Top Banner
What Went Wrong? Would debate always be rational? Could it be? Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue Who are the People? Who Speaks for the People? What is the Nation? Where should sovereignty lie in the Nation? The Paris Commune, The National Convention, the Committee of Public Safety, Lyon- Marseilles-Bordeaux? What kind of economy is possible? Desirable?
47

What Went Wrong? Would debate always be rational? Could it be? Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

What Went Wrong? Would debate always be rational? Could it be? Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue Who are the People? Who Speaks for the

People? What is the Nation? Where should sovereignty

lie in the Nation? The Paris Commune, The National Convention, the Committee of Public Safety, Lyon-Marseilles-Bordeaux?

What kind of economy is possible? Desirable?

Page 2: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

The National Convention

• Fall of Verdun to Prussians (September 2, 1792)

• September Massacres (September 2-6,1792)

• French Victory at Valmy (September 20, 1792)

• French Annexation of Savoy (27 November 1793)

Page 3: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

The Jacobins

Page 4: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue
Page 5: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

The Girondins

Page 6: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Brissot and Verniaud

Page 7: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Hebertists and Pere Duchene

Page 8: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Jacques Marie Hebert

Page 9: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Camille Desmoulins

Page 10: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Georges Danton

Page 11: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Robespierre

Page 12: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Trial of King: Move to Terror

Page 13: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Execution of Louis XVI

Page 14: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue
Page 15: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Growing Split Between Mountain and Girondins

• Execution of Louis XVI (January 21, 1793)

• French Declare War on England, Holland, Spain (Feb-March 1793)

• Levée (Draft) of 300,000 (February 24, 1793)

• Creation of Special Revolutionary Tribunal (March 10, 1793)

• Creation of Surveillance Committees (March 10, 1793)

• Creation of Committee of Public Safety (April 6, 1793)

Page 16: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Counterrevolution in Western France, March 1793

Number of Capital Sentences Passed

Page 17: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Have People of Paris Become Source of Sovereignty?

• Law of Maximum (May 4, 1793)

• Invade Convention – Persuade Mountain to Arrest 31 Girondist Deputies for Treason (June 2, 1793)

• Ascendancy of Committee of Public Safety - Robespierre

Page 18: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

July- August 1793 – Situation Dire

• Federalist Revolts in Caen, Bordeaux, Marseille, Lyon – Provinces should be sovereign, not just people of Paris

• Charlotte Corday Assassinates Jean-Paul Marat (July 13, 1793)

• Toulon Surrenders to British Navy (August 27, 1793)

• Defeat of French Revolution Seemed Certain

• Popular Movements in Paris pressure Convention to Take Radical Measures (September 5-6, 1793)

Page 19: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Marat Becomes Martyr

Page 20: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Charlotte Corday on Trial

• “I knew that he was perverting France. I have killed one man to save a hundred thousand. Besides, he was a hoarder; at Caen they have arrested a man who bought goods for him. I was a republican well before the Revolution, and I have never lacked energy.”

Page 21: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Constitution of 1793

“The aim of society is the happiness of all.”

“Public assistance is a sacred debt. Society owes a living to the unfortunate among its citizens, either by finding work for them or by guaranteeing the means of subsistence to those who are not in a fit condition to work.”

“Education is a necessity for all.”

“When the government violates the rights of the people, then insurrection …is the most sacred and necessary of duties.”

Page 22: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Ended Serfdom

Page 23: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Radical Measures of Terror

• Levée en masse (August 23, 1793):

“The young men will go in battle; married men will forge arms and transport provisions; women will make tents and clothing and serve in hospitals; children will make bandages; old men will get themselves carried to public places to arouse the courage of warriors and preach hatred of kings and unity of the republic.”

Page 24: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

The General Maximum – Organize Economy for War (September 29, 1793)

Page 25: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Emergency War Economy

• Planned Economy: Fixed Prices, Wages

• Food Rationing• “Equality Bread”• Organized

Industry/Society to Produce Arms and Ammunition

• “Emergency Socialism” of a Profound Kind

Page 26: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Women’s Clubs

• Universal Manhood suffrage proclaimed with Republic (September 1792)

• Women actively involved in clubs, Parisian sections, Convention (as hecklers)

• Women’s Clubs Closed (October 30, 1793)

Page 27: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Divorce

• September 1792 – Couple could divorce by mutual consent, or for reasons like insanity, battering, or criminal conviction

• April 23, 1794 – Women could divorce husbands who abandoned them and remarry immediately

Page 28: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Terror – Order of the Day (September 5, 1793)

• Chaumette (Paris Commune):– Food supply under attack– We are threatened by “new

seigneurs, no less cruel, avid or insolvent than the old, who have arisen on the ruins of feudalism” –those “who had bought or leased productive farms . . . Intent on a ruinous exploitation . . . To speculate on public misery.”

Page 29: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Danton Saves Convention

• Creates “Revolutionary Armies”

• “We must know how to profit from the sublime elan of the people who press in around us. I know that when the people present their needs, when they offer to march against their enemies, we must take only the measures they themselves present: for it is the genius of the nation which has dictated them.”

Page 30: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Terrorists – Javogues, Carrier

Page 31: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Joseph Fouche

Page 32: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Dechristianization

Page 33: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Can This Be Totalitarianism?

Whose in Charge?What is Radicalism?Who has power in Paris? The Sections?

The Clubs? The Paris Commune?Who has power in the countryside?Who has power in the Nation? The

Convention? The Committee of Public Safety? Danton? Robespierre? The Sans Culottes?

Page 34: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

“The Only Enemy of the People is the Government”

• “Everyone has pillaged the state. Generals have waged war against their armies. Those possessing goods and provisions, together with everything that was vicious in the monarchy, have joined in league against you and the people.”

• “A people has only one dangerous enemy, and that is its government. Yours has constantly made war against you with impunity.”

Page 35: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Robespierre

• “There must be one single will”

• If this will is to be republican, “there must be republican ministers, republican newspapers, republican representatives, a republican government”

Page 36: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Trial of Marie Antoinette

Page 37: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Execution of Marie Antoinette

Page 38: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue
Page 39: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue
Page 40: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Danton Critiques Terror

• “The will of the people is that Terror should be the order of the day, but that it should de directed against the real enemies of the Republic and against them alone. It is not the people’s will that the man whose only fault is a lack of revolutionary vigour should be treated as though he were guilty.”

Page 41: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Abolition of Slavery

• Abolition of slavery in French colonies (February 4, 1794)

Page 42: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

The Revolution “Devours Its Own”• Terror: Put on Trial “Enemies of the

Nation” for crimes against “the nation,” “against the people”

• Arrest and execution of Hébertistes (March 13-24, 1794) “Ultras”

• Arrest and execution of Dantonists (March 30-April 6, 1794) “Indulgents”

• Law of 22 Prairial II (June 10, 1794): “Every citizen is empowered to seize conspirators and counterrevolutionaries, and to bring them

before the magistrates. He is required to denounce them as soon as he

knows of them.”

• 40,000 Killed, 300,000 arrested

Page 43: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Robespierre Takes Charge

• “If the mainspring of popular government in peacetime is virtue, amid revolution it is at the same time both virtue and terror: virtue, without which terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is impotent. Terror is nothing but prompt, severe, inflexible justice; it is therefore an emanation of virtue.”

Page 44: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Thermidorian Reaction• French defeat Austrians at Fleurus

(June 26, 1794) – removal of external military threat

• 9th Thermidor (July 27, 1794) Execution and overthrow of Robespierre

– Wanted to create “A Republic of Virtue”

– Wrote early treatise against the Death Penalty

– How could the Revolution have gone so wrong?

• Abolition of General Maximum (December 24, 1794)

• Force used to restrict Popular Political Activity

• Runaway Inflation• Restricted Suffrage

Page 45: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue
Page 46: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

The Terror as Genocide/Totalitarianism

• 250,000 Insurgents killed in Vendée Fighting Alone -15% population– But 200,000 Revolutionary

troops killed too• Victims of Vendée describe

the Terror as a Genocide of the Catholic Western France

• Probably 40,000 officially executed in all of France

• Others described coercion, the Jacobin Dictatorship, the price controls, and levée en masse (universal draft of all citizens) an example of early Totalitarianism • Drowning Prisoners – The Vendée

Page 47: What Went Wrong?  Would debate always be rational? Could it be?  Obsession with Unanimity – the General Will  Emphasis on Transparency and Virtue

Question of Sovereignty Up for Grabs