Top Banner
WIRELESS HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SMART STRUCTURES USING EMBEDDED REAL-TIME DAMAGE DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHMS A.NAGARAJU M.Tech, Prof K.Ashok Babu 09D41D0602 M.Tech DSCE Department of ECE Department of ECE Sri Indu College of Engg and Tech Sri Indu College of Engg and Tech Sheriguda, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy Dist Sheriguda,Ibrahimpatnam,RangaReddyDist, Andhra Pradesh, India-501510 Andhra Pradesh, India-501510 [email protected] Abstract In this paper, a complex wireless sensing unit is designed for application in structural health monitoring systems. Fabricated from advanced embedded system technologies, the fundamental building block of the system is a wireless sensing unit capable of employing a spread-spectrum wireless modem for peer-to-peer communication between sensing units and a complex 32-bit computational core for local data interrogation in real time. The computational capabilities of the prototype structural health monitoring system design can be utilized for execution of embedded engineering analyses such as damage detection and system identification. To illustrate the computational capabilities of the system, methods for fitting auto-feedback time series models are executed as algorithms embedded in the units of system. The research goal is that the important techniques embedment support the collaborative processing of real-time measurement data for the identification of potential damage in a structural system, and suggest strong potential for unit installation in automated structural health monitoring systems. Keywords: structural health monitoring (SHM); wireless sensing unit; damage detection and identification; auto-feedback (AF) model; frequency response 1 Introduction The realization of an automated structural health monitoring system has been taken one step forward with the development of a wireless sensing unit constructed with advanced embedded system technologies. The result is a hardware design that is optimized for tasks specific to structural health monitoring applications. In particular, an advanced computational core is provided that is capable of locally processing measurement data to assess the state and possibly identify damage in a structure. Traditional structure health monitoring technology has employed wire-based systems to collect structural data. However, the installation of these wire-based systems can be expensive in labor, time and price. For example, a twelve-channel wire- based system may cost about $50,000, with half of the expense associated with its installation, including labor, cabling, etc. [1].Moreover, the installation of the wired systems can consume about 75% of the total testing time for large structures [2]. Installation labor costs can approach well over 25% of the total system cost. To isolate the wires from the bridge’s harsh environment, a wire conduit is installed at a cost of $10 per linear foot [3]. Their work demonstrated the potential and cost effectiveness of wireless monitoring systems. More recently, several other research groups have been developing various types of wireless sensing networks [4-6], many of which are generic systems that do not yet fit the unique demands of a structural health monitoring system. With a flexible and capable hardware design, the wireless sensing units are to be implemented with the computational tasks required by a structural health monitoring system. Structural health monitoring algorithms can be embedded in the wireless sensing unit to assess changes in the system, and if appropriate, infer potential structural damage from time-history measurement data. To validate the sensing unit’s role as a computational agent for structural health monitoring applications, two algorithms are embedded to locally process measurement data. The first is that will be used to derive the frequency response function from time- history data; the frequency response function serves
7

WIRELESS HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SMART STRUCTURES USING

Sep 12, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: WIRELESS HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SMART STRUCTURES USING
Page 2: WIRELESS HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SMART STRUCTURES USING
Page 3: WIRELESS HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SMART STRUCTURES USING
Page 4: WIRELESS HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SMART STRUCTURES USING

calculated and those in the database. Essentially a

nearest-neighbor approach, small distances between

coefficient vectors suggest very strong agreement

between two time-series models:

𝐷 = 𝑏𝑖𝐷𝐡 βˆ’ 𝑏𝑖

π‘₯ 2𝑝

𝑖=1 (2)

The residual error of the AF model is a damage

sensitive feature, but it is also influenced by the

operational variability of the structure. To separate

changes in the residual error resulting from structural

damage and operational variability, an auto-feedback

with exogenous input (AFX) time-series model is

used to model the relationship between the AF model

residual error, π‘Ÿπ‘˜π‘₯ , and the measured response, π‘₯π‘˜ :

π‘₯π‘˜ = 𝛼𝑖π‘₯π‘˜βˆ’π‘– +π‘Žπ‘–=1 𝛽𝑗 π‘Ÿπ‘˜βˆ’π‘—

π‘₯𝑏𝑗=0 + πœ€π‘˜

π‘₯ (3)

Coefficients on past measurements and the residual

error of the AF model are 𝛼𝑖 and 𝛽𝑗 , respectively.

The residual of the AFX model, πœ€π‘˜π‘₯ , is the damage

sensitive feature used to identify the existence of

damage regardless of the structure’s operational state.

Determination of the AF and AFX model orders (p, a,

and b) are done by exploring the autocorrelation

function of the model residual errors. The model

orders selected correspond to the autocorrelation lag

where the autocorrelation function is nearly zero.

3.2 The Two-Tiered Time-Series Damage

detection and identification Algorithm

To implement the statistical pattern recognition

approach, the structure is observed in its undamaged

state under a variety of environmental and

operational conditions in order to populate a database

of AF models of dimension p (denoted as AF (p))

paired with AFX models of dimension a and b

(denoted as AFX (a, b)). The standard deviation of

the residual error of the database AFX model 𝜎 πœ€π·π΅ , is also stored. Prior to using the raw time-

history records, the mean and variance of the records

are normalized to zero and one respectively. After

measuring the response of the structure, π‘₯π‘˜ , in an

unknown state (damage or undamaged), an AF(p)

model is fitted. The coefficients of the fitted AF

model are compared to the database of AF-AFX

model pairs previously calculated for the undamaged

structure. A match is determined by minimizing the

Euclidian distance, D, of the newly derived AF

model and the database AF model coefficients, 𝑏𝑖π‘₯

and 𝑏𝑖𝐷𝐡 , respectively. If no structural damage is

experienced and the operational conditions of the two

models are close to one another, the selected AF

model from the database will closely approximate the

measured response. If damage has been sustained by

the structure, even the closest AF model of the

database will not approximate the measured structural

response well.

The measured response of the structure in the

unknown state, π‘₯π‘˜ , and the residual error of the fitted

AF model, π‘Ÿπ‘˜π‘₯ , are substituted into the database AFX

model to determine the residual error, πœ€π‘˜π‘₯ , of the AFX

model:

π‘₯π‘˜ = 𝛼𝑖

𝐷𝐡π‘₯π‘˜βˆ’π‘– +π‘Žπ‘–=1 𝛽𝑗

π·π΅π‘Ÿπ‘˜βˆ’π‘—π‘₯𝑏

𝑗=0 + πœ€π‘˜π‘₯ (4)

Since the residual of the AFX (a, b) model is the

damage sensitive feature in the analysis, if the

structure is in a state of damage, the statistics of the

AFX model residual, πœ€π‘˜π‘₯

will vary from that of the

AFX model corresponding to the undamaged

structure. It has been shown that damage can be

identified when the ratio of the standard deviation, 𝜎,

of the model residuals exceeds a threshold value

established from good engineering judgment [2] as

shown in Eq. (5).

𝜎 πœ€π‘₯

𝜎 πœ€π·π΅ β‰₯ β„Ž. (5)

Establishing a threshold, h , that minimizes the

number of false-positive and false-negative

identifications of damage is necessary for robust

damage detection and identification.

3.3 Implementation of Auto-feedback Time Series

Modeling

The wireless sensing units can individually perform

most of the computations associated with the

statistical pattern recognition algorithms. The role of

the unit is well defined with the responsibility of

recording the structural response, normalizing the

response, and fitting AF models to the measurements.

After the AF model is fit, the model’s coefficients

would be wirelessly communicated to a centralized

data server housing a database populated by AF-AFX

model pairs. Once a model match is made, the

coefficients of the AFX model are transmitted to the

wireless sensing unit where the standard deviation of

the AFX model is calculated. The ratio of standard

deviations of AFX model errors shown in Equation

(5) is calculated and compared to a previously

established threshold. A software module is written

for the wireless sensing units embedded application

layer that determines the coefficients of an AF(p)

model based on a segment of the recorded data.

Multiplying both sides of Eq. (1) by the current

A Nagaraju et al,Int.J.Comp.Tech.Appl,Vol 2 (6), 4021-4027

IJCTA | NOV-DEC 2011 Available [email protected]

4024

ISSN:2229-6093

Page 5: WIRELESS HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SMART STRUCTURES USING
Page 6: WIRELESS HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SMART STRUCTURES USING
Page 7: WIRELESS HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM FOR SMART STRUCTURES USING