Top Banner
MOOCs: Why Low-Cost Will Not Create Equal Access Nathan Garrett Yesica Allaya eLearn 2013, Las Vegas, NV Wednesday, October 23 rd , 1:30-2:00pm http://profgarrett.com
26

Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Jan 18, 2015

Download

Education

Nathan Garrett

This is a presentation I did at eLearn 2013. It presents evidence about the relative role of Moocs, Online Learning, and Traditional Face-to-Face education modes. Essentially, I'm trying to show that just decreasing the cost of education is not enough to get everyone equal access.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

MOOCs: Why Low-Cost Will Not Create Equal Access

Nathan GarrettYesica Allaya

eLearn 2013, Las Vegas, NVWednesday, October 23rd, 1:30-2:00pm

http://profgarrett.com

Page 2: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Moocs are…

• “the biggest revolution in education since the printing press…”

Page 3: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Quality

Retention: How many students

complete successfully?

Pedagogy: What teaching techniques are

used?

Cost: What does the overall educational experience cost?

Access: What type of students are

recruited?

Page 4: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Iron Triangle

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Page 5: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access
Page 6: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Traditional Higher Ed

• 5,599 colleges & universities• 21m students• 70% public• >50% over 23• 40% part-time

Page 7: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

How many students graduate?

Page 8: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Private Not-For-Profit Four-Year Public Four-Year Private For-Profit Four-Year

67%

57%

26%

45%

39%

16%

60%

46%

28%

75%

65%

36%

White, Non- Hispanic Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander

We have unequal success between ethnic groups

Page 9: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

92-93 97-98 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

-$4,000

-$2,000

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

Public 2-year Public 4-year Private 4-year

What students pay in tuition hasn’t significantly changed

Page 10: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

What does it cost?

Page 11: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey and decennial census: Percentage of the Population 25 Years and Over Who Have Completed High School or College: Selected Year 1940-2009

But, we educate more of the population

Page 12: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Iron Triangle for Traditional Higher Education

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Page 13: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Online Learning

• 32% of college students have taken at least one course

• 9% yearly growth rate

Page 14: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Access

• Requires – Prepared & motivated students

• Minorities have lower levels of computer preparation & skills

• Non-traditional also do worse

– Heavy feedback• Perceived as harder

– by all students

Page 15: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Cost

Page 16: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Outcomes

• Perceptions v. reality– Perceptions? Employers rank lower– Reality? Outcomes similar

Page 17: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Iron Triangle for Online Learning

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Page 18: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Mooc

• xMooc v. cMooc– Dave Cormier, Bryan Alexander, George Siemens,

and Stephen Downes

Page 19: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Retention

• Range: 25%, 12%, 5%...

• Are these really serious completers?

• Coursera: – Overall: 7-9%– Intend to complete: 23%– Complete first assignment: 40%– Signature Track: 70%

Page 20: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

http://mfeldstein.com/validation-mooc-student-patterns-graphic/

Page 21: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Cost per Completion

• Free v. “Free”• Cost

– Edinburgh, $46k– U Penn: $50k

Page 22: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Access

• Who finishes a Mooc?– 70% has BA/BS, half graduate degree– Majority outside US– 60% of Coursera income <50k

• San Jose– Developmental classes in Pilot

• 29-51%, 20% lower than traditional

Page 23: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Iron Triangle for Moocs

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Page 24: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access
Page 25: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access
Page 26: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

MoocOnlineFace-to-face

Cost

Access Quality