8” 6000 PSI BV2 vs. 8FP CL 2500 BEST IN CLASS COMPACT VALVES WHY SELECT OUR COMPACT DESIGN COST SAVINGS WHEN BUILDING THE SYSTEM 4” 5000 PSI BV2 vs. 4” 5000 PSI API 6A Compact versus conventional valves: Weight = up to 70 % less Height = up to 25 % less* Torque = up to 70 % less* Fewer Seal (leak paths) Areas Length = up to 40 % less * Consult factory for details/disclaimer
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
8” 6000 PSI BV2 vs. 8FP CL 2500
BEST IN CLASS COMPACT VALVES
WHY SELECT OUR COMPACT DESIGNCOST SAVINGS WHEN BUILDING THE SYSTEM
4” 5000 PSI BV2 vs. 4” 5000 PSI API 6A
Compact versus conventional valves:Weight = up to 70 % less
Height = up to 25 % less*Torque = up to 70 % less*Fewer Seal (leak paths) Areas
Length = up to 40 % less
* Consult factory for details/disclaimer
WHY SELECT OUR COMPACT DESIGN
COST SAVINGS WHEN BUILDING THE SYSTEM
3” 6000 PSI BV2/CV6 Ball Check Combo2” 6000 PSI BV1/CV6 Ball Check Combo
Ball/Check Combo designsThese assemblies offer the shortest overall length available for maximum
space and weight savings.
BEST IN CLASS COMPACT VALVES
WHY SELECT OUR COMPACT DESIGN
MULTIPLE OPTIONS Metal Seated Throttling Lip Seal Locking Device Subsea Complete Automated Packages Internal/External Coatings Multiple Seat & Elastomers
ONE VALVE DESIGNDOZENS OF END CONNECTIONS
Blind Flange Crosses Flanged Spool Gaskets/Seals* Grayloc connection Hammer Union connection Nipples
Swivel Flange Threaded Flanges Tube Connectors Weldneck Flange
BEST IN CLASS COMPACT VALVES
Related Documents
