WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009 Quality Control of Chagas diagnostics immunoassays: Assay characteristics and manufacturer’s reference panels. Gustavo A. Capriotti, Biochemist, R&D Manager
Mar 27, 2015
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Quality Control of Chagas diagnostics immunoassays: Assay characteristics and manufacturer’s reference
panels.
Gustavo A. Capriotti, Biochemist, R&D Manager
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Antigens used in Conventional Tests for T. cruzi infection:
Whole Extracts or Semipurified Fractions of
parasite (epimastigote)
Purified Proteins
Synthetic Peptides
Recombinant Antigens
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Conventional serological tests
• Indirect hemagglutination (IHA) Parasite lysate
• ELISA Parasite lysate Recombinant antigens
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Conventional serological tests
Performance
Method Sensitivity Specificity
IHA > 97% > 98%
ELISA > 98% > 99%
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Kits
Chagatest HAI Chagatest HAI screening A-V Chagatest ELISA (lysate) Chagatest ELISA recombinante v 3.0
(FDA 510k and CE)
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Kits
New Chagatest ELISA recombinante v.4.0
(approved in LA/CE market) Chagatest ELISA recombinante for dried
blood spot samples (approved in RA) Rapid test (in development) Colorimetric PCR (in development) Quantitative PCR (to start development this
year)
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Chagatest ELISA recombinante v.4.0Recombinant Antigens
• Highly sensitive and specific mixture
• Proteins present in the trypomastigote stage• Proteins preserved in different parasite strains/linages
System with six recombinant Ags
SAPA, Ag1, Ag2, Ag13, Ag30, Ag36
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Chagatest ELISA recombinante v.4.0 Recombinant Antigens
Chronic
Ag1 Ag2 Ag30 Ag13 Ag36 Ag2 Ag13
SAPA
Ag13 Ag 36 SAPA
Acute
Congenital
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
SENSITIVITY
International performance panels
PANELS ORIGINDETECTED REACTIVE SAMPLES
SENSITIVITY %
PMT 201 BBI, USA 14/14 100%
PP 0404 Q Panel, Brazil 16/16 100%
PP 0405 Q Panel, Brazil 16/16 100%
PP 0406 Q Panel, Brazil 16/16 100%
Reactive sample panels
Pediatric samples Endemic area 100/100 100%
Pediatric samples Rosario 115/116 99.14%
Chagatest ELISA recombinante v.4.0
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
SPECIFICITY
SAMPLES SPECIFICITY %
1192 Blood Bank samples 99.66 %
477 samples from different Health Centers 99.57 %
474 samples from high prevalence population 98.30 %
491 samples with different clinical conditions 98.37 %
Chagatest ELISA recombinante v.4.0
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Chagatest ELISA recombinante v.4.0
Interference with other pathologies
ParasitesLeishmaniasis 1/10Amebiasis 0/7Toxocariasis 0/6Toxoplasmosis 0/5Hydatidosis 0/5Teniasis 0/2
Infectious disease Hepatitis B 0/22Hepatitis C 0/28Syphilis 0/19HIV 0/25
Other pathologies
Lymphoma 0/1Myeloma 0/1Lung tuberculosis 0/4
Autoimmunedisorders 1/4
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Standardized system uses a perfectly defined antigen composition.
Antigens expressed in the infected trypomastigote stage of the parasite.
Highly preserved antigens in different strains of the parasite.
SAPA antigen, acute and congenital infection marker.
Recombinant antigens
Advantages in serological diagnosis
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
- At production levelRecombinant antigens Recombinant antigens well characterized Perfectly defined antigen mix
Parasitic Lysate Characterized lysate by WB Parasite culture under strict growth conditions. Well defined WCB & MCB
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
The recombinant antigens are tested separately using an ELISA technique with an internal panel of 9 positive samples specific for each antigen and 4 negative samples.
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
ELISAs Calibration10 weak positive samples (IP between 1.0 and
2.0)10 medium positive samples (IP between 2.0
and 4.0)10 strong positive samples (IP < 4.0) Note: samples diluted in negative or bovine
serum may be used20 negative samples
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
ELISAs Calibration
A titer verifying the IP coefficient within a range of 0.9 – 1.2 must be selected.
In addition, all negative samples must yield negative results.
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
ELISAs Titer verification
- Internal panel of reactive samples evaluation: internal panel of 32 samples including weak, medium and strong.
Acceptance criteria: the individual IP coefficient of each sample must be within a range of 0.9 – 1.2
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
ELISAs Titer verification
- Specificity: 200 sera / fresh plasmas
Acceptance criteria: > 99%.
If < 99%, the conjugate is diluted and retested.
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
ELISAs Final test
- Internal panel: 2 positive control sera, 3 negative control sera, 6 weak positive, 10 medium and 10 strong samples.
- Commercial panels: Chagas performance panel (QPanel, Brazil); BBI Panel
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
Hemagglutination- Titration of red blood cells sensitization.The titers are tested with an internal panel of 15
positive sera. Some of them diluted. Panel with 10 negative sera.
Acceptance criteria: a titer where diluted sera match background titer of each sample is selected. Negative sera must yield negative results.
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
Hemagglutination
Lot preparation
- Internal panel of 20 positive sera
- 100 negative sera
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
How do we ensure Standardization?
Hemagglutination
Final verification
- Chagas performance panel (QPanel)
- BBI panel
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
Reference PanelConsiderations (proposal 2007):
• Sample: SERUM (not plasma)
• Number: 10-12 (representing a range of reactivities from non-reactive to strongly reactive)
• Not inactivated by heat (preferably aseptically filtered, photoinactivation, UV or irradiation)
• Preferable without preservatives• Representative from different disease stages and
geographic regions• Selection made based on: IHA, ELISA, Immunoblot• For analytical sensitivity: diluted samples can be used• For clinical sensitivity: undiluted samples
WHO Consultation Meeting 27-28 January 2009
International Biological Reference Preparation for Chagas (2009)
• A known reactivity standard is required to yield consistency lot to lot
• To have a primary Standard of 2 reactive sera, as suggested, seems a good alternative.
• This will allow to determine the analytical sensitivity for each lot, as being used for other international standards.