Top Banner
Why good companies go bad When business conditions change, the most successful companies are often the slowest to adapt. (Donald N. Sull 1999)
21

Why good companies go bad

Jan 04, 2016

Download

Documents

joelle-miller

Why good companies go bad When business conditions change, the most successful companies are often the slowest to adapt. (Donald N. Sull 1999). Session 7 Managing Organizational Change: Strategies Revisited. Topics for Today. Reflections on EIS simulation Strategies for change - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Why good companies go bad

Why good companies go bad

When business conditions change, the most successful companies are often the slowest to adapt.

(Donald N. Sull 1999)

Page 2: Why good companies go bad

Session 7

Managing Organizational Change: Strategies Revisited

Page 3: Why good companies go bad

Topics for Today

• Reflections on EIS simulation

• Strategies for change– The implementation process– Balanced scoreboard

• Why good companies go bad?– Structural inertia– Growth and strategic changes

• Conclusions

Page 4: Why good companies go bad

The implementation process

• A series of issues:– Top-down vs. bottom-up– Cultural vs. structural– Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation

• A systematic change program• The importance of implementation

Page 5: Why good companies go bad

Problems in implementation

• Examples– The Smithers example– Police in New York state

• Why?– Interests and interpretation– Past experience and interpretation– Competition for attention– Multiple pulling/pushing forces in different

directions– Implementation as a continuation of decision

making

Page 6: Why good companies go bad

Balanced scorecard

• What is balanced scorecard– Beyond single measure– Generate balanced attention to important

aspects

• Video• But the experience at a large consumer

bank…

Page 7: Why good companies go bad

Balanced Scorecard at a large consumer bank

• The context– The CEO’s intension – The implementation: HRM – regional office –

branches– The academic conference

• Problems in implementation– Complex system of multiple indicators– Implementation through bureaucracies– Subjective versus objective measures

• Lessons –

Page 8: Why good companies go bad

Implementation with results(Schaffer and Thomson 2000)

• Why results-driven, not activity centered?– Keep the eyes on the ball – Discourage symbolic compliance– Push out of the comfort zone– Establish early wins

• Provide clear goals and mobilize resources to carry out the change program– Get resources/support ready– Get employees involved– Insert deadlines and demand measurable

outcomes

Page 9: Why good companies go bad

Case study: Lincoln Electric in China

Page 10: Why good companies go bad

Background

• Lincoln Electric as a model of pay for performance– Measurable goals– Intensity of incentive plan– Remarkable results

• Does this model work for other industries or other lines of work?

• What are the implications for international management?

Page 11: Why good companies go bad

Questions for discussion

• How does LE’s management style and incentive design fit the Chinese context?

• What is your view of LE’s efforts in its setup process in China? Would you do anything differently? Why?

• What is your recommendation for the next step?

Page 12: Why good companies go bad

Summary and Conclusion

Page 13: Why good companies go bad

Question revisited:

Why do large, successful companies fail?

Page 14: Why good companies go bad

The case of Intel

• Background: Industry dominance• The changing environment

– Multimedia beyond computing chips

• Why failure?– Confined to expertise within own company

• The change of strategies– From speed to new markets– Challenges from competitors: A.M.D.,

Microsoft.

Page 15: Why good companies go bad

Overview of the course

Culture

Politics

Strategic design Leadership

Agents

Recipients

Page 16: Why good companies go bad

Sharing experience:

What is your main lesson about managing organizational change?

Page 17: Why good companies go bad

Why good companies go bad?(Donald N. Sull 1999)

• It is not paralysis, not unawareness, not inaction.• The inability to take appropriate action• Active inertia – tendency to follow established

patterns of behavior, even when environment changes.

• Example: the Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.– Dominant position in the early 1970s– Response to Michelin’s radial tire – old standards– Delay in phasing out bias tires– Lost market shares and dominance in the industry

Page 18: Why good companies go bad

Sources of active inertia

• Structure and interests– Ford’s T-model

• Organizational filtering and interpretation– The pooling of experience

• Competence trap• In the time of change, past success can become

obstacle: – Strategic frames blinders– Processes routines– Relationships Shackles– Values Dogmas

Page 19: Why good companies go bad

For mid-level managers

• Be clear what role you want to play– Change agent?– Entrepreneurial managers, early adopter, catalyst?– Imitator, follower?

• Invest in your social capital– Different networks for different purposes– Mobilize resources

• Protect your interests– Build coalitions– Be adaptive

• Happiness belongs to optimists!

Page 20: Why good companies go bad

About final examination

• Format of examination:– Essay questions (choose three of four)

• Discussion on business scenarios• discussion on key issues/lessons in organizational

change

• Contents to be examined:– Cases discussed in class– Key readings assigned for reading– Issues discussed in class

Page 21: Why good companies go bad

Thank you and enjoy the final exam!