Top Banner
“Where Man …Does Not Remain”: Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness Craig W. Allin Humanities & Arts Interest Group Cornell College March 18, 2004
39

“Where Man …Does Not Remain”: Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Feb 03, 2016

Download

Documents

teness

“Where Man …Does Not Remain”: Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness. Craig W. Allin Humanities & Arts Interest Group Cornell College March 18, 2004. The Wilderness Act (1964): Definition of Wilderness. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

“Where Man …Does Not Remain”: Native Americans and the Euro-American

View of Wilderness

Craig W. Allin

Humanities & Arts Interest Group

Cornell College

March 18, 2004

Page 2: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

A wilderness, in contrast with those areas where man and his own works dominate the landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain. An area of underdeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvements or human habitation, . . . with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable. . . . [§2c]

The Wilderness Act (1964): Definition of Wilderness

Page 3: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

“Where Man …Does Not Remain”: Native Americans and the Euro-American

View of Wilderness

Craig W. Allin

Humanities & Arts Interest Group

Cornell College

March 18, 2004

Page 4: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

For more than two centuries European Americans have made an imagined wilderness part of their national identity. . . . But from the start there was a problem. What has been called wilderness is some of the oldest inhabited land in North America. . . .

—Elliott West (1997)

Page 5: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

“Where Man …Does Not Remain”: Native Americans and the Euro-American

View of Wilderness

Craig W. Allin

Humanities & Arts Interest Group

Cornell College

March 18, 2004

Page 6: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Euro-American Perceptions of Native Americans & Wilderness:

Three Eras

Romantic InclusionHomestead Act & Pacific Railway Act (1862)

Hostile Exclusion Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (1971)

Awkward Accommodation

Page 7: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Romantic Inclusion

Wilderness inhabited by wild animals and by wild – “primitive” or “uncivilized” or “savage” – men.

Wilderness bad!

George Catlin & Henry David Thoreau

O beautiful for pilgrim feetWhose stern, impassioned stressA thoroughfare for freedom beatAcross the wilderness!

— Katherine Lee Bates

Page 8: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

“Buffalo Chase with Bows and Lances”George Catlin (c.1832)

Page 9: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

“Big Bend on the Upper Missouri, 1900 Miles above St. Louis” George Catlin (1832)

Page 10: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

“River Bluffs, 1320 Miles above St. Louis”George Catlin (1832)

Page 11: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

“Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone” Thomas Moran (1872)

Page 12: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Hostile Exclusion

Cultural incompatibility

Manifest Destiny

Homestead Act & Pacific Railway Act (1862)

Indian Reservations

National Parks

Page 13: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Blackfeet Chiefs, c. 1891Source: Philip Burnham, Indian Country, God’s Country, p. 128a.

Page 14: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness
Page 15: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Remains of Sheepeater Wickiups, Yellowstone[NPS Photo]

Page 16: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness
Page 17: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness
Page 18: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

United States Supreme Court (1899)Source: Vassar College

Page 19: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Source: Spence, Dispossessing the Wilderness, p. 59.

Page 20: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Evolution in Yellowstone

Source: Yellowstone.net

[NPS Photo]

Page 21: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Wild Goose Island, Glacier National ParkBob Feinberg Photo, America’s Parks Online

Page 22: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Grinnell Lake, Glacier National Park[Craig Allin Photo]

Page 23: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

“Glacier Park Indians” hired by the Great Northern Railroad to decorate its East Glacier Lodge

Source: Robert Keller & Michael Turek: American Indians & National Parks, p. 58.

Page 24: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Blackfeet telephone operator at the Great Northern Railroad’s Many Glacier Hotel in Glacier National Park (1925)

Source: Philip Burnham, Indian Country, God’s Country, p. 128c.

Page 25: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Blackfeet in Glacier National Park, 1915[NPS Photo]

Page 26: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

A wilderness, in contrast with those areas where man and his own works dominate the landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean . . . an area of underdeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvements or human habitation, which is protected and managed so as to preserve its natural conditions and which (1) generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable. . . . -- § 2 (c)

The Wilderness Act (1964): Definition of Wilderness

Page 27: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Awkward Accommodation

Rediscovering Indianson

“the last frontier”

[Photo by Craig Allin][www.asuaf.org/~cush6994/]

Page 28: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Awkward Accommodation

Alaska Statehood Act (1959)

104 million acres to the state

Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (1971)

Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (1980)

Page 29: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Nixon signs Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act extinguishing aboriginal rights and providing 40 million acres and $1 billion in

compensation to Alaska Native villages & corporations.Source: Channel 6 Television Denmark, Native Experience.

Page 30: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act

(1980)

New Units Acreage

National Parks 44 million

National Wildlife Refuges

55 million

Wilderness Areas 56 million

Unprecedented subsistence rights

Source: NPS

Page 31: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Village of Anaktuvuk Pass, Gates of the Arctic National Park

[NPS Photo]

[Photo by Arun J. Jain]

Page 32: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Denali National Park[Paw Print Photography]

Page 33: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Sport Hunting Is Big Business in Alaska

[“Best” Hunt Company Photo] [Chikatna Guide Service Photo]

Page 34: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Subsistence Rights established in ANILCA

effectively guarantee motor vehicle use in Alaska

wilderness areas.[NPS Photo]

Page 35: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Native Americans & Wilderness Preservation Today

Timbisha Indian Reservation proposed within Death Valley National Park.Oglala Sioux claim parts of Badlands National Park Wilderness.Havasupai traditional use area excluded from Grand Canyon National Park Wilderness.Acoma Pueblo residents allowed motorized access to wilderness areas in El Malpais National Monument. Tohono O'odham of Arizona seek legal control over the Baboquivari Peak Wilderness Area.

Page 36: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Native Americans & Wilderness Preservation Today

Nez Perce management of wolf recovery in Idaho wilderness areas.Salish and Kootenai management of Flathead Reservation to protect grizzly bears. Intertribal Sinkyone Wilderness Park in California.

Page 37: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Historical Progression

Inclusion: Native Americans inhabitants are essential to the concept of Wilderness.

Exclusion: Absence of all inhabitants including Native Americans is essential to the concept of Wilderness.

Accommodation: The relationship between Native Americans and Wilderness Preservation is becoming less well defined.

Page 38: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

Past, Present & FutureHistorically, Wilderness Preservation has often been accomplished at the expense of Native Americans interests.

More recently, recognition of Native American interests has often been accomplished at the expense of Wilderness Preservation.

In the future Wilderness Preservation my be the ally or the enemy of Native American interests, but wilderness is a good thing to have around.

Page 39: “Where Man …Does Not Remain”:  Native Americans and the Euro-American View of Wilderness

“Valley of the Yosemite” Albert Bierstadt (1864)