Winston & Strawn LLP © 2009 CHARLOTTE CHICAGO GENEVA LONDON LOS ANGELES MOSCOW NEW YORK NEWARK PARIS SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON, D.C. Antitrust Enforcement After the Rebound November 17, 2009
Mar 28, 2015
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2009
CHARLOTTE CHICAGO GENEVA LONDON LOS ANGELES MOSCOW
NEW YORK NEWARK PARIS SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON, D.C.
Antitrust Enforcement After the Rebound
November 17, 2009
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
2
Overview
• The Rebound Will Trigger Full Enforcement
• The Government’s Game Plan
• Best Practices For Companies’ Press Break
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
3
The Rebound Will Trigger Full Enforcement(Get Ready For An NBA-style 4th Quarter)
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
4
Top Bailout Recipients (11/10/09)
Company
All Banks
AIG
Fannie Mae
Freddie Mac
GM
Chrysler
Industry
Banking
Insurance
Fin. Serv.
Fin. Serv.
Auto
Auto
Headquarters
N/A
NY
DC
Va
Mich
Mich
Amount (Bil.)
$204.7*
$69.8
$59.9
$50.7
$50.4
$12.5
____*$133.9 outstanding
Source: http://bailout.propublica.org/main/list/index; http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/storysupplement/bankbailout
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
5
The Government’s Game Plan
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
6
The Government’s Game Plan: In General
More Vigorous Enforcement
“As President, Obama will reinvigorate antitrust enforcement, which is how we will ensure that capitalism works for consumers.”
www.barackobama.com/issues/technology
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
7
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
8
The Government’s Game Plan: Specifics
1. Full-court Press On Single-firm Conduct
2. Finals Series: Congress/Agencies v. S. Ct.
3. International Help Defense
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
9
1. Full-court Press on Single-firm Conduct
Overview
• Shift in policy/Sea change in philosophy
• More investigations/cases in targeted industries
• More scrutiny of mergers in targeted industries
• Supreme Court pick-and-roll
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
10
1. Full-court Press on Single-firm Conduct
Shift In Policy/Sea Change In Philosophy
• 9/8/08—DOJ’s 215-page report on single-firm conduct advised caution in interfering with markets. (Under Bush.)
• 9/8/08—3 of 4 FTC commissioners called report “a blueprint for radically weakened enforcement” against anticompetitive practices.
• 5/11/09—DOJ under Obama withdrew report
• Withdrawal is “a shift in philosophy and the clearest way to let everyone know that the Antitrust Division will be aggressively pursuing cases where monopolists try to use their dominance in the marketplace to stifle competition and harm consumers.”
• “[W]e can no longer rely upon the marketplace alone to ensure that competition and consumers will be protected.”
(Speech by Christine A. Varney, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the DOJ’s Antitrust Division, http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/May/09-at-459.html)
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
11
1. Full-court Press on Single-firm Conduct
• Total Monopoly Investigations Initiated:
• Total Monopolization Cases Filed:
• Total District Court Civil Antitrust Cases Filed:
• Total Fines Imposed:• Total Jail Days
Imposed:
Clinton (1993-2000)
• 85
• 11
• 178
• $1,880,662,000• 26,892Source:
Practicing Law Institute, Corporate Compliance 2002, Antitrust Division Workload Statistics: FY 1992-2001.
Bush (2001-2008)
• 58
• 0
• 86
• $2,981,971,000• 96,238Source:
http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public /workstats.htm
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
12
1. Full-court Press on Single-firm Conduct
Sea Change In Philosophy?
• “I see democracy as a conversation to be had. According to this conception, the genius of Madison’s design is not that it provides a fixed blueprint for action. It provides us with a framework and rules, but all its machinery are designed to force us into a conversation.”
The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama, p. 89-92 Oct 1, 2006.
• “[Under Obama], [m]ultilateral diplomacy has regained a central position . . . . Dialogue and negotiations are preferred . . . .” Statement by the Norwegian Nobel Committee about President Obama, http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/press.html.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
13
Philosophical War Over Enforcement
Let Them Play
Overenforcement “might effectively chill procompetitive conduct in the world at large, the very thing that it is designed to protect.”
Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co., 25 Cal. 4th 826, 852 (2001).
1. Full-court Press on Single-Firm Conduct
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
14
Call The Fouls
“Our regulators became enablers rather than enforcers. Their trust in the wisdom of the markets was infinite.”
(House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman lecturing Alan Greenspan re Wall Street collapse.)
http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/greenspan-calls-crisis-a-credit-tsunami/217508
Philosophical War Over Enforcement
1. Full-court Press on Single-Firm Conduct
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
15
Philosophical Peace?
Obama
Obama “will take steps to ensure that antitrust law is not used as a tool to interfere with robust competition or undermine efficiency to the detriment of U.S. consumers and businesses.”
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/InnovationTechnology.pdf
Balance
Study
Conversation
1. Full-court Press on Single-Firm Conduct
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
16
1. Full-court Press on Single-Firm Conduct
More Investigations In Targeted Industries
The Talk:• Internet (Network Neutrality)
• Video clip of Senator Obama speaking about the Internet on 11/14/07 at Google in Mountain View, CA.
• Healthcare (Generic Drug Entry)• Obama’s Plan will “prohibit large drug companies from keeping generics out of markets.”
www.barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/
The Walk:• Dairy Industry—Dean Foods (DOJ)• Mainframes—IBM (DOJ)• Seeds/Genetically Engineered Crops—Monsanto (DOJ)• Internet—Google (FTC)• Computer Chips—Intel (NY AG) ( FTC likely)• Telecommunications—AT&T and Verizon (DOJ)
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
17
More Industry Regulation: The Internet
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
18
1. Full-court Press on Single-Firm Conduct
More Scrutiny Of Mergers In Targeted Industries
The Talk:
• Internet
• Healthcare
• Media
• All media mergers should be “closely scrutinize[d] … for their implications for competition and consumer choice” and for their impact “on the ability of divergent communities to participate in the national media environment.” http://www.broadcastingcable.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA6570325
The Walk:
• Media—Ticketmaster/Live Nation (DOJ)
• Healthcare—CVS/Caremark (FTC)
• Oracle acquisition of Sun Microsystems (DOJ cleared)
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
19
1. Full-court Press on Single-Firm Conduct
Opportunity for a Conversation?
DOJ cleared the Oracle acquisition of Sun Microsystems on November 9, 2009:• “The Division concluded, based on the specific facts at issue in the
transaction, that consumer harm is unlikely because customers would continue to have choices from a variety of well established and widely accepted database products.”
• “The Antitrust Division will continue to work constructively with the EC and competition authorities in other jurisdictions to preserve sound antitrust enforcement policies that benefit consumers around the world.”
EC has objected.• http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2009/251782.htm
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
20
DOJ and FTC—Allocation of Industries
DOJ• aeronautics • agriculture and associated biotechnology • avionics • beer • computer software • cosmetics and hair care • defense electronics • financial services/insurance/stock and option, bond and
commodity markets • flat glass • health insurance • industrial equipment • media and entertainment • metals, mining and minerals • missiles, tanks and armored vehicles • naval defense products • photography and film • pulp, paper, lumber and timber • telecommunications services and equipment • travel and transportation • waste
FTC• airframes • autos and trucks • building materials • chemicals • computer hardware • energy • healthcare • industrial gases • munitions • operation of grocery stores and grocery manufacturing • operation of retail stores • pharmaceuticals and biotechnology (other than
associated with agriculture) • professional services • satellite manufacturing and launch vehicles • textiles
Source: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2002/02/clearance/ftcdojagree.pdf
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
21
1. Full-court Press on Single-Firm Conduct
Supreme Court Pick-and-Roll: Opportunity for a Conversation• Illinois Tool Works v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006) (Stevens, J.,
joined by all except Alito, J.)• Abandoned per se presumption that patent = market power in antitrust tying
context. 547 U.S. 28 at 31, 45-46.• Based on Congress's 1986 amendment to Patent Code eliminating per se
presumption in patent misuse context. 35 U.S.C. § 271(d)(5).
• linkLine Communications, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 129 S. Ct. 1109 (2009) (Roberts, C.J., joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito; Breyer, J., concurring, joined by Stevens, Souter, and Ginsburg)
• No "price squeeze" claim under Sherman Act section 2 in partially-regulated industry
• ISPs sued Pac Bell alleging unregulated retail prices to consumers were too low in relation to regulated wholesale prices it charged competitors for DSL access
• No duty to sell to competitors in regulated wholesale market; only viable claim—predatory pricing in retail market—not pleaded
• Concurrence: Would instruct C.D. Cal. to grant leave to amend.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
22
2. Finals Series (Congr./Agencies v. S. Ct.)
• Retail Price Maintenance Agreements
• Pay-For-Delay Settlements
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
23
2. Finals Series (Congr./Agencies v. S. Ct.)
Resale Price Maintenance Agreements—Before Leegin
• 1911: Dr. Miles, 220 U.S. 373 – per se illegal.
• 1919: Colgate, 250 U.S. 300 – no agreement where manufacturer simply announces preferred resale pricing and refuses to deal with price-cutting distributors.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
24
2. Finals Series (Congr./Agencies v. S. Ct.)
Resale Price Maintenance Agreements—After Leegin
• 2007: Leegin, 127 S. Ct. 2705 (reversing Dr. Miles) – Vertical price restraints no longer per se illegal. Two-step review of RPM policies:
• Not illegal if no pricing agreement.
• If agreement exists, court evaluates agreement’s effect on competition under rule of reason—case-by-case analysis of factors such as:
• number of manufacturers using such agreements in a market;
• whether manufacturer or retailer is source of the restraint;
• market power of party imposing the restraint. (Id. at 2710.)
• DOJ/FTC Safety Zones
• collaborating competitors collectively control 20 percent or less of relevant market. (Guidelines ¶ 4.2.)
• collaborative research and development efforts. (Guidelines ¶ 4.3.)
• health care, intellectual property, and horizontal mergers. (Health Care Statements 7 & 8; Intellectual Property Guidelines; Horizontal Merger Guidelines.)
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
25
2. Finals Series (Congr./Agencies v. S. Ct.)
Resale Price Maintenance Agreements Under Obama Admin.—Undoing Leegin
• Discount Pricing Consumer Protection Act, S. 2261
• Would reinstate Dr. Miles rule and undo Leegin.
• Senator Joe Biden co-sponsored.
• Status: Read twice and referred to Committee on the Judiciary (10/30/07). Did not become law.
• Reintroduced in 2009 as S. 148. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary (1/6/09).
• Also introduced in the House as H.R. 3190 in 2009, sponsored by Rep. Henry Johnson. Status: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote (7/30/09).
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
26
2. Finals Series (Congr./Agencies v. S. Ct.)
Pay-For-Delay Settlements—Agencies
• FTC’s Attack on “Pay-for-Delay” Settlements
• Commissioner Jon Leibowitz in May 2008:
“As our report today sadly demonstrates, pay-for-delay settlements continue to proliferate. That’s good news for the pharmaceutical industry, which will make windfall profits on these deals. But it’s bad news for consumers, who will be left footing the bill. These agreements inflict special pain on the working poor and the elderly, who need effective drugs at affordable prices.”
• Commissioner Rosch in April 2007:
Cases upholding settlements are “bad law and should be reversed,” because settlements violate Sherman Act sections 1 and 2.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
27
2. Finals Series (Congr./Agencies v. S. Ct.)
Pay-For-Delay Settlements—Congress
• Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act, S. 369• Would prohibit brand name drug companies from compensating generic drug
companies to delay the entry of a generic drug into the market.
• Status: Reported by Committee; Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 183 (10/15/09).
• Also introduced in the House as the Protecting Consumer Access to Generic Drugs Act of 2009, H.R. 1706. Status : House Energy and Commerce: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 16 - 10 (6/3/09).
• Fair Prescription Drug Competition Act, S. 501• Would amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the
marketing of "authorized generics."
• Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (2/26/09).
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
28
2. Finals Series--S. Ct. Roster
Justice
Stevens
Ginsburg
Kennedy
Scalia
Breyer
Sotomayor
Thomas
Alito
Roberts
Age
89
76
73
73
71
55
61
59
54
Appointing
President
Ford
Clinton
Reagan
Reagan
Clinton
Obama
G.H.W. Bush
G.W. Bush
G.W. Bush
Year of
Appointment
1975
1993
1988
1986
1994
2009
1991
2006
2005
Source: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/biographiescurrent.pdf
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
29
3. International Help Defense
• Overview
• Privilege and waiver issues
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
30
3. International Help Defense
Overview
• EU tenacious
• Slow rotations elsewhere, but coordination accelerating
• Increased emphasis on leniency programs creates trap for the unwary re waiver of privilege.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
31
3. Help Defense: New Cartel Laws
In past 2 years
More than 2 years ago
Cartel enforcement regimes last enacted/amended:
None
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
32
3. International Help Defense
Russia/US MOU: Ex. of Accelerating Coordination
• Russia’s Federal Antimonopoly Service/DOJ & FTC
• More communication re policies (including periodic meetings)
• Coordination re enforcement
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
33
3. International Help Defense
Privilege and Waiver Issues
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
34
Hypothetical: Privileged or Not Privileged?
EE seeks legal advice of in-house counsel regarding
proposed business strategy later alleged to be anticompetitive.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
35
Hypothetical: Privileged or Not Privileged?
• California
• Privileged. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Super. Ct., 54 Cal. App. 4th 625, 642 (1997).
• US
• Privileged. U.S. v. Rowe, 96 F.3d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir. 1996).
• EU
• Not privileged. Akzo Nobel Chemicals & Akcros Chemicals v. Commission, ECJ Cases T’125/03 and T’253/03, 17.9.07.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
36
Privileges: US, EU and China
Attorney-client
Work product
Joint defense
No privilege
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
37
Attorney-client Privilege
US EU China
Attorney-client Privilege Legal Professional PrivilegeConfidentiality of client
information
• Oral and written communications made in confidence with inside or outside counsel for the purpose of seeking, obtaining, or providing legal assistance.
• Writings
• Outside counsel (some member states such as the Netherlands hold differently)
• Counsel admitted to an EU member state bar.
• No “Attorney-client privilege”
• Attorneys required to keep client information confidential and not required to disclose all information to the court.
• Foreign attorneys subject to same rules.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
38
Prior Production to U.S. Government
Involuntary Disclosure—Only way to be sure• General Rule: privilege preserved if party makes efforts “reasonably
designed to protect and preserve the privilege.” United States v. De La Jara, 973 F.2d 746, 750 (9th Cir. 1992)
• Because appellant “did nothing to recover the letter or protect its confidentiality during the six month interlude between its seizure [by search warrant] and introduction into evidence,” privilege was waived. If he had “immediately attempt[ed] to recover the letter, appellant could have minimized the damage caused by the breach of confidentiality.” Id.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
39
Prior Production to U.S. Government
“Involuntary” Disclosure=“Coercion” • Disclosure pursuant to government request during criminal investigation
considered involuntary and did not constitute waiver. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Super. Ct. of San Diego County, 165 Cal. App. 4th 672 (2008)
• “The means of coercion the government used here were, as a practical matter, more powerful than a court order. A court order can be challenged, without penalty, by way of extraordinary writ or appeal. In contrast here, defendants had no means of asserting the privileges without incurring the severe consequences threatened by the government agencies.” Id. at 683.
• “We hasten to note the DOJ has more recently amended its policy and significantly limited the circumstances under which disclosure of privileged materials will be requested from corporate defendants.” Id. at 684 n.7
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
40
Prior Production to Foreign Government: "Sophie’s Choice"
In re Vitamins Antitrust Litig., 120 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2000):
Issue: Whether disclosure to foreign enforcement agency waives privilege.
Facts:
• Private plaintiffs in U.S. alleged global antitrust conspiracy among domestic and foreign vitamins manufacturers.
• Plaintiffs sought discovery of the leniency applications made to European Commission.
• Letter from head of EC’s Cartel Unit and Amicus Brief by EC asking special master to uphold privilege.
Holding:
• Defendants waived privilege as to submissions voluntarily given to EC without expectation of confidentiality.
• Court rejected arguments that comity principles precluded disclosure and concluded that U.S. interests outweighed potential interference with foreign enforcement.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
41
Prior Production to Foreign Government
In Re Methionine Antitrust Litig., Master file no. C99-3491, Report of Special Master (N.D. Cal. June 17, 2002).
• Upholding privilege (siding with EC’s Amicus Brief).
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
42
Prior Production to Foreign Government
Flat Glass MDL (W.D. Pa.)
• EC moved to intervene to assert privilege
• Plaintiffs filed opposition 10/20/09
• Court granted intervention 10/30/09.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
43
Best Practices For Companies’ Press Break
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
44
Best Practices For Companies’ Press Break
1. Understand Enforcement Strategies And Strengths
2. Avoid Enforcement Strengths
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
45
1. Understand Enforcement Strategies And Strengths
• Force offense to play the wrong way
• Dribble too much
• Fail to exploit weak side
• Trap in vulnerable hot spots
• Corners
• Sidelines
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
46
2. Avoid Enforcement Strengths
• Play the right way
• Avoid the trapping hot spots
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
47
Play the right way
• No Resale Price-Maintenance Agreements
• Communicate a unilateral policy
• Refuse to deal with price cutters
• Embrace Opportunities For A Conversation
• Use Supreme Court Leverage
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
48
Avoid the trapping hot spots
• One-team philosophy• Coordinate with international counterparts
• Strategy/disclosure anywhere is strategy/disclosure everywhere
• Preserve privilege• Address written communications re legal advice involving
operations/sales outside U.S. to licensed outside local counsel.
• Avoid waiver in governmental disclosures/seizures to improve Sophie’s Choice• Fight to recover seized documents
• Require recitals in agreements:• non-waiver• no further dissemination• non-dissemination promise necessary to ensure cooperation with
government.
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
49
"Winning Time"
Winston & Strawn LLP © 2008
50