Top Banner
What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002
35

What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Dec 14, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

What’s Wrong With the Election System?

David KimballUniversity of Missouri-St. Louis

December 5, 2002

Page 2: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Outline

• Impetus for an examination of voting methods in the United States

• Research findings• Recommendations for election reforms

and issues for future elections

Page 3: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Sunshine State in 2000

Page 4: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

2000 Presidential Election:“A Perfect Storm”

• Florida Official Results• George W. Bush – 2,912,790 votes• Al Gore – 2,912,253 votes• Bush wins Florida by 537 votes.• Approximately 180,000 ballots in Florida

failed to record a vote for president (roughly 3% of ballots cast).

• Nationally, about 2 million unrecorded votes in the presidential election of 2000.

Page 5: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

How Can You Fail to Cast a Vote?

• Overvote: Selecting too many candidates

• Undervote: Not selecting any candidates

Page 6: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

NORC/Media Consortium Review of Florida Ballots

• Most unrecorded votes in Florida were overvotes (68%).

• Half of the undervotes in Florida were failed attempts to vote for a single candidate.

• Half of the undervotes Florida were “genuine” (blank).

• Almost 25,000 of the unrecorded votes in Florida could have been counted.

Page 7: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Overvote in Florida

Page 8: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Overvote in Florida

Page 9: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Undervote in Florida

Page 10: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Undervote in Florida

Page 11: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Undervote in Florida

Page 12: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Undervote in Florida

Page 13: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

What’s Happened Since Florida?

• Each state and county has asked “Could Florida happen here?”

• Federal legislation – the Help America Vote Act of 2002

• State legislation – Missouri included• Research to examine the correlates of

unrecorded votes and find out what works and what does not.

Page 14: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Research on Unrecorded Votes

• Examined election returns from counties in 2000

• Examined precinct returns in Florida and Illinois

• Primarily a cross-sectional analysis• Other studies, including multiple

elections (Caltech/MIT Voting Project, groups at Maryland, Berkeley, Harvard)

Page 15: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Factors Examined

• Voting technology• Ballot features and design• Election features• Demographics

– Socio-economic disparity in unrecorded votes.

Page 16: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Local Control of Elections

• Election administration is primarily a matter of local (county) control.

• This creates a lot of variation in voting methods across the country.– Great for researchers– Headaches for election reformers

• Voting technology is a prime example

Page 17: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Votomatic Punch Card

Page 18: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Paper Ballot

Page 19: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Lever Voting Machine

Page 20: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Electronic Voting Machine (DRE)

Page 21: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Electronic Voting Machine (DRE)

Page 22: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Optical Scan Ballot

Page 23: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Voting MethodVotomatic PunchDatavote PunchLeverPaperCentral ScanPrecinct ScanDREMixed

Voting Methods Used in 2000

Page 24: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Voting Technology Results

• Votomatic punch card ballots clearly produce the highest rate of unrecorded votes in contests at the top of the ballot.

• Newer voting technology that allows voters to discover and correct mistakes reduce the number of unrecorded votes, especially in low-income or minority precincts.– DRE– Precinct-count optical scan

Page 25: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Unrecorded Votes in the 2000 Presidential Election by Voting Equipment

Voting Technology Unrecorded Votes

Punch Card – Votomatic (28% of ballots)

2.8%

Optical Scan – Central Count (15% of ballots)

1.8%

DRE (11% of ballots) 1.7%

Lever Machine (15% of ballots)

1.6%

Paper Ballot (1% of ballots) 1.6%

Punch Card – Datavote (3% of ballots)

1.2%

Mixed (6% of ballots) 1.1%

Optical Scan – Precinct Count (20% of ballots)

0.9%

Page 26: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Ballot Design

• Ballot design has been largely overlooked as a cause of unrecorded votes.

• Several ballot features are important– Number of columns– Straight-party option– “None of the above” option

Page 27: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

“Butterfly” Ballot

Page 28: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Unrecorded Votes in Florida by Ballot Design

Ballot Design

Unrecorded Votes

Overvotes

Undervotes

No Confusing Ballot Presidential candidates listed in 1 column

2.1% 1.2% 0.8%

Confusing Ballot Presidential candidates listed in 2 columns

7.6% 5.9% 1.7%

Page 29: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Straight-Party Punch

Page 30: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Percentage of Unrecorded Votes in the 2000 Presidential Election (Counties)

Exp

ecte

d P

erc

en

tag

e o

f U

nre

co

rde

d V

ote

s

Black Percentage of Population

No Straight-Party Punch Straight-Party Punch

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Page 31: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Nevada Ballot

Page 32: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Ballot Layout

Page 33: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Ballot Instructions

Page 34: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Voter Education

Page 35: What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.

Recommendations

• If cost and staffing is no object, replace punch card voting systems and adopt ballot features that reduce the number of unrecorded votes.

• Switching to new voting technology is costly. Making ballot design improvements is relatively inexpensive.

• Consider uniform voting systems at the state level?

• A potential concern is the growing use of absentee and mail-in voting.