Top Banner
why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt Patrick Bond, University of KwaZulu-Natal Centre for Civil Society and School of Built Environment and Development Studies, Durban perspectives from civil society presented to the University of Pretoria Centre for the Study of Governance and Innovation ‘Beyond-GDP in Africa’ workshop 27 October 2014 Centre for Civil Society
56

why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Jul 08, 2015

Download

News & Politics

Gaia Manco

Patrick Bond, University of KwaZulu-Natal Centre for Civil Society and School of Built Environment and Development Studies, Durban
Presentation given at the 'Beyond-GDP in Africa: Innovative Ideas for a Regional Dashboard' workshop, Centre for the study of Governance Innovation, University of Pretoria. www.governanceinnovation.org
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating

natural capital accounts and ecological debt Patrick Bond, University of KwaZulu-Natal Centre for Civil Society

and School of Built Environment and Development Studies, Durban

perspectives from civil society presented to the

University of Pretoria Centre for the Study of

Governance and Innovation ‘Beyond-GDP in Africa’

workshop 27 October 2014

Centre for Civil Society

Page 2: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

to be a very good jam-maker, you need a strong tree-shaker

Page 3: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 4: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

new measurements: against GDP MISSING FROM GDP: resource depletion (crucial to ‘extractivism’) air, water, and noise pollution loss of farmland and wetlands unpaid women’s/community work family breakdown other social values crime

Genuine Progress Indicator

Page 5: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

SA corporate profits: world’s 3rd highest

Source: IMF Article IV on SA, July 2013

Page 6: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

artificially high?

Page 7: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Moeletsi Mbeki:

“Big companies taking their capital out of South Africa are a

bigger threat to economic freedom than… Julius Malema.”

Page 8: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Thabo Mbeki runs AU’s ‘High level Panel on Illicit

Financial Flows from Africa’

Page 9: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

crime includes vast African capital flight

Page 10: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Composition of world’s illicit financial flows

Source: Kar and Cartwright-Smith (2010)

5%

35%

60%

Corruption(bribery and

embezzlement of national wealth)

Criminal activities(trade in

drugs, weapons and people)

Commercial transactions through

MNCs• the sin at the origin: capital outflows are illicit if they involve funds

that were acquired illegally (through corruption, drug and human trafficking, trade mispricing, …)

• the sin at transfer: capital outflows are illicit if they are not properly recorded with national authorities

• the sin at hidden foreign holdings: capital held abroad is illicit if it is not reported to the authorities (most likely due to sins #1 and #2)

» Source: Leonce Ndikumana

Page 11: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Illicit Financial Flows from Africa 1970-2008 # Country Cumulative IFFs US$ bn Share in Africa’s total

1 Nigeria 217.7 30.5%

2 Egypt 105.2 14.7%

3 South Africa 81.8 11.4%

4 Morocco 33.9 4.7%

5 Angola 29.5 4.1%

6 Algeria 26.1 3.7%

7 Côte d’ivoire 21.6 3.0%

8 Sudan 16.6 2.3%

9 Ethiopia 16.6 2.3%

10 Congo, Republic

16.2 2.3%

Page 12: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Illicit Financial Flows due to trade, 2001-10

Source: Simon Mevel, Siope Ofa & Stephen Karingi / RITD / UN-ECA

Page 13: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Illicit Financial Flows due to trade, by sector Top 10: Cumulative IFF from Africa by GTAP Sector, 2001-2010.

GTAP Sector USD Billion

Metals nec (Copper & Gold and other non-ferrous metals) 84.00

Oil 69.59

Natural gas 33.99

Minerals nec (non metalic minerals eg. Cement, gravel, plaster etc) 33.08

Petroleum, coal products 19.98

Crops 17.06

Food products 16.86

Machinery and equipment nec 16.82

Wearing apparel 14.00

Ferrous metals (Iron & steel) 13.15

Total 318.54 Source: Simon Mevel, Siope Ofa & Stephen Karingi / RITD / UN-ECA

Page 14: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Illicit Financial Flows due to trade, 2001-10 Source: Simon Mevel, Siope Ofa & Stephen Karingi / RITD / UN-ECA

Cumulative IFF by destination

Page 15: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

during current platinum strike, disputes over

corporate profitability have major implications for

potential wage settlement

Page 16: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

De Beers

hurts the

SA Treasury

Page 17: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

trade mispricing by just one firm, 2004-12

US$2.83 billion http://thestudyofvalue.org/2014/05/15/new-

lcsv-working-paper-explores/

Page 18: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 19: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 20: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

7019

70

1972

1974

1976

1978

198

0

198

2

198

4

198

6

198

8

199

0

199

2

199

4

199

6

199

8

200

0

200

2

200

4

200

6

200

8

2010

Net transfer on debt

ODA

FDI

Capital flight

Remittances

Source:

Leonce Ndikumana

capital flight outstrips all other flows

Page 21: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

‘Useful Africa’ Source: Le Monde

Diplomatique, Feb 2011

known minerals

in Africa, 2008

Page 22: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

1. South Africa 599

2. Botswana 92

3. Zambia 75

4. Ghana 43

5. Namibia 32

6. Angola 32

7. Mali 29

8. Guinea 21

9. Mauritania 20

Tanzania 20

Zimbabwe 20

Africa’s mining production by country, 2008

Page 23: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

“Africa Rising” (# of citations)

Page 24: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

“Africa Rising” GDP percentage increases, 1981-2012

Page 25: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 26: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 27: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

WAVES ‘50/50’ Campaign for Natural Capital Accounting

Building on the Gaborone Communique on NCA from the African Sustainability Summit, hosted by Botswana May 24-25, signed by 10 African countries

62 (32 developing) countries signed the NCA Communique, endorsing

• Implement natural capital accounting where there are internationally agreed statistical standards –the SEEA

• Develop methodology for the more difficult to measure natural capital – ecosystem services

• Demonstrate how NCA can support decision-making for sustainable development

Glenn-Marie Lange, Program Manager for WAVES Global Partnership, Environment Department, The World Bank

Page 28: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

World Bank (minimalist) adjustments to ‘genuine

savings’ fixed capital (-),

education (+), natural resource depletion (-),

and pollution (-)

Page 29: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

World Bank (minimalist) adjustments to ‘genuine

savings’ fixed capital (-),

education (+), natural resource depletion (-),

and pollution (-)

Page 30: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

World Bank adjustments to

‘genuine savings’

Page 31: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

South Africa’s natural capital accounts a first cut in the World Bank’s Changing Wealth of Nations (2011) substantial ‘subsoil assets’ within ‘natural capital’($/capita)

depletion of subsoil (mineral) assets = 9% of income

net decline in SA’s per person wealth: $245

Page 32: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 33: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

“Africa Rising” (really?)

Page 34: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

“Africa Middle Class Rising” (hmmm, a $2/day ‘middle class’?)

Page 35: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

multinational corporate profits as a percentage of firm equity

Source: UN Conference on Trade and Development (2007), World Investment Report 2007, Geneva.

extractive industries

Page 36: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

African protests rising

Page 37: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Africa protests (and food prices) rising

Page 38: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 39: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

‘ecological debt’ now recognised

as one implication of natural

capital

Page 40: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

GHG/capita by country, 2000

Australia USA

Saudi Arabia Canada

Kazakhstan Russia

Page 41: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

who are climate ‘creditors’? (who’s owed?) a ‘Climate Demography Vulnerability Index’

main losers: • Central America

and Caribbean • Andes and Amazon • Central/South Asia

and Middle East • SubSaharan Africa • Southeast Asia and

small islands

Page 42: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Africa burning

Page 43: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

who’s owed? climate change ‘creditors’

main losers: Central America, central South America, Central and Southeast Asia and much of Africa

Ecuador (Yasuni Park)

Page 44: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

can we leave the oil under the soil?

Yasuni ITT in Ecuador’s Amazon rainforest

Page 45: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Ecuador

Page 46: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

Accion Ecologica, Quito eco-feminist-indigenous defence of Yasuni

http://www.accionecologica.org/ http://www.amazoniaporlavida.org/es/El-Juego-del-Yasuni/age-of-yasuni-un-esfuerzo-para-hacer-visibles-las-luchas-de-los-pueblos-originarios.html

Page 47: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 48: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 49: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 50: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 51: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 52: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 53: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

financial sanctions to halt port-petrochem:

Page 54: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt
Page 55: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt

The results after one year of implementation have been remarkable. • Before the pilot program, 42% of children in

the village were malnourished. Now the proportion of malnourished children has dropped significantly, to 10%.

• The village school reported higher attendance rates … children were better fed and more attentive.

• Police statistics showed a 36.5% drop in crime since the introduction of the grants.

• Poverty rates declined from 86% to 68% (97% to 43% when controlled for migration).

• Unemployment dropped as well, from 60% to 45%, and there was a 29% increase in average earned income, excluding the BIG.

Carnegie Council: http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000163

Basic Income Grant (BIG) pilot in Otjivero, Namibia

(funded by German-Namibian Evangelical

Lutheran church) Council of Churches of Namibia (CCN), the National Union of Namibian Workers (NUNW), the umbrella body of the NGOs (NANGOF), the umbrella body of the AIDS organisations (NANASO), the National Youth Service (NYC), the Church Alliance for Orphans (CAFO), the Legal Assistance Centre (LAC) and the Labour Resource and Research Institute (LaRRI)

Page 56: why reversing Africa’s Resource Curse requires calculating natural capital accounts and ecological debt