF, RFC4291, Feb. 2006 [10] M. Harvan, “Connecting Wireless Sensor Networks to the Internet – a 6lowPAN implementation for TinyOS-2.0,” May 2007 [11] (2008) b6lowPAN website. [Online]. Available: http://smote.cs.berkeley.edu:8000/tracenv/wiki/b6loWPAN . [12] (2008) Contiki website [Online] Available: http://www.sics.se/contiki/current-events/uipv6-contiki-is-ipv6-ready.html [13] M. Kramer and A. Gerldy, “Energy measurements for micaz node,” presented at the ” Fachgespr¨ach, Dahtlose Sensornetze,