What’s our stack: process, technology, community and ideas for the future of RTI

What’s our stack:process, technology, community and ideas for the future of ATIP

Government&

Public Policy

Data&

Software

Negotiation&

Strategy

8

key points1. new expectations2. ATIP is technology dependent3. stack = process4. ideas

<1>New Expectations

30 milliseconds

30 milliseconds

vs.

4 months

"The Net interprets censorship as

damage and routes around it."

“Citizens interprets delay as damage..."

is ATIP the solution, or the

problem?

<2>ATIP is

technologydependent

history

1766 - Sweden

1766 - Sweden

1966 - United States

1766 - Sweden

1966 - United States

1974 - United States (Privacy Amendments)

1978 - France

1977 - Mexico

1970 - Norway

1766 - Sweden

1966 - United States

1982 - Canada, New Zealand & Australia

1974 - United States (Privacy Amendments)

1978 - France

1977 - Mexico

1970 - Norway

1985 - Denmark

1980 - Netherlands

1766 - Sweden

1966 - United States

1982 - Canada, New Zealand & Australia

1974 - United States (Privacy Amendments)

2000 - United Kingdom

1978 - France

1977 - Mexico

1970 - Norway

1985 - Denmark

1980 - Netherlands

1998 - South Korea & Belize

1993 - Belgium

1991 - Brazil

1998 - Ireland

why?

1966 - United States

1982 - Canada, New Zealand & Australia

1974 - United States (Privacy Amendments)

2000 - United Kingdom

1978 - France

1977 - Mexico

1985 - Denmark

1980 - Netherlands

1998 - South Korea & Belize

1993 - Belgium

1991 - Brazil

1998 - Ireland

1966 - United States

1970 - Norway

progressive coalitions

political/trust crisis

best practice

1966 - United States

1982 - Canada, NZ & Australia

1974 - US(Privacy Amendments)

2000 - United Kingdom

1978 - France

1977 - Mexico

1970 - Norway

1985 - Denmark

1980 - Netherlands

1998 - South Korea & Belize

1993 - Belgium

1991 - Brazil

1998 - Ireland

1960 - Xerox 914 copier

1966 - United States

1982 - Canada, NZ & Australia

1974 - US(Privacy Amendments)

2000 - United Kingdom

1978 - France

1977 - Mexico

1970 - Norway

1985 - Denmark

1980 - Netherlands

1998 - South Korea & Belize

1993 - Belgium

1991 - Brazil

1998 - Ireland

*50-59 revenue = $12M

1960 - Xerox 914 copier

1968 - $1B in sales

1966 - United States

1982 - Canada, NZ & Australia

1974 - US(Privacy Amendments)

2000 - United Kingdom

1978 - France

1977 - Mexico

1970 - Norway

1985 - Denmark

1980 - Netherlands

1998 - South Korea & Belize

1993 - Belgium

1991 - Brazil

1998 - Ireland

1960 - Xerox 914 copier

1968 - $1B in sales1969 - largest 100 companies1970 - $1.6B in sales

1966 - United States

1982 - Canada, NZ & Australia

1974 - US(Privacy Amendments)

2000 - United Kingdom

1978 - France

1977 - Mexico

1970 - Norway

1985 - Denmark

1980 - Netherlands

1998 - South Korea & Belize

1993 - Belgium

1991 - Brazil

1998 - Ireland

1980 - $8B in sales ~60% market share

1960 - Xerox 914 copier

1968 - $1B in sales1969 - largest 100 companies1970 - $1.6B in sales

ATIPis predicated

on the existenceof copiers

why it matters

<3>technology

shapes process

values driven

technology agnostic

values driven

technology agnostic

ATIP/FOIA

built on a set ofassumptions

ATIP/FOIA

built on a stack

technology stack

commissioners

live

in a world ofprocess

ATIP PROCESS

BLACK BOX

POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION

INVESTIGATIONS

ATIP PROCESS

BLACK BOX

POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION

INVESTIGATIONS

software

software is process

control the software

control the process

influence the software

influence the process

ATIP PROCESS

BLACK BOX

POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION

INVESTIGATIONS

PROCUREMENTOPEN BY DEFAULTEASY TO ACCESS

Rules, Processes

& Culture

ATIP PROCESS

BLACK BOX

POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION

INVESTIGATIONS

PROCUREMENTOPEN BY DEFAULTEASY TO ACCESS

Rules, Processes

& Culture

report about this

sometimes comment on this

write about this

auditing

booksto

spreadsheetsto

systems

auditing

booksto

spreadsheetsto

systems

auditing

booksto

spreadsheetsto

systems

<4>ideas

1. help define standards for procurement

ATIP PROCESS

BLACK BOX

POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION

INVESTIGATIONS

PROCUREMENTOPEN BY DEFAULTEASY TO ACCESS

Rules, Processes

& Culture

understand our assumptions

actpoliciesstandards

open data as pre-approved

systems

why not for some document creation

processes?

why not for some document creation

processes?

procurementbuyandsell.gc.ca

2. Create your open data on response

times

build power

64

3. open data

assess openness of data

especially regulatory data

Wonderful Case Study • 2006-2012 spills• $4000• eventually 711 pages of printed records ($262)

• months to convert• run around• Energy Resources Conservation Board ($367)

• Alberta Township System not Lat/Long ($1000 to convert)

3. there is an opportunity for a

broader tent

not just governmentnot just reporters

hello!:programmers/developersarchivistslibrariansbloggers

CIOstechnologists

access gov20

access gov20

accountability leverage

find commoninterests

speedreliabilitypersistence

accountabilityleverage

accessibility

We need a new act

- eliminates the joke of access summaries

-respects today’s expectations of access

- compels government to rethink how it creates and manages documents and data

- makes new assumptions about the stack it is on, and what the stack SHOULD be.

@[email protected] www.eaves.ca

This work is copyrighted using Creative Commons Attribution 2.5

You may share and remix this work on the condition that you attribute the work to its

original author.

ATIP PROCESS

STORAGE/ARCHIVE

INTERNAL USAGE

DOCUMENT CREATION

PROCUREMENT

POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION

HARD DRIVESARCHIVES

POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTEMAIL

ATIP PROCESS

STORAGE/ARCHIVE

INTERNAL USAGE

DOCUMENT CREATION

PROCUREMENT