More than 1.2 million people die in road traffic crashes every year
As many as 50 million people are injured or disabled by road traffic crashes every year
Road traffic crashes cost
countries up to 4% of their Gross National Product
Why should we act on road safety?
Evidence has shown that simple
low-cost engineering measures are
saving thousands of lives
Source: World Health Organization
ROAD ACCIDENTS
Source: National Crime Records Bureau ADSI 2015
Road Safety Scenario in India
4,64,674 cases
3.1% from 2014
1,48,707 fatalities
5.1% from 2014
4,82,389 injuries
16 killed an hour every day,365 days in a year due to road
accidents
55 injured in road accidents
every hour of the day leaving
dependents devastated.
Road Safety Scenario in Haryana
21.1
20.4
20.4
19.6
19.2
17.1
16.7
15.6
15.0
13.0
11.4
0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0
TAMIL NADU
HIMACHAL PRADESH
GOA
TELANGANA
HARYANA
KARNATAKA
PUNJAB
CHHATTISGARH
RAJASTHAN
GUJARAT
INDIA (Average)
Road accident deaths per 1 lakh pop.
(Top 10 states in India)
Haryana accounts for
2.2% of Road Accident
Cases in the country
It is 13th in the Total
number of Road Accidents in the country
Haryana Accounts for
3.3% of the Road
Accident Deaths in India
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2012 2013 2014 2015
No of People killed every for
every 100 accidents
An average of 43 persons are killed in every 100 accidents
Approximately 1 person dies every 2 accidents
Road Safety Scenario in Haryana
Every second accident leaves approximately one person grievously injured
Road Safety Scenario in Haryana
Vision Zero Principles
SAFETYFIRST
Protecting human life is more important than resolving other traffic-related issues, such as congestion, speed or capacity.
FORGIVINGSYSTEMS
To some extent, human error is unavoidable. Roads and vehicles, need to have fail-safe features so that human error is unlikely to cause serious injury or death.
SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
Transport providers and authorities are as responsible for safety as road users.
COORDINATED ACTION
An effective road safety strategy needs coordinated action between all stakeholders, with inter-linked targets, periodic communication and corrective mechanisms.
FOUR PRINCIPLES OF VISION ZERO
State Level:
• Transport Department, Government of Haryana
• NASSCOM
• WRI - India
Stakeholders
District Level:
• Regional Development Authorities
• Haryana State Roads & Bridges Development Corporation Limited
• District Planning Board
• Traffic Police
• Public Works Department
City Level:
• Traffic Police
• Public Works Department
• Schools
• RWAs
• Hospitals
• Civil Society
Project Scale-up
Phase 1:10 Districts / RSAs2 Project Managers
Phase 2:22 Districts / RSAs4 Project Managers1 State Coordinator
Organizational Structure
Executive CouncilHaryana Government + WRI India + NASSCOM Foundation
Project Management TeamWRI India + NASSCOM Foundation
CSR Partners
State Coordinator
Project Manager 1
Project Manager 2
Project Manager 3
Project Manager 4
RSA 1
RSA 3
RSA 2
RSA 4
RSA 5
RSA 1
RSA 3
RSA 2
RSA 4
RSA 5
RSA 1
RSA 3
RSA 2
RSA 4
RSA 1
RSA 3
RSA 2
RSA 4
RSA 5 RSA 6 RSA 5 RSA 6
Key Roles & Responsibilities
Objective Objective Lead Objective Partners Key Strategies
Program Planning
CM Office / Transport Dept
WRI;NASSCOM / NF;
Update to CM and other higher authorities
Monthly VC Meetings
Monthly HOD Meetings
Advocacy WRICM Office;Transport Dept;NASSCOM / NF;
Media & Outreach
RS Action Plan
Conferences / Seminars / Workshops
Design WRIEngineering Deptts;Police;Transport Dept;
Review design proposals
Trial of proposed designs
Complete Engagement of:
Partial Engagement of:
WRI
WRI
CMO / TD
CMO / TD
NASSCOM / NF
NASSCOM / NF
Police
Police
Engg Depts
Engg Depts
Key Roles & Responsibilities
Objective Objective Lead Objective Partners Key Strategies
Coordination NASSCOM / NFWRI;CM Office;Transport Dept;
Hiring of Project Team
Monitoring of Project Team
Stakeholder Coordination (Internal)
ExecutionCM Office / Transport Dept
Engineering Deptts;Police;
Design Execution (Implementation)
Operation & Management
Traffic Management & Enforcement
Fundraising NASSCOM / NFHonda;Genpact;Nagarro;
Outreach (Fundraising)
Coordination with Donors
Complete Engagement of:
Partial Engagement of:
WRI
WRI
CMO / TD
CMO / TD
NASSCOM / NF
NASSCOM / NF
Police
Police
Engg Depts
Engg Depts
Key Roles & Responsibilities
Objective Objective Lead Objective Partners Key Strategies
CampaigningDistrict Administration (DCs / SPs)
Transport Dept;Education Dept;Honda;
Road Safety Patrols
Community Awareness
Capacity Building
WRITransport Dept;Police;NASSCOM / NF;
CB Workshop for Project Team, Officials
Driver Training
Enforcement PoliceRTO;ULB;
Observance Days
Procure Hardware and Software
Encroachment Removal Drives
Complete Engagement of:
Partial Engagement of:
WRI
WRI
CMO / TD
CMO / TD
NASSCOM / NF
NASSCOM / NF
Police
Police
Engg Depts
Engg Depts
Modules for Key Stakeholders
Department Responsible Key Activities Engineering Departments will include:
NHAI, PWD, HSVP, ULBs, Forest, Electricity
Engineering Departments;
• Embed safe engineering measures in road projects
• Institute RS auditing for new & existing roads
• Establish wayside amenities
Transport Department;
Police;
• Stricter enforcement
• Use of ITS gadgets for enforcement & Traffic Mgmt.
• Check overloading
• Stricter driver licensing
• Traffic Incident Management
Education Department;
• Road safety education to children with support of NGOs
• Awareness campaigns through media-electronic and print
Health Department;
• Up-gradation of Trauma Care facilities
• Ensure transport of victims to hospital within 20 minutes
• Emergency Care Training
Engineering Enforcement Education Emergency
Care
Work Modules for Project Team
Strategy 1.1: Rectification of Old BlackspotsActivity 1.1.1: Historical Data CollectionActivity 1.1.2: Analysis of Historical Crash FIRsActivity 1.1.3: Inspection of Old BlackspotsActivity 1.1.4: Recommendations for Old Blackspots
Strategy 1.2: Rectification of New BlackspotsActivity 1.2.1: Determination of New BlackspotsActivity 1.2.2: Inspection of New BlackspotsActivity 1.2.3: Recommendations for New Blackspots
Blackspot
Rectification
Crash
Investigation
Activity 2.1.1: Crash-site InvestigationActivity 2.1.2: Data AnalysisActivity 2.1.3: Recommendations
Modules
Strategy 3.1: Rural Areas & National / State Highways Activity 3.1.1: InspectionActivity 3.1.2: Recommendation
Strategy 3.2: Urban AreasActivity 3.2.1: InspectionActivity 3.2.2: Road User Data CollectionActivity 3.2.3: Recommendations
Community
Outreach &
Capacity
Building
Road Safety
Inspection
Strategy 4.1: Awareness CampaignsActivity 4.1.1: Raahgiri DaysActivity 4.1.2: Zero Tolerance Days
Strategy 4.2: Capacity BuildingActivity 4.2.1: Workshop with Educational InstitutesActivity 4.2.2: Engineers TrainingActivity 4.2.3: Police Training
One Year Impact (Jan – Dec)
4160 km Road Inspection, 760 Crash Investigations, 78 Blackspots Audited,
295 Zero Tolerance drives, 87 District Road Safety Meetings
1040 Reports submitted, 80% Work implemented
DistrictsFatalities % Change from Previous Year
2015 2016 2017 2015-16 2016-17
Hisar 231 253 199 10% -21%
Ambala 247 301 240 22% -20%
Sonipat 352 425 397 21% -7%
Jhajjar 230 255 242 11% -5%
Karnal 291 390 376 34% -4%
Panipat 240 292 306 22% 5%
Rohtak 198 241 252 22% 5%
Rewari 240 274 289 14% 5%
Kurukshetra 272 234 256 -14% 9%
Gurugram 365 415 481 14% 16%
Total HVZ Districts 2666 3080 3038 16% -1%
Total non-HVZ Districts
1763 1944 2117 10% 9%
Total State 4429 5024 5155 13% 3%
17
One Year Impact (Jul – May)
*Data on number of fatalities not available, so number of fatal crashes used
186 Lives saved, 188 Crores economic savings for the State (approx.)
DistrictFatalities % Change from Previous Year
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Pre-HVZ Post-HVZ
Hisar 171 165 116 -4% -30%
Ambala* 244 279 206 14% -26%
Karnal 282 345 319 22% -8%
Panipat 257 253 236 -2% -7%
Rohtak 223 231 216 4% -6%
Rewari 227 249 243 10% -2%
Kurukshetra 222 203 209 -9% 3%
Sonipat 357 351 362 -2% 3%
Gurugram 417 384 403 -8% 5%
Jhajhar* 231 203 233 -12% 15%
Total of HVZ Districts
2631 2663 2543 1% -5%
(Calculated on the basis of social cost of road accidents estimated by the Planning Commission in its 10th Five Year Plan)
18
19
No Action (3)• Ambala- Sacraon Mode NH-152
• Panipat- Nangal Kheri NH-44
• Gurugram- Narsinghpur NH-48
Rectified (28)
Rectification work in progress (21)
Blackspot Rectification
Other 26 blackspots not shown in the map became obsolete due to start of construction / renovation work in their vicinity
Best Practices from Districts - Karnal
Department : HSVPRoad : Urban StreetsPedestrian crossing infrastructure improved by providing table-top crossings, medians with adequate refuge areas, road markings and LED Studs
20
Best Practices from Districts - Kurukshetra
Before
After
Department : HUDARoad : Sector – 30Pedestrian Crossing infrastructure improved at Sector - 30 intersection, complete with zebra crossing, lane markings, etc.
Department : PWD(B&R)Road : Village RoadsSignage and Road stud on the outer curve with reflective tape;Pedestrian Crossing with proper refuge areas
Before
After
21
Best Practices from Districts - Gurugram
Before
After
Total Quantity fixed till Date: 1. Delineators- 4982. Road studs- 10,4303. Solar Studs- 1,1044. AFP Tape - 524 Sq. ft.
Department : PWDRoad : SH 15ANo marking, Excess Vegetation & UndividedRoad lead to Crashes, This was improved Into a 4 lane divided Road with properMarkings and Road Signs.
Department : GMDARoad : All Master Roads of GurugramAll Master roads of Gurugram are being fitted with Road Studs, Marking and Reflective Tapes to increase visibility of potential hazards during night time.
Best Practices from Districts - Rohtak
Department : HSVP
Location : Rohtak City
Faulty Speed Humps were redesigned as per IRC standards
And they were block painted with retro reflective
thermoplastic Paint and Road studs were fixed so that they
are visible from a distance.
Block paint removes the confusion between a zebra crossing
and speed humps. 48 such Speed Humps were redesigned in
the city