William J. Bommer, Suresh Ram, Tanuj Patel, Laurie Vazquez, Zhongmin Li, Geeta Mahendra, PCI-CAMPOS Investigators, University of California, Davis, CA, USA THE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION CALIFORNIA AUDIT MONITORED PILOT WITH OFFSITE SURGERY (PCI-CAMPOS) OUTCOMES IN 153,950 PATIENT PROCEDURES IN HOSPITALS WITH AND WITHOUT ONSITE CARDIAC SURGERY
19
Embed
William J. Bommer, Suresh Ram, Tanuj Patel, Laurie Vazquez, Zhongmin Li, Geeta Mahendra, PCI-CAMPOS Investigators, University of California, Davis, CA,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
William J. Bommer, Suresh Ram, Tanuj Patel, Laurie Vazquez, Zhongmin Li, Geeta Mahendra, PCI-CAMPOS Investigators, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
THE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION CALIFORNIA AUDIT MONITORED PILOT WITH OFFSITE
SURGERY (PCI-CAMPOS) OUTCOMES IN 153,950 PATIENT
PROCEDURES IN HOSPITALS WITH AND WITHOUT ONSITE CARDIAC
SURGERY
DISCLOSURES
This study was conducted by the California Department of Public Health and funded by the pilot hospitals without Onsite surgery
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2PCI-CAMPOS
BACKGROUND
The ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline recommendations for primary and elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at hospitals without cardiac surgery (Offsite) were changed from Class IIb* (primary) and III (elective) in 2005 to Classes IIa (primary) and IIb (elective) in 2011. * Class IIa – Additional studies with focused objectives needed, it is reasonable to perform procedure/administer treatment
Class IIb – Additional studies with broad objectives needed, procedure/treatment may be considered Class III - No benefit/harm
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2PCI-CAMPOS
AIM
To determine and compare the initial safety and efficacy outcomes of PCIs performed at hospitals with (Onsite) and without cardiac surgery (Offsite) in California
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
METHOD
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
HOSPITAL AND OPERATOR REQUIREMENTS
Offsite HospitalsApproval from California Department of Public HealthFormal PCI development programParticipation in the elective PCI pilot program and NCDR® RegistrySigned emergency transfer agreement with Onsite surgery hospital (24/7 backup, transfer within 60 minutes)Capacity to perform minimum of 200 PCIs/year; 36 primary PCIs/year
Offsite OperatorsPerform at least 100 PCIs/year; 18 primary PCIs/yearLifetime experience ≥500 PCIs as primary operatorComplication rates and outcomes equivalent or superior to national benchmarksABIM Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases certification Active participant in hospital quality improvement program
Onsite HospitalsParticipation in NCDR® Registry
Onsite OperatorsApproval from hospital credentialing
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
METHOD
California patients admitted for primary and non-primary PCI (July 2010-13)
Offsite Hospitals without surgery (6)
Onsite Hospitals with surgery (122)
High Patient Risk includes, but is not limited to:
•Clinical risk • Decomp. CHF (Killip3) without evidence
for active ischemia • 3-VD unprotected by prior CABG with
>70% stenosis in the prox. segment of all major coronary arteries
•Myocardial risk• left main stenosis ≥50%• single target lesion that jeopardizes
over 50% of remaining viable myocardium
High Lesion Risk includes, but is not limited to:
•diffuse disease (>2cm in length) and excessive tortuosity of proximal segments•more than moderate calcification of a stenosis or proximal segments•location in an extremely angulated segment (>90 degrees)•inability to protect major side branches•degenerated older vein grafts with friable lesions•substantial thrombus in the vessel or at the lesion site•any feature that may, in the operator’s judgment, impede stent deployment
Offsite Exclusion Criteria
And
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
METHOD: AUDITS
Offsite: Central 100%: PCI-CAMPOS review of all Cath/PCI fieldsHospital Site 20%: 10% Random sample of Offsite PCI procedures and 10% selected PCI procedures with all major complicationsAngiographic: 20% assessed for NCDR® Cath/PCI Mechanical Ventricular Support, Coronary Anatomy, Lesions and Devices, and Intraprocedure Events fields and Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) accuracy.
Onsite: Central: 100% NCDR® review of certain fields (Data are filtered through the registry-specific algorithms) Hospital Site: Selected NCDR® hospital review (25 randomly identified national sites)
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
STATISTICAL METHODS
A multivariate PCI risk model was developed and risk‐adjusted primary outcomes were compared for the 6 pilot and 122 non‐pilot hospital PCI procedures
Bivariate analysis was used to create complete, parsimonious, and refined multivariable logistic risk models
All models were evaluated with the Hosmer‐Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit statistics
C‐statistics were reported as a measures of predictive powerA general linear model for analysis of variance (GLM/ANOVA) was
used to compare observed, expected, and risk‐adjusted composite event rates
The Poisson exact probability method was used to calculate and compare provider risk-adjusted composite rates
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
All PCI Primary PCI Nonprimary PCICharacteristics Offsite
Symptoms Unlikely to be Ischemic 0.4 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.8 <0.0001
No Symptoms No Angina 3.6 7.7 0.0 0.0 5.2 9.3 <0.0001
PCI Status
Emergent/Salvage 34.6 19.9
<0.0001
98.3 93.0
<0.0001
4.6 4.0
<0.0001Urgent 37.4 41.3 1.7 6.1 54.3 49.0
Elective 28.0 38.7 0.0 0.9 41.1 47.0
LESION AND PROCEDURAL CHARACTERISTICS
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
All PCIs Primary Nonprimary Offsite Onsite p value Offsite Onsite p value Offsite Onsite p valueLocation of vessel/branch — # of lesions in individual vessels/total # of lesions (%)Left main coronary artery 0.8 1.3 0.001 0.4 0.5 0.364 1.0 1.4 0.012Left anterior descending artery
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
* Statistically significant with ≥ 95% confidence (Poisson exact probability method)
SUMMARY
California Pilot Offsite hospitals perform proportionately more primary PCIs (32.0%) than Onsite hospitals (17.9%).
The risk-adjusted composite safety endpoint (in-hospital death, stroke, emergency CABG) was significantly lower in Offsite (1.87%) versus Onsite (2.36%) hospitals.
The composite efficacy endpoint (<20%, TIMI-3) was significantly lower in Offsite (88.4%) versus Onsite (91%) hospitals.
No significant differences were seen in stroke, or emergency CABG rates.
No significant hospital volume/outcome relationship was seen.
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
Similar cohorts but non-randomized (allocation bias).Higher level of audit in Offsite PCI procedures.Exclusion criteria were seen in 0.40-0.64% of Offsite
and 1.68-2.97% of Onsite patients. These patients did not experience worse outcomes.
Confirmed Operator feedback was available to Offsite operators but not confirmed for Onsite operators.
High risk Compassionate Use Criteria were not included in risk adjustment.
PCI-CAMPOS
LIMITATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
1. Pilot Offsite hospitals showed slightly better PCI composite safety and worse PCI composite efficacy endpoints than Onsite hospitals.
2. Emergency CABG rates are low in both Offsite and Onsite hospitals reducing the need for Onsite Cardiac Surgery.
3. Offsite hospitals perform more primary and fewer elective PCIs than Onsite hospitals.
4. A significant composite safety variation with outliers remains for Onsite hospitals.
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2
PCI-CAMPOS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
March 29, 2014 401:Featured Clinical Research II: TCT@ACC-i2