As the hype cycle around MOOCs drops, the question of what narratives will survive and thrive around MOOCs opens up. This keynote panel presentation for #MRI13 suggests there are two solitudes in the post-MOOC-hype discussion - one an empty picture of undeliverable promises for higher ed, and the other a loose affiliation of complicated and sometimes conflicting interests. The lot of us on the latter side need to learn to talk to each other, to the public, and to decision-makers.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
• Connection • Pedagogy • Hybrid options • Institution-specific • Fit to purpose
“we have a lousy product”
Pandora’s Box
h"p://www.flickr.com/photos/felmarah/5078680202
1. The ‘education is broken’
refrain
2. A consensus that massive student debt is not tenable
3. A recognition that education as a system CAN be unbundled
…and may need to rebundle in
new, unfamiliar ways
4. A discourse of solutions and delivery
5. A decline in public funding
6. Openness to online
Media discourse around
MOOCs is not equipped to actually grapple with
ANY of these issues
h"p://www.flickr.com/photos/scorpio58/4067099731
But unicorns do not die.
MOOCs embody digital practices Harness & contribute to knowledge abundance Are participatory Are networked Are distributed Generate knowledge & connections that extend beyond course Share the processes of knowledge work, not just the products
Established power interests & marketization
h"p://www.flickr.com/photos/midgro22/6299926854
“When colleges and universities become a market, there is no incentive to teach what customer would rather not know.
When colleges are in the business of making customers comfortable, we are