Top Banner
Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto
59

Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Beatrice Ramsey
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan

November 21, 2011 Toronto

Page 2: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

• To examine and commit to effective instructional leadership practices that support whole school improvements in literacy and numeracy learning and achievement

• To learn from and with each other and principals/teams from schools working in and with similar circumstances

• To connect our individual and collective thinking during the session to the implementation of our school action plans

• To expand networking among OFIP schools and build upon shared knowledge and common learning needs

Session Goals

Page 3: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Mary Jean Gallagher

Chief Student Achievement Officer

Student Achievement Division

Assistant Deputy Minister of Education

Opening Remarks

Page 4: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Lucy West

Whole School Improvement Planning

Page 5: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Creating Our Learning Community

• Taking a Learning Stance

• Being present

• Set a personal professional goal

• Share your goal with colleagues in a quick round robin

• Listen for themes; notice differences

• Allow the differences to be opening to possibilities

Page 6: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

What gets in the way?

• Unwilling to admit we don’t know, pretense of knowing, need to look smart, confusing knowing with learning

• Thinking I have to do it myself; not granting someone permission to teach us; unwilling to ask for help; confusing obedience/compliance with learning

• End-gaming, no time, urgency

Page 7: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

What gets in the way?

• Believing our reality is reality; unwilling to consider other perspectives

• Taking the obvious/traditional as evidence—unwilling to question what is

• Feeling overwhelmed, frustrated, impatient, anxious, distracted

• Being in a hurry, no time, unable to prioritize what really matters

Page 8: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

What are your obstacles to learning?

• Please identify at least two obstacles that might prevent you from learning today.

• Share those two obstacles with a partner or two.

• Consider what you might do to overcome your identified obstacles.

Page 9: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Self-Awareness to Self-Management

• Notice when you lose focus-- BREATHE AND REFOCUS

• Notice when unclear, confused-- ASK

• Notice when disagree—WONDER

• Notice when taking things too seriously—PLAY

• Notice when judging/blaming/comparing--EMPATHIZE

Page 10: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Commitment to Learn

• Identify one strategy/habit of mind you commit to practicing today.

• Name it.

• Describe it to a partner.

• Ask your partner for specific assistance in attaining your goal.

• Notice if you actually ask for help or not.

Page 11: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Internal And External

• Our individual learning obstacles are actually cultural—they are learned habits

• How do they show up in our organizations—schools, boards, etc.

• What is the cost of engaging in cultural norms that go against our professed goals?

Page 12: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Failure is Essential

• The important experiences are all the failures.

• It is our errors and mistakes that give us the data we need to to learn and make changes that bring us to solutions. – Edgar Schein

• What happens when people make mistakes in your school?

Page 13: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Share The Problem to Invent the Solution

• Requires relinquishing some authority

• Requires accessing our ignorance

• Requires renegotiation and willingness to be flexible

• Requires trust and respecting others to have creative ideas and possible solutions

• Requires moving from a “hero” or “expert” model to team models

Page 14: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Teams

• A team is defined by task interdependence (not motivation or intention).

• A team is a number of people who are in a perpetual, mutual, helping relationship.

• Do the adults in your school routinely help each other deepen their content knowledge and broaden their pedagogical repertoire?

Page 15: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

What are your guiding principles?

• A consuming focus on instruction and evidence of learning worth learning (TASK)

• Instructional change is a multi-stage process that takes TIME and practice (Three to ten years)

Page 16: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

 Common Understanding

• Time and again, educators meet to try to solve instructional problems without a common understanding of what they are trying to achieve in the classroom.  Instructional Rounds in Education

City, Elmore, Fiarman and Teitel

Page 17: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

 Common Definition of “Look Fors”

• It is now fairly typical for principals, coaches, and professional developers to periodically enter teachers’ classrooms for various purposes. It is not typical for these various parties to have a common definition of what they are looking for. Instructional Rounds in Education

City, Elmore, Fiarman and Teitel

Page 18: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Video 1

• Math Routine Pre-Kindergarten Class

• How many milks do we need for 16 children?

• What is the evidence that students are learning?

• What are the essential characteristics of the teacher’s practice?

Page 19: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

What did you value?

• Talk with your neighbors about what you valued in the video clips.

• What do you wonder about and want more information about in relation to this class?

• What judgments and conclusions did you come to based on 3 minutes of clips?

Page 20: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Attendance Routine: Pre-kindergarten

Teacher: Keshawn, How many milks do you think we'll need today for 16 children? Invitational.

Keshawn: 4.

T: You think we need 4, Keshawn? Affirming.

K: Yeah.

T: Why do you think we'll need 4 milks, Keshawn? Emphasis on communicating the reason underlying his choice.

K: That will work.

T: You think that will work? You think 4 milks will work? Revoicing.

K: Yes.

T: Come on over and let's get 4 milks. Let's see if 4 milks will work. Okay. Using his language, but posing a challenge to all the children.

 

Page 21: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Attendance Routine: Pre-kindergartenT: 1, 2, 3, 4.

Child: That not going to be enough.

T: You don't think it will be enough? I've given Keshawn four milks. He thinks it will be enough for 16 children. Validating another child’s statement. Highlighting Keshawn’s original idea. Setting up a possible “mathematical” argument.

Child: Ms. Jackson ...the number for milks and the number for children ...

T: What happened? Question to help the child identify what’s problematic.

K: It not enough.

T: Four milks were not enough milks for 16 children. Restating to support language development and clarity of expression.

 

Page 22: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Attendance Routine: Pre-kindergarten

Child; Ms. Jackson ...

T: Arkell didn't think it was going to be ... wait a minute, Fausto. Arkell didn't think it was going to be enough milks either. What should we do now, Keshawn? Question to support problem solving, but emphasizing that it’s the community’s problem also.

K: Count them.

D: Count what, Keshawn? What do you want us to count? Eliciting specificity.

K: The milk that don't have milk.

D: The children who don't have milks? Rephrasing to develop language and clarity.

 

Page 23: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Attendance Routine: Pre-kindergarten

Teacher: Herb?

Herb: The number ...

T: Do you think that will be enough? Focus is on thinking.

H: The number for milks and the number for children are going to be the same.

T: Say that again. I'm sorry.

H: The number for milks and the number for children are the same.

Page 24: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Video 2• Turkey Problem--24 lb. Turkey--15

minutes per pound to cook--How long to cook the turkey?

Page 25: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Video-Turkey Dinner

• Grade 3—prior to any teaching of any multiplication algorithms

• END of Lesson: Sharing student work after students have all solved the problem

• Teacher deliberately determines the order in which selected partners will share.

Page 26: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Compare the 2 Clips• What specific practices are common in

both clips?

• What must a teacher believe about learning and about children to behave in the ways these two teachers are behaving?

• What skill set would a teacher need to have to teach content responsively rather than prescriptively?

Page 27: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Adult Learning

• What are the parallels between how these two teachers are orchestrating student learning with how leaders might orchestrate professional learning?

• Orchestrating professional learning (in order to improve student learning) is the central focus of management.

Page 28: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

What is the essence?

• Read the transcript—what specific “moves” is the teacher making to generate student discussion?

• What role are the students playing?

Page 29: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Turkey Problem

• Dana: You guys, do you think you can come up and show what you did? And remember, try and explain it so we understand and then everybody else needs to listen carefully. And if you have questions or comments about Vicky or Amber’s work we can ask them when they’re finished explaining. (Dana sits with the children.) Setting clear expectations and giving the audience a role.

Page 30: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Turkey Problem

• D: And what is the 360?• Amber: How long it…• Vicky: 360• D: 360, and what does that mean, Vicky?• Vicky: That means that it is … you have to…

you have to let it cook for 360 minutes.• D: 360 minutes. Stays focused on the meaning

of the answer

Page 31: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Turkey Problem

• D: 360 minutes. Who thinks they can explain how Amber and Vicky figured this out? What did they do? Rafe. Focusing students on each other’s thinking/listening

• Rafe: They counted by 15s all the way up to 36 [sic].• D: Can you tell from there (the chart) how many 15s? How

many jumps of 15 they have to make? Focusing on making sense of the representation and meaning of the numbers

• Rafe: 24, because I can see the number sentence.• D: And what did the number sentence say?• Rafe: 15 x 24 = 360.• D: Equals 360.

Page 32: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Turkey Problem

• Rafe: 24, because I can see the number sentence.• D: And what did the number sentence say?• Rafe: 15 x 24 = 360.• D: Equals 360.

Page 33: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Turkey Problem

• D: Equals 360. Nellie, did you have something to add? Facilitating talk among students

• Nellie: Yeah. I know what they did, but there’s one thing that they didn’t figure out: how many hours 360 is. Student critiquing another student’s work

Page 34: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Turkey Problem

• D: How many hours 360 is. Without telling Victoria and Amber how many hours um 360 minutes is, can somebody give them a clue about how they might want to figure that out? How could they figure that out? Emma F? Giving the question to the students with constraints

• Emma F.: I don’t know how to explain it, but….how did they know when to stop?

• D: Well, that’s a great question. Fielding an uptake question

Page 35: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Turkey Problem• Vicky: Because…• Amber: We counted 24 jumps. We counted 15, I

mean 24 jumps.• D: You counted 24 jumps. OK. Did you

understand that, Emma? How they did that … they counted each jump and they counted 24 times. (nod from Emma) Let’s get back to the clue. How could they figure out how many hours they have to cook that? Mackenzie, what do you think? Refocuses on previous question

Page 36: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Additional Moves

• Asks three different students to give clues—all three give similar clues in different ways.

• Asks the presenting pair of students to go back and improve/complete their work.

• Moves to a group that has a more sophisticated solution.

Page 37: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Finding A Focus: Process

• What are we looking for when we enter observe a lesson?

• Student thinking is observable in two ways—orally and in writing.

• Talk includes academic language or evidence of working toward us of language

• Talk patterns include student-to-student exchanges

Page 38: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Finding A Focus: Content• What is the nature and characteristics of the

task students are being asked to do?• Authentic, worthy, relevant, rich, focuses on

big ideas or essential questions, etc.• Do all students have entry AND is the sky

the limit?• Even when working on a “skill” the focus is

on making meaning through a search for pattern, use of structure.

Page 39: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

What are adults doing?

• Routinely watching each other teach collaboratively planned lessons and providing focused feedback on shared practices (e.g. generating student discourse; focusing on big ideas)

• Practicing using evidence of student learning as the focus of the observation, collecting verbatim notes to talk from.

Page 40: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

What are adults doing?

• Non-defensively debriefing what happened in the classroom in relation to the process and content goals.

• Reflecting on how to work with students who didn’t appear to understand and where to go next with kids who did

• Refining the lesson to be used in the next class

Page 41: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Instructional Leaders’ Roles

• Create the structures and cultivate the environment of a learning culture

• Provide myriad ways for various groups to meet around instruction and learning and attend some of these meetings

• Provide coverage and opportunity for people to observe one another in the act of teacher and to then talk about it

Page 42: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Instructional Leaders’ Roles

• Stay focused for the long haul (3-5 years)

• Involve teachers and other stakeholders in identifying the key 2-3 aspects of teaching and learning that will be the focus (e.g. 1 process and 1 content)

• Visit classes to observe student learning when not “evaluating teachers”

Page 43: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Turkey Problem

• Lines 23-30 –seven student exchanges before Dana speaks again

Page 44: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

From Naming to Spreading Effective Instructional Practices

• How did Dana and Diane learn to teach in a way that make student thinking visible?

• What might the parallels be when Dana and Diane teach literacy?

• How do we spread the work from one class to another?

• How do we spread the work from one school to another?

Page 45: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Multi-step Complex Process

• Engaging all parties in learning—making CULTURE visible to transform it

• Finding a high-leverage common focus—improving instruction

• Creating a common understanding of effective instruction

• Working on specific domino-effect aspects of instruction and gathering evidence

Page 46: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Hierarchy of Interdependence

– The biggest multiculturalism that is going to have to happen is within occupations rather than between nationalities—occupations are so rigid in how they prescribe how you are supposed to relate to everyone else.

• Edgar Schein

– We have a 19the century curriculum; a early 20th century structure, and are trying to accomplish 21st century goals

Page 47: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

It’s Time to Talk to each other!

Networking at the break …

Page 48: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

CORNER 1: Focus on mathematics.

CORNER 2: Coordinate and strengthen mathematics leadership.

CORNER 3: Build understanding of effective mathematics instruction.

CORNER 4: Support collaborative professional learning in

mathematics.

CORNER 5: Design a responsive mathematics learning environment.

CORNER 6: Provide assessment and evaluation in mathematics that

supports student learning.

CORNER 7: Facilitate access to mathematics learning resources.

Seven Corner Topics

Page 49: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Seven Foundational Principles for Improvement in Mathematics, K - 12

• Number table participants 1 to 7

• Participants move to corner that has their number taking Seven Foundational Principles with them

• Talking in groups of 2 or 3, discuss how the statements relate to the numeracy component of the school plan

A numeracy lens … whole school improvement

Page 50: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Extend your thinking to include literacy:

• Continue the discussion in the same group, discuss how the statements relate to the literacy component of the school plan

• Conclude this conversation by discussing literacy and numeracy as part of integrated learning.

A literacy lens … whole school improvement

Page 51: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

• Return to table groups

• Each participant shares two key learnings from their discussion corner

• Whole group discussion

Bringing the discussions together…

Page 52: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

LunchLunch

Page 53: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Key Learning From The Morning

• How did the work of the morning connect to your personal learning goal?

• How do we build stamina and the will to persevere and what does this have to do with failure/mistakes?

• What does respect have to do with sharing the problem, the teacher down the hall, and engaging rather than judging?

• How do we connect values to actions —coherence?

Page 54: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Looking at the school plan and considering the

conversations so far …

• What questions or challenges are on your mind?• What areas of the plan do you see as well-positioned for

moving forward as a whole school?

School Team Discussions

Page 55: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

• Teachers• Administrators

• System Roles• Supervisory officers

Discussion Groups

• Share a question/challenge and an area positioned for success

Page 56: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

• Return to home tables to share role conversations with full table team

• As individual school teams work together to respond to Reflecting on the Day and Moving Forward

Bringing the conversation together … reflecting on moving forward

Page 57: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Lucy West and Mike Jancik

Connecting the Day …

Page 58: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

Final Points

• Summary of the day’s learning

• Expenses

Have a safe trip home …

the learning journey continues.

Page 59: Whole School Improvement: Implementing the Plan November 21, 2011 Toronto.

 Videos can be purchased from Heinemann:• Fostering Students Mathematical Development K-2

(Kindergarten clip)• Turkey Investigations, Grades 3-5 (Resource Package)• Antonia Cameron, City College of New York, Maarten Dolk,

Freudenthal Institute, The Netherlands, Catherine Twomey Fosnot, City College of New York, Sherrin B. Hersch, City College of New York

• These products are part of the series:

The Young Mathematicians at Work Series